1. Measurement of bronchial hyperreactivity: comparison of three Nordic dosimetric methods
- Author
-
L. P. Malmberg, Britt-Marie Sundblad, Päivi Piirilä, Anssi Sovijärvi, Paul G. Lassmann-Klee, Department of Diagnostics and Therapeutics, HUS Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District, Helsinki University Hospital Area, HUS Inflammation Center, Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venereology, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Clinicum, and University of Helsinki
- Subjects
Male ,Clinical Biochemistry ,RESPONSIVENESS ,0302 clinical medicine ,methacholine ,Forced Expiratory Volume ,HISTAMINE ,Prospective Studies ,030212 general & internal medicine ,DEPOSITION ,Child ,Methacholine Chloride ,POPULATION ,Lung function ,Bronchial hyperreactivity ,education.field_of_study ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,3. Good health ,LUNG-FUNCTION ,METHACHOLINE PROVOCATION ,TESTS ,Female ,Bronchial Hyperreactivity ,REPEATABILITY ,medicine.drug ,Adult ,Adolescent ,Population ,Scandinavian and Nordic Countries ,Bronchial Provocation Tests ,03 medical and health sciences ,HYPERRESPONSIVENESS ,medicine ,Humans ,education ,provocative dose ,Aged ,Asthma ,Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ,business.industry ,asthma ,medicine.disease ,respiratory tract diseases ,030228 respiratory system ,Spirometry ,Case-Control Studies ,response-dose slope ,Immunology ,Methacholine ,3111 Biomedicine ,CHALLENGE ,business ,Deposition (chemistry) - Abstract
Clinical testing of bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) provides valuable information in asthma diagnostics. Nevertheless, the test results depend to a great extent on the testing procedure: test substance, apparatus and protocol. In Nordic countries, three protocols predominate in the testing field: Per Malmberg, Nieminen and Sovijarvi methods. However, knowledge of their equivalence is limited. We aimed to find equivalent provocative doses (PD) to obtain similar bronchoconstrictive responses for the three protocols. We recruited 31 patients with suspected asthma and health care workers and performed BHR testing with methacholine according to Malmberg and Nieminen methods, and with histamine according to Sovijarvi. We obtained the individual response-dose slopes for each method and predicted equivalent PD values. Applying a mixed-model, we found significant differences in the mean (standard error of mean) response-dose (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)%/mg): Sovijarvi 7.2 (1.5), Nieminen 13.8 (4.2) and Malmberg 26 (7.3). We found that the earlier reported cut-point values for moderate BHR and marked BHR between the Sovijarvi (PD15) and Nieminen (PD20) methods were similar, but with the Malmberg method a significant bronchoconstrictive reaction was measured with lower PD20 values. We obtained a relationship between slope values and PD (mg) between different methods, useful in epidemiological research and clinical practice.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF