1. Predictors of study dropout in cognitive-behavioural therapy with a trauma focus for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: An individual participant data meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Wright, Simonne, Karyotaki, Eirini, Cuijpers, Pim, Bisson, Jonathan, Papola, Davide, Witteveen, Anke, Back, Sudie, Bichescu-Burian, Dana, Capezzani, Liuva, Cloitre, Marylene, Devilly, Grant, Elbert, Thomas, Mello, Marcelo, Ford, Julian, Grasso, Damion, Gamito, Pedro, Gray, Richard, Haller, Moira, Hunt, Nigel, Kleber, Rolf, König, Julia, Kullack, Claire, Laugharne, Jonathan, Liebman, Rachel, Lee, Christopher, Lely, Jeannette, Markowitz, John, Monson, Candice, Nijdam, Mirjam, Norman, Sonya, Olff, Miranda, Orang, Tahereh, Ostacoli, Luca, Paunovic, Nenad, Petkova, Eva, Resick, Patricia, Rosner, Rita, Schauer, Maggie, Schmitz, Joy, Schnyder, Ulrich, Smith, Brian, Vujanovic, Anka, Zang, Yinyin, Duran, Érica, Neto, Francisco, Seedat, Soraya, and Sijbrandij, Marit
- Subjects
PSYCHIATRY ,Humans ,Stress Disorders ,Post-Traumatic ,Patient Dropouts ,Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ,Adult ,Male ,Female - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Available empirical evidence on participant-level factors associated with dropout from psychotherapies for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is both limited and inconclusive. More comprehensive understanding of the various factors that contribute to study dropout from cognitive-behavioural therapy with a trauma focus (CBT-TF) is crucial for enhancing treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVE: Using an individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) design, we examined participant-level predictors of study dropout from CBT-TF interventions for PTSD. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic literature search was undertaken to identify randomised controlled trials comparing CBT-TF with waitlist control, treatment-as-usual or another therapy. Academic databases were screened from conception until 11 January 2021. Eligible interventions were required to be individual and in-person delivered. Participants were considered dropouts if they did not complete the post-treatment assessment. FINDINGS: The systematic literature search identified 81 eligible studies (n=3330). Data were pooled from 25 available CBT-TF studies comprising 823 participants. Overall, 221 (27%) of the 823 dropped out. Of 581 civilians, 133 (23%) dropped out, as did 75 (42%) of 178 military personnel/veterans. Bivariate and multivariate analyses indicated that military personnel/veterans (RR 2.37) had a significantly greater risk of dropout than civilians. Furthermore, the chance of dropping out significantly decreased with advancing age (continuous; RR 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the risk of premature termination from CBT-TF among younger adults and military veterans/personnel. CLINICAL IMPLICATION: Understanding predictors can inform the development of retention strategies tailored to at-risk subgroups, enhance engagement, improve adherence and yield better treatment outcomes.
- Published
- 2024