1. Flux and transmission of β-casein during cold microfiltration of skim milk subjected to different heat treatments
- Author
-
Jarosław Kowalik, Bogdan Dec, and Justyna Zulewska
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Ceramics ,Hot Temperature ,food.ingredient ,Food Handling ,Microfiltration ,Pasteurization ,law.invention ,Membrane technology ,03 medical and health sciences ,food ,law ,Skimmed milk ,Genetics ,Animals ,Thermization ,Micelles ,Chromatography ,Chemistry ,Temperature ,0402 animal and dairy science ,Caseins ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,Permeation ,040201 dairy & animal science ,Cold Temperature ,Milk ,030104 developmental biology ,Membrane ,β casein ,Cattle ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Filtration ,Food Science - Abstract
Raw skim milk was subjected to different heat treatments: thermization (65°C, 20 s), pasteurization (72°C, 15 s), and no heat treatment (milk was microfiltered using 1.4-µm membranes at 50°C for bacteria removal; 1.4 MF). The milk (thermized, pasteurized, and 1.4 MF) was cooled and stored at 2°C until processing (at least 24 h) with cold (∼6°C) microfiltration using a benchtop crossflow pilot unit (Pall Membralox XLAB 5, Pall Corp., Port Washington, NY) equipped with 0.1-µm nominal pore diameter ceramic Membralox membrane (ET1-070, α-alumina, Pall Corp.). The flux was monitored during the process, and β-casein transmission and removal were calculated. The study aimed to indicate the conditions that should be applied to maximize β-casein passage through the membrane during cold microfiltration (5.6 ± 0.4°C) of skim milk. The proper selection of heat treatment parameters (temperature, time) of the feed before the cold microfiltration process will increase β-casein removal. It is not clear whether the difference in β-casein transmission between 1.4 MF, thermized, and pasteurized milk results from the effect of heat treatment conditions on β-casein dissociation from the casein micelles or on passage of β-casein through the membrane. The values of the major parameters (permeation flux and tangential flow velocity, through the wall shear stress) responsible for a proper membrane separation process were considerably lower than the critical values. It seems that the viscosity of the retentate has a great effect on the performance of the microfiltration membranes for protein separation at refrigerated temperatures.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF