1. The 'Benefits' of Distractibility: Mechanisms Underlying Increased Stroop Effects in Schizophrenia
- Author
-
D M, Barch, C S, Carter, P C, Hachten, M, Usher, and J D, Cohen
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ,Psychosis ,Psychometrics ,Cognitive disorder ,Information processing ,Neutral stimulus ,Neuropsychological Tests ,Stimulus (physiology) ,medicine.disease ,behavioral disciplines and activities ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,mental disorders ,Color term ,Reaction Time ,Schizophrenia ,medicine ,Facilitation ,Humans ,Attention ,Female ,Psychology ,Cognitive psychology ,Stroop effect - Abstract
Recent studies of selective attention in schizophrenia patients suggest a particular pattern of single-trial Stroop performance: increased facilitation but not interference in reaction times (RTs), combined with increased error interference. Our Stroop task analysis suggests that this pattern can be explained by a selective attention deficit if one accounts for (1) performance in the congruent condition; (2) the nature of the neutral stimulus; (3) the relationship between accuracy and RT; and (4) response set effects. To test these hypotheses, we examined Stroop performance in 40 DSM-IV schizophrenia patients and 20 healthy control subjects, using a range of neutral stimuli (color patches, noncolor words, color words not in the response set). The findings confirmed several of our predictions and the results were consistent with the hypothesis that abnormal Stroop performance in schizophrenia reflects a failure to adequately attend to the task-appropriate stimulus dimension (color). This inattention affects both the congruent and incongruent conditions and multiple points in the information processing pathway.
- Published
- 1999
- Full Text
- View/download PDF