Search

Predicting the redox behavior of magnetite in reducing soils and sediments is challenging because there is neither agreement among measured potentials nor consensus on which Fe(III) | Fe(II) equilibria are most relevant. Here, we measured open-circuit potentials of stoichiometric magnetite equilibrated over a range of solution conditions. Notably, electron transfer mediators were not necessary to reach equilibrium. For conditions where ferrous hydroxide precipitation was limited, Nernstian behavior was observed with an E H vs pH slope of -179 ± 4 mV and an E H vs Fe(II) aq slope of -54 ± 4 mV. Our estimated E H o of 857 ± 8 mV closely matches a maghemite|aqueous Fe(II) E H o of 855 mV, suggesting that it plays a dominant role in poising the solution potential and that it's theoretical Nernst equation of E H [mV] = 855 - 177 pH - 59 log [Fe 2+ ] may be useful in predicting magnetite redox behavior under these conditions. At higher pH values and without added Fe(II), a distinct shift in potentials was observed, indicating that the dominant Fe(III)|Fe(II) couple(s) poising the potential changed. Our findings, coupled with previous Mössbauer spectroscopy and kinetic data, provide compelling evidence that the maghemite/Fe(II) aq couple accurately predicts the redox behavior of stoichiometric magnetite suspensions in the presence of aqueous Fe(II) between pH values of 6.5 and 8.5.

Here we revisit whether the common mixed-valent Fe mineral, magnetite, is a viable reductant for the abiotic natural attenuation of perchloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) in anoxic groundwater plumes. We measured PCE and TCE reduction by stoichiometric magnetite as a function of pH and Fe(ii) concentration. In the absence of added Fe(ii), stoichiometric magnetite does not reduce PCE and TCE over a three month period under anoxic conditions. When Fe(ii) is added to magnetite suspensions, PCE and TCE are reduced under Fe(ii) and pH conditions that appear to be controlled by the solubility of ferrous hydroxide, Fe(OH)2(s). Reduction rates are slow with only 1 to 30% carbon products (primarily acetylene) accumulating over several months. We conducted a similar set of experiments with Fe(OH)2(s) alone and found that, compared to in the presence of magnetite, Fe(OH)2(s) reduces PCE and TCE only at Fe(ii) concentrations that are too high (≥13 mM, 726 mg L-1) to be representative of natural aquifer conditions. Our results suggest that magnetite present in aquifer sediments alone is unlikely to reduce PCE and TCE sufficiently fast to contribute to natural attenuation of PCE and TCE. The lack of compelling evidence for PCE and TCE reduction by magnetite raises important questions regarding the current application of using magnetic susceptibility as a potential indicator for abiotic natural attenuation. Dynamic conditions and high Fe(ii) concentrations that favor active precipitation of minerals, such as Fe(OH)2(s) in the presence of magnetite (or other Fe minerals), however, may lead to PCE and TCE reduction that could help attenuate PCE and TCE plumes.

Exposure to As in groundwater negatively impacts millions of people around the globe, and As mobility in groundwater is often controlled by Fe mineral dissolution and precipitation. Additionally, trace elements can be released from and incorporated into the structure of Fe oxides in the presence of dissolved Fe(ii). The potential for As to redistribute between sorbed on the magnetite surface and incorporated in the magnetite structure, however, remains unclear. In this study, we use selective chemical extraction and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) to distinguish magnetite-sorbed and incorporated As(v) and to provide evidence for As(v) incorporation during magnetite precipitation. While As in the As-magnetite coprecipitates did not redistribute between sorbed and incorporated over a 4 month period, a small, but measurable increase in incorporated As(v) of up to 13% was observed for sorbed As(v). We suggest that Fe(ii)-catalyzed recrystallization of magnetite did not significantly influence the redistribution of sorbed As(v) because the extent of Fe atom exchange was small (∼10%). In addition, the extent of As redistribution was the same in the absence and presence of added aqueous Fe(ii), suggesting that aqueous Fe(ii) had, overall, a minor effect on As redistribution for both coprecipitated and sorbed As(v). Our results suggest that coprecipitation of As(v) with magnetite and redistribution of As(v) sorbed on magnetite are potential pathways for irreversible As(v) uptake and sequestration. These pathways are likely to play a significant role in controlling As mobility in natural systems, during human-induced redox cycling of groundwater such as aquifer storage and recovery, as well as in iron oxide-based As removal systems.

Abiotic reduction of inorganic mercury by natural organic matter and native soils is well-known, and recently there is evidence that reduced iron (Fe) species, such as magnetite, green rust, and Fe sulfides, can also reduce Hg(II). Here, we evaluated the reduction of Hg(II) by magnetites with varying Fe(II) content in both the absence and presence of chloride. Specifically, we evaluated whether magnetite stoichiometry (x = Fe(II)/Fe(III)) influences the rate of Hg(II) reduction and formation of products. In the absence of chloride, reduction of Hg(II) to Hg(0) is observed over a range of magnetite stoichiometries (0.29 < x < 0.50) in purged headspace reactors and unpurged low headspace reactors, as evidenced by Hg recovery in a volatile product trap solution and Hg L(III)-edge X-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy (XANES). In the presence of chloride, however, XANES spectra indicate the formation of a metastable Hg(I) calomel species (Hg2Cl2) from the reduction of Hg(II). Interestingly, Hg(I) species are only observed for the more oxidized magnetite particles that contain lower Fe(II) content (x < 0.42). For the more reduced magnetite particles (x ≥ 0.42), Hg(II) is reduced to Hg(0) even in the presence of high chloride concentrations. As previously observed for nitroaromatic compounds and uranium, magnetite stoichiometry appears to influence the rate of Hg(II) reduction (both in the presence and absence of chloride) confirming that it is important to consider magnetite stoichiometry when assessing the fate of contaminants in Fe-rich subsurface environments.

The reaction between magnetite and aqueous Fe(2+) has been extensively studied due to its role in contaminant reduction, trace-metal sequestration, and microbial respiration. Previous work has demonstrated that the reaction of Fe(2+) with magnetite (Fe(3)O(4)) results in the structural incorporation of Fe(2+) and an increase in the bulk Fe(2+) content of magnetite. It is unclear, however, whether significant Fe atom exchange occurs between magnetite and aqueous Fe(2+), as has been observed for other Fe oxides. Here, we measured the extent of Fe atom exchange between aqueous Fe(2+) and magnetite by reacting isotopically "normal" magnetite with (57)Fe-enriched aqueous Fe(2+). The extent of Fe atom exchange between magnetite and aqueous Fe(2+) was significant (54-71%), and went well beyond the amount of Fe atoms found at the near surface. Mössbauer spectroscopy of magnetite reacted with (56)Fe(2+) indicate that no preferential exchange of octahedral or tetrahedral sites occurred. Exchange experiments conducted with Co-ferrite (Co(2+)Fe(2)(3+)O(4)) showed little impact of Co substitution on the rate or extent of atom exchange. Bulk electron conduction, as previously invoked to explain Fe atom exchange in goethite, is a possible mechanism, but if it is occurring, conduction does not appear to be the rate-limiting step. The lack of significant impact of Co substitution on the kinetics of Fe atom exchange, and the relatively high diffusion coefficients reported for magnetite suggest that for magnetite, unlike goethite, Fe atom diffusion is a plausible mechanism to explain the rapid rates of Fe atom exchange in magnetite.

