1. Using Ecoplugs containing glyphosate can be an effective method of killing standing trees.
- Author
-
Willoughby, Ian H., Stokes, Victoria J., and Connolly, Tom
- Subjects
GLYPHOSATE ,CONIFEROUS forests ,FORESTS & forestry ,FOREST management ,NATURAL resources ,TIMBER - Abstract
Where trees need to be killed to improve the health, diversity or productivity of the remaining stand, the usual practice is to harvest them. However, if conventional harvesting and timber extraction is impractical or not economic, ‘felling to recycle’ (also referred to in the past as ‘felling to waste’ or ‘thinning to waste’), where the cut timber is left on site to degrade, is sometimes necessary. Our research investigated whether chemical thinning, which involves the killing of standing trees through the application of herbicides, might provide a more cost effective alternative to either manual ring barking or felling to recycle.We found that applying glyphosate in an encapsulated form as Ecoplug Max® at a rate of 0.068 g a.i. glyphosate per cm of stem diameter killed ~90 per cent of 47-year-old standing Douglas fir within two full growing seasons of treatment. Ecoplugs appeared to be a more effective method of applying glyphosate to kill standing trees than the traditional method of chemical thinning which involves spraying liquid glyphosate into cuts made in the tree stem. Both traditional chemical thinning and non-chemical ring barking were also moderately effective in our work, but the speed of kill was slower and overall efficacy lower than when using Ecoplugs. Ecoplugs may also have other advantages such as eliminating the risk of chemical drift and operator contamination, and providing the potential for year round application, but they are 300 per cent more expensive to use than traditional chemical thinning and 30 per cent more expensive than manual ring barking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF