1. Assessment of Eye Lens Dose Reduction When Using Lateral Lead Shields on the Patient's Head during Neurointerventional Fluoroscopic Procedures and Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Scans.
- Author
-
Xiong Z, Rudin S, and Bednarek DR
- Subjects
- Cone-Beam Computed Tomography adverse effects, Fluoroscopy adverse effects, Humans, Lead, Monte Carlo Method, Radiation Dosage, Radiography, Interventional adverse effects, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography methods, Fluoroscopy methods, Lens, Crystalline radiation effects, Radiation Protection methods, Radiography, Interventional methods
- Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of placing small lead shields on the temple region of the skull to reduce radiation dose to the lens of the eye during interventional fluoroscopically-guided procedures and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of the head. EGSnrc Monte-Carlo code was used to determine the eye lens dose reduction when using lateral lead shields for single x-ray projections, CBCT scans with different protocols, and interventional neuroradiology procedures with the Zubal computational head phantom. A clinical C-Arm system was used to take radiographic projections and CBCT scans of anthropomorphic head phantoms without and with lead patches, and the images were compared to assess the effect of the shields. For single lateral projections, a 0.1 (0.3)-mm-thick lead patch reduced the dose to the left-eye lens by 40% to 60% (55% to 80%) from 45° to 90° RAO and to the right-eye lens by around 30% (55%) from 70° to 90° RAO. For different CBCT protocols, the reduction of lens dose with a 0.3-mm-thick lead patch ranged from 20% to 53% at 110 kVp. For CBCT scans of the anthropomorphic phantom, the lead patch introduced streak artifacts that were mainly in the orbital regions but were insignificant in the brain region where most neurointerventional activity occurs. The dose to the patient's eye lens can be reduced considerably by placing small lead shields over the temple region of the head without substantially compromising image quality in neuro-imaging procedures.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF