Search

Study Question: Does 8 weeks of continuous low-dose hCG administration increase the proportion of antral follicles that reach the preovulatory state during ovarian stimulation (OS) in women with low ovarian reserve?, Summary Answer: The proportion of antral follicles (2-10 mm) that reached the preovulatory state did not increase., What Is Known Already: The administration of androgens prior to OS might upregulate FSH receptor (FSHR) expression on granulosa cells, making follicles more responsive to exogenous FSH stimulation during OS. LH and hCG stimulate the local follicular androgen synthesis in theca cells and may be used as an endogenous androgen priming method. Exogenous priming by testosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) have been shown to increase the number of retrieved oocytes and live birth rate but the studies are small, and their use is associated with side effects., Study Design, Size, Duration: A prospective, paired, non-blinded single-center study including 20 women serving as their own controls conducted between January 2021 and July 2021 at The University Hospital Copenhagen Rigshospitalet, Denmark., Participants/materials, Setting, Methods: Participants underwent two identical consecutive IVF/ICSI treatments, a Control cycle and a Study cycle, separated by ∼8 weeks (two menstrual cycles) of daily injections of 260 IU recombinant hCG (rhCG). A freeze-all strategy was applied in the Control cycle. Both IVF/ICSI cycles were performed in a fixed GnRH antagonist protocol using a daily dose of 300 IU recombinant FSH (rFSH) and GnRH antagonist 0.25 mg from stimulation days 5-6., Main Results and the Role of Chance: Follicular output rate, defined as the number of follicles >16 mm on hCG trigger day divided by the antral follicle count (2-10 mm) at baseline, did not increase after 8 weeks of hCG priming (P = 0.8). The mean number of oocytes retrieved was significantly higher after the hCG priming being 4.7 (2.8) vs 3.2 (1.7) in the Study and Control cycle, respectively (P = 0.01). The duration of stimulation was longer in the Study versus the Control cycle (P = 0.05), despite the use of identical hCG trigger criterion and similar diameters of the three biggest follicles on hCG trigger day in the two cycles (P = 0.9)., Limitations, Reasons for Caution: The sample size was small, and the number of oocytes retrieved was not the primary endpoint. Larger studies are needed to confirm this finding., Wider Implications of the Findings: Long-term, low-dose rhCG administration may increase the number of oocytes retrieved during IVF/ICSI in women with low ovarian reserve, but more research is needed before firm conclusions can be drawn., Study Funding/competing Interest(s): This study was funded by an unrestricted grant from Gedeon Richter. A.P. reports personal consulting fees from PregLem SA, Novo Nordisk A/S, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Gedeon Richter Nordics AB, Cryos International, and Merck A/S outside the submitted work and payment or honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter Nordics AB, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Merck A/S, and Theramex and Organon & Co. Grants to the institution have been provided by Gedeon Richter Nordics AB, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, and Merck A/S and receipt of equipment by the institution from Gedeon Richter Nordics AB is reported. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04643925., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Mild ovarian stimulation has emerged as an alternative to conventional IVF with the advantages of being more patient-friendly and less expensive. Inadequate data on pregnancy outcomes and concerns about the cycle cancellation rate (CCR) have prevented mild, or low-dose, IVF from gaining wide acceptance., Objective and Rationale: To evaluate parallel-group randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on IVF where comparisons were made between a mild (≤150 IU daily dose) and conventional stimulation in terms of clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness in patients described as poor, normal and non-polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) hyper-responders to IVF., Search Methods: Searches with no language restrictions were performed using Medline, Embase, Cochrane central, Pre-Medicine from January 1990 until April 2020, using pre-specified search terms. References of included studies were hand-searched as well as advance access articles to key journals. Only parallel-group RCTs that used ≤150 IU daily dose of gonadotrophin as mild-dose IVF (MD-IVF) and compared with a higher conventional dose (CD-IVF) were included. Studies were grouped under poor, normal or hyper-responders as described by the authors in their inclusion criteria. Women with PCOS were excluded in the hyper-responder group. The risk of bias was assessed as per Cochrane Handbook for the included studies. The quality of evidence (QoE) was assessed according to the GRADE system. PRISMA guidance was followed for review methodology., Outcomes: A total of 31 RCTs were included in the analysis: 15 in the poor, 14 in the normal and 2 in the hyper-responder group. Live birth rates (LBRs) per randomisation were similar following use of MD-IVF in poor (relative risk (RR) 0.91 (CI 0.68, 1.22)), normal (RR 0.88 (CI 0.69, 1.12)) and hyper-responders (RR 0.98 (CI 0.79, 1.22)) when compared to CD-IVF. QoE was moderate. Cumulative LBRs (5 RCTs, n = 2037) also were similar in all three patient types (RR 0.96 (CI 0.86 1.07) (moderate QoE). Risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was significantly less with MD-IVF than CD-IVF in both normal (RR 0.22 (CI 0.10, 0.50)) and hyper-responders (RR 0.47 (CI 0.31, 0.72)), with moderate QoE. The CCRs were comparable in poor (RR 1.33 (CI 0.96, 1.85)) and hyper-responders (RR 1.31 (CI 0.98, 1.77)) but increased with MD-IVF among normal responders (RR 2.08 (CI 1.38, 3.14)); all low to very low QoE. Although fewer oocytes were retrieved and fewer embryos created with MD-IVF, the proportion of high-grade embryos was similar in all three population types (low QoE). Compared to CD-IVF, MD-IVF was associated with less gonadotrophin use and lower cost., Wider Implications: This updated review provides reassurance on using MD-IVF not only for the LBR per cycle but also for the cumulative LBR, with moderate QoE. With risks identified with 'freeze-all' strategies, it may be time to recommend mild-dose ovarian stimulation for IVF for all categories of women i.e. hyper, poor and normal responders to IVF., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.)

The purpose of this study is to determine whether all-blastocyst-culture can benefit advanced maternal age (AMA) patients with low ovarian reserve. We retrospectively analyze AMA patients with low ovarian reserve undergoing IVF/ICSI in Reproductive Medicine Research Center of the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from May 2016 to August 2017. We divide them into group A (all-blastocyst-culture) and group B (none-blastocystculture) based on different culture approach of D3 transferrable embryo. We compared the cumulative biochemical pregnancy rate and cumulative clinical pregnancy rate between them. A total of 261 eligible patients are included, with 151 in group A and 110 in group B. The basic conditions of the two groups show no difference. Cumulative biochemical pregnancy rate/clinical pregnancy rate in group A is higher than that of group B, though not statistically significant (p > .05). After removing patients canceling embryo transfer due to failure in blastocyst culture, the cumulative biochemical pregnancy rate/clinical pregnancy rate in group A is significantly higher than group B (p < .05). Multivariate analysis showed that female age and the number of D3 transferrable embryo are risk factors for the failure of blastocyst culture (OR = 0.672 and 2.270, 95%CI 0.511-0.883 and 1.203-4.284, p = .004 and p = .011, respectively). Hence, we drew to conclusion that all-blastocyst-culture will not adversely affect the pregnancy outcome of AMA patients with low ovarian reserve.

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to calculate the cumulative pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) at ages 44-45., Methods: The study calculated cumulative live pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate of 124 women aged 44 to 45 years old who commenced IVF treatment., Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures are cumulative live pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate., Results: Cumulative live pregnancy rates following 1, 2, 3, and 4 cycles were 5.6, 11, 17, and 20%, respectively, with no additional pregnancies in further cycles. Cumulative live birth rates following 1, 2, and 3 cycles were 1.6, 3, and 7%, respectively, with no additional live births in further cycles., Conclusions: The cumulative pregnancy rate rises during the first 4 cycles and cumulative live birth rate rises during the first 3 cycles, with no additional rise in pregnancies or deliveries thereafter, suggesting that it is futile to offer more than 3 cycles of treatment to 44-45-year-old women.

