Search

Copyright of Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Sistem Informasi (JEMSI) is the property of Dinasti Publisher and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Financial reports are financial information of a company in an accounting period that can be used to describe the performance of a company (Kashmir in Gayatri). Financial reports are said to be good if they have integrity over the information contained therein. Along with the convergence of IFRS, the concept of conservatism is now replaced by prudence, what is meant by prudence in IFRS is that revenue recognition may be recognized even though it is still potential, as long as it meets the provisions for revenue recognition but still uses the principle of prudence in its recognition. After SAK adopted IFRS. This study aims to test the effect of Prudence, Audit Tenure on the Integrated Report and examine whether there is a role of Green Intellectual Capital and Busy Director as a moderation of the influence of Prudence, Audit Tenure on the Integrated Report carried out by the company. This study took the research population from financial sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2019-2021 period. The type of data used in this study is secondary data in the form of company financial reports which are used as samples. The research method used in this study is a quantitative research method. The sample was selected using the purposive sampling method. To test the hypothesis, this research uses multiple linear regression analysis. Based on the results of this study, it shows that prudence has an effect on the integrated report, Audit tenure does not have an effect on the audit report, Green Intellectual capital strengthens the effect of Prudence on the integrated report but busy directors do not strengthen the effect of Prudence on the integrated report. Green Intellectual capital strengthens the effect of Audit Tenure on the integrated report but busy directors do not strengthen the effect of Audit Tenure on the integrated report. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Financial statement fraud is a scheme in which an employee intentionally causes a misstatement or omission of material information in a company's financial statements. This study aims to analyze the effect of Fraud Hexagon on Financial Statement Fraud and the effect of Green Competitive Advantage on financial statement fraud. This researcher also aims to analyze the role of the Audit Committee as a moderator of the effect of Fraud Hexagon and Green Competitive Advantage on Financial Statement Fraud. Based on the results of the study, it shows that financial targets have a significant effect on financial statement fraud. Accrual Ratio has a significant effect on financial statement fraud. Ineffective monitoring does not have a significant effect on financial statement fraud. Changes in directors do not have a significant effect on financial statement fraud. External pressure has a significant effect on financial statement fraud. Project cooperation has a significant effect on financial statement fraud. Green Competitive advantage does not have a significant effect on financial statement fraud. The Audit Committee strengthens the influence of Financial Targets on Financial Statement Fraud. The Audit Committee strengthens the influence of Accrual Ratio on Financial Statement Fraud. The Audit Committee does not strengthen the influence of Ineffective Monitoring on Financial Statement Fraud. The Audit Committee does not strengthen the influence of Changes in Directors on Financial Statement Fraud. The Audit Committee does not strengthen the influence of External Pressure on Financial Statement Fraud. The Audit Committee strengthens the influence of Project Cooperation on Financial Statement Fraud. The Audit Committee does not strengthen the influence of Green Competitive Advantage on Financial Statement Fraud. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Sistem Informasi (JEMSI) is the property of Dinasti Publisher and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The rapid development of many industries in the world has resulted in environmental damage due to excessive use and exploitation of natural resources. As a result, there is a decline in environmental quality resulting in global warming, ozone depletion, pollution, and acid rain. The impact of environmental conventions in the world Montreal Convention, Kyoto Protocol, Ban on the Use of Certain Hazardous Materials and increasing consumer environmentalism can change the context of competition in industries around the world. This study aims to examine the effect of Green Intellectual Capital, CEO Characteristic, Free Cash Flow on Prudence moderated by Environmental Performance. This study took the research population in the energy sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2019-2023. The type of data used in this study is secondary data in the form of financial reports of companies that are used as samples. The research method used in this study is a quantitative research method. The sample was selected using the purposive sampling method. For hypothesis testing, this study uses multiple linear regression analysis. Based on the results of this study, it shows that Green Intellectual Capital, Busy Director, and Free Cash Flow have an effect on prudence but CEO Tenure has no effect on Prudence. Environmental Performance strengthens the influence of Green Intellectual Capital, Busy Director, and Free Cash Flow on prudence and Environmental Performance strengthens the influence of CEO Tenure on prudence [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]