Search

Purpose: The success of filtering surgery as in XEN-Gel-Stent (XEN) and Preserflo-Microshunt (PF) depends mainly on a functioning bleb. Primary bleb failure (PBF) is not uncommon and can be treated with needling or open bleb revision (OBR). The aim of the study is to compare surgical outcomes of OBR after XEN and PF. Methods: Eyes which received OBR as management of PBF following implantation of XEN or PF were retrospectively included. Intraocular pressure (IOP), number of IOP lowering medications (NoM), and success rates (SR) were compared between groups. Complete and qualified success were defined as IOP ≤18mmHg and a reduction of >20%, without and with medications, respectively. Results: 29 eyes after XEN and 23 eyes after PF were included. Six months following OBR, IOP reduced from 24.2±4.7 to 13.5±4.6 after XEN and from 27.3±8.7 to 15.9±5.8mmHg after PF (both p<0.001). NoM did not change (0.7±1.3 to 0.4±0.8 after XEN and 1.2±1.3 to 1.0±1.5 after PF, p>0.05 for both). Complete SR were higher after XEN than after PF (58.6% vs. 30.4%, p=0.04). Complications were mild and managed mainly conservatively. Additional glaucoma surgery was needed in 17% and 30% of eyes after XEN and PF, respectively (p=0.26). Conclusion: Although OBR was effective as management of PBF following XEN and PF, SR were higher after XEN than after PF along with comparable safety profile. The change of the surgical approach from ab interno during XEN-Implantation to ab externo during OBR seems to enhance SR compared to PF, where both interventions are done ab externo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evaluation of bleb morphology is a vital part of successful filtration glaucoma surgery. The PRESERFLO-MicroShunt (PRESERFLO) and XEN-Gel-Stent (XEN) are drainage devices implanted using different surgical approaches (ab externo and ab interno, respectively), potentially resulting in distinct bleb morphology. Understanding these morphological differences is essential for postoperative care. In this study, we retrospectively examined functioning blebs following PRESERFLO and XEN implantation using high-resolution anterior segment OCT imaging. Qualitative assessment utilizing the Jenaer Bleb Grading System and quantitative assessment measuring 12 parameters representing bleb dimensions were conducted, and the results were compared between the two groups. A total of 80 eyes from 80 patients were included (41 after PRESERFLO, 39 after XEN). Functioning blebs following PRESERFLO exhibited a higher frequency of hyperreflective tenon changes compared to XEN (31.7% vs. 10.3%, respectively, p = 0.02) and a lower frequency of cavernous changes (17.1% vs. 35.9%, p = 0.05). Additionally, PRESERFLO blebs showed a higher frequency of visible episcleral lakes (92.7% vs. 30.8%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, PRESERFLO blebs demonstrated larger height (2.13 ± 0.5 vs. 1.85 ± 0.6 mm, p = 0.03), width (10.31 ± 2.3 vs. 9.1 ± 2.3 mm, p = 0.02), length (9.13 ± 1.8 vs. 8.24 ± 1.9 mm, p = 0.04), posterior location relative to the limbus (6.21 ± 1.2 vs. 5.21 ± 1.8 mm, p = 0.005), and a thicker bleb wall (1.60 ± 0.5 vs. 1.1 ± 0.4 mm, p = 0.004). Functioning blebs following PRESERFLO and XEN displayed morphological distinctions, likely attributed to variations in surgical techniques (ab externo vs. ab interno) and stent dimensions. These morphological differences should be taken into consideration when evaluating blebs, as they could impact assessments of bleb functionality and influence decisions regarding postoperative interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]