Search

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with higher eosinophil counts are associated with increased clinical response to phosphodiesterase‐4‐inhibitors (PDE4i). However, the underlying inflammatory mechanisms associated with this increased response is not yet elucidated. This post hoc analysis focused on sputum gene expression in patients with chronic bronchitis who underwent 32‐day treatment with two doses of the inhaled PDE4i CHF6001 (tanimilast) or placebo on top of triple therapy. Biological characterization and treatment effects were assessed between patients with different sputum eosinophil levels (eosinophilhigh ≥ 3%; eosinophillow

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cardiovascular safety of two new inhaled fixed-dose combinations for treatment of asthma: (i) the inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta2-agonist (ICS/LABA) mometasone furoate/indacaterol acetate (MF/IND), (ii) the ICS/LABA/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) MF/IND/glycopyrronium bromide (GLY).METHODS: Patient-level data were pooled from four randomized trials, including 52-week studies PALLADIUM (n = 2216) and IRIDIUM (n = 3092), 24-week study ARGON (n = 1426), and 12-week study QUARTZ (n = 802). Cardio-/cerebrovascular (CCV) event frequencies were examined in the following comparisons: (1) LABA effect: pooled-dose MF/IND vs. pooled-dose MF; (2) LAMA effect: pooled-dose MF/IND/GLY vs. pooled-dose MF/IND; (3) ICS-dose effects: (a) high-dose MF/IND vs. medium-dose MF/IND, (b) high-dose MF/IND/GLY vs. medium-dose MF/IND/GLY; (4) intra-class effects: (a) high-dose MF/IND vs. Fluticasone/Salmeterol (F/S), (b) high-dose MF/IND/GLY vs. F/S + Tiotropium (TIO). Risk estimates (percentage of patients with ≥1 CCV event) and risk differences (RDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each comparison.RESULTS: The frequency of CCV events was low, without notable differences between comparison groups. Risk estimates and corresponding RDs (95% CIs) were as follows: (1) pooled-dose MF/IND = 2.35%, pooled-dose MF = 2.18%, RD = 0.17% (-1.00%, 1.34%); (2) pooled-dose MF/IND/GLY = 3.65%, pooled-dose MF/IND = 3.77%, RD = -0.12% (-1.63%, 1.39%); (3a) high-dose MF/IND = 3.69%, medium-dose MF/IND = 3.35%, RD = 0.34% (-1.25%, 1.94%); (3b) high-dose MF/IND/GLY = 2.84%, medium-dose MF/IND/GLY = 2.02%, RD = 0.82% (-0.49%, 2.13%); (4a) high-dose MF/IND = 3.69%, F/S = 2.82%, RD = 0.87% (-0.66%, 2.40%); (4b) high-dose MF/IND/GLY = 1.26%, F/S + TIO = 1.05%, RD = 0.21% (-1.26%, 1.68%).CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of increased cardiovascular risk attributable to the addition of IND to MF or addition of GLY to MF/IND. Similarly, no evidence of increased cardiovascular risk was observed with an increase in the ICS-dose or relative to F/S ± TIO.

Background The efficacy and safety of once-daily (o.d.) fixed-dose combination of indacaterol (IND), glycopyrronium (GLY) and mometasone furoate (MF) via Breezhaler® versus concurrent administration of salmeterol/fluticasone (SAL/FLU) twice-daily (b.i.d.) via Accuhaler®+Tiotropium (TIO) o.d. via Respimat® was evaluated in patients with uncontrolled asthma. Methods Patients (aged ≥18 years), symptomatic (Asthma Control Questionnaire [ACQ]-7 ≥1.5) despite treatment with long-acting β2-agonist/inhaled corticosteroid medium- or high-dose, received IND/GLY/MF high- (150/50/160 μg) or medium-dose (150/50/80 μg) o.d. or SAL/FLU high-dose (50/500 μg) b.i.d.+Tio 5 μg o.d. for 24 weeks. The primary objective was to confirm the non-inferiority of either dose of IND/GLY/MF to SAL/FLU high dose + TIO in terms of Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ). Additional endpoints: ACQ-7, lung function, health status (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ]), exacerbations, and safety after 24 weeks. Results IND/GLY/MF high- and medium-dose met the primary endpoint, confirming non-inferiority to SAL/FLU high dose + TIO for AQLQ (least square mean treatment difference [Δ]: 0.073 and −0.038, respectively; both p Conclusions IND/GLY/MF high- and medium-dose o.d. via a single inhaler were non-inferior to SAL/FLU high-dose b.i.d. + TIO o.d. via two inhalers for AQLQ. IND/GLY/MF high-dose o.d. improved lung function, asthma control and health status versus SAL/FLU high dose + TIO, while IND/GLY/MF medium-dose had comparable efficacy but at a corresponding lower steroid dose.

