1. Advance care planning in discussion: a solution or challenge with pitfalls?
- Author
-
C. Muente and C. Eggers
- Subjects
Male ,Advance care planning ,Attitude to Death ,Advance Care Planning ,03 medical and health sciences ,Critical discourse analysis ,0302 clinical medicine ,Health care ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Sociology ,Governmentality ,Terminal Care ,business.industry ,030503 health policy & services ,Politics ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,General Medicine ,Guideline ,Middle Aged ,3. Good health ,Death ,Female ,Engineering ethics ,Advance Directives ,0305 other medical science ,business ,Quality assurance ,Biopower - Abstract
Objectives Care planning should define care at the end of life in advance. At a later stage, when patients are no longer able to do this themselves, it should serve as a guideline for health care. The aim of this article is to give a first insight into the discussions around this social instrument. Study design The study design was comparing the arguments of proponents and critics. Methods This is a critical discourse analysis. Results A discussion of proponents and critics shows how closely this social instrument is interwoven with the areas of biopolitics, economics and governmentality. Conclusions Further research should address the question of what quality assurance can look like.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF