Search

OBJECTIVES Pulmonary sequestration is a rare congenital pulmonary malformation. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of different therapeutic strategies on the clinical outcome of asymptomatic intralobar pulmonary sequestration. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 37 patients diagnosed with intralobar sequestration. All the patients were asymptomatic. Seventeen patients underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) once diagnosed and 20 patients chose to undergo observation. Of these 20 patients, 16 patients developed symptoms during the observation period and also underwent VATS; 4 patients never showed symptoms and did not have surgery. The 33 patients who had VATS were divided into 2 groups: group 1, patients who underwent VATS once diagnosed; group 2, patients who underwent VATS once symptoms appeared. Postoperative data and respiratory function data were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS Twenty of the patients were men and 17 were women (mean age 37.05 ± 7.89 years). Results of a comparative analysis of the 2 groups indicated that patients in group 1 had better values for median estimated blood loss, median duration of chest tube insertion, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative hospital stay than those in group 2. Postoperative complications were reported in 1 patient in group 1 and in 3 patients in group 2. Meanwhile, the loss of lung function between group 1 and group 2 was statistically significant, which also suggested that patients benefited from surgery once diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS For asymptomatic intralobar sequestration, VATS could be effective and safe. The surgical intervention should be performed once the condition is diagnosed to avoid manifestations occurring and to preserve patients’ quality of life.

Background Anastomotic leakage (AL), a serious complication after esophagectomy, might impair patient quality of life, prolong hospital stay, and even lead to surgery-related death. The aim of this study was to show a novel decision model based on classification and regression tree (CART) analysis for the prediction of postoperative AL among patients who have undergone esophagectomy. Methods A total of 450 patients (training set: 356; test set: 94) with perioperative information were included. A decision tree model was established to identify the predictors of AL in the training set, which was validated in the test set. A receiver operating characteristic curve was also created to illustrate the diagnostic ability of the decision model. Results A total of 12.2% (55/450) of the 450 patients suffered AL, which was diagnosed at median postoperative day 7 (range: 6-16). The decision tree model, containing surgical duration, postoperative lymphocyte count, and postoperative C-reactive protein to albumin ratio, was established by CART analysis. Among the three variables, the postoperative C-reactive protein to albumin ratio was identified as the most important indicator in the CART model with normalized importance of 100%. According to the results validated in the test set, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of the prediction model were 80%, 98.8%, 88.9%, 97.6%, and 96.8%, respectively. Moreover, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.95. Conclusion The decision model based on CART analysis presented good performance for predicting AL, and might allow the early identification of patients at high risk.

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are frequently dysregulated in multiple malignancies, demonstrating their potential oncogenic or tumor-suppressive roles in tumorigenesis. Herein, we reported the identification of a novel lncRNA, linc00665 (ENST00000590622), which was markedly upregulated in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) tissues and might serve as an independent predictor for poor prognosis. Functional assays indicated that linc00665 reinforced LUAD cell proliferation and metastasis in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, transcription factor SP1 induced the transcription of linc00665 in LUAD cells, which exerted its oncogenic role by functioning as competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) for miR-98 and subsequently activating downstream AKR1B10-ERK signaling pathway. Together, our study elucidates oncogenic roles of linc00665–miR98–AKR1B10 axis in LUAD tumorigenesis, which may serve as potential diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Objective To evaluate the safety of early oral feeding in patients with type II diabetes after radical resection of esophageal carcinoma. Methods The clinical data of 121 patients with type II diabetes who underwent radical resection of esophageal carcinoma in the department of cardiothoracic surgery of Jinling Hospital from January 2016 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the median time (7 days) of the first oral feeding after surgery, the patients were divided into early oral feeding group (EOF, feeding within 7 days after surgery, 67 cases) and late oral feeding group (LOF, feeding after 7 days, 54 cases). Postoperative blood glucose level, incidence of complications, nutritional and immune indexes, inflammatory indexes, normalized T12-SMA (the postoperative/preoperative ratio of vertical spinal muscle cross-sectional area at the 12th thoracic vertebra level) and QLQ-C30 (Quality Of Life Questionnaire) scores were recorded and compared in the two groups. Results There was no statistical difference in preoperative nutritional index and postoperative complication rates between the EOF and LOF group (p > 0.05). The postoperative nutritional index (ALB, PA, TRF, Hb) and immune index (IgA, IgG, IgM) of the EOF group were higher than those of the LOF group (p p p Conclusions Early oral feeding is safe and feasible for patients with type II diabetes after radical resection of esophageal cancer, and it can improve short-term nutritional status and postoperative life quality of the patients.

SUMMARYThe aims of this pilot study are to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of conducting an enhanced nutritional support pathway including extended preoperative nutritional support and one month home enteral nutrition (HEN) for patients who underwent enhanced recovery after esophagectomy. We implemented extended preoperative nutritional support and one month HEN after discharge for patients randomized into an enhanced nutrition group and implemented standard nutritional support for patients randomized into a conventional nutrition group. Except the nutritional support program, both group patients underwent the same standardized enhanced recovery after surgery programs of esophagectomy based on published guidelines. Patients were assessed at preoperative day, postoperative day 7 (POD7), and POD30 for perioperative outcomes and nutritional status. To facilitate the determination of an effect size for subsequent appropriately powered randomized clinical trials and assess the effectiveness, the primary outcome we chose was the weight change before and after esophagectomy. Other outcomes including body mass index (BMI), lean body mass (LBM), appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI), nutrition-related complications, and quality of life (QoL) were also analyzed. The intention-to-treat analysis of the 50 randomized patients showed that there was no significant difference in baseline characteristics. The weight (−2.03 ± 2.28 kg vs. −4.05 ± 3.13 kg, P = 0.012), BMI (−0.73 ± 0.79 kg/m2 vs. −1.48 ± 1.11 kg/m2, P = 0.008), and ASMI (−1.10 ± 0.37 kg/m2 vs. −1.60 ± 0.66 kg/m2, P = 0.010) loss of patients in the enhanced nutrition group were obviously decreased compared to the conventional nutrition group at POD30. In particular, LBM (48.90 ± 9.69 kg vs. 41.96 ± 9.37 kg, p = 0.031) and ASMI (7.56 ± 1.07 kg/m2 vs. 6.50 ± 0.97 kg/m2, P = 0.003) in the enhanced nutrition group were significantly higher compared to the conventional nutrition group at POD30, despite no significant change between pre- and postoperation. In addition, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 scores revealed that enhanced nutritional support improved the QoL of patients in physical function (75.13 ± 9.72 vs. 68.33 ± 7.68, P = 0.009) and fatigue symptom (42.27 ± 9.93 vs. 49.07 ± 11.33, P = 0.028) compared to conventional nutritional support. This pilot study demonstrated that an enhanced nutritional support pathway including extended preoperative nutritional support and HEN was feasible, safe, and might be beneficial to patients who underwent enhanced recovery after esophagectomy. An appropriately powered trial is warranted to confirm the efficacy of this approach.