Author: "Cook, Linda S." / Topic: female - Searchworks@Jio Institute Digital Library Search Results

Your search keyword '"Cook, Linda S."' showing total 95 results

Start Over Author "Cook, Linda S." Topic female

95 results on '"Cook, Linda S."'

1. Racial and ethnic differences in epithelial ovarian cancer risk: an analysis from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium

Author: Meagher, Nicola S, White, Kami K, Wilkens, Lynne R, Bandera, Elisa V, Berchuck, Andrew, Carney, Michael E, Cramer, Daniel W, Cushing-Haugen, Kara L, Jordan, Susan, Kaufmann, Scott H, Le, Nhu D, Pike, Malcolm C, Riggan, Marjorie, Qin, Bo, Rothstein, Joseph H, Titus, Linda, Winham, Stacey J, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Doherty, Jennifer A, Goode, Ellen L, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Risch, Harvey A, Webb, Penelope M, Cook, Linda S, Goodman, Marc T, Harris, Holly R, Le Marchand, Loic, McGuire, Valerie, Pharoah, Paul DP, Sarink, Danja, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Sieh, Weiva, Terry, Kathryn L, Thompson, Pamela J, Whittemore, Alice S, Wu, Anna H, Peres, Lauren C, and Merritt, Melissa A
Subjects: Epidemiology, Health Sciences, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Minority Health, Prevention, Women's Health, Humans, Female, Ovarian Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Risk Factors, Adult, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, Case-Control Studies, Aged, Sterilization, Tubal, Parity, Asian, White People, Hispanic or Latino, United States, Contraceptives, Oral, Logistic Models, Smoking, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ethnicity, Odds Ratio, ovarian cancer, risk factors, race, ethnicity, Mathematical Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences
Abstract: Limited estimates exist on risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) in Asian, Hispanic, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander women. Participants in this study included 1734 Asian (n = 785 case and 949 control participants), 266 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (n = 99 case and 167 control participants), 1149 Hispanic (n = 505 case and 644 control participants), and 24 189 White (n = 9981 case and 14 208 control participants) from 11 studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for risk associations by race and ethnicity. Heterogeneity in EOC risk associations by race and ethnicity (P ≤ .02) was observed for oral contraceptive (OC) use, parity, tubal ligation, and smoking. We observed inverse associations with EOC risk for OC use and parity across all groups; associations were strongest in Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and Asian women. The inverse association for tubal ligation with risk was most pronounced for Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander participants (odds ratio (OR) = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13-0.48) compared with Asian and White participants (OR = 0.68 [95% CI, 0.51-0.90] and OR = 0.78 [95% CI, 0.73-0.85], respectively). Differences in EOC risk factor associations were observed across racial and ethnic groups, which could be due, in part, to varying prevalence of EOC histotypes. Inclusion of greater diversity in future studies is essential to inform prevention strategies. This article is part of a Special Collection on Gynecological Cancers.
Published: 2024

2. Concurrent RB1 Loss and BRCA Deficiency Predicts Enhanced Immunologic Response and Long-term Survival in Tubo-ovarian High-grade Serous Carcinoma

Author: Saner, Flurina AM, Takahashi, Kazuaki, Budden, Timothy, Pandey, Ahwan, Ariyaratne, Dinuka, Zwimpfer, Tibor A, Meagher, Nicola S, Fereday, Sian, Twomey, Laura, Pishas, Kathleen I, Hoang, Therese, Bolithon, Adelyn, Traficante, Nadia, Group, for the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Alsop, Kathryn, Christie, Elizabeth L, Kang, Eun-Young, Nelson, Gregg S, Ghatage, Prafull, Lee, Cheng-Han, Riggan, Marjorie J, Alsop, Jennifer, Beckmann, Matthias W, Boros, Jessica, Brand, Alison H, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Carney, Michael E, Coulson, Penny, Courtney-Brooks, Madeleine, Cushing-Haugen, Kara L, Cybulski, Cezary, El-Bahrawy, Mona A, Elishaev, Esther, Erber, Ramona, Gayther, Simon A, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Gilks, C Blake, Harnett, Paul R, Harris, Holly R, Hartmann, Arndt, Hein, Alexander, Hendley, Joy, Hernandez, Brenda Y, Jakubowska, Anna, Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes, Jones, Michael E, Kaufmann, Scott H, Kennedy, Catherine J, Kluz, Tomasz, Koziak, Jennifer M, Kristjansdottir, Björg, Le, Nhu D, Lener, Marcin, Lester, Jenny, Lubiński, Jan, Mateoiu, Constantina, Orsulic, Sandra, Ruebner, Matthias, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Shah, Mitul, Sharma, Raghwa, Sherman, Mark E, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Soong, T Rinda, Steed, Helen, Sukumvanich, Paniti, Talhouk, Aline, Taylor, Sarah E, Vierkant, Robert A, Wang, Chen, Widschwendter, Martin, Wilkens, Lynne R, Winham, Stacey J, Anglesio, Michael S, Berchuck, Andrew, Brenton, James D, Campbell, Ian, Cook, Linda S, Doherty, Jennifer A, Fasching, Peter A, Fortner, Renée T, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Huntsman, David G, Karlan, Beth Y, Kelemen, Linda E, Menon, Usha, Modugno, Francesmary, Pharoah, Paul DP, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Sundfeldt, Karin, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Goode, Ellen L, DeFazio, Anna, Köbel, Martin, Ramus, Susan J, Bowtell, David DL, and Garsed, Dale W
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Immunology, Genetics, Women's Health, Rare Diseases, Orphan Drug, Cancer Genomics, Ovarian Cancer, Precision Medicine, Human Genome, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Humans, Female, Ovarian Neoplasms, BRCA2 Protein, BRCA1 Protein, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Retinoblastoma Binding Proteins, Prognosis, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Neoplasm Grading, Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating, Middle Aged, Germ-Line Mutation, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Aged, Biomarkers, Tumor, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Clinical sciences, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate RB1 expression and survival across ovarian carcinoma histotypes and how co-occurrence of BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) alterations and RB1 loss influences survival in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC).Experimental designRB1 protein expression was classified by immunohistochemistry in ovarian carcinomas of 7,436 patients from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. We examined RB1 expression and germline BRCA status in a subset of 1,134 HGSC, and related genotype to overall survival (OS), tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes, and transcriptomic subtypes. Using CRISPR-Cas9, we deleted RB1 in HGSC cells with and without BRCA1 alterations to model co-loss with treatment response. We performed whole-genome and transcriptome data analyses on 126 patients with primary HGSC to characterize tumors with concurrent BRCA deficiency and RB1 loss.ResultsRB1 loss was associated with longer OS in HGSC but with poorer prognosis in endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. Patients with HGSC harboring both RB1 loss and pathogenic germline BRCA variants had superior OS compared with patients with either alteration alone, and their median OS was three times longer than those without pathogenic BRCA variants and retained RB1 expression (9.3 vs. 3.1 years). Enhanced sensitivity to cisplatin and paclitaxel was seen in BRCA1-altered cells with RB1 knockout. Combined RB1 loss and BRCA deficiency correlated with transcriptional markers of enhanced IFN response, cell-cycle deregulation, and reduced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. CD8+ lymphocytes were most prevalent in BRCA-deficient HGSC with co-loss of RB1.ConclusionsCo-occurrence of RB1 loss and BRCA deficiency was associated with exceptionally long survival in patients with HGSC, potentially due to better treatment response and immune stimulation.
Published: 2024

3. Lifetime ovulatory years and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: a multinational pooled analysis

Author: Fu, Zhuxuan, Brooks, Maria Mori, Irvin, Sarah, Jordan, Susan, Aben, Katja KH, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Bandera, Elisa V, Beckmann, Matthias W, Berchuck, Andrew, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Cushing-Haugen, Kara L, Doherty, Jennifer A, Ekici, Arif B, Fasching, Peter A, Fortner, Renée T, Gayther, Simon A, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Group, AOCS, Harris, Holly R, Hein, Alexander, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Köbel, Martin, Kotsopoulos, Joanne, Le, Nhu D, Lee, Alice W, Matsuo, Keitaro, McGuire, Valerie, McLaughlin, John R, Menon, Usha, Milne, Roger L, Moysich, Kirsten B, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Pike, Malcolm C, Qin, Bo, Ramus, Susan J, Riggan, Marjorie J, Rothstein, Joseph H, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Sieh, Weiva, Sutphen, Rebecca, Terry, Kathryn L, Thompson, Pamela J, Titus, Linda, van Altena, Anne M, White, Emily, Whittemore, Alice S, Wu, Anna H, Zheng, Wei, Ziogas, Argyrios, Taylor, Sarah E, Tang, Lu, Songer, Thomas, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Webb, Penelope M, Risch, Harvey A, and Modugno, Francesmary
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Rare Diseases, Clinical Research, Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Prevention, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Parity, Contraceptives, Oral, Case-Control Studies, AOCS Group, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundThe role of ovulation in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is supported by the consistent protective effects of parity and oral contraceptive use. Whether these factors protect through anovulation alone remains unclear. We explored the association between lifetime ovulatory years (LOY) and EOC.MethodsLOY was calculated using 12 algorithms. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) estimated the association between LOY or LOY components and EOC among 26 204 control participants and 21 267 case patients from 25 studies. To assess whether LOY components act through ovulation suppression alone, we compared beta coefficients obtained from regression models with expected estimates assuming 1 year of ovulation suppression has the same effect regardless of source.ResultsLOY was associated with increased EOC risk (OR per year increase = 1.014, 95% CI = 1.009 to 1.020 to OR per year increase = 1.044, 95% CI = 1.041 to 1.048). Individual LOY components, except age at menarche, also associated with EOC. The estimated model coefficient for oral contraceptive use and pregnancies were 4.45 times and 12- to 15-fold greater than expected, respectively. LOY was associated with high-grade serous, low-grade serous, endometrioid, and clear cell histotypes (ORs per year increase = 1.054, 1.040, 1.065, and 1.098, respectively) but not mucinous tumors. Estimated coefficients of LOY components were close to expected estimates for high-grade serous but larger than expected for low-grade serous, endometrioid, and clear cell histotypes.ConclusionsLOY is positively associated with nonmucinous EOC. Differences between estimated and expected model coefficients for LOY components suggest factors beyond ovulation underlie the associations between LOY components and EOC in general and for non-HGSOC.
Published: 2023

4. p53 and ovarian carcinoma survival: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study

Author: Köbel, Martin, Kang, Eun‐Young, Weir, Ashley, Rambau, Peter F, Lee, Cheng‐Han, Nelson, Gregg S, Ghatage, Prafull, Meagher, Nicola S, Riggan, Marjorie J, Alsop, Jennifer, Anglesio, Michael S, Beckmann, Matthias W, Bisinotto, Christiani, Boisen, Michelle, Boros, Jessica, Brand, Alison H, Brooks‐Wilson, Angela, Carney, Michael E, Coulson, Penny, Courtney‐Brooks, Madeleine, Cushing‐Haugen, Kara L, Cybulski, Cezary, Deen, Suha, El‐Bahrawy, Mona A, Elishaev, Esther, Erber, Ramona, Fereday, Sian, Group, AOCS, Fischer, Anna, Gayther, Simon A, Barquin‐Garcia, Arantzazu, Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra, Gilks, C Blake, Gronwald, Helena, Grube, Marcel, Harnett, Paul R, Harris, Holly R, Hartkopf, Andreas D, Hartmann, Arndt, Hein, Alexander, Hendley, Joy, Hernandez, Brenda Y, Huang, Yajue, Jakubowska, Anna, Jimenez‐Linan, Mercedes, Jones, Michael E, Kennedy, Catherine J, Kluz, Tomasz, Koziak, Jennifer M, Lesnock, Jaime, Lester, Jenny, Lubiński, Jan, Longacre, Teri A, Lycke, Maria, Mateoiu, Constantina, McCauley, Bryan M, McGuire, Valerie, Ney, Britta, Olawaiye, Alexander, Orsulic, Sandra, Osorio, Ana, Paz‐Ares, Luis, Ramón y Cajal, Teresa, Rothstein, Joseph H, Ruebner, Matthias, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Shah, Mitul, Sharma, Raghwa, Sherman, Mark E, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Singh, Naveena, Steed, Helen, Storr, Sarah J, Talhouk, Aline, Traficante, Nadia, Wang, Chen, Whittemore, Alice S, Widschwendter, Martin, Wilkens, Lynne R, Winham, Stacey J, Benitez, Javier, Berchuck, Andrew, Bowtell, David D, dos Reis, Francisco J Candido, Campbell, Ian, Cook, Linda S, DeFazio, Anna, Doherty, Jennifer A, Fasching, Peter A, Fortner, Renée T, García, María J, Goodman, Marc T, Goode, Ellen L, Gronwald, Jacek, Huntsman, David G, Karlan, Beth Y, Kelemen, Linda E, Kommoss, Stefan, Le, Nhu D, and Martin, Stewart G
Subjects: Reproductive Medicine, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Cancer, Rare Diseases, Ovarian Cancer, Clinical Research, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Humans, Female, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Ovarian Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Carcinoma, Endometrioid, ovarian cancer, high-grade serous carcinoma, endometrioid, clear cell, TP53, p53, prognosis, AOCS Group, Clinical sciences
Abstract: Our objective was to test whether p53 expression status is associated with survival for women diagnosed with the most common ovarian carcinoma histotypes (high-grade serous carcinoma [HGSC], endometrioid carcinoma [EC], and clear cell carcinoma [CCC]) using a large multi-institutional cohort from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium. p53 expression was assessed on 6,678 cases represented on tissue microarrays from 25 participating OTTA study sites using a previously validated immunohistochemical (IHC) assay as a surrogate for the presence and functional effect of TP53 mutations. Three abnormal expression patterns (overexpression, complete absence, and cytoplasmic) and the normal (wild type) pattern were recorded. Survival analyses were performed by histotype. The frequency of abnormal p53 expression was 93.4% (4,630/4,957) in HGSC compared to 11.9% (116/973) in EC and 11.5% (86/748) in CCC. In HGSC, there were no differences in overall survival across the abnormal p53 expression patterns. However, in EC and CCC, abnormal p53 expression was associated with an increased risk of death for women diagnosed with EC in multivariate analysis compared to normal p53 as the reference (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-3.47, p = 0.0011) and with CCC (HR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.11-2.22, p = 0.012). Abnormal p53 was also associated with shorter overall survival in The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I/II EC and CCC. Our study provides further evidence that functional groups of TP53 mutations assessed by abnormal surrogate p53 IHC patterns are not associated with survival in HGSC. In contrast, we validate that abnormal p53 IHC is a strong independent prognostic marker for EC and demonstrate for the first time an independent prognostic association of abnormal p53 IHC with overall survival in patients with CCC.
Published: 2023

5. CCNE1 and survival of patients with tubo‐ovarian high‐grade serous carcinoma: An Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study

Author: Kang, Eun‐Young, Weir, Ashley, Meagher, Nicola S, Farrington, Kyo, Nelson, Gregg S, Ghatage, Prafull, Lee, Cheng‐Han, Riggan, Marjorie J, Bolithon, Adelyn, Popovic, Gordana, Leung, Betty, Tang, Katrina, Lambie, Neil, Millstein, Joshua, Alsop, Jennifer, Anglesio, Michael S, Ataseven, Beyhan, Barlow, Ellen, Beckmann, Matthias W, Berger, Jessica, Bisinotto, Christiani, Bösmüller, Hans, Boros, Jessica, Brand, Alison H, Brooks‐Wilson, Angela, Brucker, Sara Y, Carney, Michael E, Casablanca, Yovanni, Cazorla‐Jiménez, Alicia, Cohen, Paul A, Conrads, Thomas P, Cook, Linda S, Coulson, Penny, Courtney‐Brooks, Madeleine, Cramer, Daniel W, Crowe, Philip, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Darcy, Kathleen M, El‐Bahrawy, Mona A, Elishaev, Esther, Erber, Ramona, Farrell, Rhonda, Fereday, Sian, Fischer, Anna, García, María J, Gayther, Simon A, Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra, Gilks, C Blake, Group, AOCS, Grube, Marcel, Harnett, Paul R, Harrington, Shariska Petersen, Harter, Philipp, Hartmann, Arndt, Hecht, Jonathan L, Heikaus, Sebastian, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hendley, Joy, Hernandez, Brenda Y, Polo, Susanna Hernando, Heublein, Sabine, Hirasawa, Akira, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus K, Horlings, Hugo M, Huntsman, David G, Huzarski, Tomasz, Jewell, Andrea, Jimenez‐Linan, Mercedes, Jones, Michael E, Kaufmann, Scott H, Kennedy, Catherine J, Khabele, Dineo, Kommoss, Felix KF, Kruitwagen, Roy FPM, Lambrechts, Diether, Le, Nhu D, Lener, Marcin, Lester, Jenny, Leung, Yee, Linder, Anna, Loverix, Liselore, Lubiński, Jan, Madan, Rashna, Maxwell, G Larry, Modugno, Francesmary, Neuhausen, Susan L, Olawaiye, Alexander, Olbrecht, Siel, Orsulic, Sandra, Palacios, José, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Pike, Malcolm C, Quinn, Carmel M, Mohan, Ganendra Raj, Rodríguez‐Antona, Cristina, Ruebner, Matthias, and Ryan, Andy
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Cancer, Clinical Research, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Female, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms, Transcription Factors, Carcinoma, RNA, Messenger, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Oncogene Proteins, Cyclin E, CCNE1 amplification, cyclin E1 expression, high-grade serous carcinoma, ovarian cancer, prognosis, AOCS Group, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis, Public health
Abstract: BackgroundCyclin E1 (CCNE1) is a potential predictive marker and therapeutic target in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Smaller studies have revealed unfavorable associations for CCNE1 amplification and CCNE1 overexpression with survival, but to date no large-scale, histotype-specific validation has been performed. The hypothesis was that high-level amplification of CCNE1 and CCNE1 overexpression, as well as a combination of the two, are linked to shorter overall survival in HGSC.MethodsWithin the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium, amplification status and protein level in 3029 HGSC cases and mRNA expression in 2419 samples were investigated.ResultsHigh-level amplification (>8 copies by chromogenic in situ hybridization) was found in 8.6% of HGSC and overexpression (>60% with at least 5% demonstrating strong intensity by immunohistochemistry) was found in 22.4%. CCNE1 high-level amplification and overexpression both were linked to shorter overall survival in multivariate survival analysis adjusted for age and stage, with hazard stratification by study (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08-1.47, p = .034, and HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05-1.32, p = .015, respectively). This was also true for cases with combined high-level amplification/overexpression (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.09-1.47, p = .033). CCNE1 mRNA expression was not associated with overall survival (HR, 1.00 per 1-SD increase; 95% CI, 0.94-1.06; p = .58). CCNE1 high-level amplification is mutually exclusive with the presence of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants and shows an inverse association to RB1 loss.ConclusionThis study provides large-scale validation that CCNE1 high-level amplification is associated with shorter survival, supporting its utility as a prognostic biomarker in HGSC.
Published: 2023

6. Increased FOXJ1 protein expression is associated with improved overall survival in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis Consortium Study

Author: Weir, Ashley, Kang, Eun-Young, Meagher, Nicola S, Nelson, Gregg S, Ghatage, Prafull, Lee, Cheng-Han, Riggan, Marjorie J, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Ryan, Andy, Singh, Naveena, Widschwendter, Martin, Alsop, Jennifer, Anglesio, Michael S, Beckmann, Matthias W, Berger, Jessica, Bisinotto, Christiani, Boros, Jessica, Brand, Alison H, Brenton, James D, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Carney, Michael E, Cunningham, Julie M, Cushing-Haugen, Kara L, Cybulski, Cezary, Elishaev, Esther, Erber, Ramona, Fereday, Sian, Fischer, Anna, Paz-Ares, Luis, Gayarre, Javier, Gilks, Blake C, Grube, Marcel, Harnett, Paul R, Harris, Holly R, Hartmann, Arndt, Hein, Alexander, Hendley, Joy, Hernandez, Brenda Y, Heublein, Sabine, Huang, Yajue, Huzarski, Tomasz, Jakubowska, Anna, Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes, Kennedy, Catherine J, Kommoss, Felix KF, Koziak, Jennifer M, Kraemer, Bernhard, Le, Nhu D, Lesnock, Jaime, Lester, Jenny, Lubiński, Jan, Menkiszak, Janusz, Ney, Britta, Olawaiye, Alexander, Orsulic, Sandra, Osorio, Ana, Robles-Díaz, Luis, Ruebner, Matthias, Shah, Mitul, Sharma, Raghwa, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Steed, Helen, Talhouk, Aline, Taylor, Sarah E, Traficante, Nadia, Vierkant, Robert A, Wang, Chen, Wilkens, Lynne R, Winham, Stacey J, Benitez, Javier, Berchuck, Andrew, Bowtell, David D, Candido dos Reis, Francisco J, Cook, Linda S, DeFazio, Anna, Doherty, Jennifer A, Fasching, Peter A, García, María J, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Huntsman, David G, Karlan, Beth Y, Kommoss, Stefan, Modugno, Francesmary, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Sinn, Hans-Peter, Staebler, Annette, Kelemen, Linda E, Ford, Caroline E, Menon, Usha, Pharoah, Paul DP, Köbel, Martin, and Ramus, Susan J
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Genetics, Ovarian Cancer, Clinical Research, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Humans, Female, Ovarian Neoplasms, Prognosis, Survival Analysis, RNA, Messenger, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Biomarkers, Tumor, Forkhead Transcription Factors, AOCs group, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundRecently, we showed a >60% difference in 5-year survival for patients with tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) when stratified by a 101-gene mRNA expression prognostic signature. Given the varied patient outcomes, this study aimed to translate prognostic mRNA markers into protein expression assays by immunohistochemistry and validate their survival association in HGSC.MethodsTwo prognostic genes, FOXJ1 and GMNN, were selected based on high-quality antibodies, correlation with protein expression and variation in immunohistochemical scores in a preliminary cohort (n = 134 and n = 80, respectively). Six thousand four hundred and thirty-four (FOXJ1) and 5470 (GMNN) formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded ovarian neoplasms (4634 and 4185 HGSC, respectively) represented on tissue microarrays from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium underwent immunohistochemical staining and scoring, then univariate and multivariate survival analysis.ResultsConsistent with mRNA, FOXJ1 protein expression exhibited a linear, increasing association with improved overall survival in HGSC patients. Women with >50% expression had the most favourable outcomes (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.67-0.91, p 35% GMNN expression showed a trend for better outcomes, though this was not significant.ConclusionWe provide foundational evidence for the prognostic value of FOXJ1 in HGSC, validating the prior mRNA-based prognostic association by immunohistochemistry.
Published: 2023

7. Copy Number Variants Are Ovarian Cancer Risk Alleles at Known and Novel Risk Loci

Author: DeVries, Amber A, Dennis, Joe, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Peng, Pei-Chen, Coetzee, Simon G, Reyes, Alberto L, Plummer, Jasmine T, Davis, Brian D, Chen, Stephanie S, Dezem, Felipe Segato, Aben, Katja KH, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Beckmann, Matthias W, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Berchuck, Andrew, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bogdanova-Markov, Nadja, Brenton, James D, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Cook, Linda S, DeFazio, Anna, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, Eccles, Diana M, Eliassen, A Heather, Fasching, Peter A, Fortner, Renée T, Giles, Graham G, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Webb, P, DeFazio, A, Friedlander, M, Obermair, A, Grant, P, Nagle, C, Beesley, V, Chevenix-Trench, G, Bowtell, D, Blomfield, P, Brand, A, Davis, A, Leung, Y, Nicklin, J, Quinn, M, Livingstone, K, O'Neill, H, Williams, M, Black, A, Hadley, A, Glasgow, A, Garrett, A, Rao, A, Shannon, C, Steer, C, Allen, D, Neesham, D, Otton, G, Au-Yeung, G, Goss, G, Wain, G, Gard, G, Robertson, G, Lombard, J, Tan, J, McNeilage, J, Power, J, Coward, J, Miller, J, Carter, J, Lamont, J, Wong, KM, Reid, K, Perrin, L, Milishkin, L, Nascimento, M, Buck, M, Bunting, M, Harrison, M, Chetty, N, Hacker, N, McNally, O, Harnett, P, Beale, P, Awad, R, Mohan, R, Farrell, R, McIntosh, R, Rome, R, Sayer, R, Houghton, R, Hogg, R, Land, R, Baron-Hay, S, and Paramasivum, S
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Human Genome, Genetic Testing, Clinical Research, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Prevention, Women's Health, Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Female, Humans, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Genome-Wide Association Study, Alleles, DNA Copy Number Variations, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Ovarian Neoplasms, OPAL Study Group, AOCS Group, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundKnown risk alleles for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) account for approximately 40% of the heritability for EOC. Copy number variants (CNVs) have not been investigated as EOC risk alleles in a large population cohort.MethodsSingle nucleotide polymorphism array data from 13 071 EOC cases and 17 306 controls of White European ancestry were used to identify CNVs associated with EOC risk using a rare admixture maximum likelihood test for gene burden and a by-probe ratio test. We performed enrichment analysis of CNVs at known EOC risk loci and functional biofeatures in ovarian cancer-related cell types.ResultsWe identified statistically significant risk associations with CNVs at known EOC risk genes; BRCA1 (PEOC = 1.60E-21; OREOC = 8.24), RAD51C (Phigh-grade serous ovarian cancer [HGSOC] = 5.5E-4; odds ratio [OR]HGSOC = 5.74 del), and BRCA2 (PHGSOC = 7.0E-4; ORHGSOC = 3.31 deletion). Four suggestive associations (P
Published: 2022

