1. Evaluation of a saliva molecular point of care for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in ambulatory care
- Author
-
Pierre Quentin, Constance Delaugerre, Caroline Elie, Béatrice Parfait, Jacques Fourgeaud, Marine Minier, Marie-Laure Alby, Laure Choupeaux, Audrey Gabassi, Jérôme LeGoff, Solen Kernéis, Nabil Gastli, Juliette Pavie, Marie Laure Néré, Jean-Marc Treluyer, Séverine Mercier-Delarue, Chrystel Leroy, and Patricia Brazille
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Saliva ,Point-of-Care Systems ,Point-of-care testing ,Science ,Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Gastroenterology ,Article ,Virus ,fluids and secretions ,Antigen ,stomatognathic system ,Nasopharynx ,Virology ,Internal medicine ,Ambulatory Care ,Humans ,Medicine ,False Positive Reactions ,Prospective Studies ,Prospective cohort study ,False Negative Reactions ,Multidisciplinary ,Molecular medicine ,Diagnostic Tests, Routine ,SARS-CoV-2 ,business.industry ,COVID-19 ,Reproducibility of Results ,Nucleic acid amplification technique ,Middle Aged ,stomatognathic diseases ,Real-time polymerase chain reaction ,Molecular Diagnostic Techniques ,Point-of-Care Testing ,COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing ,RNA, Viral ,Infectious diseases ,Female ,business ,Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques - Abstract
Rapid identification of SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals is a cornerstone for the control of virus spread. The sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection by RT-PCR is similar in saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs. Rapid molecular point-of-care tests in saliva could facilitate, broaden and speed up the diagnosis. We conducted a prospective study in two community COVID-19 screening centers to evaluate the performances of a CE-marked RT-LAMP assay (EasyCoV) designed for the detection of SARS-CoV2 RNA from fresh saliva samples, compared to nasopharyngeal RT-PCR, to saliva RT-PCR and to nasopharyngeal antigen testing. Overall, 117 of the 1718 participants (7%) tested positive with nasopharyngeal RT-PCR. Compared to nasopharyngeal RT-PCR, the sensitivity and specificity of the RT-LAMP assay in saliva were 34% and 97%, respectively. The Ct values of nasopharyngeal RT-PCR were significantly lower in the 40 true positive subjects with saliva RT-LAMP (Ct 25.9) than in the 48 false negative subjects with saliva RT-LAMP (Ct 28.4) (p = 0.028). Considering six alternate criteria for reference tests, including saliva RT-PCR and nasopharyngeal antigen, the sensitivity of saliva RT-LAMP ranged between 27 and 44%. The detection of SARS-CoV-2 in crude saliva samples with an RT-LAMP assay had a lower sensitivity than nasopharyngeal RT-PCR, saliva RT-PCR and nasopharyngeal antigen testing.Registration number: NCT04578509.
- Published
- 2021