Search

Background To compare the feasibility and efficiency of atrioventricular junction (AVJ) ablation and device implantation in patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation using three different approaches. Methods Sixty-nine patients (57% male; age 72 ± 10; ejection fraction 45 ± 15%) undergoing device implantation and AVJ ablation were retrospectively studied at a tertiary referral center. In 20 patients (29%) AVJ ablation was performed via the femoral vein immediately following device implantation (group 1), whereas 33 patients (48%) underwent a staged procedure with AVJ ablation via the femoral vein >3 weeks after device implantation (group 2). In a third group of 16 patients (23%), AVJ ablation was performed during device implantation through the pocket using the same axillary vein access site (group 3). The main outcome measures were: procedure time, fluoroscopy time, laboratory occupancy time, and success rate. Results There was a significant difference in procedure time (118 ± 45 minutes. in group 1, 133 ± 32 minutes in group 2, and 87 ± 26 minutes in group 3, P < 0.001) and the laboratory occupancy time (175 ± 48 minutes in group 1, 200 ± 32 minutes in group 2, and 121 ± 27 minutes in group 3, P < 0.001). There was no difference in fluoroscopy time (group 1: 20 ± 15 minutes, group 2: 27 ± 22 minutes, and group 3: 24 ± 9 minutes P = 0.4). The procedure was successfully completed in all patients, but cross-over to a femoral approach was required in one patient in group 3. Conclusion The alternative approach of AVJ ablation during permanent pacemaker implantation from the same axillary vein access site is feasible and more efficient compared to the femoral approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background To categorize indications of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), to determine predictors for conduction disturbances and to quantify the need for ventricular pacing during follow-up. Method We studied 97 patients (median age 83 years, 58% female) undergoing TAVI using the Medtronic CoreValve Revalving System (MCRS; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) or Edwards-Sapien Valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA). During follow-up, no need for ventricular pacing was defined as <1% ventricular pacing and intrinsic 1:1 atrioventricular (AV) conduction. Results In the 35 patients (36.1%) undergoing PPM implantation three indication categories were identified: (1) high-grade AV block (Mobitz 2 or higher), (2) new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) with a prolonged PR interval, and (3) new-onset LBBB. The only independent predictors of high-grade AV block were the use of MCRS (odds ratio [OR] 79.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.57-1373.31) and the presence of preprocedural right bundle branch block (OR 81.95; 95% 95% CI 8.72-770.46). Whereas high-grade AV block resolved only in 17% of cases, none of the patients receiving a PPM due to LBBB with or without PR prolongation required ventricular pacing during follow-up. Conclusion Our findings justify early PPM implantation in patients with high-grade AV block and may suggest a more conservative approach to PPM implantation in patients with new-onset LBBB after TAVI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Role of Defibrillation Threshold Testing. Introduction: Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing has been performed to prove functionality of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Over the past years it has become increasingly controversial because of possible morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study was to determine unsuccessful shock testing and report strategies used to overcome these problems. Methods and Results: A total of 314 patients with a de novo implantation of an ICD and 127 patients receiving a generator exchange were identified retrospectively. All patients underwent defibrillation threshold testing after induction of VF using a low-energy T-wave shock during the intervention, 2 shock tests after de novo implantations, 1 after generator change. A safety margin of 10 J or more was requested. Seven (2.3%) patients in the de novo group and 2 patients (1.4%) in the generator exchange group could not be defibrillated using the standard approach. All of those patients had either chronic amiodarone therapy, secondary prevention or a cardiac resynchronization therapy device (CRT). In univariate analysis, amiodarone therapy, dilated cardiomyopathy, and lower ejection fraction were predictors of failure. Conclusion: Our study's results as well as a review of the current literature favor shock testing, especially in patients with specific risk factors as mentioned above. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 437-441, April 2013) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anatomical Predictors for Acute and Mid-Term Success of Cryoballoon Ablation. Introduction: Cryoballoon (CB) pulmonary vein isolation (CB-PVI) for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) has been demonstrated to be safe and reliable. Preprocedural patient selection to address the high variability in pulmonary vein (PV) anatomy may improve the acute and chronic success of CB-PVI. The purpose of this study was to identify anatomical predictors for CB-PVI failure using the 28 mm balloon. Methods and Results : We included 47 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing CB-PVI with the 28 mm CB. Anatomical global left atrial and PV selective parameters were quantified from 3-dimensional reconstructed preprocedural computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging data. The mean follow-up was 26 ± 9 months (range: 12-32 months). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a continuous sharp left lateral ridge between the left PVs and the left lateral appendage (OR, 7.09; 95% CI, 1.17-43.47) and a sharp carina between the left superior and left inferior PV (OR, 5.99; 95% CI, 1.33-27.03) predict acute and mid-term failure. For the right inferior PVs, a non-perpendicular angle between the axis of the PV and the ostial plane (OR, 6.33; 95% CI, 1.20-33.33) and an early branching PV with change in the axis angle (OR, 7.41; 95% CI, 1.44-38.46) were predictors of acute and mid-term failure. Conclusion: Anatomical variables preventing maximal heat transfer from the tissue to the CB could be identified as predictors for CB-PVI failure with the 28 mm balloon. These findings may be a step toward a more tailored ablation strategy based on individual anatomical variations. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 132-138, February 2013) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic yield of Holter monitoring in very old adults (≥80) with syncope. DESIGN: A Holter study was considered diagnostic if the arrhythmia explained syncope (atrioventricular (AV) block, sinus node dysfunction, atrial fibrillation with severe bradycardia or tachycardia, supraventricular or ventricular tachycardia). SETTING: A tertiary care center in Switzerland over a period of 10 years. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred seventy-five Holter studies were performed in individuals aged 80 and older (median age 84, 65% female, mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 0.56 0.1%). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Fifty-three Holter studies (11%) were diagnostic. The detected arrhythmias were AV block (n=13), sinus node dysfunction (n=13), binodal disease (n=2), atrial fibrillation with slow or rapid ventricular response (n=21), ventricular tachycardia (n=3) and supraventricular tachycardia (n=1). Forty participants (8%) received a pacemaker, and one received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator because of the results of Holter monitoring. The yield of Holter monitoring was significantly greater (all P<.01) in the presence of heart disease (17%) and low LVEF (22%), in men (17%) and in participants aged 90 and older (20%). Heart disease (odds ratio (OR)=3.2, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.7–6.1), male sex (OR=2.1, 95% CI51.1–3.8), and aged 90 and older (OR=2.4, 95% CI=1.2–5.1) remained independent predictors for a high diagnostic yield of Holter monitoring. Furthermore, Holter monitoring was helpful in excluding arrhythmias as a cause of syncope in an additional 10% of cases. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic value of Holter monitoring in participants aged 80 and older with syncope was 11.2%. Its yield was higher in men and in the presence of structural heart disease and was 20% in individuals aged 90 and older. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]