Objective: To determine whether or not the level of serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is related to early ovarian aging in young women (< 35 years of age) undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: An IVF laboratory in a university hospital in Taiwan. Patient (s): 70 young women (< 35 years of age) with low level of serum AMH (< 2 ng/ml) and 104 young women with level of serum AMH (≥ 2 ng/ml) who underwent IVF/ICSI cycles between January 2011 and November 2012 were enrolled. Intervention (s): None. Main outcome measure (s): Number of oocytes, fertilization rate, embryo quality, cycle cancellation rate, clinical pregnancy/abortion rate, and perinatal/infant outcomes., Results: The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer was favorable (low AMH group vs. normal AMH group [47.2% and 47.9%]) for women < 35 years of age, including women with a low serum AMH. Similarly, the live birth rate per transfer (low AMH group vs. normal AMH group [37.7% and 35.4%]) and perinatal outcomes were also comparable between the two groups. A significantly higher cycle cancellation was noted in the low AMH group than the normal AMH group (24.2% vs. 7.6%)., Conclusion: Although early ovarian aging should be taken into consideration for young and infertile women with low AMH level than expected, our results suggest that low serum AMH level may suggest early ovarian aging in accelerated oocyte loss only, but may not fully represent "early ovarian aging" based on the favorable outcomes of pregnancy.

Objective: To investigate whether ovarian fragmentation for follicular activation (OFFA) improves ovarian reserve markers and in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in women with poor ovarian response (POR).Design: Randomized, controlled trial, with parallel assignment.Setting: University hospital.Patient(s): Thirty-four women with POR according to the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology criteria.Intervention(s): Women with POR were randomly allocated to receive ovarian fragmentation in 1 ovary or to no intervention (control group). Ovarian reserve markers were followed at 2-week intervals for 6 months. In vitro fertilization cycles were initiated when the antral follicle count (AFC) doubled or at the end of follow-up.Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome was the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes obtained. Antral follicle count, antimüllerian hormone level, and reproductive outcomes were recorded as secondary outcomes. Exploratory outcomes included surgical results and analysis of protein and gene expression.Result(s): Ovarian fragmentation for follicular activation resulted in an increase in AFC in the intervention ovary compared with the control ovary and an increase in total AFC in the OFFA group compared with controls. Serum antimüllerian hormone and follicle-stimulating-hormone levels did not improve in the OFFA group throughout the follow-up period. Fifteen patients from each arm underwent IVF. In the control group, 33 MII oocytes were retrieved and 18 embryo transfers were performed, with a 20% pregnancy rate and an 18.7% live birth rate per cycle. In the OFFA group, 23 MII oocytes were retrieved and 11 embryo transfers were performed, with a 13.3% pregnancy rate and a 6.7% live birth rate per cycle. Reproductive outcomes did not significantly differ between the groups. Hippo pathway inhibition was confirmed by an 18.8% reduction in the phospho-YAP/YAP (Yes-associated protein 1) ratio and BIRC and CCN overexpression after fragmentation.Conclusion(s): Ovarian fragmentation for follicular activation in women with POR resulted in an increase in AFC but did not modify IVF outcomes when compared with controls.Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT02354963. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the effect of DHEA supplementation on In-Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) outcome as assessed by ovarian response, oocyte developmental competence and live birth rates in women predicted to have poor ovarian reserve (OR). The feasibility of conducting a large trial is also assessed by evaluating the recruitment rates and compliance of the recruited participants with DHEA/placebo intake and follow-up rates.Study Design: A single centre, double blinded, placebo controlled, randomized trial was performed over two years with 60 women undergoing in-vitro fertilisation (IVF). Subjects were randomized, based on a computer-generated pseudo-random code to receive either DHEA or placebo with both capsules having similar colour, size and appearance. 60 women with poor OR based on antral follicle count or anti-Mullerian hormone thresholds undergoing IVF were recruited. They were randomised to receive DHEA 75mg/day or placebo for at-least 12 weeks before starting ovarian stimulation. They had long protocol using hMG 300 IU/day. Data analysed by "intention to treat". Ovarian response, live birth rates and molecular markers of oocyte quality were compared between the study and control groups.Results: The recruitment rate was 39% (60/154). A total of 52 participants (27 versus 25 in the study and placebo groups) were included in the final analysis after excluding eight. While the mean (standard deviation) DHEA levels were similar at recruitment (9.4 (5) versus 7.5 (2.4) ng/ml; P=0.1), the DHEA levels at pre-stimulation were higher in the study group than in the controls (16.3 (5.8) versus 11.1 (4.5) ng/ml; P<0.01). The number (median, range) of oocytes retrieved (4, 0-18 versus 4, 0-15 respectively; P=0.54) and live birth rates (7/27, 26% versus 8/25, 32% respectively; RR (95% CI): 0.74 (0.22-2.48) and mRNA expression of developmental biomarkers in granulosa and cumulus cells were similar between the groups.Conclusion: Pre-treatment DHEA supplementation, albeit statistical power in this study is low, did not improve the response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation or oocyte quality or live birth rates during IVF treatment with long protocol in women predicted to have poor OR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this retrospective study of 652 anticipated low response women, the overall clinical outcomes (live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate [PR]) of low-dose flare (LDF) protocol appeared lower than those of conventional down-regulation (DR) (LDF: 15.1% vs. DR: 20.6% and LDF: 10.3% vs. DR: 17.4%, respectively). The findings that LDF protocol improved the clinical outcome in older women, or when LDF followed an unsuccessful IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle with DR (LDF: 19.4% vs. DR: 9.76% and LDF: 13.9% vs. DR: 4.2% respectively), need further evaluation through randomized trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To find a simple multivariate score that has the potential to predict ovarian reserve, as well as pregnancy rate, in infertile women. Design: A prospective study. Setting: A university-affiliated reproductive medicine unit. Patient(s): One hundred sixty-eight consecutive women undergoing their first IVF-ET treatment at our unit. Intervention(s): Basal ovarian reserve studies, endocrine and sonographic, were performed before starting therapy. After completion of treatment, a logistic regression analysis was performed to examine which parameters significantly determined low ovarian reserve. These parameters were incorporated thereafter in a multivariate score to predict ovarian reserve, as well as clinical pregnancy rate. Main Outcome Measure(s): Low ovarian reserve defined as Result(s): Logistic regression analysis revealed that age, antral follicle count, basal FSH, FSH/LH ratio, mean ovarian volume, infertility duration, number of previous cycle cancellations, and body mass index were all, in decreasing significance, independent factors that determine low ovarian reserve. The multivariate score was shown to have a distinctive prediction of ovarian reserve. A cumulative score of >14 was shown to be more accurate in predicting low ovarian reserve than age, day 3 FSH, or antral follicle count separately. Moreover, a score of >14 was shown to have a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 69% in predicting low ovarian reserve. More important, women with a score of >14 had significantly lower clinical implantation and pregnancy rates relative to women with a score of Conclusion(s): A novel and simple multivariate score using clinical and basal endocrine and sonographic parameters has a distinctive prediction of low ovarian reserve in infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment. Moreover, it has the potential to predict clinical implantation and pregnancy rates in women with low and good ovarian reserve. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate whether seminatural cycle is a reasonable management for ovarian aging patients. Design: Prospective study. Setting: ART Unit, Clamart, France. Patient(s): Seventy-five women, 158 cycles. Intervention(s): Infertile women who presented with ovarian aging (defined as low ovarian reserve and characterized by cycle day 3 high FSH, high E2, and/or low inhibin B and/or previous cycle cancellations due to poor ovarian response to COH) were studied. Patients were offered up to three cycles. Treatment was scheduled as follows. From cycle day 8 onward the selection of the dominant follicle was monitored by ultrasound and hormonal measurements. When the dominant follicle appeared, patients received GnRH antagonist and, thereafter, hMG to support further follicular development. Main Outcome Measure(s): Implantation rate and clinical pregnancy. Result(s): Twenty-eight of 158 cycles were cancelled (17.7%). Oocyte pickups were performed in 119 (75.3%) cycles, 91 (57.6%) mature oocytes were retrieved, and 67 (42.4%) embryos transferred. Nineteen clinical pregnancies were obtained; the cumulative pregnancy rate per patient, after 3 cycles, was 35.2%. Conclusion(s): Use of a seminatural cycle is a reasonable management for patients with ovarian aging who have ovulatory menstrual cycles. It achieves a high implantation rate (28.3%). [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: To describe the first reported case of a seizure in a patient using the dietary supplement DHEA in an attempt to improve ovarian oocyte production. Design: Case report. Setting: University-affiliated teaching hospital, neurologic department. Patient(s): A 30-year-old woman with fragile X syndrome and no history of any convulsive disorder who was receiving IVF treatment. Intervention(s): Daily treatment with the dietary supplement DHEA. Main Outcome Measure(s): Generalized seizure. Result(s): After 1 month of DHEA treatment, the patient was admitted with a generalized seizure. Conclusion(s): A generalized seizure, associated with concurrent intake of DHEA. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]