Search

The determination of ligand-receptor binding affinities plays a key role in the development process of pharmaceuticals. While the classical radiochemical binding assay uses radioligands, fluorescence-based binding assays require fluorescent probes. Usually, radio- and fluorescence-labeled ligands are dissimilar in terms of structure and bioactivity, and can be used in either radiochemical or fluorescence-based assays. Aiming for a close comparison of both assay types, we synthesized tritiated fluorescent neurotensin receptor ligands ([ 3 H] 13 , [ 3 H] 18 ) and their nontritiated analogues ( 13 , 18 ). The labeled probes were studied in radiochemical and fluorescence-based (high-content imaging, flow cytometry, fluorescence anisotropy) binding assays. Equilibrium saturation binding yielded well-comparable ligand-receptor affinities, indicating that all these setups can be used for the screening of new drugs. In contrast, discrepancies were found in the kinetic behavior of the probes, which can be attributed to technical differences of the methods and require further studies with respect to the elucidation of the underlying mechanisms.

BRET and fluorescence anisotropy (FA) are two fluorescence-based techniques used for the characterization of ligand binding to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and both allow monitoring of ligand binding in real time. In this study, we present the first direct comparison of BRET-based and FA-based binding assays using the human M 2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (M 2 R) and two TAMRA (5-carboxytetramethylrhodamine)-labeled fluorescent ligands as a model system. The determined fluorescent ligand affinities from both assays were in good agreement with results obtained from radioligand competition binding experiments. The assays yielded real-time kinetic binding data revealing differences in the mechanism of binding for the investigated fluorescent probes. Furthermore, the investigation of various unlabeled M 2 R ligands yielded pharmacological profiles in accordance with earlier reported data. Taken together, this study showed that BRET- and FA-based binding assays represent valuable alternatives to radioactivity-based methods for screening purposes and for a precise characterization of binding kinetics supporting the exploration of binding mechanisms., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

During the past decade, fluorescence methods have become valuable tools for characterizing ligand binding to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). However, only a few of the assays enable studying wild-type receptors and monitor the ligand binding in real time. One of the approaches that is inherently suitable for this purpose is the fluorescence anisotropy (FA) assay. In the FA assay, the change of ligand's rotational freedom connected with its binding to the receptor can be monitored with a conventional fluorescence plate reader equipped with suitable optical filters. To achieve the high receptor concentration required for the assay and the low autofluorescence levels essential for reliable results, budded baculoviruses that display GPCRs on their surfaces can be used. The monitoring process generates a substantial amount of kinetic data, which is usually stored as a proprietary file format limiting the flexibility of data analysis. To solve this problem, we propose the use of the data curation software Aparecium ( http://gpcr.ut.ee/aparecium.html ), which integrates experimental data with metadata in a Minimum Information for Data Analysis in Systems Biology (MIDAS) format. Aparecium enables data export to different software packages for fitting to suitable kinetic or equilibrium models. A combination of the FA assay with the novel data analysis strategy is suitable for screening new active compounds, but also for modeling complex systems of ligand binding to GPCRs. We present the proposed approach using different fluorescent probes and assay types to characterize ligand binding to melanocortin 4 (MC 4 ) receptor.