Background Although phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitors have been shown to reduce COPD exacerbation rate, their biological mechanism of action is not completely elucidated at the molecular level. We aimed to characterise the whole genome gene expression profile of the inhaled PDE4-inhibitor CHF6001 on top of triple therapy in sputum cells and whole blood of patients with COPD and chronic bronchitis. Methods Whole genome gene expression analysis was carried out by microarray in 54 patients before and after 32 days treatment with CHF6001 800 and 1600 μg and placebo twice daily (BID) in a randomised crossover study. Results CHF6001 had a strong effect in sputum, with 1471 and 2598 significantly differentially-expressed probe-sets relative to placebo (p-adjusted for False Discovery Rate 87%) were downregulated, including macrophage inflammatory protein-1-alpha and 1-beta, interleukin-27-beta, interleukin-12-beta, interleukin-32, tumour necrosis factor-alpha-induced-protein-8, ligand-superfamily-member-15, and matrix-metalloproteinases-7,12 and 14. The effect in blood was not significant. Conclusions Inhaled PDE4 inhibition by CHF6001 on top of triple therapy in patients with COPD and chronic bronchitis significantly modulated key inflammatory targets and pathways in the lung but not in blood. Mechanistically these findings support a targeted effect in the lung while minimising unwanted systemic class-effects. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov, EudraCT, 2015–005550-35. Registered 15 July 2016.

Background CHF6001 is a novel inhaled phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor. This Phase IIa study assessed the effects of CHF6001 on markers of inflammation in induced sputum and blood in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods This was a multicentre, three-period (each 32 days), three-way, placebo-controlled, double-blind, complete-block crossover study. Eligible patients had COPD, chronic bronchitis, and were receiving inhaled triple therapy for ≥2 months. Patients received CHF6001 800 or 1600 μg, or matching placebo twice daily via multi-dose dry-powder inhaler (NEXThaler). Induced sputum was collected pre-dose on Day 1, and post-dose on Days 20, 26 and 32. Blood was sampled pre-dose on Day 1, and pre- and post-dose on Day 32. Results Of 61 randomised patients, 54 (88.5%) completed the study. There were no significant differences between groups for overall sputum cell count, or absolute numbers of neutrophils, eosinophils or lymphocytes. CHF6001 800 μg significantly decreased the absolute number and percentage of macrophages vs placebo. In sputum, compared with placebo both CHF6001 doses significantly decreased leukotriene B4, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8, macrophage inflammatory protein 1β, matrix metalloproteinase 9, and tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα). In blood, both CHF6001 doses significantly decreased serum surfactant protein D vs placebo. CHF6001 1600 μg significantly decreased TNFα ex-vivo (after incubation with lipopolysaccharide). Conclusion The data from this study show that CHF6001 inhaled twice daily has anti-inflammatory effects in the lungs of patients with COPD already treated with triple inhaled therapy. Trial registration The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03004417). Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-019-1142-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Kai Michael Beeh,1 Anne-Marie Kirsten,2 Ana-Maria Tanase,3 Alexia Richard,3 Weihua Cao,4 Bettina Hederer,3 Jutta Beier,1 Oliver Kornmann,5 Richard N van Zyl-Smit6 1Insaf Respiratory Research Institute Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany; 2Pulmonary Research Institute at Lung Clinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany; 3Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 4Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA; 5IKF Pneumologie, Clinical Research Centre Respiratory Diseases, Frankfurt, Germany; 6Division of Pulmonology and UCT Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa Background and purpose: Fixed-dose combinations of a long-acting beta agonist and an inhaled corticosteroid are more effective than the individual components in COPD. The primary study objective was to demonstrate that the combination indacaterol acetate/mometasone furoate (IND/MF [QMF149]) was non-inferior to the twice-daily combination salmeterol xinafoate/fluticasone propionate (Sal/Flu) in terms of trough FEV1 at week 12 (day 85). Secondary objectives were to compare the efficacy of IND/MF (QMF149) vs Sal/Flu with respect to other lung function parameters, COPD exacerbations, symptoms and dyspnea, health status/health-related quality of life, and rescue medication use.Materials and methods: This was a 12-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, Phase II study in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD, who were randomized (1:1) to IND/MF (QMF149) (150/160 µg once daily; n=316) or Sal/Flu (50/500 µg twice daily; n=313).Results: Over 90% of patients completed the study: 94.6% in the IND/MF (QMF149) group and 92.0% in the Sal/Flu group. The primary objective of non-inferiority of IND/MF (QMF149) to Sal/Flu for trough FEV1 at week 12 (day 85) was met: the lower limit of the CI (95% CI: 27.7, 83.3 mL) was greater than -60 mL. The analysis for superiority of IND/MF (QMF149) to Sal/Flu demonstrated superiority of IND/MF (QMF149), with a difference of 56 mL (P

