1. Feasibility of a novel laparoscopic technique with unidirectional knotless barbed sutures for the primary closure of duodenal ulcer perforation
- Author
-
Eun-Jin Song, Jung-Woo Woo, Jae Yool Jang, Sang-Ho Jeong, Tae-Han Kim, Jin-Kwon Lee, Ji-Ho Park, Ju-Yeon Kim, Sang-Kyung Choi, Woo-Song Ha, Woohyung Lee, Young-Joon Lee, Taejin Park, Seung-Jin Kwag, Soon-Chan Hong, Eun-Jung Jung, Chi-Young Jeong, and Young-Tae Ju
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Peptic ,Operative Time ,03 medical and health sciences ,Primary repair ,Postoperative Complications ,0302 clinical medicine ,Humans ,Operation time ,Medicine ,Complication rate ,Duodenal ulcer perforation ,Retrospective Studies ,Sutures ,business.industry ,Equipment Design ,Middle Aged ,Surgery ,Barbed suture ,Duodenal Ulcer ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Peptic Ulcer Perforation ,Feasibility Studies ,Female ,Laparoscopy ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,business ,Complication ,Abdominal surgery - Abstract
Laparoscopic primary repair is one of the main procedures used for perforated gastric ulcers, and this technique requires reproducible and secure suturing. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a novel continuous suture method with barbed sutures during laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcers. Clinical data from 116 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcers were collected between November 2009 and October 2015. Continuous suturing with 15-cm-long unidirectional absorbable barbed sutures was used for laparoscopic repair in the study group, termed group V (n = 51). Patients who underwent laparoscopic repair with conventional interrupted sutures were defined as group C (n = 65). The complication and operative data were compared between groups. Although there was no difference between group V and group C in the overall complication rate (15.7% vs. 24.6%; p = 0.259), the complication rate related to suturing was lower (3.9% vs. 15.4%; p = 0.04) in group V. Group V showed rates of 0% for leakage, 2% for intra-abdominal fluid collection, and 2% for stricture; the corresponding rates in group C were 3.1, 7.7, and 4.6%, respectively. Regarding operative data, the total operation time (V vs. C, 87.7 min vs. 131.2 min), total suture time (7.1 min vs. 25.3 min), and suture time per stitch (1.2 min vs. 6.2 min) were significantly shorter in group V than in group C (p
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF