Search

Background: In the monitoring of infant and young child feeding, dietary diversity is used as an indicator of micronutrient adequacy; however, their relation may have weakened with the increasing use of fortified complementary foods., Objective: The objectives were to assess the relation between dietary diversity and micronutrient adequacy in an urban infant population with a high consumption of fortified foods and to investigate whether dietary diversity and micronutrient adequacy were independently associated with subsequent growth., Methods: We used longitudinal data on 811 infants in the Chilenje Infant Growth, Nutrition, and Infection Study conducted in Lusaka, Zambia. The relation between mean micronutrient adequacies and dietary diversity scores derived from 24-h diet recalls at 6 mo of age was investigated with the use of Spearman rank correlation. Multiple linear regression was used to assess the association between micronutrient adequacy, dietary diversity, and subsequent growth to 18 mo of age., Results: Overall mean micronutrient density adequacy (MMDA) and MMDA of "problem micronutrients," defined as those micronutrients (calcium, iron, zinc) with mean density adequacies less than half of estimated needs, were correlated with dietary diversity scores (ρ = 0.36 and 0.30, respectively, both P < 0.0001). Consumption of "sentinel foods" (iron rich, fortified, animal source, dairy) showed better correlation with MMDA than with dietary diversity (ρ = 0.58-0.69, all P < 0.0001). In fully adjusted analyses, MMDA calcium, iron, zinc, and dietary diversity, but not overall MMDA, were associated with linear growth to 18 mo (both P ≤ 0.028)., Conclusions: Micronutrient adequacy in infants consuming fortified foods may be more accurately assessed using locally specific sentinel food indicators rather than dietary diversity scores. Nonetheless, dietary diversity has a positive effect on subsequent linear growth apart from that of micronutrient adequacy, warranting its continued monitoring and further investigation into the mechanisms underlying this finding. This trial was registered at www.controlled-trials.com as ISRCTN37460449., (© 2016 American Society for Nutrition.)

The present randomised trial investigated the effects of feeding Zambian infants from 6 to 18 months old either a richly or basal micronutrient-fortified complementary/replacement food on gut integrity and systemic inflammation. Blood samples were obtained from all infants (n 743) at 6 and 18 months for the assessment of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and α1-acid glycoprotein (AGP). A subsample of 502 infants, selected from the main cohort to include a larger proportion of infants with HIV-positive mothers, was assigned to lactulose/mannitol gut permeability tests. Lactulose:mannitol (L:M) ratio analyses were adjusted for baseline urinary L:M ratio, socio-economic status, mother's education, season of birth and baseline stunting, and stratified by maternal antenatal HIV status, child's sex, concurrent breast-feeding status and anaemia at baseline. There was no significant difference in geometric mean L:M ratio between the richly fortified and basal-fortified porridge arms at 12 months (0·47 (95 % CI 0·41, 0·55) v. 0·41 (95 % CI 0·34, 0·49); P = 0·16 adjusted). At 18 months, the richly fortified porridge group had a significantly higher geometric mean L:M ratio than the basal-fortified group (0·23 (95 % CI 0·19, 0·28) v. 0·15 (95 % CI 0·12, 0·19); P = 0·02 adjusted). This effect was evident for all stratifications, significantly among boys (P = 0·04), among the infants of HIV-negative mothers (P = 0·01), among the infants of HIV-negative mothers not concurrently breast-fed (P = 0·01) and among those who were not anaemic at baseline (P = 0·03). CRP, but not AGP, was positively associated with L:M ratio, but there were no significant effects of the diet on either CRP or AGP. In conclusion, a richly fortified complementary/replacement food did not benefit and may have worsened intestinal permeability.

Background/objectives: We aimed to assess the effects on mild morbidity of a richly micronutrient-fortified complementary/replacement food given to Zambian infants aged 6-18 months. Previous results (The Chilenje Infant Growth, Nutrition and Infection Study Team, 2010) showed an increase in the rate of hospital referral for pneumonia in the same cohort., Subject/methods: A total of 743 six-month-old healthy Zambian infants were randomised to receive either a richly or a basal micronutrient-fortified porridge for 12 months. Mild morbidity was defined as an illness that did not cause death or require hospitalisation and was diagnosed on clinical examination at scheduled visits., Results: There was no evidence of an effect of trial arm on overall mild morbidity during the study (odds ratio (OR)=1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.90, 1.20, P=0.62). Infants in the richly fortified arm had significantly more visits in which they were diagnosed with lower respiratory tract infections/pneumonia (OR=1.65, 95% CI=1.06, 2.59, P=0.03) and fewer visits in which a diagnosis of urinary tract infection was made (OR=0.43, 95% CI=0.21, 0.87, P=0.02). Maternally reported symptoms were similar between trial arms., Conclusion: Compared with the basal diet, the richly micronutrient-fortified food was associated with more episodes of lower respiratory infections/pneumonia diagnosed at scheduled visits, which reinforces our previously reported findings of a higher incidence in hospital referral for pneumonia.

Background: HIV-exposed, uninfected (HIV-EU) children represent a large proportion of children in southern Africa. The reasons for their poorer growth and higher morbidity and mortality than their HIV-unexposed peers are unclear., Objective: We compared anthropometry of 125 HIV-EU with 382 HIV-unexposed young Zambian children participating in a trial of micronutrient-fortified complementary/replacement food., Design: The randomized controlled trial provided children from age 6 to 18 months with a porridge flour containing either a basal or a rich level of micronutrients. Weight and length were measured 3 monthly and head and arm circumferences and triceps and subscapular skinfolds 6 monthly., Results: There were no significant anthropometric differences between the 2 treatment groups. In unadjusted analyses, most anthropometric Z scores of HIV-EU children were lower than those of HIV-unexposed children; after adjustment for treatment arm, socioeconomic factors, breastfeeding and sex, head and arm circumference Z scores remained lower. Subscapular skinfold Z scores were lower among HIV-EU than HIV-unexposed children at 6 months but not 18 months., Conclusions: Socioeconomic factors accounted for some but not all of the impaired growth of HIV-EU children. Micronutrient malnutrition may not be the socioeconomic factor responsible for the growth faltering. Factors acting earlier in life had irreversible effects.