Hexavalent uranium (U(VI)) can be reduced enzymatically by various microbes and abiotically by Fe(2+)-bearing minerals, including magnetite, of interest because of its formation from Fe(3+) (oxy)hydroxides via dissimilatory iron reduction. Magnetite is also a corrosion product of iron metal in suboxic and anoxic conditions and is likely to form during corrosion of steel waste containers holding uranium-containing spent nuclear fuel. Previous work indicated discrepancies in the extent of U(VI) reduction by magnetite. Here, we demonstrate that the stoichiometry (the bulk Fe(2+)/Fe(3+) ratio, x) of magnetite can, in part, explain the observed discrepancies. In our studies, magnetite stoichiometry significantly influenced the extent of U(VI) reduction by magnetite. Stoichiometric and partially oxidized magnetites with x ≥ 0.38 reduced U(VI) to U(IV) in UO(2) (uraninite) nanoparticles, whereas with more oxidized magnetites (x < 0.38) and maghemite (x = 0), sorbed U(VI) was the dominant phase observed. Furthermore, as with our chemically synthesized magnetites (x ≥ 0.38), nanoparticulate UO(2) was formed from reduction of U(VI) in a heat-killed suspension of biogenic magnetite (x = 0.43). X-ray absorption and Mössbauer spectroscopy results indicate that reduction of U(VI) to U(IV) is coupled to oxidation of Fe(2+) in magnetite. The addition of aqueous Fe(2+) to suspensions of oxidized magnetite resulted in reduction of U(VI) to UO(2), consistent with our previous finding that Fe(2+) taken up from solution increased the magnetite stoichiometry. Our results suggest that magnetite stoichiometry and the ability of aqueous Fe(2+) to recharge magnetite are important factors in reduction of U(VI) in the subsurface.

The factors controlling rates of contaminant reduction by magnetite (Fe3O4) are poorly understood. Here, we measured the reduction rates of three ArNO2 compounds by magnetite particles ranging from highly oxidized (x = Fe2+/Fe3+ = 0.31) to fully stoichiometric (x = 0.50). Rates of ArNO2 reduction became almost 5 orders of magnitude faster as the particle stoichiometry increased from x = 0.31 to 0.50. To evaluate what was controlling the rate of ArNO2 reduction, we measured apparent 15N kinetic isotope effects ((15)N-AKIE) values for nitrobenzene and magnetite open-circuit potentials (E(OCP)). 15N-AKIE values were greater than unity for all magnetite stoichiometries investigated, indicating that mass transfer processes are not controlling the rate of ArNO2 reduction by magnetite. E(OCP) measurements showed that the E(OCP) for magnetite was linearly related to the stoichiometry, with more stoichiometric magnetite having a lower potential. Based on these results, we propose that conceptual models that incorporate both redox and Fe2+ diffusion processes, rather than those that rely solely on diffusion of Fe2+, are more appropriate for understanding contaminant reduction by magnetite. Our work indicates that particle stoichiometry should be considered when evaluating rates of contaminant reduction by magnetite.

Magnetite (Fe3O4) is a common biomineralization product of microbial iron respiration and is often found in subsurface anoxic environments, such as groundwater aquifers where aqueous Fe(II) is present We investigated the reaction between aqueous Fe(II) and magnetite using the isotopic selectivity of 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy and revisited the reduction of nitrobenzene by magnetite. Similar to our previous findings with Fe3+ oxides, we did not observe the formation of a stable sorbed Fe(II) species; instead, we observed oxidation of the Fe(II) to a partially oxidized magnetite phase. Oxidation of Fe(II) was accompanied by reduction of the octahedral Fe3+ atoms in the underlying magnetite to octahedral Fe2+ atoms. The lack of a stable, sorbed Fe(II) species on magnetite prompted us to reevaluate what is controlling the extent of Fe(II) uptake on magnetite, as well as contaminant reduction in the presence of magnetite and Fe(II). Uptake of Fe(II) by magnetite appears to be limited by the stoichiometry of the magnetite particles, rather than the surface area of the particles. More oxidized (or less stoichiometric) magnetite particles take up more Fe(II), with the formation of stoichiometric magnetite (Fe2+/Fe3+ = 0.5) limiting the extent of Fe(II) uptake. We also showthat stoichiometric magnetite, in the absence of aqueous Fe(II), can rapidly reduce nitrobenzene. Based on these results, we speculate that contaminant reduction that was previously attributed to Fe(II) sorbed on magnetite is due to a process similar to negative (n) doping of a solid, which increases the stoichiometry of the magnetite and alters the bulk redox properties of the particle to make reduction more favorable.