Search

Aims: Incorrectly fitting footwear (IFF) poses a risk of trauma to at‐risk feet with diabetes. The aim of this systematic review was to summarise and assess the evidence that IFF is a statistically significant cause of ulceration. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar for English‐language peer‐reviewed studies reporting the number or percentage of people with diabetes‐related foot ulceration (DFU) attributed to wearing IFF and included a physical examination of the footwear worn. Two independent reviewers assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Results: 4318 results were retrieved excluding duplicates with 45 studies shortlisted. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria with most rated as fair (n = 6) or good (n = 3). There is some evidence that DFU is significantly associated with IFF, but this is limited: only 3 of 10 included studies found a statistically significant percentage of those with DFU were wearing IFF or inappropriate footwear which included fastening, material, type or fit (15.0%–93.3%). Risk of bias in these three studies ranged from 'fair' to 'poor'. IFF definitions were often unreported or heterogeneous. Only one study reported IFF‐related ulcer sites: 70% were at plantar hallux/toes and 10% at plantar metatarsal heads. Conclusions: There is some evidence that IFF is a cause of DFU, but further research is needed, which defines IFF, and methodically records footwear assessment, ulcer location and physical activity. Researchers need to uncover why IFF is worn and if this is due to economic factors, a need for footwear education or other reasons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Home foot temperature monitoring (HFTM) is recommended for those at moderate to high ulcer risk. Where a > 2.2°C difference in temperature between feet (hotspot) is detected, it is suggested that individuals (1) notify a healthcare professional (HCP); (2) reduce daily steps by 50%. We assess adherence to this and HFTM upon detecting a recurrent hotspot. Methods: PubMed and Google Scholar were searched until 9 June 2023 for English‐language peer‐reviewed HFTM studies which reported adherence to HFTM, daily step reduction or HCP hotspot notification. The search returned 1030 results excluding duplicates of which 28 were shortlisted and 11 included. Results: Typical adherence among HFTM study participants for >3 days per week was 61%–93% or >80% of study duration was 55.6%–83.1%. Monitoring foot temperatures >50% of the study duration was associated with decreased ulcer risk (Odds Ratio: 0.50, p < 0.001) in one study (n = 173), but no additional risk reduction was found for >80% adherence. Voluntary dropout was 5.2% (Smart mats); 8.1% (sock sensor) and 4.8%–35.8% (infrared thermometers). Only 16.9%–52.5% of participants notified an HCP upon hotspot detection. Objective evidence of adherence to 50% reduction in daily steps upon hotspot detection was limited to one study where the average step reduction was a pedometer‐measured 51.2%. Conclusions: Ulcer risk reduction through HFTM is poorly understood given only half of the participants notify HCPs of recurrent hotspots and the number of reducing daily steps is largely unknown. HFTM adherence and dropout are variable and more research is needed to determine factors affecting adherence and those likely to adhere. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Adequate footwear fit is critical in preventing diabetes-related foot ulcers. One important element is the toe gap, the difference between foot length and internal footwear length available to the foot. We summarised the literature on toe gaps in studies assessing footwear worn by people with diabetes, the methods used to measure both foot length and internal footwear length and identify ambiguities which may impact on toe gap assessment in clinical practice, and suggest pragmatic solutions. Methods: The Google Scholar database was searched to April 2020 for peer-reviewed studies using keywords related to incorrectly fitting or ill-fitting and diabetes, foot and ulcer which returned 979 results. Included studies within this narrative review encompassed toe gap measurement to assess footwear worn by people with diabetes. Results: A total of eight studies were included after full paper review. Toe gap ranges as used in assessments of footwear worn by people with diabetes vary, with a minimum of 1.0–1.6 cm and a maximum of 1.5–2.0 cm, as do methods of measuring internal footwear length. Only three published studies suggested possible measuring devices. Conclusions: Toe gap ranged as used when assessing footwear fit in people with diabetes vary and a gold standard device for internal footwear length measurement has yet to emerge. International guidelines provide welcome standardisation, but further research is needed to evaluate both the effect of toe gap ranges upon pressure, plantar stress response and ulceration and available measuring devices to facilitate development of toe gap measurement protocols that may further enhance consistency in practical assessments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent advances in technology have given us 3D printed footwear for marathon runners, along with insoles capable of measuring in-shoe temperature and pressure. Custom 3D printed biometric footwear for those with diabetes and neuropathy therefore seems a natural development but has yet to emerge. The authors discuss both the feasibility of developing a 3D printed shoe incorporating sensors to provide real-time microclimate data and some of the practical problems that remain, including a brief outline of recent advances in this field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]