Search

Recent studies suggest social media activity can function as a proxy for measures of state-level public health, detectable through natural language processing. We present results of our efforts to apply this approach to estimate homelessness at the state level throughout the US during the period 2010-2019 and 2022 using a dataset of roughly 1 million geotagged tweets containing the substring ``homeless.'' Correlations between homelessness-related tweet counts and ranked per capita homelessness volume, but not general-population densities, suggest a relationship between the likelihood of Twitter users to personally encounter or observe homelessness in their everyday lives and their likelihood to communicate about it online. An increase to the log-odds of ``homeless'' appearing in an English-language tweet, as well as an acceleration in the increase in average tweet sentiment, suggest that tweets about homelessness are also affected by trends at the nation-scale. Additionally, changes to the lexical content of tweets over time suggest that reversals to the polarity of national or state-level trends may be detectable through an increase in political or service-sector language over the semantics of charity or direct appeals. An analysis of user account type also revealed changes to Twitter-use patterns by accounts authored by individuals versus entities that may provide an additional signal to confirm changes to homelessness density in a given jurisdiction. While a computational approach to social media analysis may provide a low-cost, real-time dataset rich with information about nationwide and localized impacts of homelessness and homelessness policy, we find that practical issues abound, limiting the potential of social media as a proxy to complement other measures of homelessness., 29 pages, 21 figures

Well curated, large-scale corpora of social media posts containing broad public opinion offer an alternative data source to complement traditional surveys. While surveys are effective at collecting representative samples and are capable of achieving high accuracy, they can be both expensive to run and lag public opinion by days or weeks. Both of these drawbacks could be overcome with a real-time, high volume data stream and fast analysis pipeline. A central challenge in orchestrating such a data pipeline is devising an effective method for rapidly selecting the best corpus of relevant documents for analysis. Querying with keywords alone often includes irrelevant documents that are not easily disambiguated with bag-of-words natural language processing methods. Here, we explore methods of corpus curation to filter irrelevant tweets using pre-trained transformer-based models, fine-tuned for our binary classification task on hand-labeled tweets. We are able to achieve F1 scores of up to 0.95. The low cost and high performance of fine-tuning such a model suggests that our approach could be of broad benefit as a pre-processing step for social media datasets with uncertain corpus boundaries., Comment: 12 pages, 6 figures

Mental health challenges are thought to afflict around 10% of the global population each year, with many going untreated due to stigma and limited access to services. Here, we explore trends in words and phrases related to mental health through a collection of 1- , 2-, and 3-grams parsed from a data stream of roughly 10% of all English tweets since 2012. We examine temporal dynamics of mental health language, finding that the popularity of the phrase 'mental health' increased by nearly two orders of magnitude between 2012 and 2018. We observe that mentions of 'mental health' spike annually and reliably due to mental health awareness campaigns, as well as unpredictably in response to mass shootings, celebrities dying by suicide, and popular fictional stories portraying suicide. We find that the level of positivity of messages containing 'mental health', while stable through the growth period, has declined recently. Finally, we use the ratio of original tweets to retweets to quantify the fraction of appearances of mental health language due to social amplification. Since 2015, mentions of mental health have become increasingly due to retweets, suggesting that stigma associated with discussion of mental health on Twitter has diminished with time., Comment: 12 pages, 5 figures, 1 table

Using a random 10% sample of tweets authored from 2019-09-01 through 2020-04-30, we analyze the dynamic behavior of words (1-grams) used on Twitter to describe the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Across 24 languages, we find two distinct dynamic regimes: One characterizing the rise and subsequent collapse in collective attention to the initial Coronavirus outbreak in late January, and a second that represents March COVID-19-related discourse. Aggregating countries by dominant language use, we find that volatility in the first dynamic regime is associated with future volatility in new cases of COVID-19 roughly three weeks (average 22.49 $\pm$ 3.26 days) later. Our results suggest that surveillance of change in usage of epidemiology-related words on social media may be useful in forecasting later change in disease case numbers, but we emphasize that our current findings are not causal or necessarily predictive., 12 + 4 pages, 11 + 4 figures, code + data + figures will soon be available at http://compstorylab.org/covid19ngrams/

When building a global brand of any kind -- a political actor, clothing style, or belief system -- developing widespread awareness is a primary goal. Short of knowing any of the stories or products of a brand, being talked about in whatever fashion -- raw fame -- is, as Oscar Wilde would have it, better than not being talked about at all. Here, we measure, examine, and contrast the day-to-day raw fame dynamics on Twitter for US Presidents and major US Presidential candidates from 2008 to 2020: Barack Obama, John McCain, Mitt Romney, Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, and Joe Biden. We assign ``lexical fame'' to be the number and (Zipfian) rank of the (lowercased) mentions made for each individual across all languages. We show that all five political figures have at some point reached extraordinary volume levels of what we define to be ``lexical ultrafame'': An overall rank of approximately 300 or less which is largely the realm of function words and demarcated by the highly stable rank of `god'. By this measure, `trump' has become enduringly ultrafamous, from the 2016 election on. We use typical ranks for country names and function words as standards to improve perception of scale. We quantify relative fame rates and find that in the eight weeks leading up the 2008 and 2012 elections, `obama' held a 1000:757 volume ratio over `mccain' and 1000:892 over `romney', well short of the 1000:544 and 1000:504 volumes favoring `trump' over `hillary' and `biden' in the 8 weeks leading up to the 2016 and 2020 elections. Finally, we track how only one other entity has more sustained ultrafame than `trump' on Twitter: The K-pop (Korean pop) band BTS. We chart the dramatic rise of BTS, finding their Twitter handle `@bts\_twt' has been able to compete with `a' and `the'. Our findings for BTS more generally point to K-pop's growing economic, social, and political power., 31 pages (21 pages main text, 10 pages appendix), 8 figures (7 in main text, 1 in appendix), 10 tables (1 in main text, 9 in appendix)