Search

The identification of human remains using DNA analysis can be extremely challenging and its success is certainly influenced by the time elapsed since death. In that context, intact teeth have been shown to be highly successful in DNA analysis. However, restored teeth are usually available and, surprisingly, these specimens have been poorly studied. In fact, there are no reports regarding forensic DNA analysis of those types of samples in real cases. Therefore, the aim of this study was to perform DNA typing on healthy and restored teeth from exhumed human remains, which had been buried for 46 years. A powder-free DNA extraction protocol specifically designed for teeth was followed and human DNA quantitation and degradation assessment was performed using an in-house qPCR assay. Samples were amplified with commercial human identification kits for autosomal and Y chromosome markers. The obtained DNA profiles were compared to those of a previously processed femur sample as well as a buccal swab from a putative son. One healthy and one restored tooth yielded complete, concordant and compatible DNA profiles with previously typed samples from the femur and the putative son. Biostatistical calculations supported the paternity relationship with a likelihood ratio greater than 11 million. The present study highlights the use of restored teeth in a real exhumation case and the powder-free approach specifically designed for the extraction of DNA from teeth is discussed.

For over 10 years, quantitative PCR (qPCR) for DNA quantitation has been reported in forensics. However, assays have not been described for small qPCR platforms. Thus, technological advancement is not always implemented in small forensic genetics laboratories. A duplex qPCR assay is reported, using a StepOne instrument and targeting a short and a long human DNA region. This study was performed according to international validation guidelines, including sensitivity, repeatability, reproducibility, precision, accuracy, contamination assessment, known and case-type samples, and degradation studies. Characterization of the genetic markers, species specificity, and population studies had already been conducted. Moreover, case-type samples were quantified, amplified using commercial kits and the number of alleles detected was recorded. Sensitivity was shown to be 10 pg/µL. Standard curve replicates demonstrated the assay is accurate, precise, as well as fairly repeatable and reproducible. The NGM Detect kit was shown to yield higher peaks than Identifiler Plus and NGM Select for degraded samples. Moreover, quality sensors were always present and proved useful. The quantification values of the large target showed a correlation with the number of alleles detected in the STR profiles for known and casework samples. The degradation index was shown to be informative, with a value of 10 or higher indicating dropout. It is suggested that after quantitation, samples with low or degraded DNA be amplified using newer amplification kits containing quality sensors to confirm that the low-quality profile was not affected by inhibition.

DNA profiling can identify an individual from a sample of biological material but it does not reveal what body fluid or tissue source the DNA profile originated from. In many cases it is important to know from what body fluid or tissue the DNA profile originated in order to provide crucial information necessary to the investigation, especially in cases where the victims are not able to give information about the dynamics of the event. For this purpose messenger RNA (mRNA) analysis has been shown to be a suitable method for the identification of body fluids, resulting in a trend to overcome the conventional approaches. Here we present the first report about case regarding a three-year-old child supposedly victim of a sexual assault with digital penetration. Thanks to the use of the combined DNA profiling and RNA analysis it was possible to demonstrate the sexual assault suffered by the victim.