1. Does working memory protect against auditory distraction in older adults?
- Author
-
Jeesun Kim, Chris Davis, and Yatin Mahajan
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Poison control ,Mismatch negativity ,lcsh:Geriatrics ,Audiology ,Electroencephalography ,behavioral disciplines and activities ,050105 experimental psychology ,Task (project management) ,03 medical and health sciences ,P3a ,0302 clinical medicine ,Distraction ,medicine ,Reaction Time ,Humans ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Oddball paradigm ,Aged ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Working memory ,business.industry ,05 social sciences ,Middle Aged ,lcsh:RC952-954.6 ,Memory, Short-Term ,Older adults ,Mental Recall ,Female ,Geriatrics and Gerontology ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,psychological phenomena and processes ,ERP ,Research Article - Abstract
BackgroundPast research indicates that when younger adults are engaged in a visual working memory task, they are less distracted by novel auditory stimuli than when engaged in a visual task that does not require working memory. The current study aimed to determine whether working memory affords the same protection to older adults.MethodWe examined behavioral and EEG responses in 16 younger and 16 older adults to distractor sounds when the listeners performed two visual tasks; one that required working memory (W1) and the other that did not (W0). Auditory distractors were presented in an oddball paradigm, participants were exposed to either standard tones (600 Hz: 80%) or various novel environmental sounds (20%).ResultsIt was found that: 1) when presented with novel vs standard sounds, older adults had faster correct response times in the W1 visual task than in the W0 task, indicating that they were less distracted by the novel sound; there was no difference in error rates. Younger adults did not show a task effect for correct response times but made slightly more errors when a novel sound was presented in the W1 task compared to the W0 task. 2) In older adults (but not the younger adults), the amplitude of N1 was smaller in the W1 condition compared to the W0 condition. 3) The working memory manipulation had no effect on MMN amplitude in older adults. 4) For the W1 compared to W0 task, the amplitude of P3a was attenuated for the older adults but not for the younger adults.ConclusionsThese results suggest that during the working memory manipulation older adults were able to engage working memory to reduce the processing of task-irrelevant sounds.
- Published
- 2020