Search

Testes were associated with maleness from antiquity, and ancient societies had fanciful myths about the origins of the sexes and about fetal sexual development. 17th century anatomists developed the concept that mammals developed from eggs and discovered sperm in semen; in 1878, Hertwig observed sperm entering eggs (of sea urchins), establishing the cellular basis of sex development. Individuals with atypical genitalia were known clinically in the 17th century, with much debate about their origins, but by the late 19th century it was generally accepted that gonads determined sex, and that sex determined gender role. Testosterone was isolated in 1935, and Alfred Jost showed that both circulating testosterone and diffusible anti-Mullerian hormone were needed for male development. Patients with apparent androgen insensitivity were reported in 1937 and shown to be unresponsive to exogenous androgen by Lawson Wilkins in 1957; androgen receptor mutations were reported in 1989. Steroidogenic errors were associated with differences in sex development (DSDs) starting in the 1940s, and finding mutations in the responsible enzymes explained many forms of hyper- and hypo-androgenism in both sexes. Sex chromosomes were identified in the early 20th century; Y was associated with maleness, and the responsible SRY gene was identified in 1991. Early efforts to manage patients with DSDs were confounded by philosophical perspectives on the relative roles of prenatal biology versus postnatal environment. Approaches to natal sex assignment evolved in the later 20th century and now emphasize a team approach based on data, not guessing, parental involvement, cultural considerations, and the acknowledgement of uncertainty.

This report of a 46,XY patient born with a micropenis consistent with etiology from isolated congenital growth hormone deficiency is used to (1) raise the question regarding what degree testicular testosterone exposure to the central nervous system during fetal life and early infancy has on the development of male gender identity, regardless of gender of rearing; (2) suggest the obligatory nature of timely full disclosure of medical history; (3) emphasize that virtually all 46,XY infants with functional testes and a micropenis should be initially boys except some with partial androgen insensitivity syndrome; and (4) highlight the sustaining value of a positive long-term relationship with a trusted physician (R.M.B.). When this infant presented, it was commonly considered inappropriate to gender assign an infant male whose penis was so small that an adult size was expected to be inadequate, even if the karyotype was 46,XY, and testes were functional. Concomitantly, female gender assignment was considered the appropriate decision, believing that parental rearing in the assigned gender was considered the major factor determining established adult gender identity. Full disclosure of medical information was considered inappropriate. Progress in appreciating the complexities of gender identity development, which is not yet completely understood, and sexuality, coping ability, and outcome data has resulted in a change of practice in initial gender assignment. A 46,XY individual with functional testes and verified androgen responsiveness should be assigned and reared as male, regardless of penis size. Without androgen responsiveness, the multiple factors must be carefully considered and disclosed.

Rearing a child with a chronic illness is stressful and can potentially affect parenting style, which may result in poorer outcomes for children. The purpose of this study was to compare parenting characteristics of female caregivers rearing children with a disorder of sex development (DSD) to female caregivers rearing children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Caregivers of both groups were matched according to age and compared on measures of stress and parenting practices. Both groups demonstrated significant levels of stress and negative parenting practices. Children with T1DM and male children with non-life-threatening DSD were perceived as more vulnerable by their caregivers. Better understanding of parenting experiences of female caregivers rearing children with DSD, particularly male children, will facilitate the development of individualized interventions to ameliorate negative parenting practices and stress, with the long-term goal of improved health outcomes for their children.

This review article answers three questions relevant to the medical management and care of individuals born with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS), partial androgen insensitivity syndrome (PAIS), or a micropenis: (1) Do any of these individuals reassign themselves from their initial gender assignment? (2) Do more reassign than the ones who do not? (3) Is there evidence of gender dysphoria in those who do not self-initiate reassignment? Reviewed were all articles on CAIS, PAIS, and micropenis cited in K. J. Zucker (1999) plus articles published through 2004. There were no documented cases of gender change in individuals with CAIS (N= 156 females) or micropenis (N= 89: 79 males, 10 females). Nine (9.1%) out of 99 individuals with PAIS changed gender. Thus, self-initiated gender reassignment was rare. Gender dysphoria also appears to be a rare occurrence. The best predictor of adult gender identity in CAIS, PAIS, and micropenis is initial gender assignment.

We determined whether the degree of genital malformation at birth in children with a disorder of sex development is related to subsequent caregiver distress, specifically symptoms of depression and anxiety.A total of 66 caregivers of children with disorders of sex development were recruited from 3 centers that specialize in disorders of sex development medicine. The caregivers completed the Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd Edition and the Beck Anxiety Inventory. The child's Prader score at birth was determined by the child's treating pediatric endocrinologist and/or pediatric urologist at each institution.Results from the current study revealed that for caregivers of male children, under masculinization of the child's genitals at birth was significantly related to higher levels of subsequent caregiver depression. In contrast, over masculinization of the genitals of female children at birth was unrelated to caregiver depression or anxiety.These findings suggest that caregivers of male children with disorders of sex development may be at increased risk for psychological distress and could benefit from family based psychosocial interventions.

Physicians and other providers are often confronted with difficult decisions in the area of disclosure. This article examines a hypothetical situation relevant to the practice of pediatric endocrinology. The parents of a child with a disorder of sex development (DSD) wish the physician to treat their child, but without revealing key medical information to the child. Herein, we will explore the legal and ethical responsibilities of a provider to disclose information to an under-age DSD patient and to provide insight on when and how to tell the patient.

We assessed the adult quality of life of five medical chart-selected genetic males (ages 29-34 years) assigned and reared as females due to ambiguity of the external genitalia. All five were treated following the traditional method proposed by John Money and colleagues in 1955, commonly referred to as the "optimal gender policy". The adult follow-up assessment included physical and endocrinological evaluation, completion of self-report questionnaires, and a semi-structured interview assessing gender identity, sexual experience and orientation. Quality of life domains assessed by questionnaire included health-related issues, satisfaction with health-care management, emotional distress, and relationship satisfaction. Vaginoplasty in four out of five patients was initially unsuccessful. Four patients had periodic lapses in adherence to hormone replacement therapy. Gender role behavior across development was masculine relative to norms for women. All participants reported a female gender identity without a history of gender dysphoria. The majority of participants (four of five) reported being sexually active and in long-term relationships (three heterosexual, one homosexual). Current emotional adaptation and health-related quality of life are within the normal range for four participants. Sex assignment of 46,XY individuals with ambiguous genitalia as females is compatible with a positive quality of life.

Management of infants born with ambiguous sex organs requires the close collaboration of a team of professionals: pediatric endocrinologist, pediatric psychologist, gynecologist, and surgeon. The interdisciplinary teamwork of a group of professionals is described in the case of a patient announced at birth as a male but within days reannounced and reared as a female. Over the next 21 years, she became completely aware of her endocrine condition, including its medical classification (male pseudohermaphroditism), her chromosomal (46 XY) and gonadal (testes) status, and her early history of male sex assignment. The clinical management described herein helped this person deal effectively with her condition despite unsuccessful reconstructive vagal surgery. Substantiation of this is provided by the patient's personal comments.

Four black and three whilte families have a male-to-female transexual member surgically reassigned more than 5 years ag. The black families were more open than the white in declaring the reassignment within the family and community. Thereby they relieved themselves and the transexual member of a need for deception, defiance, or defensiveness, and they were less scheming and manipulative. Without the anxiety of concealment, they could feel more positive about sex reassignment as a form of rehabilitation. A formal public declaration of sex reassignment, analogous to a declared change of citizenship, would be advantageous in transexual rehabilitation.