Search

Background: Primary arthrodesis of Lisfranc fracture-dislocations is a reliable treatment option, yet concerns remain about nonunion. Nitinol staple use has recently proliferated in midfoot arthrodesis. The purpose of this study is to examine the union rate of primary arthrodesis of acute Lisfranc fracture-dislocations treated with nitinol staples compared with traditional plate-and-screw fixation. The secondary objective is to assess the difference in operative times and reoperation rates., Methods: Midfoot fracture-dislocations treated with primary arthrodesis by 7 foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeons were reviewed. Of 160 eligible patients, 121 patients (305 joints) met the required 4-month minimum radiographic follow-up. Radiographic outcomes were analyzed at the individual joint level. Each joint was classified as either staples alone (45 patients, 154 joints), staples plus plates and screws (hybrid) (45 patients, 40 joints), or plates and screws alone (31 patients, 111 joints). The primary outcome was arthrodesis union at each joint fused., Results: Nonunion was more common (9.0%, 10/111) among joints fixed with plate and screws than with hybrid (2.5%, 1/40) or staples only (1.3%, 2/154) ( P  = .0085). Multivariable regression demonstrated that autograft use was independent associated with union ( P  = .0035) and plate-and-screw only fixation was an independent risk factor for nonunion ( P  = .0407). Median operating room and tourniquet times were shorter for hybrid (92 and 83 minutes) and staple only (67 and 63 minutes) constructs compared to plate-and-screw only fixation (105 and 95 minutes) ( P   ≤  .0001 and .0003). There was no difference in reoperation rates among patients with different fixation types., Conclusion: We found that use of nitinol compression staple and bone autograft in primary arthrodesis of Lisfranc and midfoot fracture-dislocations was associated with both improved union rates and shorter tourniquet and operative times compared to traditional plate-and-screw fixation techniques., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Todd A. Irwin, MD, reports royalties or licenses and consulting fees from Paragon 28 and MEDLINE. Bruce E. Cohen, MD, reports royalties or licenses and consulting fees from Stryker. J. Kent Ellington, MD, reports royalties or licenses from Synthes, Stryker, and MEDLINE, and consulting fees from Stryker and MEDLINE. Carroll P. Jones III, MD, reports royalties or licenses and consulting fees from Stryker (EasyFuse Staples). Scott B. Shawen, MD, reports royalties or licenses; consulting fees; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from CrossRoads Extremities, Synthes, J&J; Medline Industries; and patents planned, issued, or pending from CrossRoads Extremities. Samuel E. Ford, MD, reports consulting fees from Stryker. Disclosure forms for all authors are available online.

Pediatric talus fractures are rare injuries that generally result from high-energy trauma. The relative elasticity of pediatric bone is thought to contribute to the lower rate of fracture in children. Although these injuries are rare, complications of talar body fractures, including avascular necrosis, collapse of the talar dome, and tibiotalar arthrosis, are well described. In the pediatric patient, these complications can result in poor outcomes and a disabling position for the patient. There is a relative paucity of data given the low incidence of these injuries and lack of consensus on operative versus nonoperative management. The authors present the case of an 11-year-old female with a combined talar neck and body fracture. The patient underwent open reduction internal fixation of her fractures with combined cannulated screw and Kirshner wire fixation. She was followed to 7 years postoperatively with excellent functional outcome and no evidence of avascular necrosis or collapse of the talar body., (Copyright © 2019 the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There are conflicting data regarding the benefits of delaying operative fixation of calcaneus fractures to decrease wound complication rates. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of delaying fixation on wound complication rates as well as to identify other risk factors., Methods: A retrospective review at 4 institutions, including 24 surgeons, identified 405 closed, operatively treated, intra-articular calcaneus fractures. We compared fractures with and without wound complications with regards to patient demographics, medical risk factors, fracture severity, time to fixation, operative approach, primary subtalar arthrodesis, and surgeon experience., Results: Wound complications were observed in 21% (87/405) of fractures, of which 33% (29/87) required operative intervention. Male sex (P = .032), smoking (P = .028), and the extensile lateral approach (P < .001) were associated with higher complication rates. Fractures treated with an extensile lateral approach had an overall wound complication rate of 32.1%, while those treated with a sinus tarsi or percutaneous approach had an overall wound complication rate of 8.3% (odds ratio [OR], 5.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9-9.5; P < .001). Among patients treated with an extensile lateral approach, delayed operative fixation did not decrease wound complication rates despite comparable fracture severity across time points. In contrast, among fractures treated with less invasive approaches, delayed fixation beyond 2 weeks resulted in a significantly increased wound complication rate of 15.2% as compared to a wound complication rate of only 2.1% among fractures treated within a week of injury (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.3-9.5; P = .01). This was observed despite similar fracture severity across time points. Primary subtalar arthrodesis did not impact complication rates. A higher wound complication rate among senior surgeons was likely secondary to their predilection for the extensile lateral approach., Conclusion: Delaying definitive fixation of closed, intra-articular calcaneus fractures did not decrease wound complication rates when using the extensile lateral approach, and we found an increased wound complication rate when using less invasive approaches., Level of Evidence: Level III, observational study., (© The Author(s) 2015.)

Unlabelled: The distal tibial blind spot represents an area where improperly measured long screws may pose a risk to surrounding anatomic structures and is not well visualized on AP, mortise, and lateral radiographs. Awareness of this area as well as the use of a 45° external rotation oblique view when placing fixation in this area may prevent iatrogenic injury., Levels of Evidence: Level V, Expert Opinion., (© 2014 The Author(s).)

Background: The development of a deep wound infection in the presence of hardware after open reduction and internal fixation presents a clinical dilemma, and there is scant literature to aid in decision-making. The purpose of the present study was to determine the prevalence of osseous union with maintenance of hardware after the development of postoperative infection within six weeks after internal fixation of a fracture., Methods: The present study included 121 patients from three level-I trauma centers, retrospectively identified from billing and trauma registries, in whom 123 postoperative wound infections with positive intraoperative cultures had developed within six weeks after internal fixation of acute fractures. The incidence of fracture union without hardware removal was calculated, and the parameters that predicted success or failure were evaluated., Results: Eighty-six patients (eighty-seven fractures; 71%) had fracture union with operative débridement, retention of hardware, and culture-specific antibiotic treatment and suppression. Predictors of treatment failure were open fracture (p = 0.03) and the presence of an intramedullary nail (p = 0.01). Several variables were not significant but trended toward an association with failure, including smoking, infection with Pseudomonas species, and involvement of the femur, tibia, ankle, or foot., Conclusions: Deep infection after internal fixation of a fracture can be treated successfully with operative débridement, antibiotic suppression, and retention of hardware until fracture union occurs. These results may be improved by patient selection based on certain risk factors and the specific bacteria and implants involved.