Search

Introduction : The Ocular manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) reported include conjunctivitis, conjunctival hyperemia, chemosis, epiphora, episcleritis, retinal manifestations included cotton wool spots (CWS), micro-hemorrhages, papillophlebitis and neuro-ophthalmic manifestations. Purpose : To report post COVID-19 ophthalmic manifestations using multimodal imaging. Results : A 66-year-old Asian Indian male presented to us with bilateral blurring of vision, RE>LE, of 3 days following a diagnosis of COVID-19 disease. Corrected distance visual acuity were 20/2666 and 20/25 in the right (RE) and left (LE) eyes respectively. He had bilateral anterior chamber inflammation with a relative afferent pupillary defect in the RE. RE showed central retinal artery occlusion(CRAO) with CWS, few flame-shaped retinal hemorrhages and disc edema and hyperemia. LE had disc edema and hyperemia, few flame-shaped retinal hemorrhages, cystoid changes and CWS. A diagnosis of bilateral panuveitis and papillitis with CRAO in the RE was made. Conclusion : Our patient developed a vascular occlusion with panuveitis, which possibly represents an immune mediated event following COVID-19. Patients should be warned about possible ophthalmic sequelae even after recovery.

Competing Interests: None

Purpose: To compare MultiColor fundus imaging (MC) and colour fundus photography (CFP) for the evaluation of epiretinal membrane (ERM)., Methods: In this retrospective study, 192 eyes (181 patients) that underwent vitrectomy for ERM were imaged using Spectralis optical coherence tomography (for MC) and AFC-210 digital camera (for CFP) 1 week before vitrectomy. Two investigators independently determined the rate of delineability and ERM area for each modality., Results: The intergrader agreement rates for delineability were very high for both image modalities. The rate of delineability of ERM (%) was higher for MC than for CFP, for both investigators [70.8% versus 52.6% and 73.4% versus 53.6% (both p -)]. Epiretinal membrane (ERM) area measurement showed high agreement between investigators for MC (p = 0.466) but differed significantly between the investigators for CFP (p -). The ERM area determined on MC was significantly wider than that on CFP for both investigators (p - for investigator 1 and p - for investigator 2)., Conclusion: The ERM area is more clearly detectable and widely demarcated in MC than in CFP images. MultiColor imaging (MC) may be more sensitive and accurate for early detection of ERM and ERM area measurement., (© 2018 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Competing Interests: None

Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest

Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest

Purpose: To describe the appearance of reticular pseudodrusen on multicolor imaging and to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy as compared with the two modalities that may be considered the current reference standard, blue light and infrared imaging., Methods: Retrospective study in which all multicolor images (constructed from images acquired at 486 nm-blue, 518 nm-green and 815 nm-infrared) of 45 consecutive patients visited in a single center was reviewed. Inclusion criteria involved the presence of >1 reticular pseudodrusen on a 30° × 30° image centered on the fovea as seen with the blue light channel derived from the multicolor imaging. Three experienced observers, masked to each other's results with other imaging modalities, independently classified the number of reticular pseudodrusen with each modality., Results: The median interobserver agreement (kappa) was 0.58 using blue light; 0.65 using infrared; and 0.64 using multicolor images. Multicolor and infrared modalities identified a higher number of reticular pseudodrusen than blue light modality in all fields for all observers (p < 0.0001). Results were not different when multicolor and infrared were compared (p ≥ 0.27)., Conclusions: These results suggest that multicolor and infrared are more sensitive and reproducible than blue light in the identification of RPD. Multicolor did not appear to add a significant value to infrared in the evaluation of RDP. Clinicians using infrared do not need to incorporate multicolor for the identification and quantification of RPD.

PurposeTo compare retinal pathology visualization in multispectral scanning laser ophthalmoscope imaging between the Spectralis and Optos devices.MethodsThis retrospective cross-sectional study included 42 eyes from 30 patients with age-related macular degeneration (19 eyes), diabetic retinopathy (10 eyes), and epiretinal membrane (13 eyes). All patients underwent retinal imaging with a color fundus camera (broad-spectrum white light), the Spectralis HRA-2 system (3-color monochromatic lasers), and the Optos P200 system (2-color monochromatic lasers). The Optos image was cropped to a similar size as the Spectralis image. Seven masked graders marked retinal pathologies in each image within a 5 × 5 grid that included the macula.ResultsThe average area with detected retinal pathology in all eyes was larger in the Spectralis images compared with Optos images (32.4% larger, P < 0.0001), mainly because of better visualization of epiretinal membrane and retinal hemorrhage. The average detection rate of age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy pathologies was similar across the three modalities, whereas epiretinal membrane detection rate was significantly higher in the Spectralis images.ConclusionSpectralis tricolor multispectral scanning laser ophthalmoscope imaging had higher rate of pathology detection primarily because of better epiretinal membrane and retinal hemorrhage visualization compared with Optos bicolor multispectral scanning laser ophthalmoscope imaging.

PurposeOur purpose was to compare the characteristics of the retinal and choroidal lesions including choroidal nevus, choroidal melanoma and congenital hypertrophy of the retina pigment epithelium using conventional color fundus photography (CFP) and multicolor imaging (MCI).MethodsThe paired images of patients with retinal or choroidal lesions were assessed for the visibility of lesion's border, halo and drusen using a grading scale (0-2). The area of the lesion was measured on both imaging modalities. The same grading was also done on the individual color channels of MCI for a further evaluation.ResultsThirty-three eyes of 33 patients were included. There were no significant differences in the mean border, drusen and halo visibility scores between the two imaging modalities (p = 0.12, p = 0.70, p = 0.35). However, the mean area of the lesion was significantly smaller on MCI than that on CFP (14.9±3.3 versus 18.7±3.4 mm2, p = 0.01).ConclusionThe appearance of choroidal and/ or retinal lesions on MCI may be different than that on CFP. Though MCI can provide similar information with CFP for the features of retinal and/ or choroidal lesions including border, halo and drusen; the infrared light reflection on MCI underestimates the extent of the choroidal lesion by 33%.

Diagnostic investigation on pachychoroid spectrum disease (PSD) has been growing along with the rapid advancement of imaging technology. In optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based studies, choroidal thickness profile, luminal and stromal choroidal ratio, and abnormalities in the neurosensory retina have demonstrated various patterns in different clinical entities related to PSD. The emerging role of OCT angiography ()CTA) has been expanded to involve the quantitative analysis of the OCTA parameters in different clinical entities of PSD and to evaluate the choriocapillaris signal void and vessel density as indicators of choriocapillaris ischemia. OCTA has broadened our knowledge in characterization and assessment of both active and quiescent choroidal neovascularization and its association with treatment response. Recent studies using indocyanine green angiography have focused on the evaluation of choroidal vascular hyperpermeability and its relationship with other pachychoroid related features. Ultra-widefield indocyanine green angiography enables observation and characterization of peripheral choroidal pathologies and their associations with macular abnormalities. Multicolor imaging is an emerging modality with the capability to demonstrate early abnormalities in PSD. We summarize all investigations reflecting the new insights into the application of multimodal imaging for PSD and focus on novel findings observed in different clinical entities with each imaging modality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of MultiColor imaging (MC) compared to fluorescein angiography (FA) in detecting proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and associated diabetic retinopathy features. Methods: Fifty-nine eyes from 38 PDR patients were included. MC images were reviewed by 2 independent masked graders. A qualitative analysis based on the following features was performed: neovascular complexes (NVC), disc neovascularization (NVD), neovascularization elsewhere (NVE), microaneurysm (MA), intraretinal hemorrhage (IRH), vitreous hemorrhage (VH), preretinal hemorrhage (PRH), fibrosis, hard exudates (HE), epiretinal membrane (ERM), diabetic macular edema (DME), ischemia and laser spots (LS). Measures of diagnostic accuracy compared to FA were determined. Results: The sensitivity for the detection of NVC using MC was 95.1%, with a specificity of 40.0%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 92.9% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 50.0%. Sensitivity and specificity were higher in detecting NVD (88.9% and 76.9%) while NVE registered higher PPV (88.9%). MC was highly sensitive in detecting IRH, HE, ERM and LS (100%), MA (98.0%) and fibrosis (95.5%). Highest specificity was found for VH (100.0%), DME (100.0%), PRH (98.1%) and LS (89.5%). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic analysis of MC was excellent in NVD (0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.71–0.95, p < 0.001), IRH (0.89, 95% CI 0.74–1.00, p < 0.001), VH (0.81, 95% CI 0.60–1.00, p = 0.005) and PRH (0.89, 95% CI 0.68–1.00, p = 0.004) and outstanding in LS detection (0.95, 95% CI 0.87–1.00, p < 0.001). These results are likely due to the contrast and quality of the MC since better discrimination is enabled by the green wavelength. Conclusion: MC is useful in evaluation of PDR patients and can complement noninvasive imaging. MC detected some PDR features more accurately than FA such as NVD, IRH, VH, PRH, and LS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]