Search

This article presents the construction of a chain of care of perinatal psychiatric situations within the University Service of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, which evolved within the framework of the departmentalization of this service. This chain of care includes the psychiatry of the liaison, the outpatient clinics as well as and day hospital care and extends from the prenatal period to the child's five years, with a focus on the relationship between child and caregivers, as well as an individual perspective on the child. Herein, we present and describe the different units and their functioning emphasizing the synergies and collaborations put in place that ensure the best possible continuity for patients and their families by promoting as much as possible the therapeutic alliance in this chain of care.Cet article présente la mise en place d’une filière de soins pour la prise en charge des situations de psychiatrie périnatale au sein du Service universitaire de psychiatrie de l’enfant et de l’adolescent, qui prend place dans le cadre de la départementalisation de ce service. Cette filière de soins comprend des prises en charge de liaison, en ambulatoire et en hôpital de jour, et s’étend de la période prénatale aux 5 ans de l’enfant, en se focalisant sur les aspects relationnels parents-bébé mais également sur l’enfant en tant qu’individu. Les différents lieux de prise en charge sont présentés et chacun de leur mode de fonctionnement est décrit. Cet article insiste sur l’importance capitale d’une articulation et d’une collaboration étroite entre les différents lieux de prise en charge afin d’assurer la meilleure continuité possible des soins pour les patients et leur famille en favorisant au maximum l’alliance thérapeutique.

This study examines the attachment quality and how this changed over time among infants who had cleft lip and palate (CLP), by conducting a prospective longitudinal study addressing the effects of this type of perinatal event on the parent-infant relationship and the emotional development of the infants. At 12 months of age, the Strange Situation Paradigm (SSP; M. Ainsworth, M.C. Blehar, E. Waters,T. Wall, 1978) was administered to a sample of 38 CLP infants (born between 2003 and 2010) and 17 healthy controls. At 4 years of age, the Attachment Story Completion Task (ASCT; I. Bretherton, D. Ridgeway,J. Cassidy, 1990) was administered to 32 individuals from the CLP sample and 14 from the control group. As reported in the literature, CLP infants display secure attachment behaviors as frequently as do control infants (55%). However, a more detailed analysis of the attachment scales revealed that CLP infants show more avoidance and less proximity seeking. In addition, a closer examination of the subcategories of attachment styles revealed that most CLP infants (71%) displayed distal attachment strategies such as the B1/B2 or A1/A2 subcategories. At 4 years old, CLP infants clearly displayed more deactivation and less security than did the control sample. Moreover, when detailing the evolution of attachment individually, almost 60% of the CLP children showing distal strategies at 12 months became deactivated or disorganized when they reached 4 years. Indeed, subtle differences in attachment behaviors at 12 months old-which can be considered marginally secure at that age-may reveal attachment vulnerabilities, which seem to be more apparent over the course of development.

ObjectiveThe announcement, prenatally or at birth, of a cleft lip and/or palate represents a challenge for the parents. The purpose of this study is to identify parental working internal models of the child (parental representations of the child and relationship in the context of attachment theory) and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in mothers of infants born with a cleft.MethodThe study compares mothers with a child born with a cleft (n = 22) and mothers with a healthy infant (n = 36).ResultsThe study shows that mothers of infants with a cleft more often experience insecure parental working internal models of the child and more posttraumatic stress symptoms than mothers of the control group. It is interesting that the severity or complexity of the cleft is not related to parental representations and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. The maternal emotional involvement, as expressed in maternal attachment representations, is higher in mothers of children with a cleft who had especially high posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, as compared with mothers of children with a cleft having fewer posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms.DiscussionMothers of children with a cleft may benefit from supportive therapy regarding parent-child attachment, even when they express low posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms.