1. Mycoplasma bovis infection in dairy herds-Risk factors and effect of control measures
- Author
-
Nella Vähänikkilä, Tiina Autio, Tarja Pohjanvirta, Sinikka Pelkonen, Erja Tuunainen, Heli Simojoki, Laura Kulkas, Timo Soveri, Vera Maria Haapala, Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Helsinki One Health (HOH), Ruminant health, University Management, Departments of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Agricultural Sciences, and Animal Science Research
- Subjects
Male ,Mycoplasma bovis ,Veterinary medicine ,Disease ,Biology ,medicine.disease_cause ,413 Veterinary science ,Polymerase Chain Reaction ,DISEASE ,control measure ,03 medical and health sciences ,Mammary Glands, Animal ,Risk Factors ,MASTITIS ,Genetics ,medicine ,Animals ,Mycoplasma Infections ,BULK TANK MILK ,Risk factor ,Mastitis, Bovine ,412 Animal science, dairy science ,Finland ,Dairy cattle ,030304 developmental biology ,0303 health sciences ,Dairy herds ,Risk of infection ,0402 animal and dairy science ,dairy cattle ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,medicine.disease ,040201 dairy & animal science ,3. Good health ,Mastitis ,PREVALENCE ,Dairying ,Milk ,risk factor ,416 Food Science ,Herd ,Cattle ,Female ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Food Science - Abstract
As Mycoplasma bovis spreads to new countries and becomes increasingly recognized as a disease with major welfare and economic effects, control measures on dairy farms are needed. To minimize the risk of infection spread to naive herds, all possible risk factors for M. bovis infection should be identified and controlled. Mycoplasma bovis was first diagnosed in dairy cattle in Finland in 2012, and by January 2020, 86 Finnish dairy farms (1.5%) supporting M. bovis infections were identified. We evaluated risk factors for M. bovis infection using a questionnaire provided to 40 infected and 30 control dairy farms. Control measures were advised for 19 of the infected dairy farms during visits by a veterinarian. The course of the infection on those farms was followed by analyzing calf nasal swabs with PCR for presence of M. bovis 4 times at 6-mo intervals. Control measures included culling of M. bovis mastitic cows, isolation of new calves from older animals after initial M. bovis mastitic cows had been culled, prevention of nose-to-nose contact with infected animals, early detection of mastitis cases using M. bovis PCR, and hygiene measures mainly related to milking, calf pens, feeding buckets, and teats. Farms implemented the control measures related to the isolation of calves or avoidance of nose-to-nose contact in various ways, according to farm structures and financial circumstances. In our study, the control measures recommended to the dairy farms appeared effective, such that 13 of 19 farms reached a low risk level during at least 3 consecutive negative samplings from calves, with no M. bovis mastitis detected subsequently. Among risk factors, insemination with an M. bovis-positive bull indicated a trend of increasing the odds of M. bovis infection on the farm in a multivariable logistic model. In contrast, higher herd average milk yield had an association with lower odds for M. bovis infection. Occurrence of other infectious diseases affecting several animals on the dairy farm in the previous 6 mo before M. bovis infection were more frequent on M. bovis-infected farms.
- Published
- 2021