Search

In everyday clinical practice, health professionals and parents of chronically ill children often rely on the principle of 'best interest' in the development of medically oriented treatment plans. In most cases, such processes are done collaboratively; however, 'best interest' as a standard for decision-making becomes ambiguous in situations wherein parents and health professionals fail to agree on the course of treatment. This paper will explore the potential tensions that can exist in clinical practice when 'best interest' is used for making health care decisions. The discussion will be framed within the case of baby M, a newborn child of Mennonite descent diagnosed at birth with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). M's parents refused medically-prescribed therapy on behalf of their child because of the uncertainty of the treatment and beliefs regarding quality of life. This case highlights that the application of the 'best interest' principle in the clinical domain can be ambiguously interpreted and subjectively operationalized along a narrowly defined medical understanding of what is in the patient's best interest. In addition, this case serves as an example of how power within the health care system can be used to operationalize a medically-sanctioned definition of 'best interest', often at the expense of the values, beliefs and interests of parental caregivers.

Parenting a child with chronic kidney disease has a profound impact on the parental caregivers across social, emotional, and physical functioning. As the survival rates for children with chronic kidney disease increase, the demands on parents caring for these children intensify. The aim of this study was to understand the lived experience of being a mother of a child who has undergone kidney transplantation. Seven mothers caring for children with chronic kidney disease in Ontario, Canada participated in in-depth interviews that were analyzed according to the principles of hermeneutic phenomenology. The present study presents the findings concerning post-traumatic growth: personal strength, new possibilities, enhanced relationships, appreciation of life and spiritual change. Recognizing positive aspects of stressful situations and the potential for growth can impact the practice of social workers and other health-care professionals. Ultimately the assistance that is provided to parent caregivers can be improved with a better understanding of the whole experience.

Advances in the surgical and immunological aspects of pediatric kidney transplantation have resulted in significant improvements in long-term outcome and survival rates. However, there continues to be a negative impact reported on overall family functioning despite the reported good health and quality of life for the transplanted child. This research utilizes a phenomenological approach to examine the lived experiences of seven mothers of children who had undergone kidney transplantation. Findings of the study illuminate that the experience of mothering in the context of pediatric kidney transplantation is reflected in (1) the significance of relationships to the experience of self; (2) the lived experience of time; and (3) opportunities for growth and personal development. This research identifies that, while maternal caregiving in this context is fraught with challenges, there are opportunities for the development of skills and personal growth within the experience. By embracing a strength-based perspective, social work is well positioned to offer support for maternal meaning-making and adjustment during times of stress and uncertainty.