Background Global initiative for asthma (GINA) 2019 recommends adding a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) to an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) as a maintenance controller therapy in patients with inadequately controlled asthma. Indacaterol acetate (IND, a LABA) in combination with mometasone furoate (MF, an ICS) is under development for the treatment of these patients. Objective This phase III QUARTZ was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy and parallel-group study to assess the efficacy and safety of low-dose IND/MF 150/80 μg once daily (o.d.) versus MF 200 μg o.d. in adult and adolescent patients with inadequately controlled asthma. Methods Eligible patients (n = 802) were randomised (1:1) to receive either low-dose IND/MF 150/80 μg o.d. via Breezhaler® or MF 200 μg o.d. via Twisthaler® for 12 weeks. Primary endpoint was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and key secondary endpoint was Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) treatment difference after 12-week treatment. Other secondary endpoints included ACQ-7 responder analysis, morning and evening peak expiratory flow, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire total score, rescue medication use, daily symptom score, nighttime awakenings and rate of exacerbations, evaluated over 12-week treatment. Safety was also assessed including serious asthma outcomes. Results Low-dose IND/MF significantly improved trough FEV1 (least squares mean treatment difference [LSMTD]: 0.182 L; p Conclusion These results support the use of low-dose IND/MF 150/80 μg o.d. as a potential therapy for adult and adolescent patients with inadequately controlled asthma.

Phosphoinositide 3-kinase δ (PI3Kδ) is a lipid kinase involved in leukocyte recruitment and activation. Activation of PI3Kδ has been linked to airway inflammation and asthma pathogenesis. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study investigated the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of a PI3Kδ inhibitor, nemiralisib (GSK2269557), in patients with persistent, uncontrolled asthma. Patients (n = 50) received once-daily inhaled nemiralisib (1000 µg) or placebo for 28 days, with a crossover to the alternative treatment following a 4-week washout period. Spirometry demonstrated no discernible difference in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline (adjusted posterior median 7 ml; 95% credible interval -83, 102 ml) between nemiralisib and placebo treatment at day 28 (primary endpoint). These results were supported by most secondary endpoints, including weighted mean FEV1 (0-4 hours) and change in trough forced vital capacity at day 28. Nemiralisib was generally well-tolerated, with few side effects except for post-inhalation cough (nemiralisib: 35%; placebo: 9%). At day 14, sputum interleukin (IL)-5, IL-13, IL-6, and IL-8 levels were reduced by a median of 17%, 7%, 15%, and 8%, respectively, when comparing nemiralisib with placebo [n = 15 (IL-5, IL-8) or 16 (IL-6, IL-13); posterior probability of a true ratio >0%: 78%, 64%, 76%, and 63%, respectively]. These results suggest that nemiralisib inhibited PI3Kδ locally; however, this did not translate into meaningful clinical improvement. Further studies will investigate the potential efficacy of nemiralisib in patients with asthma with other specific more severe phenotypes, including those who are colonized with bacteria and frequently exacerbate.

GSK961081 is an inhaled bi-functional molecule with both muscarinic antagonism and β2-agonism (MABA) properties. This randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study evaluated 14 days treatment with the MABA GSK961081 400 μg and 1200 μg once daily and tiotropium 18 μg once daily plus salmeterol 50 μg twice daily (TIO + SAL), versus placebo in 50 patients with moderate COPD. The primary endpoint was forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at 24 h on Days 1 and 14. MABA 400 (n = 29), MABA 1200 (n = 32) and TIO + SAL (n = 41) resulted in significant increases in FEV1 over 24 h. Mean (95% CI) 24 h trough FEV1 (L) values relative to placebo (n = 43) were, for Day 1, MABA 400: 0.141 (0.060, 0.222); MABA 1200: 0.184 (0.105, 0.263); TIO + SAL: 0.162 (0.092, 0.231); for Day 14, MABA 400: 0.115 (0.024, 0.205); MABA 1200: 0.168 (0.080, 0.255); TIO + SAL: 0.103 (0.026, 0.180). Onset of bronchodilation was faster for both MABA doses versus TIO + SAL. No clinically relevant systemic pharmacodynamic effects were observed. Adverse events were similar across groups; however tremor (n = 2, MABA 1200), dysgeusia (n = 2, MABA 1200; n = 2, MABA 400) and dry mouth (n = 1, MABA 1200) were reported after GSK961081 only. GSK961081 demonstrated sustained bronchodilation similar to TIO + SAL, but with a more rapid onset, and was well tolerated at the tested doses.

Objective Mepolizumab is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that blocks human IL-5 from binding to the IL-5 receptor, which is mainly expressed on eosinophils. Eosinophils are key cells in the inflammatory cascade of various diseases, including asthma. This study investigated the pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) relationship between exposure of mepolizumab subcutaneous (SC) administration and blood eosinophil reduction compared with intravenous (IV) administration in adult subjects with asthma. Methods In this multi-center, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, repeat-dose study, 70 adult subjects received one of four possible treatment regimens: mepolizumab 12.5, 125, or 250 mg SC or 75 mg IV. In addition to analyzing the dose and PK/PD relationship, absolute bioavailability, safety, tolerability, and incidence of anti-mepolizumab antibodies were evaluated. Results Blood eosinophil levels decreased in a dose-dependent manner with the lowest (12.5 mg) dose clearly differentiating from the other doses. A non-linear inhibition Imax model based on blood eosinophil levels at week 12 identified that the SC doses providing 50% and 90% of maximal blood eosinophil inhibition were 11 mg (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.19 - 16.85) and 99 mg (95% CI: 47 - 152), respectively. The route of administration did not affect the exposure-response relationship. The estimated mepolizumab SC absolute bioavailability (arm) was 74% (90% CI: 54 - 102%). The safety profile of mepolizumab was favorable. Conclusions A dose-dependent reduction in blood eosinophils across all mepolizumab doses investigated was observed. The subcutaneous absolute bioavailability was 74%. The route of administration did not affect the mepolizumab exposure eosinophil response relationship.

SummaryForced inspiratory measures have been described to reflect the reduction in dyspnoea upon bronchodilation in severe COPD. Based on this we evaluated the applicability and usefulness of a portable device for the assessment of forced inspiration. In 37 patients with COPD (GOLD II/II/IV n = 16/15/6, mean ± SD FEV1 46.2 ± 15.4%pred) lung function was recorded prior to inhalation of 24 μg formoterol and 30 min later. Assessments comprised spirometry including forced inspiration, body plethysmography, maximum inspiratory flow (InCheck, Clement Clarke), and changes in dyspnoea via visual analogue scale (VAS). The sequence was repeated on a second day to assess reproducibility. Bronchodilation by formoterol was detectable in all functional indices (p

Omalizumab is a humanized monoclonal anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody indicated in Europe for the treatment of uncontrolled severe persistent allergic (IgE-mediated) asthma despite optimal therapy with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta(2) agonists. Between 2005 and 2007 280 patients (58% female, mean age 44+/-16 yrs., 46% on oral corticosteroids, median serum IgE level 235IU/ml) who met the EU criteria for add-on therapy with anti-IgE were treated prospectively with omalizumab by 134 physicians as part of a post-marketing surveillance trial and were followed-up for 6 months. The median follow-up time was 195 days, the patients were treated with a median dose of 450mg omalizumab every 4 weeks. After 6 months there was a marked effect of omalizumab treatment on daily (-76%) and nocturnal symptoms (-84%), exacerbations (-82%), unscheduled health care contacts (-81%), hospitalizations (-78%) and quality of life (Mini-AQLQ: score increase from 2.9 to 4.5). Overall, efficacy of omalizumab was rated as excellent or good by the majority of physicians (82%) and patients (86%). In 19 patients (7%) omalizumab-related adverse events were recorded. This post-marketing surveillance trial confirms the marked and clinically relevant effect of omalizumab on asthma symptoms and level of asthma control in the majority of patients with severe persistent allergic (IgE-mediated) asthma in a real-life situation.

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a LTB 4 receptor antagonist on inflammatory markers in induced sputum, in particular sputum neutrophilia, in ex-smokers with moderate stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The trial followed a double-blind, randomized, cross-over design including two treatment periods (4 weeks) separated by a 4-week washout period. Sputum inductions and lung function measurements were carried out at the beginning of each period, and after 2 and 4 weeks. Twenty-four patients were included (18/6 m/f; mean (±S.D.) age 64±5 years; FEV 1 57±10% predicted); the per-protocol population comprised 17 patients. No significant differences occurred between LTB019 and placebo regarding the percentage of sputum neutrophils (treatment means, 68.0% vs. 69.3%), total cell count (in units of 10 6 /mL, log e of treatment means: 1.56 vs. 1.27), or the levels of MPO, IL-8, and TNF-α. There were also no differences in FEV 1 , FVC, or the use of rescue medication. We therefore conclude that a 4-week treatment with LTB019 had no effect on sputum neutrophil numbers and related cytokine levels in these patients, despite the plasma concentrations achieved being similar to those shown to prevent the ex vivo LTB 4 -induced upregulation of CD11b/18 on neutrophils. The present data suggest that LTB 4 antagonism by LTB019 is not a promising therapeutic approach for attenuating chronic airway neutrophilia, at least in patients with moderate COPD.

Background: Indacaterol is an inhaled, once-daily, ultra-long-acting beta(2)-agonist for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We report on the effectiveness of indacaterol and other bronchodilators compared with placebo in patients across the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2011 categories A to D.Methods: A post-hoc, subgroup pooled analysis of 6-month efficacy data from three randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies involving 3862 patients was performed across GOLD 2011 categories A to D, according to baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) % predicted, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, and exacerbation history in the 12 months prior to entry. Efficacy of once-daily indacaterol 150 and 300 mu g, open-label tiotropium 18 mu g, twice-daily salmeterol 50 mu g, and formoterol 12 mu g was compared with placebo. End points analysed were trough FEV1, transition dyspnea index (TDI), and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score, all at Week 26, and mean rescue medication use over 26 weeks.Results: Indacaterol 150 and 300 mu g significantly improved FEV1, compared with placebo across all GOLD groups. Indacaterol 150 and 300 jig also significantly improved TDI, SGRQ total score, and mean rescue medication use compared with placebo across most GOLD subgroups.Conclusions: Treatment selection according to patient's symptoms as well as lung function is an important consideration in maintenance treatment of COPD. Indacaterol 150 and 300 mu g effectively improved lung function and symptoms in patients across all GOLD 2011 categories. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Background: Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are highly prevalent chronic diseases characterized by airflow limitation. Both diseases have a distinct pathogenesis and require unique treatment approaches. Due to some common characteristic traits, asthma and COPD are often lumped together in clinical practice. We sought to develop a simple questionnaire for the distinction of asthma and COPD.Methods: Clinical discriminants of asthma and COPD were retrospectively identified by multiple logistic regression using files from 547 consecutive adult patients presenting to a pulmonary specialist practice with a diagnosis of asthma or COPD. With these features, we generated a simple quantitative questionnaire supporting a diagnosis of COPD with high scores and asthma with low scores (range 0–15 points). Questionnaire results were compared with physician's diagnosis based on GINA and GOLD guidelines including skin tests, spirometry and reversibility data.Results: 210 patients had COPD and 337 had asthma. Age of onset, smoking history, atopy status, and cough quality were significantly associated with a diagnosis of asthma or COPD. Questionnaire scores for COPD patients were higher than those for asthmatics (mean score 10.5±0.18 vs. 4±0.12, P

Background: Neutrophilic inflammation is a major feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and several novel therapies aim at the suppression of neutrophils in COPD. Due to the abundance and redundancy of mediators involved in neutrophilic inflammation, there is an ongoing controversy about the feasibility of such anti-neutrophilic approaches. Systemic chemotherapy has broad side effects, including neutrophil toxicity. Objectives: In this observational study, we have measured cellular and neutrophil-related inflammatory markers in induced sputum of COPD patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: 15 COPD/NSCLC patients were followed during their first course of chemotherapy with cisplatin (60 mg/m2 days 1 and 7) and etoposide (100 mg/m2 days 3, 4, and 5). Sputum induction was performed before, and 3 weeks after chemotherapy. Peripheral blood count, sputum total cells and differentials, and the concentrations of the inflammatory markers interleukin (IL)-8, and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 in sputum supernatant were analyzed. Results: Similar to COPD controls (n = 12), COPD/NSCLC patients had increased levels of absolute and relative sputum neutrophils, IL-8, and MMP-9 at baseline, when compared with healthy controls (n = 14, p < 0.001, all comparisons). After chemotherapy, there was a significant reduction in peripheral blood leukocytes (pre: 10,736 ± 550, post: 6,536 ± 1,064 cells/µl, p = 0.002) and log neutrophils (pre: 8.9 ± 0.09, post: 8.1 ± 0.2 cells/µl, p = 0.004), whereas log sputum neutrophils (pre: 0.3 ± 0.37, post: 0.18 ± 0.3 cells × 106/ml, p = 0.1) , IL-8 (pre 15.9 ± 3.8, post: 17.7 ± 3.6 ng/ml, p = 0.7), and log MMP-9 (pre: 5.3 ± 0.57, post: 5.6 ± 0.7 ng/ml, p = 0.33) remained unchanged. Conclusion: A single course of platinum-based chemotherapy markedly decreases peripheral blood neutrophils, but has no effect on inflammatory patterns of induced sputum in COPD patients with unresectable NSCLC.

Background: In patients with allergic rhinitis, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and airway inflammation may increase during pollen exposure. BHR can be assessed by adenosine-5′-monophosphate (AMP) or methacholine challenge. It has been suggested that BHR to AMP is more closely related to airway inflammation than BHR to methacholine. Seasonal allergic rhinitis offers a dynamic model to study changes in BHR and airway inflammation during natural allergen exposure. Methods: We measured BHR [provocative concentration causing a 20% fall (PC20) in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)] to AMP and methacholine, and induced sputum cells in 16 rhinitis patients before and during the 2001 grass pollen season. Results: There was a decrease in PC20 methacholine during pollen exposure (geometric mean PC20 from 3.22 to 1.73 mg/ml, p = 0.0023), whereas no reduction was observed for PC20 AMP (p = 0.11). There was no increase in sputum eosinophils [pre: 0.69% (95% confidence interval 0.22–2.07); during: 1.85 (0.55– 5.6), p = 0.31]. Although the correlation of log PC20 methacholine and log PC20 AMP at baseline was good (r = 0.76, p = 0.001), individual seasonal changes (doubling concentrations) in PC20 methacholine were not correlated with changes in PC20 AMP (ρ = 0.21, p = 0.44). There was no correlation between baseline log PC20 methacholine or seasonal changes in PC20 methacholine and sputum eosinophils (p > 0.12, all correlations). In contrast, there was a significant correlation between seasonal changes in PC20 AMP and changes in sputum eosinophils (ρ = –0.59, p = 0.025). Conclusions: These data show dissimilarity between seasonal changes in PC20 AMP and methacholine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Moreover, PC20 AMP seems to be more closely related to sputum eosinophils than PC20 methacholine. The clinical significance of this discrepancy is unclear.

The efficacy and safety of inhaled long-acting β(2)-adrenergic agonists in asthmatic patients with the B16-Arg/Arg genotype has been questioned, and the use of antimuscarinics has been proposed as an alternative in patients whose symptoms are not controlled by inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs).We compared the efficacy and safety of the long-acting anticholinergic tiotropium with salmeterol and placebo added to an ICS in B16-Arg/Arg patients with asthma that was not controlled by ICSs alone.In a double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled trial, after a 4-week run-in period with 50 μg of twice-daily salmeterol administered through a metered-dose inhaler, 388 asthmatic patients were randomized 1:1:1 to 16 weeks of treatment with 5 μg of Respimat tiotropium administered daily in the evening, 50 μg of salmeterol administered twice daily through a metered-dose inhaler, or placebo. Patients aged 18 to 67 years demonstrated reversibility to bronchodilators, and their symptoms were uncontrolled by regular ICSs (400-1000 μg of budesonide/equivalent). ICS regimens were maintained throughout the trial. The mean weekly morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) before randomization was 358 ± 115.7 L/min (range, 80.3-733.0 L/min).Changes in weekly PEF from the last week of the run-in period to the last week of treatment (primary end point: change in PEF) were -3.9 ± 4.87 L/min (n = 128) for tiotropium and -3.2 ± 4.64 L/min (n = 134) for salmeterol, and these were superior to placebo (-24.6 ± 4.84 L/min, n = 125, P .05). Tiotropium was noninferior to salmeterol (estimated difference, -0.78 L/min [95% CI, -13.096 to 11.53]; P = .002; α = .025, 1-sided; noninferiority, 20 L/min). Tiotropium and salmeterol were numerically superior to placebo in some patient-reported secondary outcomes. Adverse events were comparable across treatments.Tiotropium was more effective than placebo and as effective as salmeterol in maintaining improved lung function in B16-Arg/Arg patients with moderate persistent asthma. Safety profiles were comparable.

Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) is used as a surrogate marker to monitor eosinophilic airway inflammation, assist in diagnosis, and support treatment decisions for asthma patients. The aim of this study was to compare five NO analysers: Medisoft (M), Aerocrine Niox (N), Aerocrine Niox flex (NF), Aerocrino Niox mino (NM) and EcoMedics (E).In 85 subjects (25 asthma patients, 25 COPD patients, 35 healthy volunteers; median age 36.5 years, range 23-79, 47% female), three NO measurements per individual were performed, using each analyser according to the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines. Subjects evaluated the devices on the basis of comfort and ease of performing the measurement.Median NO concentrations were 24.8 parts per billion (ppb) (range 6.3-262.7) for M, 14.5 ppb (0.0-196.6) for N, 15.2 ppb (5.6-67.7) for NF, 16.3 ppb (5.0-208.3) for NM, and 13.1 ppb (4.0-103.0) for E. There was significant correlation among the absolute NO values measured with all the devices (0.743 for M vs NFr0.979 for N vs NF). Bland-Altman plots suggested an acceptable degree of agreement among the results obtained with the three Niox analysers. Measurements obtained with the Medisoft and Ecomedics analysers were not directly comparable with those obtained with the other devices. The greatest differences in absolute NO levels for individual patients were between measurements with the M and E analysers (8.3 ppb, range 27.4-159.7, P0.001). Acceptance of the measurements by patients was high, independent of the device used.Exhaled NO values obtained with different devices were not directly comparable and may differ to a clinically relevant extent, depending on which device is used.

Indacaterol is a novel, inhaled, once-daily, ultra-long-acting β(2)-agonist bronchodilator recently approved in Europe for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of indacaterol compared with placebo and the twice-daily β(2)-agonist, salmeterol, as an active control. Patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomised to 6 months double-blind treatment with indacaterol (150 μg once daily), salmeterol (50 μg twice daily) or placebo. The primary efficacy end-point was trough (24 h post-dose) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) after 12 weeks. 1,002 patients were randomised and 838 (84%) completed the study. Indacaterol increased trough FEV(1) at week 12 by 170 mL over placebo (p

This dose-ranging study assessed the bronchodilator efficacy and tolerability of indacaterol, a novel once-daily inhaled beta2-agonist, in subjects clinically diagnosed with COPD. Comparative data with tiotropium were collected. In the double-blind, core period of the study, 635 subjects with COPD (prebronchodilator FEV(1)40% of predicted and > or =1.0L; FEV1/FVC

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a disease of unknown etiology. Biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage studies have shown, that accumulation of inflammatory cells, particularily neutrophils, in the alveolar space is a relevant feature of the pathogenesis of IPF. This paper adresses the issue of whether the safe and non-invasive method of sputum induction is a suitable tool to study respiratory tract inflammation in IPF.In a cross-sectional analysis, 15 IPF patients and 14 healthy, non-smoking subjects underwent sputum induction. Total sputum cell counts, differentials, and the amount of interleukin (IL)-8, granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and soluble ICAM-1 (sICAM) in sputum supernatant were analyzed.IPF patients had increased sputum neutrophils (60 +/- 6 vs 22 +/- 3%, p = 0.0003), and supernatant concentrations of IL-8 (19 +/- 3 vs. 7 +/- 1 ng/ml, p = 0.0002), GM-CSF (205 +/- 43 vs. 122 +/- 36 pg/ml, p = 0.08) and sICAM (12 +/- 3 vs. 5 +/- 3 ng/ml, p = 0.01), when compared with healthy controls. Sputum IL-8 was correlated with sputum neutrophils (rho = 0.61, p = 0.0006) in all patients. The extent of sputum neutrophilia was also correlated with lung function impairment (vital capacity, % of predicted) in IPF patients (rho = -0.68, p = 0.007).These data confirm the established role of neutrophilic inflammation in the pathogenesis of IPF, and show the potential of induced sputum to directly study inflammatory processes and surrogate markers in interstitial lung diseases like IPF.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a disease of unknown aetiology. Increased oxidant burden and antioxidant, e.g. glutathione (GSH), deficiency in the lower respiratory tract have been thought to play a role in the progression of IPF. Sputum induction is a safe noninvasive tool to study inflammation in the respiratory tract. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the direct measurement of GSH in induced sputum supernatant. Sixteen IPF patients and 15 healthy, nonsmoking subjects underwent sputum induction. Total GSH in sputum, saliva and plasma was measured spectrophotometrically. Sputum GSH was decreased more then four-fold in IPF patients when compared to healthy subjects (mean GSH 1.4+/-0.34 microM versus 5.8+/-0.98 microM). Salivary GSH was generally low or undetectable in all subjects. Plasma GSH levels were lower in IPF patients (0.26+/-0.1 versus 0.74+/-0.16 microM). In IPF patients, there was a borderline correlation of sputum GSH levels with disease duration and lung-function impairment. These data confirm the established role of oxidant/antioxidant imbalance in the pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and show the potential of induced sputum to directly study inflammatory processes and surrogate markers in interstitial lung diseases like idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

James F Donohue1, Dave Singh2, Oliver Kornmann3, David Lawrence4, Cheryl Lassen4, Benjamin Kramer5 1University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; 2University of Manchester, Medicines Evaluation Unit, Manchester, UK; 3IKF Pneumologie GmbH and Co KG, Clinical Research Centre Respiratory Diseases, Frankfurt, Germany; 4Novartis Horsham Research Centre, Horsham, UK; 5Novartis Pharmaceuticals Inc, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA Purpose: Pooled data were analyzed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of indacaterol, a once-daily inhaled long-acting ß2-agonist for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Patients and methods: Data were pooled from clinical studies of 3–12 months’ duration in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD receiving double-blind indacaterol 75 µg (n = 449), 150 µg (n = 2611), 300 µg (n = 1157), or 600 µg once daily (n = 547); formoterol 12 µg twice daily (n = 556); salmeterol 50 µg twice daily (n = 895); placebo (n = 2012); or tiotropium 18 µg once daily, given open label or blinded (n = 1214). Outcomes were adverse events, serious adverse events and deaths, plasma potassium, blood glucose, and QTc interval and vital signs. Results: The commonest adverse events with indacaterol were COPD worsening, nasopharyngitis, and headache; most cases were mild or moderate and incidence was generally similar to placebo and other active treatments. The risk of acute respiratory serious adverse events (leading to hospitalization, intubation, or death) was not significantly increased with any of the active treatments compared with placebo. COPD exacerbation rates (analyzed in the intent-to-treat population) were significantly reduced with all active treatments versus placebo. Hazard ratios versus placebo for major cardiovascular adverse events were

SummaryBackgroundIndacaterol is a once-daily, long-acting β2-agonist bronchodilator that improves dyspnoea and health status in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. While its bronchodilator effects have been shown to be maintained in different patient subgroups, effects on clinical outcomes in certain subgroups are not yet defined.MethodsPost-hoc analysis of pooled clinical study data to investigate efficacy and safety of indacaterol compared with placebo and other long-acting bronchodilators (formoterol, salmeterol, open-label tiotropium) in patient subgroups defined by COPD severity (GOLD stage II or III; n = 4082) and ICS use at baseline (no/yes; n = 4088). Efficacy outcomes were trough (24-h post-dose) FEV1, dyspnoea (transition dyspnoea index; TDI) and health status (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire; SGRQ) after 26 weeks.ResultsAll active treatments significantly improved trough FEV1 and dyspnoea compared with placebo, and all apart from open-label tiotropium improved health status compared with placebo. Among active treatments, indacaterol 150 μg had the best overall efficacy profile in the GOLD II and no-ICS subgroups. In the GOLD III and ICS subgroups, indacaterol 300 μg had the best overall efficacy, including a marked effect on dyspnoea (1.4-point improvement in TDI total score vs. placebo; p

Background: Matrix-metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their inhibitors, the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), are involved in the turnover of extracellular matrix. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) are inflammatory diseases characterized by excessive matrix degradation and tissue fibrosis. We have compared sputum concentrations of MMP-9, TIMP-1 and the controlling cytokine tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha in patients with COPD, IPF and healthy subjects. Methods: In a cross-sectional analysis, 12 patients with stable COPD, 15 patients with IPF and 14 healthy subjects underwent sputum induction. Induced sputum cells were counted and concentrations of MMP-9, TIMP-1 and TNF were measured by enzyme immunoassays. Results: Sputum neutrophils were markedly elevated in COPD and IPF patients compared with controls (P0.2, all comparisons). MMP-9 concentrations were negatively correlated with airway obstruction (FEV1%FVC) in COPD (rho=−0.62, P=0.03), but not with diffusion capacity or vital capacity (% predicted) in IPF (rho=−0.06, P=0.85, and rho=−0.3, P=0.29, respectively). MMP-9 was positively correlated with sputum neutrophils in all patients (rho=0.68, P