8. Polygenic risk modeling for prediction of epithelial ovarian cancer risk

Author: Dareng, Eileen O, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Barnes, Daniel R, Jones, Michelle R, Yang, Xin, Aben, Katja KH, Adank, Muriel A, Agata, Simona, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Aravantinos, Gerasimos, Arun, Banu K, Augustinsson, Annelie, Balmaña, Judith, Bandera, Elisa V, Barkardottir, Rosa B, Barrowdale, Daniel, Beckmann, Matthias W, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernardini, Marcus Q, Bjorge, Line, Black, Amanda, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bonanni, Bernardo, Borg, Ake, Brenton, James D, Budzilowska, Agnieszka, Butzow, Ralf, Buys, Saundra S, Cai, Hui, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Cannioto, Rikki, Cassingham, Hayley, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chen, Kexin, Chiew, Yoke-Eng, Chung, Wendy K, Claes, Kathleen BM, Colonna, Sarah, Cook, Linda S, Couch, Fergus J, Daly, Mary B, Dao, Fanny, Davies, Eleanor, de la Hoya, Miguel, de Putter, Robin, Dennis, Joe, DePersia, Allison, Devilee, Peter, Diez, Orland, Ding, Yuan Chun, Doherty, Jennifer A, Domchek, Susan M, Dörk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Dürst, Matthias, Eccles, Diana M, Eliassen, Heather A, Engel, Christoph, Evans, Gareth D, Fasching, Peter A, Flanagan, James M, Fortner, Renée T, Machackova, Eva, Friedman, Eitan, Ganz, Patricia A, Garber, Judy, Gensini, Francesca, Giles, Graham G, Glendon, Gord, Godwin, Andrew K, Goodman, Marc T, Greene, Mark H, Gronwald, Jacek, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hamann, Ute, Hansen, Thomas VO, Harris, Holly R, Hartman, Mikael, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus K, Hopper, John L, Huang, Ruea-Yea, Huff, Chad, Hulick, Peter J, Huntsman, David G, Imyanitov, Evgeny N, Isaacs, Claudine, Jakubowska, Anna, James, Paul A, and Janavicius, Ramunas
Subjects: Prevention, Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Good Health and Well Being, Bayes Theorem, Breast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Male, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, GEMO Study Collaborators, GC-HBOC Study Collaborators, EMBRACE Collaborators, OPAL Study Group, AOCS Group, KConFab Investigators, HEBON Investigators, OCAC Consortium, CIMBA Consortium, Genetics, Clinical Sciences, Genetics & Heredity
Abstract: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have the potential to improve risk stratification. Joint estimation of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) effects in models could improve predictive performance over standard approaches of PRS construction. Here, we implemented computationally efficient, penalized, logistic regression models (lasso, elastic net, stepwise) to individual level genotype data and a Bayesian framework with continuous shrinkage, "select and shrink for summary statistics" (S4), to summary level data for epithelial non-mucinous ovarian cancer risk prediction. We developed the models in a dataset consisting of 23,564 non-mucinous EOC cases and 40,138 controls participating in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC) and validated the best models in three populations of different ancestries: prospective data from 198,101 women of European ancestries; 7,669 women of East Asian ancestries; 1,072 women of African ancestries, and in 18,915 BRCA1 and 12,337 BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers of European ancestries. In the external validation data, the model with the strongest association for non-mucinous EOC risk derived from the OCAC model development data was the S4 model (27,240 SNPs) with odds ratios (OR) of 1.38 (95% CI: 1.28-1.48, AUC: 0.588) per unit standard deviation, in women of European ancestries; 1.14 (95% CI: 1.08-1.19, AUC: 0.538) in women of East Asian ancestries; 1.38 (95% CI: 1.21-1.58, AUC: 0.593) in women of African ancestries; hazard ratios of 1.36 (95% CI: 1.29-1.43, AUC: 0.592) in BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers and 1.49 (95% CI: 1.35-1.64, AUC: 0.624) in BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. Incorporation of the S4 PRS in risk prediction models for ovarian cancer may have clinical utility in ovarian cancer prevention programs.
Published: 2022

9. Cross-Cancer Genome-Wide Association Study of Endometrial Cancer and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Identifies Genetic Risk Regions Associated with Risk of Both Cancers

Author: Glubb, Dylan M, Thompson, Deborah J, Aben, Katja KH, Alsulimani, Ahmad, Amant, Frederic, Annibali, Daniela, Attia, John, Barricarte, Aurelio, Beckmann, Matthias W, Berchuck, Andrew, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernardini, Marcus Q, Bischof, Katharina, Bjorge, Line, Bodelon, Clara, Brand, Alison H, Brenton, James D, Brinton, Louise A, Bruinsma, Fiona, Buchanan, Daniel D, Burghaus, Stefanie, Butzow, Ralf, Cai, Hui, Carney, Michael E, Chanock, Stephen J, Chen, Chu, Chen, Xiao Qing, Chen, Zhihua, Cook, Linda S, Cunningham, Julie M, De Vivo, Immaculata, deFazio, Anna, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Dunning, Alison M, Dürst, Matthias, Edwards, Todd, Edwards, Robert P, Ekici, Arif B, Ewing, Ailith, Fasching, Peter A, Ferguson, Sarah, Flanagan, James M, Fostira, Florentia, Fountzilas, George, Friedenreich, Christine M, Gao, Bo, Gaudet, Mia M, Gawełko, Jan, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Harris, Holly R, Harter, Philipp, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hillemanns, Peter, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus K, Holliday, Elizabeth G, Huntsman, David G, Huzarski, Tomasz, Jakubowska, Anna, Jensen, Allan, Jones, Michael E, Karlan, Beth Y, Karnezis, Anthony, Kelley, Joseph L, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Killeen, Jeffrey L, Kjaer, Susanne K, Klapdor, Rüdiger, Köbel, Martin, Konopka, Bozena, Konstantopoulou, Irene, Kopperud, Reidun K, Koti, Madhuri, Kraft, Peter, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Larson, Melissa C, Le Marchand, Loic, Lele, Shashikant, Lester, Jenny, Li, Andrew J, Liang, Dong, Liebrich, Clemens, Lipworth, Loren, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lu, Lingeng, Lu, Karen H, Macciotta, Alessandra, Mattiello, Amalia, May, Taymaa, McAlpine, Jessica N, and McGuire, Valerie
Subjects: Epidemiology, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Health Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Human Genome, Uterine Cancer, Genetics, Biotechnology, Ovarian Cancer, Prevention, Cancer, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Endometrial Neoplasms, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms, Quantitative Trait Loci, Risk Factors, OPAL Study Group, AOCS Group, Medical and Health Sciences, Biomedical and clinical sciences, Health sciences
Abstract: BackgroundAccumulating evidence suggests a relationship between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. Independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer have identified 16 and 27 risk regions, respectively, four of which overlap between the two cancers. We aimed to identify joint endometrial and ovarian cancer risk loci by performing a meta-analysis of GWAS summary statistics from these two cancers.MethodsUsing LDScore regression, we explored the genetic correlation between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. To identify loci associated with the risk of both cancers, we implemented a pipeline of statistical genetic analyses (i.e., inverse-variance meta-analysis, colocalization, and M-values) and performed analyses stratified by subtype. Candidate target genes were then prioritized using functional genomic data.ResultsGenetic correlation analysis revealed significant genetic correlation between the two cancers (rG = 0.43, P = 2.66 × 10-5). We found seven loci associated with risk for both cancers (P Bonferroni < 2.4 × 10-9). In addition, four novel subgenome-wide regions at 7p22.2, 7q22.1, 9p12, and 11q13.3 were identified (P < 5 × 10-7). Promoter-associated HiChIP chromatin loops from immortalized endometrium and ovarian cell lines and expression quantitative trait loci data highlighted candidate target genes for further investigation.ConclusionsUsing cross-cancer GWAS meta-analysis, we have identified several joint endometrial and ovarian cancer risk loci and candidate target genes for future functional analysis.ImpactOur research highlights the shared genetic relationship between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. Further studies in larger sample sets are required to confirm our findings.
Published: 2021

10. Clinical and pathological associations of PTEN expression in ovarian cancer: a multicentre study from the Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis Consortium

Author: Martins, Filipe Correia, Couturier, Dominique-Laurent, Paterson, Anna, Karnezis, Anthony N, Chow, Christine, Nazeran, Tayyebeh M, Odunsi, Adekunle, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Vrvilo, Aleksandra, Hein, Alexander, Talhouk, Aline, Osorio, Ana, Hartkopf, Andreas D, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, DeFazio, Anna, Fischer, Anna, Hartmann, Arndt, Hernandez, Brenda Y, McCauley, Bryan M, Karpinskyj, Chloe, de Sousa, Christiani B, Høgdall, Claus, Tiezzi, Daniel G, Herpel, Esther, Taran, Florin Andrei, Modugno, Francesmary, Keeney, Gary, Nelson, Gregg, Steed, Helen, Song, Honglin, Luk, Hugh, Benitez, Javier, Alsop, Jennifer, Koziak, Jennifer M, Lester, Jenny, Rothstein, Joseph H, de Andrade, Jurandyr M, Lundvall, Lene, Paz-Ares, Luis, Robles-Díaz, Luis, Wilkens, Lynne R, Garcia, Maria J, Intermaggio, Maria P, Alcaraz, Marie-Lyne, Brett, Mary A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes, Anglesio, Michael, Carney, Michael E, Schneider, Michael, Traficante, Nadia, Pejovic, Nadja, Singh, Naveena, Le, Nhu, Sinn, Peter, Ghatage, Prafull, Erber, Ramona, Edwards, Robert, Vierkant, Robert, Ness, Roberta B, Leung, Samuel, Orsulic, Sandra, Brucker, Sara Y, Kaufmann, Scott H, Fereday, Sian, Gayther, Simon, Winham, Stacey J, Kommoss, Stefan, Pejovic, Tanja, Longacre, Teri A, McGuire, Valerie, Rhenius, Valerie, Sieh, Weiva, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Whittemore, Alice S, Staebler, Annette, Karlan, Beth Y, Rodriguez-Antona, Cristina, Bowtell, David D, Goode, Ellen L, Høgdall, Estrid, Candido dos Reis, Francisco J, Gronwald, Jacek, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Moysich, Kirsten B, Kelemen, Linda E, Cook, Linda S, Goodman, Marc T, Fasching, Peter A, Crawford, Robin, Deen, Suha, Menon, Usha, Huntsman, David G, Köbel, Martin, Ramus, Susan J, Pharoah, Paul DP, and Brenton, James D
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell, Age Factors, Biomarkers, Tumor, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Cohort Studies, Down-Regulation, Female, Gene Knockout Techniques, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Ovarian Neoplasms, PTEN Phosphohydrolase, Prospective Studies, Receptors, Androgen, Receptors, Estrogen, Receptors, Progesterone, Tissue Array Analysis, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundPTEN loss is a putative driver in histotypes of ovarian cancer (high-grade serous (HGSOC), endometrioid (ENOC), clear cell (CCOC), mucinous (MOC), low-grade serous (LGSOC)). We aimed to characterise PTEN expression as a biomarker in epithelial ovarian cancer in a large population-based study.MethodsTumours from 5400 patients from a multicentre observational, prospective cohort study of the Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis Consortium were used to evaluate associations between immunohistochemical PTEN patterns and overall survival time, age, stage, grade, residual tumour, CD8+ tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) counts, expression of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and androgen receptor (AR) by means of Cox proportional hazard models and generalised Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests.ResultsDownregulation of cytoplasmic PTEN expression was most frequent in ENOC (most frequently in younger patients; p value = 0.0001) and CCOC and was associated with longer overall survival in HGSOC (hazard ratio: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.94, p value = 0.022). PTEN expression was associated with ER, PR and AR expression (p values: 0.0008, 0.062 and 0.0002, respectively) in HGSOC and with lower CD8 counts in CCOC (p value
Published: 2020

11. A comprehensive gene–environment interaction analysis in Ovarian Cancer using genome‐wide significant common variants

Author: Kim, Sehee, Wang, Miao, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Jensen, Allan, Wiensch, Ashley, Liu, Gang, Lee, Alice W, Ness, Roberta B, Salvatore, Maxwell, Tworoger, Shelley S, Whittemore, Alice S, Anton‐Culver, Hoda, Sieh, Weiva, Olson, Sara H, Berchuck, Andrew, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Doherty, Jennifer Anne, Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia, Rossing, Mary Anne, Webb, Penelope M, Giles, Graham G, Terry, Kathryn L, Ziogas, Argyrios, Fortner, Renée T, Menon, Usha, Gayther, Simon A, Wu, Anna H, Song, Honglin, Brooks‐Wilson, Angela, Bandera, Elisa V, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Milne, Roger L, Winham, Stacey J, Kjaer, Susanne K, Modugno, Francesmary, Thompson, Pamela J, Chang‐Claude, Jenny, Harris, Holly R, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Le, Nhu D, Wentzensen, Nico, Trabert, Britton, Høgdall, Estrid, Huntsman, David, Pike, Malcolm C, Pharoah, Paul DP, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, and Mukherjee, Bhramar
Subjects: Rare Diseases, Human Genome, Clinical Research, Genetics, Patient Safety, Cancer, Prevention, Ovarian Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Good Health and Well Being, Case-Control Studies, Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal, Environment, Environmental Exposure, Female, Gene-Environment Interaction, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk, ovarian cancer, genetics, additive interaction, G x E, G × E, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract: As a follow-up to genome-wide association analysis of common variants associated with ovarian carcinoma (cancer), our study considers seven well-known ovarian cancer risk factors and their interactions with 28 genome-wide significant common genetic variants. The interaction analyses were based on data from 9971 ovarian cancer cases and 15,566 controls from 17 case-control studies. Likelihood ratio and Wald tests for multiplicative interaction and for relative excess risk due to additive interaction were used. The top multiplicative interaction was noted between oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use (ever vs. never) and rs13255292 (p value = 3.48 × 10-4 ). Among women with the TT genotype for this variant, the odds ratio for OCP use was 0.53 (95% CI = 0.46-0.60) compared to 0.71 (95%CI = 0.66-0.77) for women with the CC genotype. When stratified by duration of OCP use, women with 1-5 years of OCP use exhibited differential protective benefit across genotypes. However, no interaction on either the multiplicative or additive scale was found to be statistically significant after multiple testing correction. The results suggest that OCP use may offer increased benefit for women who are carriers of the T allele in rs13255292. On the other hand, for women carrying the C allele in this variant, longer (5+ years) use of OCP may reduce the impact of carrying the risk allele of this SNP. Replication of this finding is needed. The study presents a comprehensive analytic framework for conducting gene-environment analysis in ovarian cancer.
Published: 2019

12. Genetic Data from Nearly 63,000 Women of European Descent Predicts DNA Methylation Biomarkers and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk

Author: Yang, Yaohua, Wu, Lang, Shu, Xiang, Lu, Yingchang, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Cai, Qiuyin, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Li, Bingshan, Ye, Fei, Berchuck, Andrew, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Banerjee, Susana, Benitez, Javier, Bjørge, Line, Brenton, James D, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian G, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chen, Kexin, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, deFazio, Anna, Dennis, Joe, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, Eccles, Diana M, Edwards, Digna Velez, Fasching, Peter A, Fortner, Renée T, Gayther, Simon A, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind M, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Harris, Holly R, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle A, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus K, Huntsman, David G, Kar, Siddhartha P, Karlan, Beth Y, Kelemen, Linda E, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Kjaer, Susanne K, Koushik, Anita, Lambrechts, Diether, Le, Nhu D, Levine, Douglas A, Massuger, Leon F, Matsuo, Keitaro, May, Taymaa, McNeish, Iain A, Menon, Usha, Modugno, Francesmary, Monteiro, Alvaro N, Moorman, Patricia G, Moysich, Kirsten B, Ness, Roberta B, Nevanlinna, Heli, Olsson, Håkan, Onland-Moret, N Charlotte, Park, Sue K, Paul, James, Pearce, Celeste L, Pejovic, Tanja, Phelan, Catherine M, Pike, Malcolm C, Ramus, Susan J, Riboli, Elio, Rodriguez-Antona, Cristina, Romieu, Isabelle, Sandler, Dale P, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Setiawan, Veronica W, Shan, Kang, Siddiqui, Nadeem, Sieh, Weiva, Stampfer, Meir J, Sutphen, Rebecca, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Szafron, Lukasz M, Teo, Soo Hwang, Tworoger, Shelley S, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Webb, Penelope M, Wentzensen, Nicolas, White, Emily, Willett, Walter C, Wolk, Alicja, Woo, Yin Ling, Wu, Anna H, Yan, Li, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Sellers, Thomas A, Pharoah, Paul DP, Zheng, Wei, and Long, Jirong
Subjects: Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Genetics, Biotechnology, Rare Diseases, Ovarian Cancer, Cancer Genomics, Prevention, Women's Health, Cancer, Clinical Research, Human Genome, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Biomarkers, Tumor, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Cohort Studies, DNA Methylation, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Models, Genetic, Ovarian Neoplasms, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk, White People, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Biochemistry and cell biology, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: DNA methylation is instrumental for gene regulation. Global changes in the epigenetic landscape have been recognized as a hallmark of cancer. However, the role of DNA methylation in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains unclear. In this study, high-density genetic and DNA methylation data in white blood cells from the Framingham Heart Study (N = 1,595) were used to build genetic models to predict DNA methylation levels. These prediction models were then applied to the summary statistics of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of ovarian cancer including 22,406 EOC cases and 40,941 controls to investigate genetically predicted DNA methylation levels in association with EOC risk. Among 62,938 CpG sites investigated, genetically predicted methylation levels at 89 CpG were significantly associated with EOC risk at a Bonferroni-corrected threshold of P < 7.94 × 10-7. Of them, 87 were located at GWAS-identified EOC susceptibility regions and two resided in a genomic region not previously reported to be associated with EOC risk. Integrative analyses of genetic, methylation, and gene expression data identified consistent directions of associations across 12 CpG, five genes, and EOC risk, suggesting that methylation at these 12 CpG may influence EOC risk by regulating expression of these five genes, namely MAPT, HOXB3, ABHD8, ARHGAP27, and SKAP1. We identified novel DNA methylation markers associated with EOC risk and propose that methylation at multiple CpG may affect EOC risk via regulation of gene expression. SIGNIFICANCE: Identification of novel DNA methylation markers associated with EOC risk suggests that methylation at multiple CpG may affect EOC risk through regulation of gene expression.
Published: 2019

13. Association of p16 expression with prognosis varies across ovarian carcinoma histotypes: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study.

Author: Rambau, Peter F, Vierkant, Robert A, Intermaggio, Maria P, Kelemen, Linda E, Goodman, Marc T, Herpel, Esther, Pharoah, Paul D, Kommoss, Stefan, Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes, Karlan, Beth Y, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Menon, Usha, Polo, Susanna Hernando, Candido Dos Reis, Francisco J, Doherty, Jennifer Anne, Gayther, Simon A, Sharma, Raghwa, Larson, Melissa C, Harnett, Paul R, Hatfield, Emma, de Andrade, Jurandyr M, Nelson, Gregg S, Steed, Helen, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Carney, Micheal E, Høgdall, Estrid, Whittemore, Alice S, Widschwendter, Martin, Kennedy, Catherine J, Wang, Frances, Wang, Qin, Wang, Chen, Armasu, Sebastian M, Daley, Frances, Coulson, Penny, Jones, Micheal E, Anglesio, Micheal S, Chow, Christine, de Fazio, Anna, García-Closas, Montserrat, Brucker, Sara Y, Cybulski, Cezary, Harris, Holly R, Hartkopf, Andreas D, Huzarski, Tomasz, Jensen, Allan, Lubiński, Jan, Oszurek, Oleg, Benitez, Javier, Mina, Fady, Staebler, Annette, Taran, Florin Andrei, Pasternak, Jana, Talhouk, Aline, Rossing, Mary Anne, Hendley, Joy, AOCS Group, Edwards, Robert P, Fereday, Sian, Modugno, Francesmary, Ness, Roberta B, Sieh, Weiva, El-Bahrawy, Mona A, Winham, Stacey J, Lester, Jenny, Kjaer, Susanne K, Gronwald, Jacek, Sinn, Peter, Fasching, Peter A, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Moysich, Kirsten B, Bowtell, David D, Hernandez, Brenda Y, Luk, Hugh, Behrens, Sabine, Shah, Mitul, Jung, Audrey, Ghatage, Prafull, Alsop, Jennifer, Alsop, Kathryn, García-Donas, Jesús, Thompson, Pamela J, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Karpinskyj, Chloe, Cazorla-Jiménez, Alicia, García, María J, Deen, Susha, Wilkens, Lynne R, Palacios, José, Berchuck, Andrew, Koziak, Jennifer M, Brenton, James D, Cook, Linda S, Goode, Ellen L, Huntsman, David G, Ramus, Susan J, and Köbel, Martin
Subjects: AOCS Group, Ovary, Humans, Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Ovarian Neoplasms, Prognosis, Immunohistochemistry, Survival Rate, Adult, Aged, Middle Aged, Female, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16, RT-QPCR, immunocytochemistry, ovary, Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Cancer, Genetics, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors
Abstract: We aimed to validate the prognostic association of p16 expression in ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC) and to explore it in other ovarian carcinoma histotypes. p16 protein expression was assessed by clinical-grade immunohistochemistry in 6525 ovarian carcinomas including 4334 HGSC using tissue microarrays from 24 studies participating in the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. p16 expression patterns were interpreted as abnormal (either overexpression referred to as block expression or absence) or normal (heterogeneous). CDKN2A (which encodes p16) mRNA expression was also analyzed in a subset (n = 2280) mostly representing HGSC (n = 2010). Association of p16 expression with overall survival (OS) was determined within histotypes as was CDKN2A expression for HGSC only. p16 block expression was most frequent in HGSC (56%) but neither protein nor mRNA expression was associated with OS. However, relative to heterogeneous expression, block expression was associated with shorter OS in endometriosis-associated carcinomas, clear cell [hazard ratio (HR): 2.02, 95% confidence (CI) 1.47-2.77, p < 0.001] and endometrioid (HR: 1.88, 95% CI 1.30-2.75, p = 0.004), while absence was associated with shorter OS in low-grade serous carcinomas (HR: 2.95, 95% CI 1.61-5.38, p = 0.001). Absence was most frequent in mucinous carcinoma (50%), and was not associated with OS in this histotype. The prognostic value of p16 expression is histotype-specific and pattern dependent. We provide definitive evidence against an association of p16 expression with survival in ovarian HGSC as previously suggested. Block expression of p16 in clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma should be further validated as a prognostic marker, and absence in low-grade serous carcinoma justifies CDK4 inhibition.
Published: 2018

14. rs495139 in the TYMS-ENOSF1 Region and Risk of Ovarian Carcinoma of Mucinous Histology.

Author: Kelemen, Linda E, Earp, Madalene, Fridley, Brooke L, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Fasching, Peter A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Ekici, Arif B, Hein, Alexander, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Vergote, Ignace, Rossing, Mary Anne, Doherty, Jennifer A, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Behrens, Sabine, Moysich, Kirsten B, Cannioto, Rikki, Lele, Shashikant, Odunsi, Kunle, Goodman, Marc T, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Thompson, Pamela J, Wilkens, Lynne R, Dörk, Thilo, Antonenkova, Natalia, Bogdanova, Natalia, Hillemanns, Peter, Runnebaum, Ingo B, du Bois, Andreas, Harter, Philipp, Heitz, Florian, Schwaab, Ira, Butzow, Ralf, Pelttari, Liisa M, Nevanlinna, Heli, Modugno, Francesmary, Edwards, Robert P, Kelley, Joseph L, Ness, Roberta B, Karlan, Beth Y, Lester, Jenny, Orsulic, Sandra, Walsh, Christine, Kjaer, Susanne K, Jensen, Allan, Cunningham, Julie M, Vierkant, Robert A, Giles, Graham G, Bruinsma, Fiona, Southey, Melissa C, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Liang, Dong, Lu, Karen, Wu, Xifeng, Sellers, Thomas A, Levine, Douglas A, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Iversen, Edwin S, Terry, Kathryn L, Cramer, Daniel W, Tworoger, Shelley S, Poole, Elizabeth M, Bandera, Elisa V, Olson, Sara H, Orlow, Irene, Vestrheim Thomsen, Liv Cecilie, Bjorge, Line, Krakstad, Camilla, Tangen, Ingvild L, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Aben, Katja KH, Massuger, Leon FAG, van Altena, Anne M, Pejovic, Tanja, Bean, Yukie, Kellar, Melissa, Cook, Linda S, Le, Nhu D, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Gronwald, Jacek, Cybulski, Cezary, Jakubowska, Anna, Lubiński, Jan, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Brinton, Louise A, Lissowska, Jolanta, Hogdall, Estrid, Engelholm, Svend Aage, Hogdall, Claus, Lundvall, Lene, Nedergaard, Lotte, Pharoah, Paul DP, Dicks, Ed, Song, Honglin, Tyrer, Jonathan P, McNeish, Iain, Siddiqui, Nadeem, and Carty, Karen
Subjects: Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Humans, Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous, Ovarian Neoplasms, Hydro-Lyases, Thymidylate Synthase, Proteins, RNA, Antisense, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Risk, Case-Control Studies, Signal Transduction, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Middle Aged, Female, Genetic Association Studies, consortia, enolase superfamily member 1, expression quantitative trait locus, genetics, gynecology, ovarian neoplasms, single-nucleotide polymorphism, thymidylate synthase, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Biotechnology, Cancer, Digestive Diseases, Genetics, Chemical Physics, Other Chemical Sciences, Other Biological Sciences
Abstract: Thymidylate synthase (TYMS) is a crucial enzyme for DNA synthesis. TYMS expression is regulated by its antisense mRNA, ENOSF1. Disrupted regulation may promote uncontrolled DNA synthesis and tumor growth. We sought to replicate our previously reported association between rs495139 in the TYMS-ENOSF1 3' gene region and increased risk of mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) in an independent sample. Genotypes from 24,351 controls to 15,000 women with invasive OC, including 665 MOC, were available. We estimated per-allele odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using unconditional logistic regression, and meta-analysis when combining these data with our previous report. The association between rs495139 and MOC was not significant in the independent sample (OR = 1.09; 95% CI = 0.97⁻1.22; p = 0.15; N = 665 cases). Meta-analysis suggested a weak association (OR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.03⁻1.24; p = 0.01; N = 1019 cases). No significant association with risk of other OC histologic types was observed (p = 0.05 for tumor heterogeneity). In expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis, the rs495139 allele was positively associated with ENOSF1 mRNA expression in normal tissues of the gastrointestinal system, particularly esophageal mucosa (r = 0.51, p = 1.7 × 10-28), and nonsignificantly in five MOC tumors. The association results, along with inconclusive tumor eQTL findings, suggest that a true effect of rs495139 might be small.
Published: 2018

15. Assessment of moderate coffee consumption and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomization study

Author: Ong, Jue-Sheng, Hwang, Liang-Dar, Cuellar-Partida, Gabriel, Martin, Nicholas G, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Quinn, Michael CJ, Cornelis, Marilyn C, Gharahkhani, Puya, Webb, Penelope M, MacGregor, Stuart, Bryne, Enda, Fasching, Peter A, Hein, Alexander, Burghaus, Stefanie, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Vergote, Ignace, Vanderstichele, Adriaan, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Jones, Michael, Orr, Nicholas, Schoemaker, Minouk, Edwards, Digna Velez, Brenton, James, Benítez, Javier, García, María J, Rodriguez-Antona, Cristina, Rossing, Mary Anne, Fortner, Renée T, Riboli, Elio, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Eilber, Ursula, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis, Goodman, Marc T, Bogdanova, Natalia, Dörk, Thilo, Duerst, Matthias, Hillemanns, Peter, Runnebaum, Ingo B, Antonenkova, Natalia, Butzow, Ralf, Nevanlinna, Heli, Pelttari, Liisa M, Edwards, Robert P, Kelley, Joseph L, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Ness, Roberta B, Cannioto, Rikki, Heitz, Florian, Karlan, Beth, Olsson, Håkan, Kjaer, Susanne K, Jensen, Allan, Giles, Graham G, Bruinsma, Fiona, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Liang, Dong, Wu, Xifeng, Le Marchand, Loic, Setiawan, V Wendy, Permuth, Jennifer B, Bisogna, Maria, Dao, Fanny, Levine, Douglas A, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Tworoger, Shelley S, Stampfer, Meir, Willet, Walter, Missmer, Stacey, Bjorge, Line, Kopperud, Reidun K, Bischof, Katharina, Thomsen, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Massuger, Leon FAG, Pejovic, Tanja, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Olson, Sara H, McGuire, Valerie, Rothstein, Joseph H, Sieh, Weiva, Whittemore, Alice S, Cook, Linda S, Le, Nhu D, Gilks, C Blake, Gronwald, Jacek, Jakubowska, Anna, Lubiński, Jan, Kluz, Tomasz, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Brinton, Louise, Trabert, Britton, and Lissowska, Jolanta
Subjects: Epidemiology, Health Sciences, Clinical Research, Ovarian Cancer, Nutrition, Rare Diseases, Prevention, Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Coffee, Female, Humans, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Odds Ratio, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk Factors, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Statistics, Public Health and Health Services, Public health
Abstract: BackgroundCoffee consumption has been shown to be associated with various health outcomes in observational studies. However, evidence for its association with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is inconsistent and it is unclear whether these associations are causal.MethodsWe used single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with (i) coffee and (ii) caffeine consumption to perform Mendelian randomization (MR) on EOC risk. We conducted a two-sample MR using genetic data on 44 062 individuals of European ancestry from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC), and combined instrumental variable estimates using a Wald-type ratio estimator.ResultsFor all EOC cases, the causal odds ratio (COR) for genetically predicted consumption of one additional cup of coffee per day was 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79, 1.06]. The COR was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.73, 1.10) for high-grade serous EOC. The COR for genetically predicted consumption of an additional 80 mg caffeine was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.11) for all EOC cases and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.73, 1.10) for high-grade serous cases.ConclusionsWe found no evidence indicative of a strong association between EOC risk and genetically predicted coffee or caffeine levels. However, our estimates were not statistically inconsistent with earlier observational studies and we were unable to rule out small protective associations.
Published: 2018

16. Adult height is associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomisation study

Author: Dixon-Suen, Suzanne C, Nagle, Christina M, Thrift, Aaron P, Pharoah, Paul DP, Ewing, Ailith, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Zheng, Wei, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Fasching, Peter A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Vergote, Ignace, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Rossing, Mary Anne, Doherty, Jennifer A, Wicklund, Kristine G, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Jung, Audrey Y, Moysich, Kirsten B, Odunsi, Kunle, Goodman, Marc T, Wilkens, Lynne R, Thompson, Pamela J, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Dörk, Thilo, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Hillemanns, Peter, Bogdanova, Natalia, Butzow, Ralf, Nevanlinna, Heli, Pelttari, Liisa M, Leminen, Arto, Modugno, Francesmary, Ness, Roberta B, Edwards, Robert P, Kelley, Joseph L, Heitz, Florian, du Bois, Andreas, Harter, Philipp, Schwaab, Ira, Karlan, Beth Y, Lester, Jenny, Orsulic, Sandra, Rimel, Bobbie J, Kjær, Susanne K, Høgdall, Estrid, Jensen, Allan, Goode, Ellen L, Fridley, Brooke L, Cunningham, Julie M, Winham, Stacey J, Giles, Graham G, Bruinsma, Fiona, Milne, Roger L, Southey, Melissa C, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Wu, Xifeng, Lu, Karen H, Liang, Dong, Levine, Douglas A, Bisogna, Maria, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Berchuck, Andrew, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Bandera, Elisa V, Olson, Sara H, Salvesen, Helga B, Thomsen, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim, Kopperud, Reidun K, Bjorge, Line, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Massuger, Leon FAG, Pejovic, Tanja, Bruegl, Amanda, Cook, Linda S, Le, Nhu D, Swenerton, Kenneth D, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Kelemen, Linda E, Lubiński, Jan, Huzarski, Tomasz, Gronwald, Jacek, Menkiszak, Janusz, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Brinton, Louise, Yang, Hannah, Lissowska, Jolanta, Høgdall, Claus K, Lundvall, Lene, Song, Honglin, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Campbell, Ian, Eccles, Diana, Paul, James, Glasspool, Rosalind, Siddiqui, Nadeem, and Whittemore, Alice S
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Rare Diseases, Prevention, Genetics, Ovarian Cancer, Women's Health, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Height, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Case-Control Studies, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Geography, Humans, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Young Adult, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundObservational studies suggest greater height is associated with increased ovarian cancer risk, but cannot exclude bias and/or confounding as explanations for this. Mendelian randomisation (MR) can provide evidence which may be less prone to bias.MethodsWe pooled data from 39 Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium studies (16,395 cases; 23,003 controls). We applied two-stage predictor-substitution MR, using a weighted genetic risk score combining 609 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Study-specific odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between genetically predicted height and risk were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.ResultsGreater genetically predicted height was associated with increased ovarian cancer risk overall (pooled-OR (pOR) = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11 per 5 cm increase in height), and separately for invasive (pOR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11) and borderline (pOR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.02-1.29) tumours.ConclusionsWomen with a genetic propensity to being taller have increased risk of ovarian cancer. This suggests genes influencing height are involved in pathways promoting ovarian carcinogenesis.
Published: 2018

17. Variants in genes encoding small GTPases and association with epithelial ovarian cancer susceptibility

Author: Earp, Madalene, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Winham, Stacey J, Lin, Hui-Yi, Chornokur, Ganna, Dennis, Joe, Aben, Katja KH, Anton‐Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, Bandera, Elisa V, Bean, Yukie T, Beckmann, Matthias W, Bjorge, Line, Bogdanova, Natalia, Brinton, Louise A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bruinsma, Fiona, Bunker, Clareann H, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian G, Carty, Karen, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Despierre, Evelyn, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Dürst, Matthias, Easton, Douglas F, Eccles, Diana M, Edwards, Robert P, Ekici, Arif B, Fasching, Peter A, Fridley, Brooke L, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Harter, Philipp, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hillemanns, Peter, Hogdall, Claus K, Høgdall, Estrid, Hosono, Satoyo, Iversen, Edwin S, Jakubowska, Anna, Jensen, Allan, Ji, Bu-Tian, Jung, Audrey Y, Karlan, Beth Y, Kellar, Melissa, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Lim, Boon Kiong, Kjaer, Susanne K, Krakstad, Camilla, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D, Lele, Shashi, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A, Li, Zheng, Liang, Dong, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lu, Karen, Lubinski, Jan, Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon FAG, Matsuo, Keitaro, McGuire, Valerie, McLaughlin, John R, McNeish, Iain, Menon, Usha, Milne, Roger L, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Ness, Roberta B, Nevanlinna, Heli, Odunsi, Kunle, Olson, Sara H, Orlow, Irene, Orsulic, Sandra, Paul, James, Pejovic, Tanja, Pelttari, Liisa M, Permuth, Jenny B, Pike, Malcolm C, Poole, Elizabeth M, Rosen, Barry, Rossing, Mary Anne, Rothstein, Joseph H, and Runnebaum, Ingo B
Subjects: Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Biological Sciences, Genetics, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Biotechnology, Ovarian Cancer, Cancer, Human Genome, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, A Kinase Anchor Proteins, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Genetic Association Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genotype, Humans, Monomeric GTP-Binding Proteins, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Rho Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors, Risk Factors, General Science & Technology
Abstract: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the fifth leading cause of cancer mortality in American women. Normal ovarian physiology is intricately connected to small GTP binding proteins of the Ras superfamily (Ras, Rho, Rab, Arf, and Ran) which govern processes such as signal transduction, cell proliferation, cell motility, and vesicle transport. We hypothesized that common germline variation in genes encoding small GTPases is associated with EOC risk. We investigated 322 variants in 88 small GTPase genes in germline DNA of 18,736 EOC patients and 26,138 controls of European ancestry using a custom genotype array and logistic regression fitting log-additive models. Functional annotation was used to identify biofeatures and expression quantitative trait loci that intersect with risk variants. One variant, ARHGEF10L (Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 like) rs2256787, was associated with increased endometrioid EOC risk (OR = 1.33, p = 4.46 x 10-6). Other variants of interest included another in ARHGEF10L, rs10788679, which was associated with invasive serous EOC risk (OR = 1.07, p = 0.00026) and two variants in AKAP6 (A-kinase anchoring protein 6) which were associated with risk of invasive EOC (rs1955513, OR = 0.90, p = 0.00033; rs927062, OR = 0.94, p = 0.00059). Functional annotation revealed that the two ARHGEF10L variants were located in super-enhancer regions and that AKAP6 rs927062 was associated with expression of GTPase gene ARHGAP5 (Rho GTPase activating protein 5). Inherited variants in ARHGEF10L and AKAP6, with potential transcriptional regulatory function and association with EOC risk, warrant investigation in independent EOC study populations.
Published: 2018

18. Dose-Response Association of CD8+ Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Survival Time in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer

Author: Goode, Ellen L, Block, Matthew S, Kalli, Kimberly R, Vierkant, Robert A, Chen, Wenqian, Fogarty, Zachary C, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Tołoczko, Aleksandra, Hein, Alexander, Bouligny, Aliecia L, Jensen, Allan, Osorio, Ana, Hartkopf, Andreas D, Ryan, Andy, Chudecka-Głaz, Anita, Magliocco, Anthony M, Hartmann, Arndt, Jung, Audrey Y, Gao, Bo, Hernandez, Brenda Y, Fridley, Brooke L, McCauley, Bryan M, Kennedy, Catherine J, Wang, Chen, Karpinskyj, Chloe, de Sousa, Christiani B, Tiezzi, Daniel G, Wachter, David L, Herpel, Esther, Taran, Florin Andrei, Modugno, Francesmary, Nelson, Gregg, Lubiński, Jan, Menkiszak, Janusz, Alsop, Jennifer, Lester, Jenny, García-Donas, Jesús, Nation, Jill, Hung, Jillian, Palacios, José, Rothstein, Joseph H, Kelley, Joseph L, de Andrade, Jurandyr M, Robles-Díaz, Luis, Intermaggio, Maria P, Widschwendter, Martin, Beckmann, Matthias W, Ruebner, Matthias, Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes, Singh, Naveena, Oszurek, Oleg, Harnett, Paul R, Rambau, Peter F, Sinn, Peter, Wagner, Philipp, Ghatage, Prafull, Sharma, Raghwa, Edwards, Robert P, Ness, Roberta B, Orsulic, Sandra, Brucker, Sara Y, Johnatty, Sharon E, Longacre, Teri A, Eilber, Ursula, McGuire, Valerie, Sieh, Weiva, Natanzon, Yanina, Li, Zheng, Whittemore, Alice S, deFazio, Anna, Staebler, Annette, Karlan, Beth Y, Gilks, Blake, Bowtell, David D, Høgdall, Estrid, dos Reis, Francisco J Candido, Steed, Helen, Campbell, Ian G, Gronwald, Jacek, Benítez, Javier, Koziak, Jennifer M, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Moysich, Kirsten B, Kelemen, Linda E, Cook, Linda S, Goodman, Marc T, García, María José, Fasching, Peter A, Kommoss, Stefan, Deen, Suha, Kjaer, Susanne K, Menon, Usha, Brenton, James D, Pharoah, Paul DP, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Huntsman, David G, Winham, Stacey J, Köbel, Martin, and Ramus, Susan J
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Immunology, Cancer, Prevention, Vaccine Related, Rare Diseases, Clinical Research, Ovarian Cancer, BRCA2 Protein, CD8 Antigens, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Cohort Studies, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Female, Humans, Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Grading, Ovarian Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) Consortium, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: ImportanceCytotoxic CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) participate in immune control of epithelial ovarian cancer; however, little is known about prognostic patterns of CD8+ TILs by histotype and in relation to other clinical factors.ObjectiveTo define the prognostic role of CD8+ TILs in epithelial ovarian cancer.Design, setting, and participantsThis was a multicenter observational, prospective survival cohort study of the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis Consortium. More than 5500 patients, including 3196 with high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs), were followed prospectively for over 24 650 person-years.ExposuresFollowing immunohistochemical analysis, CD8+ TILs were identified within the epithelial components of tumor islets. Patients were grouped based on the estimated number of CD8+ TILs per high-powered field: negative (none), low (1-2), moderate (3-19), and high (≥20). CD8+ TILs in a subset of patients were also assessed in a quantitative, uncategorized manner, and the functional form of associations with survival was assessed using penalized B-splines.Main outcomes and measuresOverall survival time.ResultsThe final sample included 5577 women; mean age at diagnosis was 58.4 years (median, 58.2 years). Among the 5 major invasive histotypes, HGSOCs showed the most infiltration. CD8+ TILs in HGSOCs were significantly associated with longer overall survival; median survival was 2.8 years for patients with no CD8+ TILs and 3.0 years, 3.8 years, and 5.1 years for patients with low, moderate, or high levels of CD8+ TILs, respectively (P value for trend = 4.2 × 10−16). A survival benefit was also observed among women with endometrioid and mucinous carcinomas, but not for those with the other histotypes. Among HGSOCs, CD8+ TILs were favorable regardless of extent of residual disease following cytoreduction, known standard treatment, and germline BRCA1 pathogenic mutation, but were not prognostic for BRCA2 mutation carriers. Evaluation of uncategorized CD8+ TIL counts showed a near-log-linear functional form.Conclusions and relevanceThis study demonstrates the histotype-specific nature of immune infiltration and provides definitive evidence for a dose-response relationship between CD8+ TILs and HGSOC survival. That the extent of infiltration is prognostic, not merely its presence or absence, suggests that understanding factors that drive infiltration will be the key to unraveling outcome heterogeneity in this cancer.
Published: 2017

19. Dose-Response Association of CD8+ Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Survival Time in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer.

Author: Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) Consortium, Goode, Ellen L, Block, Matthew S, Kalli, Kimberly R, Vierkant, Robert A, Chen, Wenqian, Fogarty, Zachary C, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Tołoczko, Aleksandra, Hein, Alexander, Bouligny, Aliecia L, Jensen, Allan, Osorio, Ana, Hartkopf, Andreas, Ryan, Andy, Chudecka-Głaz, Anita, Magliocco, Anthony M, Hartmann, Arndt, Jung, Audrey Y, Gao, Bo, Hernandez, Brenda Y, Fridley, Brooke L, McCauley, Bryan M, Kennedy, Catherine J, Wang, Chen, Karpinskyj, Chloe, de Sousa, Christiani B, Tiezzi, Daniel G, Wachter, David L, Herpel, Esther, Taran, Florin Andrei, Modugno, Francesmary, Nelson, Gregg, Lubiński, Jan, Menkiszak, Janusz, Alsop, Jennifer, Lester, Jenny, García-Donas, Jesús, Nation, Jill, Hung, Jillian, Palacios, José, Rothstein, Joseph H, Kelley, Joseph L, de Andrade, Jurandyr M, Robles-Díaz, Luis, Intermaggio, Maria P, Widschwendter, Martin, Beckmann, Matthias W, Ruebner, Matthias, Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes, Singh, Naveena, Oszurek, Oleg, Harnett, Paul R, Rambau, Peter F, Sinn, Peter, Wagner, Philipp, Ghatage, Prafull, Sharma, Raghwa, Edwards, Robert P, Ness, Roberta B, Orsulic, Sandra, Brucker, Sara Y, Johnatty, Sharon E, Longacre, Teri A, Ursula, Eilber, McGuire, Valerie, Sieh, Weiva, Natanzon, Yanina, Li, Zheng, Whittemore, Alice S, Anna, deFazio, Staebler, Annette, Karlan, Beth Y, Gilks, Blake, Bowtell, David D, Høgdall, Estrid, Candido dos Reis, Francisco J, Steed, Helen, Campbell, Ian G, Gronwald, Jacek, Benítez, Javier, Koziak, Jennifer M, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Moysich, Kirsten B, Kelemen, Linda E, Cook, Linda S, Goodman, Marc T, García, María José, Fasching, Peter A, Kommoss, Stefan, Deen, Suha, Kjaer, Susanne K, Menon, Usha, Brenton, James D, Pharoah, Paul DP, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Huntsman, David G, Winham, Stacey J, Köbel, Martin, and Ramus, Susan J
Subjects: Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) Consortium, Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating, Humans, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Ovarian Neoplasms, BRCA2 Protein, Treatment Outcome, Survival Analysis, Cohort Studies, Prospective Studies, Mutation, Middle Aged, Female, Neoplasm Grading, CD8 Antigens, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Cancer, Prevention, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Vaccine Related, Clinical Research, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Public Health and Health Services
Abstract: ImportanceCytotoxic CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) participate in immune control of epithelial ovarian cancer; however, little is known about prognostic patterns of CD8+ TILs by histotype and in relation to other clinical factors.ObjectiveTo define the prognostic role of CD8+ TILs in epithelial ovarian cancer.Design, setting, and participantsThis was a multicenter observational, prospective survival cohort study of the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis Consortium. More than 5500 patients, including 3196 with high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs), were followed prospectively for over 24 650 person-years.ExposuresFollowing immunohistochemical analysis, CD8+ TILs were identified within the epithelial components of tumor islets. Patients were grouped based on the estimated number of CD8+ TILs per high-powered field: negative (none), low (1-2), moderate (3-19), and high (≥20). CD8+ TILs in a subset of patients were also assessed in a quantitative, uncategorized manner, and the functional form of associations with survival was assessed using penalized B-splines.Main outcomes and measuresOverall survival time.ResultsThe final sample included 5577 women; mean age at diagnosis was 58.4 years (median, 58.2 years). Among the 5 major invasive histotypes, HGSOCs showed the most infiltration. CD8+ TILs in HGSOCs were significantly associated with longer overall survival; median survival was 2.8 years for patients with no CD8+ TILs and 3.0 years, 3.8 years, and 5.1 years for patients with low, moderate, or high levels of CD8+ TILs, respectively (P value for trend = 4.2 × 10−16). A survival benefit was also observed among women with endometrioid and mucinous carcinomas, but not for those with the other histotypes. Among HGSOCs, CD8+ TILs were favorable regardless of extent of residual disease following cytoreduction, known standard treatment, and germline BRCA1 pathogenic mutation, but were not prognostic for BRCA2 mutation carriers. Evaluation of uncategorized CD8+ TIL counts showed a near-log-linear functional form.Conclusions and relevanceThis study demonstrates the histotype-specific nature of immune infiltration and provides definitive evidence for a dose-response relationship between CD8+ TILs and HGSOC survival. That the extent of infiltration is prognostic, not merely its presence or absence, suggests that understanding factors that drive infiltration will be the key to unraveling outcome heterogeneity in this cancer.
Published: 2017

20. Identification of 12 new susceptibility loci for different histotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Author: Phelan, Catherine M, Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Kar, Siddhartha P, Lawrenson, Kate, Winham, Stacey J, Dennis, Joe, Pirie, Ailith, Riggan, Marjorie J, Chornokur, Ganna, Earp, Madalene A, Lyra, Paulo C, Lee, Janet M, Coetzee, Simon, Beesley, Jonathan, McGuffog, Lesley, Soucy, Penny, Dicks, Ed, Lee, Andrew, Barrowdale, Daniel, Lecarpentier, Julie, Leslie, Goska, Aalfs, Cora M, Aben, Katja KH, Adams, Marcia, Adlard, Julian, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, AOCS study group, Aravantinos, Gerasimos, Arnold, Norbert, Arun, Banu K, Arver, Brita, Azzollini, Jacopo, Balmaña, Judith, Banerjee, Susana N, Barjhoux, Laure, Barkardottir, Rosa B, Bean, Yukie, Beckmann, Matthias W, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernardini, Marcus Q, Birrer, Michael J, Bjorge, Line, Black, Amanda, Blankstein, Kenneth, Blok, Marinus J, Bodelon, Clara, Bogdanova, Natalia, Bojesen, Anders, Bonanni, Bernardo, Borg, Åke, Bradbury, Angela R, Brenton, James D, Brewer, Carole, Brinton, Louise, Broberg, Per, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bruinsma, Fiona, Brunet, Joan, Buecher, Bruno, Butzow, Ralf, Buys, Saundra S, Caldes, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Cannioto, Rikki, Carney, Michael E, Cescon, Terence, Chan, Salina B, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen, Chen, Xiao Qing, Chiew, Yoke-Eng, Chiquette, Jocelyne, Chung, Wendy K, Claes, Kathleen BM, Conner, Thomas, Cook, Linda S, Cook, Jackie, Cramer, Daniel W, Cunningham, Julie M, D'Aloisio, Aimee A, Daly, Mary B, Damiola, Francesca, Damirovna, Sakaeva Dina, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Dao, Fanny, Davidson, Rosemarie, DeFazio, Anna, Delnatte, Capucine, Doheny, Kimberly F, Diez, Orland, Ding, Yuan Chun, Doherty, Jennifer Anne, Domchek, Susan M, and Dorfling, Cecilia M
Subjects: AOCS study group, EMBRACE Study, GEMO Study Collaborators, HEBON Study, KConFab Investigators, OPAL study group, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Telomere-Binding Proteins, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Risk Factors, Genotype, Mutation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Alleles, Female, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genetic Loci, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Genetics, Cancer, Human Genome, Rare Diseases, Prevention, Ovarian Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology
Abstract: To identify common alleles associated with different histotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), we pooled data from multiple genome-wide genotyping projects totaling 25,509 EOC cases and 40,941 controls. We identified nine new susceptibility loci for different EOC histotypes: six for serous EOC histotypes (3q28, 4q32.3, 8q21.11, 10q24.33, 18q11.2 and 22q12.1), two for mucinous EOC (3q22.3 and 9q31.1) and one for endometrioid EOC (5q12.3). We then performed meta-analysis on the results for high-grade serous ovarian cancer with the results from analysis of 31,448 BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, including 3,887 mutation carriers with EOC. This identified three additional susceptibility loci at 2q13, 8q24.1 and 12q24.31. Integrated analyses of genes and regulatory biofeatures at each locus predicted candidate susceptibility genes, including OBFC1, a new candidate susceptibility gene for low-grade and borderline serous EOC.
Published: 2017

21. Inherited variants affecting RNA editing may contribute to ovarian cancer susceptibility: results from a large-scale collaboration

Author: Permuth, Jennifer B, Reid, Brett, Earp, Madalene, Chen, Y Ann, Monteiro, Alvaro NA, Chen, Zhihua, Group, AOCS Study, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Fasching, Peter A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Vanderstichele, Adriaan, Van Niewenhuyse, Els, Vergote, Ignace, Rossing, Mary Anne, Doherty, Jennifer Anne, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Moysich, Kirsten, Odunsi, Kunle, Goodman, Marc T, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Wilkens, Lynne R, Thompson, Pamela J, Dörk, Thilo, Bogdanova, Natalia, Butzow, Ralf, Nevanlinna, Heli, Pelttari, Liisa, Leminen, Arto, Modugno, Francesmary, Edwards, Robert P, Ness, Roberta B, Kelley, Joseph, Heitz, Florian, Karlan, Beth, Lester, Jenny, Kjaer, Susanne K, Jensen, Allan, Giles, Graham, Hildebrandt, Michelle, Liang, Dong, Lu, Karen H, Wu, Xifeng, Levine, Douglas A, Bisogna, Maria, Berchuck, Andrew, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Tworoger, Shelley S, Poole, Elizabeth M, Bandera, Elisa V, Fridley, Brooke, Cunningham, Julie, Winham, Stacey J, Olson, Sara H, Orlow, Irene, Bjorge, Line, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Massuger, Leon, Pejovic, Tanja, Moffitt, Melissa, Le, Nhu, Cook, Linda S, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Kelemen, Linda E, Gronwald, Jacek, Lubinski, Jan, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Brinton, Louise A, Lissowska, Jolanta, Yang, Hanna, Hogdall, Estrid, Hogdall, Claus, Lundvall, Lene, Pharoah, Paul DP, Song, Honglin, Campbell, Ian, Eccles, Diana, McNeish, Iain, Whittemore, Alice, McGuire, Valerie, Sieh, Weiva, Rothstein, Joseph, Phelan, Catherine M, Risch, Harvey, Narod, Steven, McLaughlin, John, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Menon, Usha, Gayther, Simon, Ramus, Susan J, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Wu, Anna H, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Cheng, Jin Q, and Goode, Ellen L
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Ovarian Cancer, Cancer, Genetics, Rare Diseases, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Animals, Disease Susceptibility, Female, Genetic Variation, Humans, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, RNA Editing, polymorphisms, RNA editing, ovarian cancer risk, AOCS Study Group, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: RNA editing in mammals is a form of post-transcriptional modification in which adenosine is converted to inosine by the adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADAR) family of enzymes. Based on evidence of altered ADAR expression in epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC), we hypothesized that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in ADAR genes modify EOC susceptibility, potentially by altering ovarian tissue gene expression. Using directly genotyped and imputed data from 10,891 invasive EOC cases and 21,693 controls, we evaluated the associations of 5,303 SNPs in ADAD1, ADAR, ADAR2, ADAR3, and SND1. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), with adjustment for European ancestry. We conducted gene-level analyses using the Admixture Maximum Likelihood (AML) test and the Sequence-Kernel Association test for common and rare variants (SKAT-CR). Association analysis revealed top risk-associated SNP rs77027562 (OR (95% CI)= 1.39 (1.17-1.64), P=1.0x10-4) in ADAR3 and rs185455523 in SND1 (OR (95% CI)= 0.68 (0.56-0.83), P=2.0x10-4). When restricting to serous histology (n=6,500), the magnitude of association strengthened for rs185455523 (OR=0.60, P=1.0x10-4). Gene-level analyses revealed that variation in ADAR was associated (P
Published: 2016

22. Assessment of variation in immunosuppressive pathway genes reveals TGFBR2 to be associated with risk of clear cell ovarian cancer

Author: Hampras, Shalaka S, Sucheston-Campbell, Lara E, Cannioto, Rikki, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Modugno, Francesmary, Dörk, Thilo, Hillemanns, Peter, Preus, Leah, Knutson, Keith L, Wallace, Paul K, Hong, Chi-Chen, Friel, Grace, Davis, Warren, Nesline, Mary, Pearce, Celeste L, Kelemen, Linda E, Goodman, Marc T, Bandera, Elisa V, Terry, Kathryn L, Schoof, Nils, Eng, Kevin H, Clay, Alyssa, Singh, Prashant K, Joseph, Janine M, Aben, Katja KH, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, Baker, Helen, Bean, Yukie, Beckmann, Matthias W, Bisogna, Maria, Bjorge, Line, Bogdanova, Natalia, Brinton, Louise A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bruinsma, Fiona, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian G, Carty, Karen, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Cybulski, Cezary, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Dennis, Joe, Despierre, Evelyn, Dicks, Ed, Doherty, Jennifer A, du Bois, Andreas, Dürst, Matthias, Easton, Doug, Eccles, Diana, Edwards, Robert P, Ekici, Arif B, Fasching, Peter A, Fridley, Brooke L, Gao, Yu-Tang, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Gronwald, Jacek, Harrington, Patricia, Harter, Philipp, Hasmad, Hanis Nazihah, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hogdall, Claus, Hogdall, Estrid, Hosono, Satoyo, Iversen, Edwin S, Jakubowska, Anna, Jensen, Allan, Ji, Bu-Tian, Karlan, Beth Y, Kellar, Melissa, Kelley, Joseph L, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Klapdor, Rüdiger, Kolomeyevskaya, Nonna, Krakstad, Camilla, Kjaer, Susanne K, Kruszka, Bridget, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D, Lee, Alice W, Lele, Shashikant, Leminen, Arto, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A, Liang, Dong, Lissowska, Jolanta, Liu, Song, Lu, Karen, Lubinski, Jan, Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon FAG, Matsuo, Keitaro, and McGuire, Valeria
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Immunology, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell, Adult, Aged, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Gene Frequency, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genotype, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Receptor, Transforming Growth Factor-beta Type II, Receptors, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Risk Factors, T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory, ovarian cancer, immunosuppression, biomarkers, genetic variation, TGFBR2, TGFBR2, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundRegulatory T (Treg) cells, a subset of CD4+ T lymphocytes, are mediators of immunosuppression in cancer, and, thus, variants in genes encoding Treg cell immune molecules could be associated with ovarian cancer.MethodsIn a population of 15,596 epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cases and 23,236 controls, we measured genetic associations of 1,351 SNPs in Treg cell pathway genes with odds of ovarian cancer and tested pathway and gene-level associations, overall and by histotype, for the 25 genes, using the admixture likelihood (AML) method. The most significant single SNP associations were tested for correlation with expression levels in 44 ovarian cancer patients.ResultsThe most significant global associations for all genes in the pathway were seen in endometrioid ( p = 0.082) and clear cell ( p = 0.083), with the most significant gene level association seen with TGFBR2 ( p = 0.001) and clear cell EOC. Gene associations with histotypes at p < 0.05 included: IL12 ( p = 0.005 and p = 0.008, serous and high-grade serous, respectively), IL8RA ( p = 0.035, endometrioid and mucinous), LGALS1 ( p = 0.03, mucinous), STAT5B ( p = 0.022, clear cell), TGFBR1 ( p = 0.021 endometrioid) and TGFBR2 ( p = 0.017 and p = 0.025, endometrioid and mucinous, respectively).ConclusionsCommon inherited gene variation in Treg cell pathways shows some evidence of germline genetic contribution to odds of EOC that varies by histologic subtype and may be associated with mRNA expression of immune-complex receptor in EOC patients.
Published: 2016

23. Association of vitamin D levels and risk of ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.

Author: Ong, Jue-Sheng, Cuellar-Partida, Gabriel, Lu, Yi, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Fasching, Peter A, Hein, Alexander, Burghaus, Stefanie, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Vergote, Ignace, Vanderstichele, Adriaan, Anne Doherty, Jennifer, Anne Rossing, Mary, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Eilber, Ursula, Rudolph, Anja, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Goodman, Marc T, Bogdanova, Natalia, Dörk, Thilo, Dürst, Matthias, Hillemanns, Peter, Runnebaum, Ingo B, Antonenkova, Natalia, Butzow, Ralf, Leminen, Arto, Nevanlinna, Heli, Pelttari, Liisa M, Edwards, Robert P, Kelley, Joseph L, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Ness, Roberta B, Cannioto, Rikki, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus K, Jensen, Allan, Giles, Graham G, Bruinsma, Fiona, Kjaer, Susanne K, Hildebrandt, Michelle At, Liang, Dong, Lu, Karen H, Wu, Xifeng, Bisogna, Maria, Dao, Fanny, Levine, Douglas A, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Tworoger, Shelley S, Stampfer, Meir, Missmer, Stacey, Bjorge, Line, Salvesen, Helga B, Kopperud, Reidun K, Bischof, Katharina, Aben, Katja Kh, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Massuger, Leon Fag, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Olson, Sara H, McGuire, Valerie, Rothstein, Joseph H, Sieh, Weiva, Whittemore, Alice S, Cook, Linda S, Le, Nhu D, Gilks, C Blake, Gronwald, Jacek, Jakubowska, Anna, Lubiński, Jan, Kluz, Tomasz, Song, Honglin, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Brinton, Louise, Trabert, Britton, Lissowska, Jolanta, McLaughlin, John R, Narod, Steven A, Phelan, Catherine, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Eccles, Diana, Campbell, Ian, Gayther, Simon A, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Menon, Usha, Ramus, Susan J, Wu, Anna H, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Timorek, Agnieszka, Szafron, Lukasz, Cunningham, Julie M, Fridley, Brooke L, Winham, Stacey J, Bandera, Elisa V, and Poole, Elizabeth M
Subjects: Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Vitamin D, Odds Ratio, Risk Factors, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Female, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Prevention, Rare Diseases, Nutrition, Clinical Research, Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Statistics, Public Health and Health Services, Epidemiology
Abstract: BackgroundIn vitro and observational epidemiological studies suggest that vitamin D may play a role in cancer prevention. However, the relationship between vitamin D and ovarian cancer is uncertain, with observational studies generating conflicting findings. A potential limitation of observational studies is inadequate control of confounding. To overcome this problem, we used Mendelian randomization (MR) to evaluate the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration and risk of ovarian cancer.MethodsWe employed SNPs with well-established associations with 25(OH)D concentration as instrumental variables for MR: rs7944926 (DHCR7), rs12794714 (CYP2R1) and rs2282679 (GC). We included 31 719 women of European ancestry (10 065 cases, 21 654 controls) from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, who were genotyped using customized Illumina Infinium iSelect (iCOGS) arrays. A two-sample (summary data) MR approach was used and analyses were performed separately for all ovarian cancer (10 065 cases) and for high-grade serous ovarian cancer (4121 cases).ResultsThe odds ratio for epithelial ovarian cancer risk (10 065 cases) estimated by combining the individual SNP associations using inverse variance weighting was 1.27 (95% confidence interval: 1.06 to 1.51) per 20 nmol/L decrease in 25(OH)D concentration. The estimated odds ratio for high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer (4121 cases) was 1.54 (1.19, 2.01).ConclusionsGenetically lowered 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations were associated with higher ovarian cancer susceptibility in Europeans. These findings suggest that increasing plasma vitamin D levels may reduce risk of ovarian cancer.
Published: 2016

24. Functional mechanisms underlying pleiotropic risk alleles at the 19p13.1 breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility locus.

Author: Lawrenson, Kate, Kar, Siddhartha, McCue, Karen, Kuchenbaeker, Karoline, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Tyrer, Jonathan, Beesley, Jonathan, Ramus, Susan J, Li, Qiyuan, Delgado, Melissa K, Lee, Janet M, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Arun, Banu K, Arver, Brita, Bandera, Elisa V, Barile, Monica, Barkardottir, Rosa B, Barrowdale, Daniel, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Berchuck, Andrew, Bisogna, Maria, Bjorge, Line, Blomqvist, Carl, Blot, William, Bogdanova, Natalia, Bojesen, Anders, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Bonanni, Bernardo, Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brennan, Paul, Brenner, Hermann, Bruinsma, Fiona, Brunet, Joan, Buhari, Shaik Ahmad, Burwinkel, Barbara, Butzow, Ralf, Buys, Saundra S, Cai, Qiuyin, Caldes, Trinidad, Campbell, Ian, Canniotto, Rikki, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chiquette, Jocelyne, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Claes, Kathleen BM, GEMO Study Collaborators, Cook, Linda S, Cox, Angela, Cramer, Daniel W, Cross, Simon S, Cybulski, Cezary, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Damiola, Francesca, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Darabi, Hatef, Dennis, Joe, Devilee, Peter, Diez, Orland, Doherty, Jennifer A, Domchek, Susan M, Dorfling, Cecilia M, Dörk, Thilo, Dumont, Martine, Ehrencrona, Hans, Ejlertsen, Bent, Ellis, Steve, EMBRACE, Engel, Christoph, Lee, Eunjung, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Feliubadalo, Lidia, Figueroa, Jonine, Flesch-Janys, Dieter, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Foretova, Lenka, Fostira, Florentia, Foulkes, William D, Fridley, Brooke L, Friedman, Eitan, Frost, Debra, Gambino, Gaetana, Ganz, Patricia A, Garber, Judy, García-Closas, Montserrat, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Ghoussaini, Maya, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Godwin, Andrew K, Goldberg, Mark S, and Goldgar, David E
Subjects: GEMO Study Collaborators, EMBRACE, Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Research Group Netherlands, KConFab Investigators, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, RNA, Messenger, Genotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Alleles, African Continental Ancestry Group, Asian Continental Ancestry Group, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19, RNA, Messenger, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Cancer, Rare Diseases, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors
Abstract: A locus at 19p13 is associated with breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) risk. Here we analyse 438 SNPs in this region in 46,451 BC and 15,438 OC cases, 15,252 BRCA1 mutation carriers and 73,444 controls and identify 13 candidate causal SNPs associated with serous OC (P=9.2 × 10(-20)), ER-negative BC (P=1.1 × 10(-13)), BRCA1-associated BC (P=7.7 × 10(-16)) and triple negative BC (P-diff=2 × 10(-5)). Genotype-gene expression associations are identified for candidate target genes ANKLE1 (P=2 × 10(-3)) and ABHD8 (P
Published: 2016

25. Exome genotyping arrays to identify rare and low frequency variants associated with epithelial ovarian cancer risk

Author: Permuth, Jennifer B, Pirie, Ailith, Chen, Y Ann, Lin, Hui-Yi, Reid, Brett M, Chen, Zhihua, Monteiro, Alvaro, Dennis, Joe, Mendoza-Fandino, Gustavo, Group, AOCS Study, Study, Australian Cancer, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Bandera, Elisa V, Bisogna, Maria, Brinton, Louise, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Carney, Michael E, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, D’Aloisio, Aimee A, Doherty, Jennifer Anne, Earp, Madalene, Edwards, Robert P, Fridley, Brooke L, Gayther, Simon A, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Hogdall, Estrid, Iversen, Edwin S, Jakubowska, Anna, Jensen, Allan, Karlan, Beth Y, Kelemen, Linda E, Kjaer, Suzanne K, Kraft, Peter, Le, Nhu D, Levine, Douglas A, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lubinski, Jan, Matsuo, Keitaro, Menon, Usha, Modugno, Rosemary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Nakanishi, Toru, Ness, Roberta B, Olson, Sara, Orlow, Irene, Pearce, Celeste L, Pejovic, Tanja, Poole, Elizabeth M, Ramus, Susan J, Rossing, Mary Anne, Sandler, Dale P, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Song, Honglin, Taylor, Jack A, Teo, Soo-Hwang, Terry, Kathryn L, Thompson, Pamela J, Tworoger, Shelley S, Webb, Penelope M, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Wilkens, Lynne R, Winham, Stacey, Woo, Yin-Ling, Wu, Anna H, Yang, Hannah, Zheng, Wei, Ziogas, Argyrios, Phelan, Catherine M, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Berchuck, Andrew, Goode, Ellen L, Pharoah, Paul DP, Sellers, Thomas A, and Consortium, on behalf of the Ovarian Cancer Association
Subjects: Biological Sciences, Genetics, Rare Diseases, Human Genome, Prevention, Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Actins, Biotinidase, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Exome, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Humans, Keratin-13, Neoplasm Proteins, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Receptor, Melanocortin, Type 2, AOCS Study Group, Australian Cancer Study, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Medical and Health Sciences, Genetics & Heredity
Abstract: Rare and low frequency variants are not well covered in most germline genotyping arrays and are understudied in relation to epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk. To address this gap, we used genotyping arrays targeting rarer protein-coding variation in 8,165 EOC cases and 11,619 controls from the international Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). Pooled association analyses were conducted at the variant and gene level for 98,543 variants directly genotyped through two exome genotyping projects. Only common variants that represent or are in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) with previously-identified signals at established loci reached traditional thresholds for exome-wide significance (P P≥5.0 ×10 - 7) were detected for rare and low-frequency variants at 16 novel loci. Four rare missense variants were identified (ACTBL2 rs73757391 (5q11.2), BTD rs200337373 (3p25.1), KRT13 rs150321809 (17q21.2) and MC2R rs104894658 (18p11.21)), but only MC2R rs104894668 had a large effect size (OR = 9.66). Genes most strongly associated with EOC risk included ACTBL2 (PAML = 3.23 × 10 - 5; PSKAT-o = 9.23 × 10 - 4) and KRT13 (PAML = 1.67 × 10 - 4; PSKAT-o = 1.07 × 10 - 5), reaffirming variant-level analysis. In summary, this large study identified several rare and low-frequency variants and genes that may contribute to EOC susceptibility, albeit with possible small effects. Future studies that integrate epidemiology, sequencing, and functional assays are needed to further unravel the unexplained heritability and biology of this disease.
Published: 2016

26. Assessing the genetic architecture of epithelial ovarian cancer histological subtypes

Author: Cuellar-Partida, Gabriel, Lu, Yi, Dixon, Suzanne C, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Fasching, Peter A, Hein, Alexander, Burghaus, Stefanie, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Vergote, Ignace, Vanderstichele, Adriaan, Doherty, Jennifer Anne, Rossing, Mary Anne, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Rudolph, Anja, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Goodman, Marc T, Bogdanova, Natalia, Dörk, Thilo, Dürst, Matthias, Hillemanns, Peter, Runnebaum, Ingo B, Antonenkova, Natalia, Butzow, Ralf, Leminen, Arto, Nevanlinna, Heli, Pelttari, Liisa M, Edwards, Robert P, Kelley, Joseph L, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Ness, Roberta B, Cannioto, Rikki, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus, Jensen, Allan, Giles, Graham G, Bruinsma, Fiona, Kjaer, Susanne K, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Liang, Dong, Lu, Karen H, Wu, Xifeng, Bisogna, Maria, Dao, Fanny, Levine, Douglas A, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Tworoger, Shelley S, Stampfer, Meir, Missmer, Stacey, Bjorge, Line, Salvesen, Helga B, Kopperud, Reidun K, Bischof, Katharina, Aben, Katja KH, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Massuger, Leon FAG, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Olson, Sara H, McGuire, Valerie, Rothstein, Joseph H, Sieh, Weiva, Whittemore, Alice S, Cook, Linda S, Le, Nhu D, Blake Gilks, C, Gronwald, Jacek, Jakubowska, Anna, Lubiński, Jan, Kluz, Tomasz, Song, Honglin, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Brinton, Louise, Trabert, Britton, Lissowska, Jolanta, McLaughlin, John R, Narod, Steven A, Phelan, Catherine, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Eccles, Diana, Campbell, Ian, Gayther, Simon A, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Menon, Usha, Ramus, Susan J, Wu, Anna H, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Timorek, Agnieszka, Szafron, Lukasz, Cunningham, Julie M, Fridley, Brooke L, Winham, Stacey J, Bandera, Elisa V, Poole, Elizabeth M, and Morgan, Terry K
Subjects: Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Genetics, Obesity, Women's Health, Cancer Genomics, Ovarian Cancer, Cancer, Human Genome, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Genotype, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Pathology, Molecular, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, Genetics & Heredity, Reproductive medicine
Abstract: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is one of the deadliest common cancers. The five most common types of disease are high-grade and low-grade serous, endometrioid, mucinous and clear cell carcinoma. Each of these subtypes present distinct molecular pathogeneses and sensitivities to treatments. Recent studies show that certain genetic variants confer susceptibility to all subtypes while other variants are subtype-specific. Here, we perform an extensive analysis of the genetic architecture of EOC subtypes. To this end, we used data of 10,014 invasive EOC patients and 21,233 controls from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium genotyped in the iCOGS array (211,155 SNPs). We estimate the array heritability (attributable to variants tagged on arrays) of each subtype and their genetic correlations. We also look for genetic overlaps with factors such as obesity, smoking behaviors, diabetes, age at menarche and height. We estimated the array heritabilities of high-grade serous disease ([Formula: see text] = 8.8 ± 1.1 %), endometrioid ([Formula: see text] = 3.2 ± 1.6 %), clear cell ([Formula: see text] = 6.7 ± 3.3 %) and all EOC ([Formula: see text] = 5.6 ± 0.6 %). Known associated loci contributed approximately 40 % of the total array heritability for each subtype. The contribution of each chromosome to the total heritability was not proportional to chromosome size. Through bivariate and cross-trait LD score regression, we found evidence of shared genetic backgrounds between the three high-grade subtypes: serous, endometrioid and undifferentiated. Finally, we found significant genetic correlations of all EOC with diabetes and obesity using a polygenic prediction approach.
Published: 2016

27. No clinical utility of KRAS variant rs61764370 for ovarian or breast cancer

Author: Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, Hollestelle, Antoinette, van der Baan, Frederieke H, Berchuck, Andrew, Johnatty, Sharon E, Aben, Katja K, Agnarsson, Bjarni A, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Alducci, Elisa, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Antoniou, Antonis C, Apicella, Carmel, Arndt, Volker, Arnold, Norbert, Arun, Banu K, Arver, Brita, Ashworth, Alan, Group, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Baglietto, Laura, Balleine, Rosemary, Bandera, Elisa V, Barrowdale, Daniel, Bean, Yukie T, Beckmann, Lars, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Berger, Andreas, Berger, Raanan, Beuselinck, Benoit, Bisogna, Maria, Bjorge, Line, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Anders, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Bonanni, Bernardo, Brand, Judith S, Brauch, Hiltrud, Register, Breast Cancer Family, Brenner, Hermann, Brinton, Louise, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bruinsma, Fiona, Brunet, Joan, Brüning, Thomas, Budzilowska, Agnieszka, Bunker, Clareann H, Burwinkel, Barbara, Butzow, Ralf, Buys, Saundra S, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Carter, Jonathan, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Claes, Kathleen BM, Collée, J Margriet, Cook, Linda S, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cramer, Daniel, Cross, Simon S, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Czene, Kamila, Damiola, Francesca, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Darabi, Hatef, de la Hoya, Miguel, deFazio, Anna, Dennis, Joseph, Devilee, Peter, Dicks, Ed M, Diez, Orland, Doherty, Jennifer A, Domchek, Susan M, Dorfling, Cecilia M, Dörk, Thilo, Dos Santos Silva, Isabel, du Bois, Andreas, Dumont, Martine, Dunning, Alison M, Duran, Mercedes, Easton, Douglas F, Eccles, Diana, Edwards, Robert P, Ehrencrona, Hans, Ejlertsen, Bent, Ekici, Arif B, Ellis, Steve D, EMBRACE, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Fasching, Peter A, Feliubadalo, Lidia, Figueroa, Jonine, and Flesch-Janys, Dieter
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Clinical Research, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities, Genetic Testing, Ovarian Cancer, Women's Health, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Breast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), KRAS variant, Breast cancer, Ovarian cancer, Genetic association, Clinical outcome, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, and Consortium of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Breast Cancer Family Register, EMBRACE, GEMO Study Collaborators, GENICA Network, HEBON, KConFab Investigators, SWE-BRCA, Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Clinical sciences, Oncology and carcinogenesis, Reproductive medicine
Abstract: ObjectiveClinical genetic testing is commercially available for rs61764370, an inherited variant residing in a KRAS 3' UTR microRNA binding site, based on suggested associations with increased ovarian and breast cancer risk as well as with survival time. However, prior studies, emphasizing particular subgroups, were relatively small. Therefore, we comprehensively evaluated ovarian and breast cancer risks as well as clinical outcome associated with rs61764370.MethodsCentralized genotyping and analysis were performed for 140,012 women enrolled in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (15,357 ovarian cancer patients; 30,816 controls), the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (33,530 breast cancer patients; 37,640 controls), and the Consortium of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (14,765 BRCA1 and 7904 BRCA2 mutation carriers).ResultsWe found no association with risk of ovarian cancer (OR=0.99, 95% CI 0.94-1.04, p=0.74) or breast cancer (OR=0.98, 95% CI 0.94-1.01, p=0.19) and results were consistent among mutation carriers (BRCA1, ovarian cancer HR=1.09, 95% CI 0.97-1.23, p=0.14, breast cancer HR=1.04, 95% CI 0.97-1.12, p=0.27; BRCA2, ovarian cancer HR=0.89, 95% CI 0.71-1.13, p=0.34, breast cancer HR=1.06, 95% CI 0.94-1.19, p=0.35). Null results were also obtained for associations with overall survival following ovarian cancer (HR=0.94, 95% CI 0.83-1.07, p=0.38), breast cancer (HR=0.96, 95% CI 0.87-1.06, p=0.38), and all other previously-reported associations.Conclusionsrs61764370 is not associated with risk of ovarian or breast cancer nor with clinical outcome for patients with these cancers. Therefore, genotyping this variant has no clinical utility related to the prediction or management of these cancers.
Published: 2016

28. A targeted genetic association study of epithelial ovarian cancer susceptibility

Author: Earp, Madalene, Winham, Stacey J, Larson, Nicholas, Permuth, Jennifer B, Sicotte, Hugues, Chien, Jeremy, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Bandera, Elisa V, Berchuck, Andrew, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel, Doherty, Jennifer A, Goodman, Marc T, Levine, Douglas A, Monteiro, Alvaro NA, Ness, Roberta B, Pearce, Celeste L, Rossing, Mary Anne, Tworoger, Shelley S, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Bisogna, Maria, Brinton, Louise, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Carney, Michael E, Cunningham, Julie M, Edwards, Robert P, Fogarty, Zachary C, Iversen, Edwin S, Kraft, Peter, Larson, Melissa C, Le, Nhu D, Lin, Hui-Yi, Lissowska, Jolanta, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Olson, Sara H, Pike, Malcolm C, Poole, Elizabeth M, Rider, David N, Terry, Kathryn L, Thompson, Pamela J, van den Berg, David, Vierkant, Robert A, Vitonis, Allison F, Wilkens, Lynne R, Wu, Anna H, Yang, Hannah P, Ziogas, Argyrios, Phelan, Catherine M, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Chen, Yian Ann, Sellers, Thomas A, Fridley, Brooke L, and Goode, Ellen L
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Prevention, Cancer, Human Genome, Rare Diseases, Ovarian Cancer, Clinical Research, Genetics, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Biomarkers, Tumor, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Case-Control Studies, Female, Gene Expression Profiling, Genetic Association Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Humans, Neoplasm Staging, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Prognosis, Risk Factors, ovarian cancer, high-grade serous carcinoma, genetic association, susceptibility loci, NF-kappa B, NF-κB, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: BackgroundGenome-wide association studies have identified several common susceptibility alleles for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). To further understand EOC susceptibility, we examined previously ungenotyped candidate variants, including uncommon variants and those residing within known susceptibility loci.ResultsAt nine of eleven previously published EOC susceptibility regions (2q31, 3q25, 5p15, 8q21, 8q24, 10p12, 17q12, 17q21.31, and 19p13), novel variants were identified that were more strongly associated with risk than previously reported variants. Beyond known susceptibility regions, no variants were found to be associated with EOC risk at genome-wide statistical significance (p
Published: 2016

29. Evidence of a genetic link between endometriosis and ovarian cancer

Author: Lee, Alice W, Templeman, Claire, Stram, Douglas A, Beesley, Jonathan, Tyrer, Jonathan, Berchuck, Andrew, Pharoah, Paul P, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Consortium, Ovarian Cancer Association, Ness, Roberta B, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Hein, Alexander, Whittemore, Alice S, Jensen, Allan, du Bois, Andreas, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Rudolph, Anja, Jakubowska, Anna, Wu, Anna H, Ziogas, Argyrios, Ekici, Arif B, Leminen, Arto, Study, Australian Cancer, Group, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Rosen, Barry, Spiewankiewicz, Beata, Karlan, Beth Y, Trabert, Britton, Fridley, Brooke L, Gilks, C Blake, Krakstad, Camilla, Phelan, Catherine M, Cybulski, Cezary, Walsh, Christine, Hogdall, Claus, Cramer, Daniel W, Huntsman, David G, Eccles, Diana, Lambrechts, Diether, Liang, Dong, Levine, Douglas A, Iversen, Edwin S, Bandera, Elisa V, Poole, Elizabeth M, Goode, Ellen L, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Hogdall, Estrid, Bruinsma, Fiona, Heitz, Florian, Modugno, Francesmary, Giles, Graham G, Risch, Harvey A, Baker, Helen, Salvesen, Helga B, Nevanlinna, Heli, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Song, Honglin, McNeish, Iain, Campbell, Ian G, Vergote, Ignace, Runnebaum, Ingo B, Tangen, Ingvild L, Schwaab, Ira, Gronwald, Jacek, Paul, James, Lubinski, Jan, Doherty, Jennifer A, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Lester, Jenny, Schildkraut, Joellen M, McLaughlin, John R, Lissowska, Jolanta, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Kelley, Joseph L, Rothstein, Joseph H, Cunningham, Julie M, Lu, Karen, Carty, Karen, Terry, Kathryn L, Aben, Katja KH, Moysich, Kirsten B, Wicklund, Kristine G, Odunsi, Kunle, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Sucheston-Campbell, Lara, Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon FAG, Pelttari, Liisa M, Kelemen, Linda E, Cook, Linda S, Bjorge, Line, Nedergaard, Lotte, Brinton, Louise A, Wilkens, Lynne R, Pike, Malcolm C, Goodman, Marc T, and Bisogna, Maria
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Prevention, Cancer, Rare Diseases, Ovarian Cancer, Genetics, Genetic Testing, Clinical Research, Endometriosis, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Case-Control Studies, Computational Biology, Databases, Genetic, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Neoplasm Grading, Ovarian Neoplasms, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, SNPs, genetic variation, ovarian cancer, Clinical Sciences, Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, Public Health and Health Services, Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Reproductive medicine
Abstract: ObjectiveTo evaluate whether endometriosis-associated genetic variation affects risk of ovarian cancer.DesignPooled genetic analysis.SettingUniversity hospital.Patient(s)Genetic data from 46,176 participants (15,361 ovarian cancer cases and 30,815 controls) from 41 ovarian cancer studies.Intervention(s)None.Main outcome measure(s)Endometriosis-associated genetic variation and ovarian cancer.Result(s)There was significant evidence of an association between endometriosis-related genetic variation and ovarian cancer risk, especially for the high-grade serous and clear cell histotypes. Overall we observed 15 significant burden statistics, which was three times more than expected.Conclusion(s)By focusing on candidate regions from a phenotype associated with ovarian cancer, we have shown a clear genetic link between endometriosis and ovarian cancer that warrants further follow-up. The functional significance of the identified regions and SNPs is presently uncertain, though future fine mapping and histotype-specific functional analyses may shed light on the etiologies of both gynecologic conditions.
Published: 2016

30. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) Gene Variants and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) Risk.

Author: Amankwah, Ernest K, Lin, Hui-Yi, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Lawrenson, Kate, Dennis, Joe, Chornokur, Ganna, Aben, Katja KH, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, Bruinsma, Fiona, Bandera, Elisa V, Bean, Yukie T, Beckmann, Matthias W, Bisogna, Maria, Bjorge, Line, Bogdanova, Natalia, Brinton, Louise A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bunker, Clareann H, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian G, Carty, Karen, Chen, Zhihua, Chen, Y Ann, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, du Bois, Andreas, Despierre, Evelyn, Dicks, Ed, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, Dürst, Matthias, Easton, Douglas F, Eccles, Diana M, Edwards, Robert P, Ekici, Arif B, Fasching, Peter A, Fridley, Brooke L, Gao, Yu-Tang, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Harrington, Patricia, Harter, Philipp, Hasmad, Hanis N, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hillemanns, Peter, Hogdall, Claus K, Hogdall, Estrid, Hosono, Satoyo, Iversen, Edwin S, Jakubowska, Anna, Jensen, Allan, Ji, Bu-Tian, Karlan, Beth Y, Jim, Heather, Kellar, Melissa, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Krakstad, Camilla, Kjaer, Susanne K, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D, Lee, Alice W, Lele, Shashi, Leminen, Arto, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A, Liang, Dong, Lim, Boon Kiong, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lu, Karen, Lubinski, Jan, Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon FAG, Matsuo, Keitaro, McGuire, Valerie, McLaughlin, John R, McNeish, Ian, Menon, Usha, Milne, Roger L, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Ness, Roberta B, Nevanlinna, Heli, Eilber, Ursula, Odunsi, Kunle, Olson, Sara H, Orlow, Irene, Orsulic, Sandra, and Weber, Rachel Palmieri
Subjects: Georgia Chenevix-Trench on behalf of the AOCS management group, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Odds Ratio, Risk, Genotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Adult, Aged, Middle Aged, European Continental Ancestry Group, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, ovarian cancer, single-nucleotide polymorphisms, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Epidemiology, Public Health and Health Services, Genetics
Abstract: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a process whereby epithelial cells assume mesenchymal characteristics to facilitate cancer metastasis. However, EMT also contributes to the initiation and development of primary tumors. Prior studies that explored the hypothesis that EMT gene variants contribute to epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) risk have been based on small sample sizes and none have sought replication in an independent population. We screened 15,816 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 296 genes in a discovery phase using data from a genome-wide association study of EOC among women of European ancestry (1,947 cases and 2,009 controls) and identified 793 variants in 278 EMT-related genes that were nominally (P < 0.05) associated with invasive EOC. These SNPs were then genotyped in a larger study of 14,525 invasive-cancer patients and 23,447 controls. A P-value
Published: 2015

31. Common variants at the CHEK2 gene locus and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer

Author: Lawrenson, Kate, Iversen, Edwin S, Tyrer, Jonathan, Weber, Rachel Palmieri, Concannon, Patrick, Hazelett, Dennis J, Li, Qiyuan, Marks, Jeffrey R, Berchuck, Andrew, Lee, Janet M, Aben, Katja KH, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, Bandera, Elisa V, Bean, Yukie, Beckmann, Matthias W, Bisogna, Maria, Bjorge, Line, Bogdanova, Natalia, Brinton, Louise A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bruinsma, Fiona, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian G, Carty, Karen, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Chen, Ann, Chen, Zhihua, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Plisiecka-Halasa, Joanna, Dennis, Joe, Dicks, Ed, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Eccles, Diana, Easton, Douglas T, Edwards, Robert P, Eilber, Ursula, Ekici, Arif B, Fasching, Peter A, Fridley, Brooke L, Gao, Yu-Tang, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Harter, Philipp, Hasmad, Hanis Nazihah, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hillemanns, Peter, Hogdall, Estrid, Hogdall, Claus, Hosono, Satoyo, Jakubowska, Anna, Paul, James, Jensen, Allan, Karlan, Beth Y, Kjaer, Susanne Kruger, Kelemen, Linda E, Kellar, Melissa, Kelley, Joseph L, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Krakstad, Camilla, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D, Lee, Alice W, Cannioto, Rikki, Leminen, Arto, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A, Liang, Dong, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lu, Karen, Lubinski, Jan, Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon FAG, Matsuo, Keitaro, McGuire, Valerie, McLaughlin, John R, Nevanlinna, Heli, McNeish, Iain, Menon, Usha, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Narod, Steven A, Nedergaard, Lotte, Ness, Roberta B, Azmi, Mat Adenan Noor, Odunsi, Kunle, and Olson, Sara H
Subjects: Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Clinical Research, Biotechnology, Cancer, Human Genome, Ovarian Cancer, Prevention, Rare Diseases, Genetic Testing, Genetics, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Case-Control Studies, Checkpoint Kinase 2, Female, Genetic Loci, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Risk Factors, Australian Cancer Study, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract: Genome-wide association studies have identified 20 genomic regions associated with risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), but many additional risk variants may exist. Here, we evaluated associations between common genetic variants [single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and indels] in DNA repair genes and EOC risk. We genotyped 2896 common variants at 143 gene loci in DNA samples from 15 397 patients with invasive EOC and controls. We found evidence of associations with EOC risk for variants at FANCA, EXO1, E2F4, E2F2, CREB5 and CHEK2 genes (P ≤ 0.001). The strongest risk association was for CHEK2 SNP rs17507066 with serous EOC (P = 4.74 x 10(-7)). Additional genotyping and imputation of genotypes from the 1000 genomes project identified a slightly more significant association for CHEK2 SNP rs6005807 (r (2) with rs17507066 = 0.84, odds ratio (OR) 1.17, 95% CI 1.11-1.24, P = 1.1×10(-7)). We identified 293 variants in the region with likelihood ratios of less than 1:100 for representing the causal variant. Functional annotation identified 25 candidate SNPs that alter transcription factor binding sites within regulatory elements active in EOC precursor tissues. In The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset, CHEK2 gene expression was significantly higher in primary EOCs compared to normal fallopian tube tissues (P = 3.72×10(-8)). We also identified an association between genotypes of the candidate causal SNP rs12166475 (r (2) = 0.99 with rs6005807) and CHEK2 expression (P = 2.70×10(-8)). These data suggest that common variants at 22q12.1 are associated with risk of serous EOC and CHEK2 as a plausible target susceptibility gene.
Published: 2015

32. Network-Based Integration of GWAS and Gene Expression Identifies a HOX-Centric Network Associated with Serous Ovarian Cancer Risk.

Author: Kar, Siddhartha P, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Li, Qiyuan, Lawrenson, Kate, Aben, Katja KH, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Australian Cancer Study, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Baker, Helen, Bandera, Elisa V, Bean, Yukie T, Beckmann, Matthias W, Berchuck, Andrew, Bisogna, Maria, Bjørge, Line, Bogdanova, Natalia, Brinton, Louise, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian, Carty, Karen, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chen, Yian Ann, Chen, Zhihua, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Dennis, Joe, Dicks, Ed, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Dürst, Matthias, Eccles, Diana, Easton, Douglas F, Edwards, Robert P, Ekici, Arif B, Fasching, Peter A, Fridley, Brooke L, Gao, Yu-Tang, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Grownwald, Jacek, Harrington, Patricia, Harter, Philipp, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hillemanns, Peter, Hogdall, Estrid, Hogdall, Claus K, Hosono, Satoyo, Iversen, Edwin S, Jakubowska, Anna, Paul, James, Jensen, Allan, Ji, Bu-Tian, Karlan, Beth Y, Kjaer, Susanne K, Kelemen, Linda E, Kellar, Melissa, Kelley, Joseph, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Krakstad, Camilla, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D, Lee, Alice W, Lele, Shashi, Leminen, Arto, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A, Liang, Dong, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lu, Karen, Lubinski, Jan, Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon, Matsuo, Keitaro, McGuire, Valerie, McLaughlin, John R, McNeish, Iain A, Menon, Usha, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Narod, Steven A, Nedergaard, Lotte, Ness, Roberta B, Nevanlinna, Heli, Odunsi, Kunle, Olson, Sara H, and Orlow, Irene
Subjects: Australian Cancer Study, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Humans, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Ovarian Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Nuclear Proteins, Transcription Factors, DNA, Neoplasm, Morbidity, Risk Factors, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Genotype, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Global Health, Ovarian Cancer, Biotechnology, Cancer, Genetics, Rare Diseases, Prevention, Human Genome, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Epidemiology, Medical and Health Sciences
Abstract: BackgroundGenome-wide association studies (GWAS) have so far reported 12 loci associated with serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk. We hypothesized that some of these loci function through nearby transcription factor (TF) genes and that putative target genes of these TFs as identified by coexpression may also be enriched for additional EOC risk associations.MethodsWe selected TF genes within 1 Mb of the top signal at the 12 genome-wide significant risk loci. Mutual information, a form of correlation, was used to build networks of genes strongly coexpressed with each selected TF gene in the unified microarray dataset of 489 serous EOC tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Genes represented in this dataset were subsequently ranked using a gene-level test based on results for germline SNPs from a serous EOC GWAS meta-analysis (2,196 cases/4,396 controls).ResultsGene set enrichment analysis identified six networks centered on TF genes (HOXB2, HOXB5, HOXB6, HOXB7 at 17q21.32 and HOXD1, HOXD3 at 2q31) that were significantly enriched for genes from the risk-associated end of the ranked list (P < 0.05 and FDR < 0.05). These results were replicated (P < 0.05) using an independent association study (7,035 cases/21,693 controls). Genes underlying enrichment in the six networks were pooled into a combined network.ConclusionWe identified a HOX-centric network associated with serous EOC risk containing several genes with known or emerging roles in serous EOC development.ImpactNetwork analysis integrating large, context-specific datasets has the potential to offer mechanistic insights into cancer susceptibility and prioritize genes for experimental characterization.
Published: 2015

33. Cis-eQTL analysis and functional validation of candidate susceptibility genes for high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Author: Lawrenson, Kate, Li, Qiyuan, Kar, Siddhartha, Seo, Ji-Heui, Tyrer, Jonathan, Spindler, Tassja J, Lee, Janet, Chen, Yibu, Karst, Alison, Drapkin, Ronny, Aben, Katja KH, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Baker, Helen, Bandera, Elisa V, Bean, Yukie, Beckmann, Matthias W, Berchuck, Andrew, Bisogna, Maria, Bjorge, Line, Bogdanova, Natalia, Brinton, Louise A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bruinsma, Fiona, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian G, Carty, Karen, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Chen, Anne, Chen, Zhihua, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Dennis, Joe, Dicks, Ed, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Dürst, Matthias, Eccles, Diana, Easton, Douglas T, Edwards, Robert P, Eilber, Ursula, Ekici, Arif B, Fasching, Peter A, Fridley, Brooke L, Gao, Yu-Tang, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Grownwald, Jacek, Harrington, Patricia, Harter, Philipp, Hasmad, Hanis Nazihah, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hillemanns, Peter, Hogdall, Estrid, Hogdall, Claus, Hosono, Satoyo, Iversen, Edwin S, Jakubowska, Anna, James, Paul, Jensen, Allan, Ji, Bu-Tian, Karlan, Beth Y, Kruger Kjaer, Susanne, Kelemen, Linda E, Kellar, Melissa, Kelley, Joseph L, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Krakstad, Camilla, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D, Lee, Alice W, Lele, Shashi, Leminen, Arto, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A, Liang, Dong, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lu, Karen, Lubinski, Jan, Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon FAG, Matsuo, Keitaro, McGuire, Valerie, McLaughlin, John R, Nevanlinna, Heli, McNeish, Ian, and Menon, Usha
Subjects: Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Cell Line, Tumor, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Homeodomain Proteins, Neoplasm Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Protein Binding, Quantitative Trait Loci, Female, Nuchal Cord, Genetic Association Studies, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Cell Line, Tumor, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Rare Diseases, Prevention, Ovarian Cancer, Biotechnology, Human Genome, Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors
Abstract: Genome-wide association studies have reported 11 regions conferring risk of high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analyses can identify candidate susceptibility genes at risk loci. Here we evaluate cis-eQTL associations at 47 regions associated with HGSOC risk (P≤10(-5)). For three cis-eQTL associations (P
Published: 2015

34. Genome-wide significant risk associations for mucinous ovarian carcinoma

Author: Kelemen, Linda E, Lawrenson, Kate, Tyrer, Jonathan, Li, Qiyuan, Lee, Janet M, Seo, Ji-Heui, Phelan, Catherine M, Beesley, Jonathan, Chen, Xiaoqing, Spindler, Tassja J, Aben, Katja KH, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, Baker, Helen, Bandera, Elisa V, Bean, Yukie, Beckmann, Matthias W, Bisogna, Maria, Bjorge, Line, Bogdanova, Natalia, Brinton, Louise A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bruinsma, Fiona, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian G, Carty, Karen, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chen, Y Ann, Chen, Zhihua, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Dennis, Joe, Dicks, Ed, Doherty, Jennifer A, Doerk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Duerst, Matthias, Eccles, Diana, Easton, Douglas T, Edwards, Robert P, Eilber, Ursula, Ekici, Arif B, Engelholm, Svend Aage, Fasching, Peter A, Fridley, Brooke L, Gao, Yu-Tang, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Grownwald, Jacek, Harrington, Patricia, Harter, Philipp, Hasmad, Hanis Nazihah, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hillemanns, Peter, Hogdall, Estrid, Hogdall, Claus, Hosono, Satoyo, Iversen, Edwin S, Jakubowska, Anna, Jensen, Allan, Ji, Bu-Tian, Karlan, Beth Y, Kellar, Melissa, Kelley, Joseph L, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Krakstad, Camilla, Kjaer, Susanne K, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D, Lee, Alice W, Lele, Shashi, Leminen, Arto, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A, Liang, Dong, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lu, Karen, Lubinski, Jan, Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon FAG, Matsuo, Keitaro, McGuire, Valerie, McLaughlin, John R, McNeish, Iain, Menon, Usha, Modugno, Francesmary, Moes-Sosnowska, Joanna, and Moysich, Kirsten B
Subjects: Rare Diseases, Prevention, Ovarian Cancer, Genetics, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous, Base Sequence, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Nucleus, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 2, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Genetic Association Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Homeodomain Proteins, Humans, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Molecular Sequence Data, Neoplasm Proteins, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Risk Factors, Australian Cancer Study, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology
Abstract: Genome-wide association studies have identified several risk associations for ovarian carcinomas but not for mucinous ovarian carcinomas (MOCs). Our analysis of 1,644 MOC cases and 21,693 controls with imputation identified 3 new risk associations: rs752590 at 2q13 (P = 3.3 × 10(-8)), rs711830 at 2q31.1 (P = 7.5 × 10(-12)) and rs688187 at 19q13.2 (P = 6.8 × 10(-13)). We identified significant expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) associations for HOXD9 at 2q31.1 in ovarian (P = 4.95 × 10(-4), false discovery rate (FDR) = 0.003) and colorectal (P = 0.01, FDR = 0.09) tumors and for PAX8 at 2q13 in colorectal tumors (P = 0.03, FDR = 0.09). Chromosome conformation capture analysis identified interactions between the HOXD9 promoter and risk-associated SNPs at 2q31.1. Overexpressing HOXD9 in MOC cells augmented the neoplastic phenotype. These findings provide the first evidence for MOC susceptibility variants and insights into the underlying biology of the disease.
Published: 2015

35. Cell-type-specific enrichment of risk-associated regulatory elements at ovarian cancer susceptibility loci

Author: Coetzee, Simon G, Shen, Howard C, Hazelett, Dennis J, Lawrenson, Kate, Kuchenbaecker, Karoline, Tyrer, Jonathan, Rhie, Suhn K, Levanon, Keren, Karst, Alison, Drapkin, Ronny, Ramus, Susan J, Consortium, The Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1 2 The Ovarian Cancer Association, Couch, Fergus J, Offit, Kenneth, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Monteiro, Alvaro NA, Antoniou, Antonis, Freedman, Matthew, Coetzee, Gerhard A, Pharoah, Paul DP, Noushmehr, Houtan, Gayther, Simon A, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, Baker, Helen, Bandera, Elisa V, Bean, Yukie, Beckmann, Matthias W, Berchuck, Andrew, Bisogna, Maria, Bjorge, Line, Bogdanova, Natalia, Brinton, Louise A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bruinsma, Fiona, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian G, Carty, Karen, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chen, Ann, Chen, Zhihua, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Dennis, Joe, Dicks, Ed, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Dürst, Matthias, Eccles, Diana, Easton, Douglas F, Edwards, Robert P, Eilber, Ursula, Ekici, Arif B, Fasching, Peter A, Fridley, Brooke L, Gao, Yu-Tang, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Grownwald, Jacek, Harrington, Patricia, Harter, Philipp, Hasmad, Hanis Nazihah, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hillemanns, Peter, Hogdall, Estrid, Hogdall, Claus, Hosono, Satoyo, Iversen, Edwin S, Jakubowska, Anna, James, Paul, Jensen, Allan, Ji, Bu-Tian, Karlan, Beth Y, Kjaer, Susanne Kruger, Kelemen, Linda E, Kellar, Melissa, Kelley, Joseph L, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Krakstad, Camilla, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D, Lele, Shashi, Leminen, Arto, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A, Liang, Dong, and Lissowska, Jolanta
Subjects: Biological Sciences, Genetics, Rare Diseases, Prevention, Human Genome, Ovarian Cancer, Biotechnology, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Underpinning research, Aetiology, 1.1 Normal biological development and functioning, Chromatin, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Histones, Humans, Organ Specificity, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, The Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium The Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2, Medical and Health Sciences, Genetics & Heredity
Abstract: Understanding the regulatory landscape of the human genome is a central question in complex trait genetics. Most single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with cancer risk lie in non-protein-coding regions, implicating regulatory DNA elements as functional targets of susceptibility variants. Here, we describe genome-wide annotation of regions of open chromatin and histone modification in fallopian tube and ovarian surface epithelial cells (FTSECs, OSECs), the debated cellular origins of high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOCs) and in endometriosis epithelial cells (EECs), the likely precursor of clear cell ovarian carcinomas (CCOCs). The regulatory architecture of these cell types was compared with normal human mammary epithelial cells and LNCaP prostate cancer cells. We observed similar positional patterns of global enhancer signatures across the three different ovarian cancer precursor cell types, and evidence of tissue-specific regulatory signatures compared to non-gynecological cell types. We found significant enrichment for risk-associated SNPs intersecting regulatory biofeatures at 17 known HGSOC susceptibility loci in FTSECs (P = 3.8 × 10(-30)), OSECs (P = 2.4 × 10(-23)) and HMECs (P = 6.7 × 10(-15)) but not for EECs (P = 0.45) or LNCaP cells (P = 0.88). Hierarchical clustering of risk SNPs conditioned on the six different cell types indicates FTSECs and OSECs are highly related (96% of samples using multi-scale bootstrapping) suggesting both cell types may be precursors of HGSOC. These data represent the first description of regulatory catalogues of normal precursor cells for different ovarian cancer subtypes, and provide unique insights into the tissue specific regulatory variation with respect to the likely functional targets of germline genetic susceptibility variants for ovarian cancer.
Published: 2015

36. Characterization of Large Structural Genetic Mosaicism in Human Autosomes

Author: Machiela, Mitchell J, Zhou, Weiyin, Sampson, Joshua N, Dean, Michael C, Jacobs, Kevin B, Black, Amanda, Brinton, Louise A, Chang, I-Shou, Chen, Chu, Chen, Constance, Chen, Kexin, Cook, Linda S, Bou, Marta Crous, De Vivo, Immaculata, Doherty, Jennifer, Friedenreich, Christine M, Gaudet, Mia M, Haiman, Christopher A, Hankinson, Susan E, Hartge, Patricia, Henderson, Brian E, Hong, Yun-Chul, Hosgood, H Dean, Hsiung, Chao A, Hu, Wei, Hunter, David J, Jessop, Lea, Kim, Hee Nam, Kim, Yeul Hong, Kim, Young Tae, Klein, Robert, Kraft, Peter, Lan, Qing, Lin, Dongxin, Liu, Jianjun, Le Marchand, Loic, Liang, Xiaolin, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lu, Lingeng, Magliocco, Anthony M, Matsuo, Keitaro, Olson, Sara H, Orlow, Irene, Park, Jae Yong, Pooler, Loreall, Prescott, Jennifer, Rastogi, Radhai, Risch, Harvey A, Schumacher, Fredrick, Seow, Adeline, Setiawan, Veronica Wendy, Shen, Hongbing, Sheng, Xin, Shin, Min-Ho, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Berg, David VanDen, Wang, Jiu-Cun, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Wong, Maria Pik, Wu, Chen, Wu, Tangchun, Wu, Yi-Long, Xia, Lucy, Yang, Hannah P, Yang, Pan-Chyr, Zheng, Wei, Zhou, Baosen, Abnet, Christian C, Albanes, Demetrius, Aldrich, Melinda C, Amos, Christopher, Amundadottir, Laufey T, Berndt, Sonja I, Blot, William J, Bock, Cathryn H, Bracci, Paige M, Burdett, Laurie, Buring, Julie E, Butler, Mary A, Carreón, Tania, Chatterjee, Nilanjan, Chung, Charles C, Cook, Michael B, Cullen, Michael, Davis, Faith G, Ding, Ti, Duell, Eric J, Epstein, Caroline G, Fan, Jin-Hu, Figueroa, Jonine D, Fraumeni, Joseph F, Freedman, Neal D, Fuchs, Charles S, Gao, Yu-Tang, Gapstur, Susan M, Patiño-Garcia, Ana, Garcia-Closas, Montserrat, Gaziano, J Michael, Giles, Graham G, and Gillanders, Elizabeth M
Subjects: Biological Sciences, Genetics, Human Genome, Clinical Research, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Aged, Chromosome Aberrations, Female, Genome, Human, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mosaicism, Neoplasms, Medical and Health Sciences, Genetics & Heredity, Biological sciences, Biomedical and clinical sciences, Health sciences
Abstract: Analyses of genome-wide association study (GWAS) data have revealed that detectable genetic mosaicism involving large (>2 Mb) structural autosomal alterations occurs in a fraction of individuals. We present results for a set of 24,849 genotyped individuals (total GWAS set II [TGSII]) in whom 341 large autosomal abnormalities were observed in 168 (0.68%) individuals. Merging data from the new TGSII set with data from two prior reports (the Gene-Environment Association Studies and the total GWAS set I) generated a large dataset of 127,179 individuals; we then conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the patterns of detectable autosomal mosaicism (n = 1,315 events in 925 [0.73%] individuals). Restricting to events >2 Mb in size, we observed an increase in event frequency as event size decreased. The combined results underscore that the rate of detectable mosaicism increases with age (p value = 5.5 × 10(-31)) and is higher in men (p value = 0.002) but lower in participants of African ancestry (p value = 0.003). In a subset of 47 individuals from whom serial samples were collected up to 6 years apart, complex changes were noted over time and showed an overall increase in the proportion of mosaic cells as age increased. Our large combined sample allowed for a unique ability to characterize detectable genetic mosaicism involving large structural events and strengthens the emerging evidence of non-random erosion of the genome in the aging population.
Published: 2015

37. Evaluating the ovarian cancer gonadotropin hypothesis: a candidate gene study.

Author: Lee, Alice W, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Doherty, Jennifer A, Stram, Douglas A, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Plisiecka-Halasa, Joanna, Spiewankiewicz, Beata, Myers, Emily J, Australian Cancer Study (Ovarian Cancer), Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Fasching, Peter A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Ekici, Arif B, Hein, Alexander, Vergote, Ignace, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Lambrechts, Diether, Wicklund, Kristine G, Eilber, Ursula, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Rudolph, Anja, Sucheston-Campbell, Lara, Odunsi, Kunle, Moysich, Kirsten B, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Thompson, Pamela J, Goodman, Marc T, Wilkens, Lynne R, Dörk, Thilo, Hillemanns, Peter, Dürst, Matthias, Runnebaum, Ingo B, Bogdanova, Natalia, Pelttari, Liisa M, Nevanlinna, Heli, Leminen, Arto, Edwards, Robert P, Kelley, Joseph L, Harter, Philipp, Schwaab, Ira, Heitz, Florian, du Bois, Andreas, Orsulic, Sandra, Lester, Jenny, Walsh, Christine, Karlan, Beth Y, Hogdall, Estrid, Kjaer, Susanne K, Jensen, Allan, Vierkant, Robert A, Cunningham, Julie M, Goode, Ellen L, Fridley, Brooke L, Southey, Melissa C, Giles, Graham G, Bruinsma, Fiona, Wu, Xifeng, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Lu, Karen, Liang, Dong, Bisogna, Maria, Levine, Douglas A, Weber, Rachel Palmieri, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Iversen, Edwin S, Berchuck, Andrew, Terry, Kathryn L, Cramer, Daniel W, Tworoger, Shelley S, Poole, Elizabeth M, Olson, Sara H, Orlow, Irene, Bandera, Elisa V, Bjorge, Line, Tangen, Ingvild L, Salvesen, Helga B, Krakstad, Camilla, Massuger, Leon FAG, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Aben, Katja KH, van Altena, Anne M, Bean, Yukie, Pejovic, Tanja, Kellar, Melissa, Le, Nhu D, Cook, Linda S, Kelemen, Linda E, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Lubinski, Jan, Gronwald, Jacek, Cybulski, Cezary, Jakubowska, Anna, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Brinton, Louise A, Lissowska, Jolanta, Yang, Hannah, and Nedergaard, Lotte
Subjects: Australian Cancer Study, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Gonadotropins, Genetic Markers, Logistic Models, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies, Signal Transduction, Genotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Biomarkers, Tumor, Gene, Genetic variation, Genetics, Ovarian cancer, Polymorphisms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Biomarkers, Tumor, Ovarian Cancer, Aging, Prevention, Human Genome, Cancer, Biotechnology, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine
Abstract: ObjectiveOvarian cancer is a hormone-related disease with a strong genetic basis. However, none of its high-penetrance susceptibility genes and GWAS-identified variants to date are known to be involved in hormonal pathways. Given the hypothesized etiologic role of gonadotropins, an assessment of how variability in genes involved in the gonadotropin signaling pathway impacts disease risk is warranted.MethodsGenetic data from 41 ovarian cancer study sites were pooled and unconditional logistic regression was used to evaluate whether any of the 2185 SNPs from 11 gonadotropin signaling pathway genes was associated with ovarian cancer risk. A burden test using the admixture likelihood (AML) method was also used to evaluate gene-level associations.ResultsWe did not find any genome-wide significant associations between individual SNPs and ovarian cancer risk. However, there was some suggestion of gene-level associations for four gonadotropin signaling pathway genes: INHBB (p=0.045, mucinous), LHCGR (p=0.046, high-grade serous), GNRH (p=0.041, high-grade serous), and FSHB (p=0.036, overall invasive). There was also suggestive evidence for INHA (p=0.060, overall invasive).ConclusionsOvarian cancer studies have limited sample numbers, thus fewer genome-wide susceptibility alleles, with only modest associations, have been identified relative to breast and prostate cancers. We have evaluated the majority of ovarian cancer studies with biological samples, to our knowledge, leaving no opportunity for replication. Using both our understanding of biology and powerful gene-level tests, we have identified four putative ovarian cancer loci near INHBB, LHCGR, GNRH, and FSHB that warrant a second look if larger sample sizes and denser genotype chips become available.
Published: 2015

38. Common Genetic Variation In Cellular Transport Genes and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) Risk

Author: Chornokur, Ganna, Lin, Hui-Yi, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Lawrenson, Kate, Dennis, Joe, Amankwah, Ernest K, Qu, Xiaotao, Tsai, Ya-Yu, Jim, Heather SL, Chen, Zhihua, Chen, Ann Y, Permuth-Wey, Jennifer, Aben, Katja KH, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, Bruinsma, Fiona, Bandera, Elisa V, Bean, Yukie T, Beckmann, Matthias W, Bisogna, Maria, Bjorge, Line, Bogdanova, Natalia, Brinton, Louise A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bunker, Clareann H, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian G, Carty, Karen, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, du Bois, Andreas, Despierre, Evelyn, Dicks, Ed, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, Dürst, Matthias, Easton, Douglas F, Eccles, Diana M, Edwards, Robert P, Ekici, Arif B, Fasching, Peter A, Fridley, Brooke L, Gao, Yu-Tang, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Harrington, Patricia, Harter, Philipp, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hillemanns, Peter, Hogdall, Claus K, Hogdall, Estrid, Hosono, Satoyo, Jakubowska, Anna, Jensen, Allan, Ji, Bu-Tian, Karlan, Beth Y, Kelemen, Linda E, Kellar, Mellissa, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Krakstad, Camilla, Kjaer, Susanne K, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D, Lee, Alice W, Lele, Shashi, Leminen, Arto, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A, Liang, Dong, Lim, Boon Kiong, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lu, Karen, Lubinski, Jan, Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon FAG, Matsuo, Keitaro, McGuire, Valerie, McLaughlin, John R, McNeish, Iain, Menon, Usha, Milne, Roger L, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Ness, Roberta B, Nevanlinna, Heli, Eilber, Ursula, Odunsi, Kunle, Olson, Sara H, and Orlow, Irene
Subjects: Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Genetics, Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Black or African American, Alleles, Asian, Biological Transport, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Carrier Proteins, Case-Control Studies, Female, Genetic Association Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Variation, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Odds Ratio, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, AOCS management group, General Science & Technology
Abstract: BackgroundDefective cellular transport processes can lead to aberrant accumulation of trace elements, iron, small molecules and hormones in the cell, which in turn may promote the formation of reactive oxygen species, promoting DNA damage and aberrant expression of key regulatory cancer genes. As DNA damage and uncontrolled proliferation are hallmarks of cancer, including epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), we hypothesized that inherited variation in the cellular transport genes contributes to EOC risk.MethodsIn total, DNA samples were obtained from 14,525 case subjects with invasive EOC and from 23,447 controls from 43 sites in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). Two hundred seventy nine SNPs, representing 131 genes, were genotyped using an Illumina Infinium iSelect BeadChip as part of the Collaborative Oncological Gene-environment Study (COGS). SNP analyses were conducted using unconditional logistic regression under a log-additive model, and the FDR q
Published: 2015

39. Risk of ovarian cancer and the NF-κB pathway: genetic association with IL1A and TNFSF10.

Author: Charbonneau, Bridget, Block, Matthew S, Bamlet, William R, Vierkant, Robert A, Kalli, Kimberly R, Fogarty, Zachary, Rider, David N, Sellers, Thomas A, Tworoger, Shelley S, Poole, Elizabeth, Risch, Harvey A, Salvesen, Helga B, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Baglietto, Laura, Giles, Graham G, Severi, Gianluca, Trabert, Britton, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, for AOCS/ACS group, Whittemore, Alice S, Sieh, Weiva, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Bandera, Elisa V, Orlow, Irene, Terry, Kathryn, Goodman, Marc T, Thompson, Pamela J, Cook, Linda S, Rossing, Mary Anne, Ness, Roberta B, Narod, Steven A, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lu, Karen, Butzow, Ralf, Dörk, Thilo, Pejovic, Tanja, Campbell, Ian, Le, Nhu D, Bunker, Clareann H, Bogdanova, Natalia, Runnebaum, Ingo B, Eccles, Diana, Paul, James, Wu, Anna H, Gayther, Simon A, Hogdall, Estrid, Heitz, Florian, Kaye, Stanley B, Karlan, Beth Y, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Gronwald, Jacek, Hogdall, Claus K, Lambrechts, Diether, Fasching, Peter A, Menon, Usha, Schildkraut, Joellen, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Levine, Douglas A, Kjaer, Susanne Kruger, Cramer, Daniel, Flanagan, James M, Phelan, Catherine M, Brown, Robert, Massuger, Leon FAG, Song, Honglin, Doherty, Jennifer A, Krakstad, Camilla, Liang, Dong, Odunsi, Kunle, Berchuck, Andrew, Jensen, Allan, Lubinski, Jan, Nevanlinna, Heli, Bean, Yukie T, Lurie, Galina, Ziogas, Argyrios, Walsh, Christine, Despierre, Evelyn, Brinton, Louise, Hein, Alexander, Rudolph, Anja, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Olson, Sara H, Harter, Philipp, Tyrer, Jonathan, Vitonis, Allison F, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Aben, Katja K, Pike, Malcolm C, Ramus, Susan J, Wik, Elisabeth, Cybulski, Cezary, Lin, Jie, Sucheston, Lara, Edwards, Robert, McGuire, Valerie, Lester, Jenny, du Bois, Andreas, and Lundvall, Lene
Subjects: for AOCS/ACS group, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms, NF-kappa B, Risk, Case-Control Studies, Signal Transduction, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Female, TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand, Interleukin-1alpha, Genetic Association Studies, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Prevention, Ovarian Cancer, Cancer, Human Genome, Rare Diseases, Genetics, Clinical Research, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Abstract: A missense single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the immune modulatory gene IL1A has been associated with ovarian cancer risk (rs17561). Although the exact mechanism through which this SNP alters risk of ovarian cancer is not clearly understood, rs17561 has also been associated with risk of endometriosis, an epidemiologic risk factor for ovarian cancer. Interleukin-1α (IL1A) is both regulated by and able to activate NF-κB, a transcription factor family that induces transcription of many proinflammatory genes and may be an important mediator in carcinogenesis. We therefore tagged SNPs in more than 200 genes in the NF-κB pathway for a total of 2,282 SNPs (including rs17561) for genotype analysis of 15,604 cases of ovarian cancer in patients of European descent, including 6,179 of high-grade serous (HGS), 2,100 endometrioid, 1,591 mucinous, 1,034 clear cell, and 1,016 low-grade serous, including 23,235 control cases spanning 40 studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. In this large population, we confirmed the association between rs17561 and clear cell ovarian cancer [OR, 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.76-0.93; P = 0.00075], which remained intact even after excluding participants in the prior study (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95; P = 0.006). Considering a multiple-testing-corrected significance threshold of P < 2.5 × 10(-5), only one other variant, the TNFSF10 SNP rs6785617, was associated significantly with a risk of ovarian cancer (low malignant potential tumors OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79-0.91; P = 0.00002). Our results extend the evidence that borderline tumors may have a distinct genetic etiology. Further investigation of how these SNPs might modify ovarian cancer associations with other inflammation-related risk factors is warranted.
Published: 2014

40. GWAS meta-analysis and replication identifies three new susceptibility loci for ovarian cancer.

Author: Pharoah, Paul DP, Tsai, Ya-Yu, Ramus, Susan J, Phelan, Catherine M, Goode, Ellen L, Lawrenson, Kate, Buckley, Melissa, Fridley, Brooke L, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Shen, Howard, Weber, Rachel, Karevan, Rod, Larson, Melissa C, Song, Honglin, Tessier, Daniel C, Bacot, François, Vincent, Daniel, Cunningham, Julie M, Dennis, Joe, Dicks, Ed, Australian Cancer Study, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Aben, Katja K, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, Armasu, Sebastian M, Baglietto, Laura, Bandera, Elisa V, Beckmann, Matthias W, Birrer, Michael J, Bloom, Greg, Bogdanova, Natalia, Brenton, James D, Brinton, Louise A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Brown, Robert, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian, Carney, Michael E, Carvalho, Renato S, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chen, Y Anne, Chen, Zhihua, Chow, Wong-Ho, Cicek, Mine S, Coetzee, Gerhard, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Cybulski, Cezary, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Despierre, Evelyn, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Dürst, Matthias, Eccles, Diana, Edwards, Robert, Ekici, Arif B, Fasching, Peter A, Fenstermacher, David, Flanagan, James, Gao, Yu-Tang, Garcia-Closas, Montserrat, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham, Gjyshi, Anxhela, Gore, Martin, Gronwald, Jacek, Guo, Qi, Halle, Mari K, Harter, Philipp, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hillemanns, Peter, Hoatlin, Maureen, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus K, Hosono, Satoyo, Jakubowska, Anna, Jensen, Allan, Kalli, Kimberly R, Karlan, Beth Y, Kelemen, Linda E, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Kjaer, Susanne Krüger, Konecny, Gottfried E, Krakstad, Camilla, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D, Lee, Nathan, Lee, Janet, Leminen, Arto, Lim, Boon Kiong, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lubiński, Jan, Lundvall, Lene, Lurie, Galina, and Massuger, Leon FAG
Subjects: Australian Cancer Study, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Humans, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Ovarian Neoplasms, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies, Cooperative Behavior, Genotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Female, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genetic Loci, Gene-Environment Interaction, Cancer, Human Genome, Prevention, Genetics, Rare Diseases, Ovarian Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology
Abstract: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified four susceptibility loci for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), with another two suggestive loci reaching near genome-wide significance. We pooled data from a GWAS conducted in North America with another GWAS from the UK. We selected the top 24,551 SNPs for inclusion on the iCOGS custom genotyping array. We performed follow-up genotyping in 18,174 individuals with EOC (cases) and 26,134 controls from 43 studies from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. We validated the two loci at 3q25 and 17q21 that were previously found to have associations close to genome-wide significance and identified three loci newly associated with risk: two loci associated with all EOC subtypes at 8q21 (rs11782652, P = 5.5 × 10(-9)) and 10p12 (rs1243180, P = 1.8 × 10(-8)) and another locus specific to the serous subtype at 17q12 (rs757210, P = 8.1 × 10(-10)). An integrated molecular analysis of genes and regulatory regions at these loci provided evidence for functional mechanisms underlying susceptibility and implicated CHMP4C in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer.
Published: 2013

41. Identification and molecular characterization of a new ovarian cancer susceptibility locus at 17q21.31

Author: Permuth-Wey, Jennifer, Lawrenson, Kate, Shen, Howard C, Velkova, Aneliya, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Chen, Zhihua, Lin, Hui-Yi, Ann Chen, Y, Tsai, Ya-Yu, Qu, Xiaotao, Ramus, Susan J, Karevan, Rod, Lee, Janet, Lee, Nathan, Larson, Melissa C, Aben, Katja K, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, Antoniou, Antonis C, Armasu, Sebastian M, Bacot, François, Baglietto, Laura, Bandera, Elisa V, Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill, Beckmann, Matthias W, Birrer, Michael J, Bloom, Greg, Bogdanova, Natalia, Brinton, Louise A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Brown, Robert, Butzow, Ralf, Cai, Qiuyin, Campbell, Ian, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Cheng, Jin Q, Cicek, Mine S, Coetzee, Gerhard A, Cook, Linda S, Couch, Fergus J, Cramer, Daniel W, Cunningham, Julie M, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Despierre, Evelyn, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Dürst, Matthias, Easton, Douglas F, Eccles, Diana, Edwards, Robert, Ekici, Arif B, Fasching, Peter A, Fenstermacher, David A, Flanagan, James M, Garcia-Closas, Montserrat, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind M, Gonzalez-Bosquet, Jesus, Goodman, Marc T, Gore, Martin, Górski, Bohdan, Gronwald, Jacek, Hall, Per, Halle, Mari K, Harter, Philipp, Heitz, Florian, Hillemanns, Peter, Hoatlin, Maureen, Høgdall, Claus K, Høgdall, Estrid, Hosono, Satoyo, Jakubowska, Anna, Jensen, Allan, Jim, Heather, Kalli, Kimberly R, Karlan, Beth Y, Kaye, Stanley B, Kelemen, Linda E, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Kikkawa, Fumitaka, Konecny, Gottfried E, Krakstad, Camilla, Krüger Kjaer, Susanne, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Lancaster, Johnathan M, Le, Nhu D, Leminen, Arto, Levine, Douglas A, Liang, Dong, Kiong Lim, Boon, Lin, Jie, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lu, Karen H, and Lubiński, Jan
Subjects: Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Genetics, Rare Diseases, Biotechnology, Ovarian Cancer, Cancer, Human Genome, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Australian Cancer Study, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2
Abstract: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has a heritable component that remains to be fully characterized. Most identified common susceptibility variants lie in non-protein-coding sequences. We hypothesized that variants in the 3' untranslated region at putative microRNA (miRNA)-binding sites represent functional targets that influence EOC susceptibility. Here, we evaluate the association between 767 miRNA-related single-nucleotide polymorphisms (miRSNPs) and EOC risk in 18,174 EOC cases and 26,134 controls from 43 studies genotyped through the Collaborative Oncological Gene-environment Study. We identify several miRSNPs associated with invasive serous EOC risk (odds ratio=1.12, P=10(-8)) mapping to an inversion polymorphism at 17q21.31. Additional genotyping of non-miRSNPs at 17q21.31 reveals stronger signals outside the inversion (P=10(-10)). Variation at 17q21.31 is associated with neurological diseases, and our collaboration is the first to report an association with EOC susceptibility. An integrated molecular analysis in this region provides evidence for ARHGAP27 and PLEKHM1 as candidate EOC susceptibility genes.
Published: 2013

42. Common variants at 19p13 are associated with susceptibility to ovarian cancer.

Author: Bolton, Kelly L, Tyrer, Jonathan, Song, Honglin, Ramus, Susan J, Notaridou, Maria, Jones, Chris, Sher, Tanya, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Wozniak, Eva, Tsai, Ya-Yu, Weidhaas, Joanne, Paik, Daniel, Van Den Berg, David J, Stram, Daniel O, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Wu, Anna H, Brewster, Wendy, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Narod, Steven A, Levine, Douglas A, Kaye, Stanley B, Brown, Robert, Paul, Jim, Flanagan, James, Sieh, Weiva, McGuire, Valerie, Whittemore, Alice S, Campbell, Ian, Gore, Martin E, Lissowska, Jolanta, Yang, Hanna P, Medrek, Krzysztof, Gronwald, Jacek, Lubinski, Jan, Jakubowska, Anna, Le, Nhu D, Cook, Linda S, Kelemen, Linda E, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Massuger, Leon FAG, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Aben, Katja KH, van Altena, Anne M, Houlston, Richard, Tomlinson, Ian, Palmieri, Rachel T, Moorman, Patricia G, Schildkraut, Joellen, Iversen, Edwin S, Phelan, Catherine, Vierkant, Robert A, Cunningham, Julie M, Goode, Ellen L, Fridley, Brooke L, Kruger-Kjaer, Susan, Blaeker, Jan, Hogdall, Estrid, Hogdall, Claus, Gross, Jenny, Karlan, Beth Y, Ness, Roberta B, Edwards, Robert P, Odunsi, Kunle, Moyisch, Kirsten B, Baker, Julie A, Modugno, Francesmary, Heikkinenen, Tuomas, Butzow, Ralf, Nevanlinna, Heli, Leminen, Arto, Bogdanova, Natalia, Antonenkova, Natalia, Doerk, Thilo, Hillemanns, Peter, Dürst, Matthias, Runnebaum, Ingo, Thompson, Pamela J, Carney, Michael E, Goodman, Marc T, Lurie, Galina, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Hein, Rebecca, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Rossing, Mary Anne, Cushing-Haugen, Kara L, Doherty, Jennifer, Chen, Chu, Rafnar, Thorunn, Besenbacher, Soren, Sulem, Patrick, Stefansson, Kari, Birrer, Michael J, Terry, Kathryn L, Hernandez, Dena, Cramer, Daniel W, Vergote, Ignace, Amant, Frederic, Lambrechts, Diether, and Despierre, Evelyn
Subjects: Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Australian Cancer Study, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Ovary, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19, Humans, Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell, Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Ovarian Neoplasms, Endometrial Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Case-Control Studies, Gene Expression Profiling, Genotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome, Human, Middle Aged, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Biomarkers, Tumor, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19, Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell, Mucinous, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome, Biomarkers, Tumor, Cancer, Human Genome, Genetics, Ovarian Cancer, Orphan Drug, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Developmental Biology, Medical and Health Sciences, Biological Sciences
Abstract: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the leading cause of death from gynecological malignancy in the developed world, accounting for 4% of the deaths from cancer in women. We performed a three-phase genome-wide association study of EOC survival in 8,951 individuals with EOC (cases) with available survival time data and a parallel association analysis of EOC susceptibility. Two SNPs at 19p13.11, rs8170 and rs2363956, showed evidence of association with survival (overall P = 5 × 10⁻⁴ and P = 6 × 10⁻⁴, respectively), but they did not replicate in phase 3. However, the same two SNPs demonstrated genome-wide significance for risk of serous EOC (P = 3 × 10⁻⁹ and P = 4 × 10⁻¹¹, respectively). Expression analysis of candidate genes at this locus in ovarian tumors supported a role for the BRCA1-interacting gene C19orf62, also known as MERIT40, which contains rs8170, in EOC development.
Published: 2010

43. CCNE1 and survival of patients with tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: An Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study

Author: Kang, Eun-Young, Weir, Ashley, Meagher, Nicola S, Farrington, Kyo, Nelson, Gregg S, Ghatage, Prafull, Lee, Cheng-Han, Riggan, Marjorie J, Bolithon, Adelyn, Popovic, Gordana, Leung, Betty, Tang, Katrina, Lambie, Neil, Millstein, Joshua, Alsop, Jennifer, Anglesio, Michael S, Ataseven, Beyhan, Barlow, Ellen, Beckmann, Matthias W, Berger, Jessica, Bisinotto, Christiani, Bösmüller, Hans, Boros, Jessica, Brand, Alison H, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Brucker, Sara Y, Carney, Michael E, Casablanca, Yovanni, Cazorla-Jiménez, Alicia, Cohen, Paul A, Conrads, Thomas P, Cook, Linda S, Coulson, Penny, Courtney-Brooks, Madeleine, Cramer, Daniel W, Crowe, Philip, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Darcy, Kathleen M, El-Bahrawy, Mona A, Elishaev, Esther, Erber, Ramona, Farrell, Rhonda, Fereday, Sian, Fischer, Anna, García, María J, Gayther, Simon A, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Gilks, C Blake, AOCS Group, Grube, Marcel, Harnett, Paul R, Harrington, Shariska Petersen, Harter, Philipp, Hartmann, Arndt, Hecht, Jonathan L, Heikaus, Sebastian, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hendley, Joy, Hernandez, Brenda Y, Polo, Susanna Hernando, Heublein, Sabine, Hirasawa, Akira, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus K, Horlings, Hugo M, Huntsman, David G, Huzarski, Tomasz, Jewell, Andrea, Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes, Jones, Michael E, Kaufmann, Scott H, Kennedy, Catherine J, Khabele, Dineo, Kommoss, Felix KF, Kruitwagen, Roy FPM, Lambrechts, Diether, Le, Nhu D, Lener, Marcin, Lester, Jenny, Leung, Yee, Linder, Anna, Loverix, Liselore, Lubiński, Jan, Madan, Rashna, Maxwell, G Larry, Modugno, Francesmary, Neuhausen, Susan L, Olawaiye, Alexander, Olbrecht, Siel, Orsulic, Sandra, Palacios, José, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Pike, Malcolm C, Quinn, Carmel M, Mohan, Ganendra Raj, Rodríguez-Antona, Cristina, Ruebner, Matthias, Ryan, Andy, Salfinger, Stuart G, Sasamoto, Naoko, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Shah, Mitul, Sharma, Raghwa, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Singh, Naveena, Sonke, Gabe S, Steele, Linda, Stewart, Colin, Sundfeldt, Karin, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Talhouk, Aline, Tan, Adeline, Taylor, Sarah E, Terry, Kathryn L, Tołoczko, Aleksandra, Traficante, Nadia, Van De Vijver, Koen K, Van Der Aa, Maaike A, Van Gorp, Toon, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Van-Wagensveld, Lilian, Vergote, Ignace, Vierkant, Robert A, Wang, Chen, Wilkens, Lynne R, Winham, Stacey J, Wu, Anna H, Benitez, Javier, Berchuck, Andrew, Candido Dos Reis, Francisco J, DeFazio, Anna, Fasching, Peter A, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Karlan, Beth Y, Kommoss, Stefan, Menon, Usha, Sinn, Hans-Peter, Staebler, Annette, Brenton, James D, Bowtell, David D, Pharoah, Paul DP, Ramus, Susan J, Köbel, Martin, Meagher, Nicola S [0000-0001-9134-2118], Lee, Cheng-Han [0000-0003-2094-1222], Fereday, Sian [0000-0002-8559-8579], Kennedy, Catherine J [0000-0002-4465-5784], Sasamoto, Naoko [0000-0002-4526-2181], Schildkraut, Joellen M [0000-0002-0990-9339], Talhouk, Aline [0000-0001-7760-410X], Vergote, Ignace [0000-0002-7589-8981], Köbel, Martin [0000-0002-6615-2037], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
Subjects: Ovarian Neoplasms, Oncogene Proteins, Carcinoma, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, ovarian cancer, high-grade serous carcinoma, Cyclin E, Humans, Female, prognosis, RNA, Messenger, CCNE1 amplification, cyclin E1 expression, Transcription Factors
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Cyclin E1 (CCNE1) is a potential predictive marker and therapeutic target in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Smaller studies have revealed unfavorable associations for CCNE1 amplification and CCNE1 overexpression with survival, but to date no large-scale, histotype-specific validation has been performed. The hypothesis was that high-level amplification of CCNE1 and CCNE1 overexpression, as well as a combination of the two, are linked to shorter overall survival in HGSC. METHODS: Within the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium, amplification status and protein level in 3029 HGSC cases and mRNA expression in 2419 samples were investigated. RESULTS: High-level amplification (>8 copies by chromogenic in situ hybridization) was found in 8.6% of HGSC and overexpression (>60% with at least 5% demonstrating strong intensity by immunohistochemistry) was found in 22.4%. CCNE1 high-level amplification and overexpression both were linked to shorter overall survival in multivariate survival analysis adjusted for age and stage, with hazard stratification by study (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08-1.47, p = .034, and HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05-1.32, p = .015, respectively). This was also true for cases with combined high-level amplification/overexpression (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.09-1.47, p = .033). CCNE1 mRNA expression was not associated with overall survival (HR, 1.00 per 1-SD increase; 95% CI, 0.94-1.06; p = .58). CCNE1 high-level amplification is mutually exclusive with the presence of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants and shows an inverse association to RB1 loss. CONCLUSION: This study provides large-scale validation that CCNE1 high-level amplification is associated with shorter survival, supporting its utility as a prognostic biomarker in HGSC.
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

44. Polygenic risk modeling for prediction of epithelial ovarian cancer risk

Author: Dareng, Eileen O., Tyrer, Jonathan P., Barnes, Daniel R., Jones, Michelle R., Yang, Xin, Aben, Katja K. H., Adank, Muriel A., Agata, Simona, Andrulis, Irene L., Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N., Aravantinos, Gerasimos, Arun, Banu K., Augustinsson, Annelie, Balmaña, Judith, Bandera, Elisa V., Barkardottir, Rosa B., Barrowdale, Daniel, Beckmann, Matthias W., Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernardini, Marcus Q., Bjorge, Line, Black, Amanda, Bogdanova, Natalia V., Bonanni, Bernardo, Borg, Ake, Brenton, James D., Budzilowska, Agnieszka, Butzow, Ralf, Buys, Saundra S., Cai, Hui, Caligo, Maria A., Campbell, Ian, Cannioto, Rikki, Cassingham, Hayley, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J., Chen, Kexin, Chiew, Yoke-Eng, Chung, Wendy K., Claes, Kathleen, Colonna, Sarah, Lesueur, Fabienne, Mebirouk, Noura, Engel, Christoph, Schmutzler, Rita K., Davies, Eleanor, Eccles, Diana M., Evans, D. Gareth, Cook, Linda S., Couch, Fergus J., Daly, Mary B., Dao, Fanny, de la Hoya, Miguel, de Putter, Robin, Dennis, Joe, DePersia, Allison, Devilee, Peter, Diez, Orland, Ding, Yuan Chun, Doherty, Jennifer A., Domchek, Susan M., Dörk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Dürst, Matthias, Eliassen, Heather A., Evans, Gareth D., Fasching, Peter A., Flanagan, James M., Fortner, Renée T., Machackova, Eva, Friedman, Eitan, Ganz, Patricia A., Garber, Judy, Gensini, Francesca, Giles, Graham G., Glendon, Gord, Godwin, Andrew K., Goodman, Marc T., Greene, Mark H., Gronwald, Jacek, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A., Håkansson, Niclas, Hamann, Ute, Hansen, Thomas V. O., Harris, Holly R., Hartman, Mikael, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle A. T., Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus K., Hopper, John L., Huang, Ruea-Yea, Huff, Chad, Hulick, Peter J., Huntsman, David G., Imyanitov, Evgeny N., Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, van der Hout, Annemieke H., Isaacs, Claudine, Jakubowska, Anna, James, Paul A., Janavicius, Ramunas, Jensen, Allan, Johannsson, Oskar Th., John, Esther M., Jones, Michael E., Kang, Daehee, Karlan, Beth Y., Karnezis, Anthony, Kelemen, Linda E., Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kiemeney, Lambertus A., Kim, Byoung-Gie, Kjaer, Susanne K., Komenaka, Ian, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Kurian, Allison W., Kwong, Ava, Lambrechts, Diether, Larson, Melissa C., Lazaro, Conxi, Le, Nhu D., Leslie, Goska, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A., Li, Lian, Li, Jingmei, Loud, Jennifer T., Lu, Karen H., Lubiński, Jan, Mai, Phuong L., Manoukian, Siranoush, Marks, Jeffrey R., Matsuno, Rayna Kim, Matsuo, Keitaro, May, Taymaa, McGuffog, Lesley, McLaughlin, John R., McNeish, Iain A., Menon, Usha, Miller, Austin, Milne, Roger L., Minlikeeva, Albina, Modugno, Francesmary, Montagna, Marco, Moysich, Kirsten B., Munro, Elizabeth, Nathanson, Katherine L., Neuhausen, Susan L., Nevanlinna, Heli, Yie, Joanne Ngeow Yuen, Nielsen, Henriette Roed, Nielsen, Finn C., Nikitina-Zake, Liene, Odunsi, Kunle, Offit, Kenneth, Olah, Edith, Olbrecht, Siel, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I., Olson, Sara H., Olsson, Håkan, Osorio, Ana, Papi, Laura, Park, Sue K., Parsons, Michael T., Pathak, Harsha, Pedersen, Inge Sokilde, Peixoto, Ana, Pejovic, Tanja, Perez-Segura, Pedro, Permuth, Jennifer B., Peshkin, Beth, Peterlongo, Paolo, Piskorz, Anna, Prokofyeva, Darya, Radice, Paolo, Rantala, Johanna, Riggan, Marjorie J., Risch, Harvey A., Rodriguez-Antona, Cristina, Ross, Eric, Rossing, Mary Anne, Runnebaum, Ingo, Sandler, Dale P., Santamariña, Marta, Soucy, Penny, Setiawan, V. Wendy, Shan, Kang, Sieh, Weiva, Simard, Jacques, Singer, Christian F., Sokolenko, Anna P., Song, Honglin, Southey, Melissa C., Steed, Helen, Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique, Sutphen, Rebecca, Swerdlow, Anthony J., Tan, Yen Yen, Teixeira, Manuel R., Teo, Soo Hwang, Terry, Kathryn L., Terry, Mary Beth, Thompson, Pamela J., Thomsen, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim, Titus, Linda, Trabert, Britton, Travis, Ruth, Tworoger, Shelley S., Valen, Ellen, van Altena, Anne M., Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Edwards, Digna Velez, Vierkant, Robert A., Wang, Frances, Webb, Penelope M., Weinberg, Clarice R., Wentzensen, Nicolas, White, Emily, Whittemore, Alice S., Winham, Stacey J., Wolk, Alicja, Woo, Yin-Ling, Wu, Anna H., Yan, Li, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis, Zheng, Wei, Ziogas, Argyrios, Lawrenson, Kate, deFazio, Anna, Ramus, Susan J., Pearce, Celeste L., Monteiro, Alvaro N., Cunningham, Julie M., Goode, Ellen L., Schildkraut, Joellen M., Berchuck, Andrew, Gayther, Simon A., Pharoah, Paul D. P., Claes, Kathleen B. M., Thomassen, Mads, Thull, Darcy L., Tischkowitz, Marc, Toland, Amanda E., Torres, Diana, Tung, Nadine, van Rensburg, Elizabeth J., Vega, Ana, Wappenschmidt, Barbara, Weitzel, Jeffrey N., Zavaglia, Katia M., Zorn, Kristin K., Sellers, Thomas A., Antoniou, Antonis C., Kleibl, Zdenek, Easton, Douglas, DeFazio, Anna, Cunningham, Julie, GEMO Study Collaborators, [missing], GC-HBOC Study Collaborators, [missing], EMBRACE Collaborators, [missing], OPAL Study Group, [missing], AOCS Group, [missing], KConFab Investigators, [missing], HEBON Investigators, [missing], The OCAC Consortium, [missing], The CIMBA Consortium, [missing], Clinicum, Department of Pathology, HUSLAB, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, HUS Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculteit Medische Wetenschappen/UMCG, Institut Català de la Salut, [Dareng EO, Barnes DR, Yang X] University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK. [Tyrer JP] University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK. [Jones MR] Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. [Aben KKH] Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands. [Balmaña J] Hereditary cancer Genetics Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. Servei d’Oncologia Mèdica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. [Diez O] Oncogenetics Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. Àrea de Genètica Clínica i Molecular, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Ovarian Cancer Action, and National Institute for Health Research
Subjects: Male, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, OCAC Consortium, Genetic Phenomena::Genotype::Genetic Predisposition to Disease [PHENOMENA AND PROCESSES], Breast Neoplasms, Ovaris - Càncer - Aspectes genètics, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, SUSCEPTIBILITY, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, GEMO Study Collaborators, Risk Factors, OPAL Study Group, Other subheadings::Other subheadings::/genetics [Other subheadings], Medicine and Health Sciences, Genetics, Ovaris - Càncer - Propensió, Humans, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Prospective Studies, EMBRACE Collaborators, GC-HBOC Study Collaborators, Genetics (clinical), HEBON Investigators, fenómenos genéticos::genotipo::predisposición genética a la enfermedad [FENÓMENOS Y PROCESOS], Medicinsk genetik, Ovarian Neoplasms, Genetics & Heredity, 0604 Genetics, Science & Technology, Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::/genética [Otros calificadores], 1184 Genetics, developmental biology, physiology, Neoplasms::Neoplasms::Neoplasms by Site::Endocrine Gland Neoplasms::Ovarian Neoplasms::Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial [DISEASES], 1103 Clinical Sciences, Bayes Theorem, AOCS Group, neoplasias::neoplasias::neoplasias por localización::neoplasias de las glándulas endocrinas::neoplasias ováricas::carcinoma epitelial de ovario [ENFERMEDADES], Women's cancers Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 17], Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/genetics, Urological cancers Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 15], CIMBA Consortium, 1182 Biochemistry, cell and molecular biology, Female, KConFab Investigators, Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology, Medical Genetics, Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Abstract: Clinical genetics; Genetic markers; Risk factors Genética clínica; Marcadores genéticos; Factores de riesgo Genètica clínica; Marcadors genètics; Factors de risc Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have the potential to improve risk stratification. Joint estimation of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) effects in models could improve predictive performance over standard approaches of PRS construction. Here, we implemented computationally efficient, penalized, logistic regression models (lasso, elastic net, stepwise) to individual level genotype data and a Bayesian framework with continuous shrinkage, “select and shrink for summary statistics” (S4), to summary level data for epithelial non-mucinous ovarian cancer risk prediction. We developed the models in a dataset consisting of 23,564 non-mucinous EOC cases and 40,138 controls participating in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC) and validated the best models in three populations of different ancestries: prospective data from 198,101 women of European ancestries; 7,669 women of East Asian ancestries; 1,072 women of African ancestries, and in 18,915 BRCA1 and 12,337 BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers of European ancestries. In the external validation data, the model with the strongest association for non-mucinous EOC risk derived from the OCAC model development data was the S4 model (27,240 SNPs) with odds ratios (OR) of 1.38 (95% CI: 1.28–1.48, AUC: 0.588) per unit standard deviation, in women of European ancestries; 1.14 (95% CI: 1.08–1.19, AUC: 0.538) in women of East Asian ancestries; 1.38 (95% CI: 1.21–1.58, AUC: 0.593) in women of African ancestries; hazard ratios of 1.36 (95% CI: 1.29–1.43, AUC: 0.592) in BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers and 1.49 (95% CI: 1.35–1.64, AUC: 0.624) in BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. Incorporation of the S4 PRS in risk prediction models for ovarian cancer may have clinical utility in ovarian cancer prevention programs.
Published: 2022

45. Refined cut-off for TP53 immunohistochemistry improves prediction of TP53 mutation status in ovarian mucinous tumors: implications for outcome analyses

Author: Kang, Eun Young, Cheasley, Dane, LePage, Cecile, Wakefield, Matthew J, Da Cunha Torres, Michelle, Rowley, Simone, Salazar, Carolina, Xing, Zhongyue, Allan, Prue, Bowtell, David DL, Mes-Masson, Anne-Marie, Provencher, Diane M, Rahimi, Kurosh, Kelemen, Linda E, Fasching, Peter A, Doherty, Jennifer A, Goodman, Marc T, Goode, Ellen L, Deen, Suha, Pharoah, Paul DP, Brenton, James D, Sieh, Weiva, Mateoiu, Constantina, Sundfeldt, Karin, Cook, Linda S, Le, Nhu D, Anglesio, Michael S, Gilks, C Blake, Huntsman, David G, Kennedy, Catherine J, Traficante, Nadia, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, DeFazio, Anna, Kaufmann, Scott, Churchman, Michael, Gourley, Charlie, Stephens, Andrew N, Meagher, Nicola S, Ramus, Susan J, Antill, Yoland C, Campbell, Ian, Scott, Clare L, Köbel, Martin, Gorringe, Kylie L, GAMuT Collaborators, LePage, Cecile [0000-0002-8020-1544], Fasching, Peter A [0000-0003-4885-8471], Pharoah, Paul DP [0000-0001-8494-732X], Anglesio, Michael S [0000-0003-1639-5003], Churchman, Michael [0000-0003-1958-7692], Meagher, Nicola S [0000-0001-9134-2118], Campbell, Ian [0000-0002-7773-4155], Scott, Clare L [0000-0002-3689-5956], Köbel, Martin [0000-0002-6615-2037], Gorringe, Kylie L [0000-0001-5681-2022], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
Subjects: Adult, Observer Variation, Ovarian Neoplasms, endocrine system diseases, DNA Mutational Analysis, Australia, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Immunohistochemistry, Risk Assessment, United Kingdom, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Tissue Array Analysis, Mutation, North America, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Female, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous, neoplasms
Abstract: TP53 mutations are implicated in the progression of mucinous borderline tumors (MBOT) to mucinous ovarian carcinomas (MOC). Optimized immunohistochemistry (IHC) for TP53 has been established as a proxy for the TP53 mutation status in other ovarian tumor types. We aimed to confirm the ability of TP53 IHC to predict TP53 mutation status in ovarian mucinous tumors and to evaluate the association of TP53 mutation status with survival among patients with MBOT and MOC. Tumor tissue from an initial cohort of 113 women with MBOT/MOC was stained with optimized IHC for TP53 using tissue microarrays (75.2%) or full sections (24.8%) and interpreted using established criteria as normal or abnormal (overexpression, complete absence, or cytoplasmic). Cases were considered concordant if abnormal IHC staining predicted deleterious TP53 mutations. Discordant tissue microarray cases were re-evaluated on full sections and interpretational criteria were refined. The initial cohort was expanded to a total of 165 MBOT and 424 MOC for the examination of the association of survival with TP53 mutation status, assessed either by TP53 IHC and/or sequencing. Initially, 82/113 (72.6%) cases were concordant using the established criteria. Refined criteria for overexpression to account for intratumoral heterogeneity and terminal differentiation improved concordance to 93.8% (106/113). In the expanded cohort, 19.4% (32/165) of MBOT showed evidence for TP53 mutation and this was associated with a higher risk of recurrence, disease-specific death, and all-cause mortality (overall survival: HR = 4.6, 95% CI 1.5-14.3, p = 0.0087). Within MOC, 61.1% (259/424) harbored a TP53 mutation, but this was not associated with survival (overall survival, p = 0.77). TP53 IHC is an accurate proxy for TP53 mutation status with refined interpretation criteria accounting for intratumoral heterogeneity and terminal differentiation in ovarian mucinous tumors. TP53 mutation status is an important biomarker to identify MBOT with a higher risk of mortality.
Published: 2020
Full Text: View/download PDF

46. GWAS meta-analysis of 16 852 women identifies new susceptibility locus for endometrial cancer

Author: Chen, Maxine M, O'Mara, Tracy A, Thompson, Deborah J, Painter, Jodie N, Australian National Endometrial Cancer Study Group (ANECS), Attia, John, Black, Amanda, Brinton, Louise, Chanock, Stephen, Chen, Chu, Cheng, Timothy Ht, Cook, Linda S, Crous-Bou, Marta, Doherty, Jennifer, Friedenreich, Christine M, Garcia-Closas, Montserrat, Gaudet, Mia M, Gorman, Maggie, Haiman, Christopher, Hankinson, Susan E, Hartge, Patricia, Henderson, Brian E, Hodgson, Shirley, Holliday, Elizabeth G, Horn-Ross, Pamela L, Hunter, David J, Le Marchand, Loic, Liang, Xiaolin, Lissowska, Jolanta, Long, Jirong, Lu, Lingeng, Magliocco, Anthony M, Martin, Lynn, McEvoy, Mark, National Study Of Endometrial Cancer Genetics Group (NSECG), Olson, Sara H, Orlow, Irene, Pooler, Loreall, Prescott, Jennifer, Rastogi, Radhai, Rebbeck, Timothy R, Risch, Harvey, Sacerdote, Carlotta, Schumacher, Frederick, Wendy Setiawan, Veronica, Scott, Rodney J, Sheng, Xin, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Turman, Constance, Van Den Berg, David, Wang, Zhaoming, Weiss, Noel S, Wentzensen, Nicholas, Xia, Lucy, Xiang, Yong-Bing, Yang, Hannah P, Yu, Herbert, Zheng, Wei, Pharoah, Paul DP, Dunning, Alison M, Tomlinson, Ian, Easton, Douglas F, Kraft, Peter, Spurdle, Amanda B, De Vivo, Immaculata, Thompson, Deborah [0000-0003-1465-5799], Pharoah, Paul [0000-0001-8494-732X], Dunning, Alison [0000-0001-6651-7166], Easton, Douglas [0000-0003-2444-3247], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
Subjects: Genotype, Humans, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 6, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, White People, Endometrial Neoplasms, Genome-Wide Association Study
Abstract: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy in the developed world. Although there is evidence of genetic predisposition to the disease, most of the genetic risk remains unexplained. We present the meta-analysis results of four genome-wide association studies (4907 cases and 11 945 controls total) in women of European ancestry. We describe one new locus reaching genome-wide significance (P < 5 × 10 -8) at 6p22.3 (rs1740828; P = 2.29 × 10 -8, OR = 1.20), providing evidence of an additional region of interest for genetic susceptibility to endometrial cancer.
Published: 2016

47. No clinical utility of KRAS variant rs61764370 for ovarian or breast cancer

Author: Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, and Consortium of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2, Hollestelle, Antoinette, van der Baan, Frederieke H, Berchuck, Andrew, Johnatty, Sharon E, Aben, Katja K, Agnarsson, Bjarni A, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Alducci, Elisa, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Antoniou, Antonis C, Apicella, Carmel, Arndt, Volker, Arnold, Norbert, Arun, Banu K, Arver, Brita, Ashworth, Alan, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Baglietto, Laura, Balleine, Rosemary, Bandera, Elisa V, Barrowdale, Daniel, Bean, Yukie T, Beckmann, Lars, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Berger, Andreas, Berger, Raanan, Beuselinck, Benoit, Bisogna, Maria, Bjorge, Line, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Anders, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Bonanni, Bernardo, Brand, Judith S, Brauch, Hiltrud, Breast Cancer Family Register, Brenner, Hermann, Brinton, Louise, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bruinsma, Fiona, Brunet, Joan, Brüning, Thomas, Budzilowska, Agnieszka, Bunker, Clareann H, Burwinkel, Barbara, Butzow, Ralf, Buys, Saundra S, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Carter, Jonathan, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Claes, Kathleen BM, Collée, J Margriet, Cook, Linda S, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cramer, Daniel, Cross, Simon S, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Czene, Kamila, Damiola, Francesca, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Darabi, Hatef, de la Hoya, Miguel, deFazio, Anna, Dennis, Joseph, Devilee, Peter, Dicks, Ed M, Diez, Orland, Doherty, Jennifer A, Domchek, Susan M, Dorfling, Cecilia M, Dörk, Thilo, Silva, Isabel Dos Santos, du Bois, Andreas, Dumont, Martine, Dunning, Alison M, Duran, Mercedes, Easton, Douglas F, Eccles, Diana, Edwards, Robert P, Ehrencrona, Hans, Ejlertsen, Bent, Ekici, Arif B, Ellis, Steve D, EMBRACE, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Fasching, Peter A, Feliubadalo, Lidia, Figueroa, Jonine, and Flesch-Janys, Dieter
Subjects: Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, endocrine system diseases, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Breast Neoplasms, EMBRACE, GEMO Study Collaborators, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, Breast cancer, Rare Diseases, Ovarian cancer, Clinical Research, Neoplasms, Ovarian Epithelial, Genetics, Humans, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Aetiology, skin and connective tissue diseases, HEBON, Cancer, Ovarian Neoplasms, Clinical outcome, Prevention, Carcinoma, Glandular and Epithelial, SWE-BRCA, KRAS variant, and Consortium of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, Genetic association, Female, KConFab Investigators, GENICA Network, Breast Cancer Family Register
Abstract: ObjectiveClinical genetic testing is commercially available for rs61764370, an inherited variant residing in a KRAS 3' UTR microRNA binding site, based on suggested associations with increased ovarian and breast cancer risk as well as with survival time. However, prior studies, emphasizing particular subgroups, were relatively small. Therefore, we comprehensively evaluated ovarian and breast cancer risks as well as clinical outcome associated with rs61764370.MethodsCentralized genotyping and analysis were performed for 140,012 women enrolled in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (15,357 ovarian cancer patients; 30,816 controls), the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (33,530 breast cancer patients; 37,640 controls), and the Consortium of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (14,765 BRCA1 and 7904 BRCA2 mutation carriers).ResultsWe found no association with risk of ovarian cancer (OR=0.99, 95% CI 0.94-1.04, p=0.74) or breast cancer (OR=0.98, 95% CI 0.94-1.01, p=0.19) and results were consistent among mutation carriers (BRCA1, ovarian cancer HR=1.09, 95% CI 0.97-1.23, p=0.14, breast cancer HR=1.04, 95% CI 0.97-1.12, p=0.27; BRCA2, ovarian cancer HR=0.89, 95% CI 0.71-1.13, p=0.34, breast cancer HR=1.06, 95% CI 0.94-1.19, p=0.35). Null results were also obtained for associations with overall survival following ovarian cancer (HR=0.94, 95% CI 0.83-1.07, p=0.38), breast cancer (HR=0.96, 95% CI 0.87-1.06, p=0.38), and all other previously-reported associations.Conclusionsrs61764370 is not associated with risk of ovarian or breast cancer nor with clinical outcome for patients with these cancers. Therefore, genotyping this variant has no clinical utility related to the prediction or management of these cancers.
Published: 2016

48. PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM rare variants and cancer risk: data from COGS

Author: Southey, Melissa C, Goldgar, David E, Winqvist, Robert, Pylkäs, Katri, Couch, Fergus, Tischkowitz, Marc, Foulkes, William D, Dennis, Joe, Michailidou, Kyriaki, van Rensburg, Elizabeth J, Heikkinen, Tuomas, Nevanlinna, Heli, Hopper, John L, Dörk, Thilo, Claes, Kathleen Bm, Reis-Filho, Jorge, Teo, Zhi Ling, Radice, Paolo, Catucci, Irene, Peterlongo, Paolo, Tsimiklis, Helen, Odefrey, Fabrice A, Dowty, James G, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Broeks, Annegien, Hogervorst, Frans B, Verhoef, Senno, Carpenter, Jane, Clarke, Christine, Scott, Rodney J, Fasching, Peter A, Haeberle, Lothar, Ekici, Arif B, Beckmann, Matthias W, Peto, Julian, Dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Fletcher, Olivia, Johnson, Nichola, Bolla, Manjeet K, Sawyer, Elinor J, Tomlinson, Ian, Kerin, Michael J, Miller, Nicola, Marme, Federik, Burwinkel, Barbara, Yang, Rongxi, Guénel, Pascal, Truong, Thérèse, Menegaux, Florence, Sanchez, Marie, Bojesen, Stig, Nielsen, Sune F, Flyger, Henrik, Benitez, Javier, Zamora, M Pilar, Perez, Jose Ignacio Arias, Menéndez, Primitiva, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Neuhausen, Susan, Ziogas, Argyrios, Clarke, Christina A, Brenner, Hermann, Arndt, Volker, Stegmaier, Christa, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brüning, Thomas, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Muranen, Taru A, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Lindblom, Annika, Margolin, Sara, Mannermaa, Arto, Kataja, Vesa, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Hartikainen, Jaana M, Spurdle, Amanda B, Investigators, kConFab, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Wauters, Els, Smeets, Dominiek, Beuselinck, Benoit, Floris, Giuseppe, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Rudolph, Anja, Seibold, Petra, Flesch-Janys, Dieter, Olson, Janet E, Vachon, Celine, Pankratz, Vernon S, McLean, Catriona, Haiman, Christopher A, Henderson, Brian E, Schumacher, Fredrick, Le Marchand, Loic, Kristensen, Vessela, Alnæs, Grethe Grenaker, Zheng, Wei, Hunter, David J, Lindstrom, Sara, Hankinson, Susan E, Kraft, Peter, Andrulis, Irene, Knight, Julia A, Glendon, Gord, Mulligan, Anna Marie, Jukkola-Vuorinen, Arja, Grip, Mervi, Kauppila, Saila, Devilee, Peter, Tollenaar, Robert AEM, Seynaeve, Caroline, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Garcia-Closas, Montserrat, Figueroa, Jonine, Chanock, Stephen J, Lissowska, Jolanta, Czene, Kamila, Darabi, Hatef, Eriksson, Mikael, Eccles, Diana M, Rafiq, Sajjad, Tapper, William J, Gerty, Sue M, Hooning, Maartje J, Martens, John WM, Collée, J Margriet, Tilanus-Linthorst, Madeleine, Hall, Per, Li, Jingmei, Brand, Judith S, Humphreys, Keith, Cox, Angela, Reed, Malcolm WR, Luccarini, Craig, Baynes, Caroline, Dunning, Alison M, Hamann, Ute, Torres, Diana, Ulmer, Hans Ulrich, Rüdiger, Thomas, Jakubowska, Anna, Lubinski, Jan, Jaworska, Katarzyna, Durda, Katarzyna, Slager, Susan, Toland, Amanda E, Ambrosone, Christine B, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis, Swerdlow, Anthony, Ashworth, Alan, Orr, Nick, Jones, Michael, González-Neira, Anna, Pita, Guillermo, Alonso, M Rosario, Álvarez, Nuria, Herrero, Daniel, Tessier, Daniel C, Vincent, Daniel, Bacot, Francois, Simard, Jacques, Dumont, Martine, Soucy, Penny, Eeles, Rosalind, Muir, Kenneth, Wiklund, Fredrik, Gronberg, Henrik, Schleutker, Johanna, Nordestgaard, Børge G, Weischer, Maren, Travis, Ruth C, Neal, David, Donovan, Jenny L, Hamdy, Freddie C, Khaw, Kay-Tee, Stanford, Janet L, Blot, William J, Thibodeau, Stephen, Schaid, Daniel J, Kelley, Joseph L, Maier, Christiane, Kibel, Adam S, Cybulski, Cezary, Cannon-Albright, Lisa, Butterbach, Katja, Park, Jong, Kaneva, Radka, Batra, Jyotsna, Teixeira, Manuel R, Kote-Jarai, Zsofia, Olama, Ali Amin Al, Benlloch, Sara, Renner, Stefan P, Hartmann, Arndt, Hein, Alexander, Ruebner, Matthias, Lambrechts, Diether, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Vergote, Ignace, Lambretchs, Sandrina, Doherty, Jennifer A, Rossing, Mary Anne, Nickels, Stefan, Eilber, Ursula, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Odunsi, Kunle, Sucheston-Campbell, Lara E, Friel, Grace, Lurie, Galina, Killeen, Jeffrey L, Wilkens, Lynne R, Goodman, Marc T, Runnebaum, Ingo, Hillemanns, Peter A, Pelttari, Liisa M, Butzow, Ralf, Modugno, Francesmary, Edwards, Robert P, Ness, Roberta B, Moysich, Kirsten B, du Bois, Andreas, Heitz, Florian, Harter, Philipp, Kommoss, Stefan, Karlan, Beth Y, Walsh, Christine, Lester, Jenny, Jensen, Allan, Kjaer, Susanne Krüger, Høgdall, Estrid, Peissel, Bernard, Bonanni, Bernardo, Bernard, Loris, Goode, Ellen L, Fridley, Brooke L, Vierkant, Robert A, Cunningham, Julie M, Larson, Melissa C, Fogarty, Zachary C, Kalli, Kimberly R, Liang, Dong, Lu, Karen H, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Wu, Xifeng, Levine, Douglas A, Dao, Fanny, Bisogna, Maria, Berchuck, Andrew, Iversen, Edwin S, Marks, Jeffrey R, Akushevich, Lucy, Cramer, Daniel W, Schildkraut, Joellen, Terry, Kathryn L, Poole, Elizabeth M, Stampfer, Meir, Tworoger, Shelley S, Bandera, Elisa V, Orlow, Irene, Olson, Sara H, Bjorge, Line, Salvesen, Helga B, van Altena, Anne M, Aben, Katja KH, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Massuger, Leon FAG, Pejovic, Tanja, Bean, Yukie, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Kelemen, Linda E, Cook, Linda S, Le, Nhu D, Górski, Bohdan, Gronwald, Jacek, Menkiszak, Janusz, Høgdall, Claus K, Lundvall, Lene, Nedergaard, Lotte, Engelholm, Svend Aage, Dicks, Ed, Tyrer, Jonathan, Campbell, Ian, McNeish, Iain, Paul, James, Siddiqui, Nadeem, Glasspool, Rosalind, Whittemore, Alice S, Rothstein, Joseph H, McGuire, Valerie, Sieh, Weiva, Cai, Hui, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Teten, Rachel T, Sutphen, Rebecca, McLaughlin, John R, Narod, Steven A, Phelan, Catherine M, Monteiro, Alvaro N, Fenstermacher, David, Lin, Hui-Yi, Permuth, Jennifer B, Sellers, Thomas A, Chen, Y Ann, Tsai, Ya-Yu, Chen, Zhihua, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Gayther, Simon A, Ramus, Susan J, Menon, Usha, Wu, Anna H, Pearce, Celeste L, Van Den Berg, David, Pike, Malcolm C, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Plisiecka-Halasa, Joanna, Moes-Sosnowska, Joanna, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Pharoah, Paul Dp, Song, Honglin, Winship, Ingrid, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Giles, Graham G, Tavtigian, Sean V, Easton, Doug F, Milne, Roger L, Clinical Genetics, Neurology, Medical Oncology, Surgery, Erasmus MC other, Clinicum, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medicum, Kristiina Aittomäki / Principal Investigator, Department of Medical and Clinical Genetics, Department of Oncology, Department of Pathology, HUS Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tischkowitz, Marc [0000-0002-7880-0628], Dennis, Joe [0000-0003-4591-1214], Dunning, Alison [0000-0001-6651-7166], Khaw, Kay-Tee [0000-0002-8802-2903], Amin Al Olama, Ali [0000-0002-7178-3431], Dicks, Ed [0000-0002-0617-0401], Tyrer, Jonathan [0000-0003-3724-4757], Pharoah, Paul [0000-0001-8494-732X], Song, Honglin [0000-0001-5076-7371], Easton, Douglas [0000-0003-2444-3247], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
Subjects: 0301 basic medicine, Oncology, Male, Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins, prostate-cancer, Prostate cancer, 0302 clinical medicine, brca1, Medizinische Fakultät, Medicine and Health Sciences, skin and connective tissue diseases, Genetics (clinical), Ovarian Neoplasms, education.field_of_study, brca2-interacting protein, Women's cancers Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [Radboudumc 17], 1184 Genetics, developmental biology, physiology, Nuclear Proteins, Women's cancers Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 17], 3. Good health, PROSTATE-CANCER, Cancer: prostate, Multicenter Study, ovarian-cancer, Centre for Surgical Research, Urological cancers Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 15], 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, ovary [Cancer], Female, Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group N Protein, metaanalysis, Risk, medicine.medical_specialty, SUSCEPTIBILITY LOCI, Population, 3122 Cancers, cancer predisposition, Breast Neoplasms, OVARIAN-CANCER, BRCA2-INTERACTING PROTEIN, Cancer: ovary, 03 medical and health sciences, Breast cancer, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, Internal medicine, prostate [Cancer], medicine, Cancer Genetics, Genetics, Journal Article, breast [Cancer], BREAST-CANCER, Humans, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, ddc:610, education, gene, CHEK2, FAMILY REGISTRY, METAANALYSIS, breast-cancer, Genetic Association Studies, business.industry, MUTATIONS, Cancer: breast, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Case-control study, Cancer, Prostatic Neoplasms, medicine.disease, BRCA1, mutations, GENE, susceptibility loci, Checkpoint Kinase 2, 030104 developmental biology, Relative risk, Case-Control Studies, Mutation, family registry, Ovarian cancer, business
Abstract: Background: The rarity of mutations in PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM make it difficult to estimate precisely associated cancer risks. Population-based family studies have provided evidence that at least some of these mutations are associated with breast cancer risk as high as those associated with rare BRCA2 mutations. We aimed to estimate the relative risks associated with specific rare variants in PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM via a multicentre case-control study.Methods: We genotyped 10 rare mutations using the custom iCOGS array: PALB2 c.1592delT, c.2816T>G and c.3113G>A, CHEK2c.349A>G, c.538C>T, c.715G>A, c.1036C>T, c.1312G>T, and c.1343T>G and ATM c.7271T>G. We assessed associations with breast cancer risk (42 671 cases and 42 164 controls), as well as prostate (22 301 cases and 22 320 controls) and ovarian (14 542 cases and 23 491 controls) cancer risk, for each variant.Results: For European women, strong evidence of association with breast cancer risk was observed for PALB2 c.1592delT OR 3.44 (95% CI 1.39 to 8.52, p=7.1×10−5), PALB2 c.3113G>A OR 4.21 (95% CI 1.84 to 9.60, p=6.9×10−8) and ATM c.7271T>G OR 11.0 (95% CI 1.42 to 85.7, p=0.0012). We also found evidence of association with breast cancer risk for three variants in CHEK2, c.349A>G OR 2.26 (95% CI 1.29 to 3.95), c.1036C>T OR 5.06 (95% CI 1.09 to 23.5) and c.538C>T OR 1.33 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.67) (p≤0.017). Evidence for prostate cancer risk was observed for CHEK2 c.1343T>G OR 3.03 (95% CI 1.53 to 6.03, p=0.0006) for African men and CHEK2 c.1312G>T OR 2.21 (95% CI 1.06 to 4.63, p=0.030) for European men. No evidence of association with ovarian cancer was found for any of these variants.Conclusions: This report adds to accumulating evidence that at least some variants in these genes are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer that is clinically important.
Published: 2016

49. The Breast Cancer to Bone (B2B) Metastases Research Program: a multi-disciplinary investigation of bone metastases from breast cancer

Author: Brockton, Nigel T., Gill, Stephanie J., Laborge, Stephanie L., Paterson, Alexander H. G., Cook, Linda S., Vogel, Hans J., Shemanko, Carrie S., Hanley, David A., Magliocco, Anthony M., and Friedenreich, Christine M.
Subjects: Cancer Research, Survival, Bone Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms, Population-based, Metastasis, Study Protocol, Breast cancer, Recurrence, Genetics, Biomarkers, Tumor, Metabolomics, Humans, Prospective Studies, Vitamin D, Bone, Inflammation, Physical activity, Gene Expression Profiling, Cohort, Lifestyle, Survival Analysis, Diet, Oncology, Research Design, Cytokines, Female, Gene expression
Abstract: Background Bone is the most common site of breast cancer distant metastasis, affecting 50–70 % of patients who develop metastatic disease. Despite decades of informative research, the effective prevention, prediction and treatment of these lesions remains elusive. The Breast Cancer to Bone (B2B) Metastases Research Program consists of a prospective cohort of incident breast cancer patients and four sub-projects that are investigating priority areas in breast cancer bone metastases. These include the impact of lifestyle factors and inflammation on risk of bone metastases, the gene expression features of the primary tumour, the potential role for metabolomics in early detection of bone metastatic disease and the signalling pathways that drive the metastatic lesions in the bone. Methods/Design The B2B Research Program is enrolling a prospective cohort of 600 newly diagnosed, incident, stage I-IIIc breast cancer survivors in Alberta, Canada over a five year period. At baseline, pre-treatment/surgery blood samples are collected and detailed epidemiologic data is collected by in-person interview and self-administered questionnaires. Additional self-administered questionnaires and blood samples are completed at specified follow-up intervals (24, 48 and 72 months). Vital status is obtained prior to each follow-up through record linkages with the Alberta Cancer Registry. Recurrences are identified through medical chart abstractions. Each of the four projects applies specific methods and analyses to assess the impact of serum vitamin D and cytokine concentrations, tumour transcript and protein expression, serum metabolomic profiles and in vitro cell signalling on breast cancer bone metastases. Discussion The B2B Research Program will address key issues in breast cancer bone metastases including the association between lifestyle factors (particularly a comprehensive assessment of vitamin D status) inflammation and bone metastases, the significance or primary tumour gene expression in tissue tropism, the potential of metabolomic profiles for risk assessment and early detection and the signalling pathways controlling the metastatic tumour microenvironment. There is substantial synergy between the four projects and it is hoped that this integrated program of research will advance our understanding of key aspects of bone metastases from breast cancer to improve the prevention, prediction, detection, and treatment of these lesions.
Published: 2015

50. Intrauterine devices and endometrial cancer risk : a pooled analysis of the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium

Author: Felix, Ashley S., Gaudet, Mia M., La Vecchia, Carlo, Nagle, Christina M., Ou Shu, Xiao, Weiderpass, Elisabete, Olov Adami, Hans, Beresford, Shirley, Bernstein, Leslie, Chen, Chu, Cook, Linda S., De Vivo, Immaculata, Doherty, Jennifer A., Friedenreich, Christine M., Gapstur, Susan M., Hill, Dierdre, Horn-Ross, Pamela L., Lacey, James V., Levi, Fabio, Liang, Xiaolin, Lu, Lingeng, Magliocco, Anthony, McCann, Susan E., Negri, Eva, Olson, Sara H., Palmer, Julie R., Patel, Alpa V., Petruzella, Stacey, Prescott, Jennifer, Risch, Harvey A., Rosenberg, Lynn, Sherman, Mark E., Spurdle, Amanda B., Webb, Penelope M., Wise, Lauren A., Xiang, Yong-Bing, Xu, Wanghong, Yang, Hannah P., Yu, Herbert, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Anne, and Brinton, Louise A.
Subjects: Adult, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Article, United States, Endometrial Neoplasms, Cohort Studies, Contraception, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies, Humans, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Intrauterine Devices
Abstract: Intrauterine devices (IUDs), long-acting and reversible contraceptives, induce a number of immunological and biochemical changes in the uterine environment that could affect endometrial cancer (EC) risk. We addressed this relationship through a pooled analysis of data collected in the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium. We combined individual-level data from 4 cohort and 14 case-control studies, in total 8,801 EC cases and 15,357 controls. Using multivariable logistic regression, we estimated pooled odds ratios (pooled-ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for EC risk associated with ever use, type of device, ages at first and last use, duration of use and time since last use, stratified by study and adjusted for confounders. Ever use of IUDs was inversely related to EC risk (pooled-OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.74-0.90). Compared with never use, reduced risk of EC was observed for inert IUDs (pooled-OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.58-0.82), older age at first use (≥ 35 years pooled-OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.43-0.67), older age at last use (≥ 45 years pooled-OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.50-0.72), longer duration of use (≥ 10 years pooled-OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.52-0.71) and recent use (within 1 year of study entry pooled-OR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.30-0.49). Future studies are needed to assess the respective roles of detection biases and biologic effects related to foreign body responses in the endometrium, heavier bleeding (and increased clearance of carcinogenic cells) and localized hormonal changes.
Published: 2015

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources

See catalog results

Searchworks

Select search scope, currently: Articles Catalog books, media & more in Jio Institute collections Articles journal articles & other e-resources

Search

Search Constraints

Refine your results

Search Limiters

Topic

Publication Year Range

Language

Publication Type

Journal

Database

Publisher

95 results on '"Cook, Linda S."'

Search Results

Catalog

Select search scope, currently: Articles

Catalog

books, media & more in Jio Institute collections

Articles

journal articles & other e-resources