Search

The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the effects of a phytogenic feed additive (PHYT) on the health and performance of newly-received, high-risk calves. Auction market derived crossbred beef steers and bulls (n = 712; initial body weight; BW = 239 ± 6.8 kg) were stratified by sex, blocked by BW, and randomly allocated to experimental treatments (n = 9 pens per treatment; n = 24 to 29 calves per pen). Experimental treatments included: a control diet (CON), 250 mg · steer-1 · d-1 of PHYT (PHYT250), or 500 mg · steer-1 · d-1 of PHYT (PHYT500). Pen served as the experimental unit for all dependent variables. Contrasts were performed for PHYT inclusion (PHYT250 and PHYT500 vs. CON). No differences in BW existed between treatments throughout the experiment (P ≥ 0.20; PHYT vs. CON P ≥ 0.11). In the overall model, no differences (P ≥ 0.23) in average daily gain (ADG) existed between CON, PHYT250, or PHYT500. However, when comparing PHTY to the CON, ADG tended to be less in the calves receiving CON from d 0 through d 14 (P = 0.09). No differences in dry matter intake (DMI) existed between treatments throughout the experiment (P ≥ 0.27; PHYT vs. CON P ≥ 0.13). While there was no difference in gain to feed (G:F) in the overall model (P ≥ 0.26), the tendency observed for a difference in ADG from d 0 through d 14 did result in a similar tendency for G:F across the same interval when comparing PHYT to the CON (PHYT vs. CON P ≥ 0.10). A difference was observed in the percentage of steers treated once for bovine respiratory disease (BRD; P = 0.02), with CON being treated more frequently than PHYT500, while PHYT250 was intermediate and similar to both CON and PHYT500. When comparing PHYT to the CON, there was a decrease in the percentage of steers receiving PHYT to be treated once for BRD (P = 0.01). However, there were no differences in either the percentage of steers treated twice for BRD or the in the percentage of total BRD treatments administered (P ≥ 0.29; PHYT vs. CON P ≥ 0.14). The mortality percentage and the percentage of steers removed from the study were not different (P ≥ 0.16; PHYT vs. CON P ≥ 0.14); however, there tended to be more combined mortalities and removals for steers receiving PHYT than the CON (P = 0.08; PHYT vs. CON P = 0.09), with PHYT500 and CON tending to be different, and PHYT250 being intermediate and similar to both PHYT500 and CON. In summary, PHYT did not impact overall performance, but did reduce initial antimicrobial treatments for BRD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objectives of this experiment were to evaluate the effects of feeding Bacillus subtilis PB6 on clinical health, performance, and carcass characteristics of feedlot steers. Bos indicus crossbred steer calves (n = 397; 342 kg initial body weight [BW]) were randomly assigned to pens by initial BW; pens (n = 24) were randomly assigned to one of two of the following experimental treatments: 1) no supplemental dietary direct-fed microbial, control (CON; n = 12 pens) or 2) 13 g/steer daily B. subtilis PB6 (CLO; CLOSTAT, Kemin Industries, Des Moines, IA; n = 12 pens). Steers were housed in 12.2 × 30.5 m soil-surfaced pens; pen served as the experimental unit. The percentage of cattle treated once or twice for bovine respiratory disease (BRD) did not differ among treatments (P ≥ 0.27); BRD mortality also did not differ between CON and CLO (P = 0.34). During the receiving period, final BW (P = 0.97), average daily gain (ADG; P = 0.91), dry matter intake (DMI; P = 0.77), and gain:feed (P = 0.79) were not different among treatments. There was a tendency (P = 0.09) for CLO-supplemented steers to be 14% more efficient from days 0 to 14 of the receiving period. Final BW, overall finishing phase ADG, and DMI did not differ by treatment (P ≥ 0.14); ADG was 0.14 kg greater for CLO than CON (P = 0.03) from days 29 to 56 of the finishing period. Gain: feed tended (P = 0.07) to be 7% greater (0.144 vs. 0.141) for CLO than CON throughout the duration of the finishing period, and 6.7% greater (P = 0.08; 0.152 for CLO vs. 0.150 for CON) for the entirety of the experiment. Carcass traits did not differ among treatments (P ≥ 0.31). The results of this experiment suggest that supplementing 13 g/steer daily B. subtilis PB6 may improve feed efficiency in feedlot cattle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Growth-promoting technologies such as implants, ionophores, and β-agonists improve feedlot performance, efficiency, and carcass characteristics of cattle. The objective of this experiment was to determine the effects of dose and duration of ractopamine hydrochloride (RH) on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics when fed to Holstein steers. A randomized complete block design was used with a 3 × 3 factorial arrangement of treatments with 3 RH doses (0, 300, or 400 mg∙steer−1∙d−1) fed for 3 durations (28, 35, or 42 d). Holstein steers (n = 855; initial body weight [BW] = 448 ± 37 kg) were blocked by BW and randomly allocated to 1 of 9 pens (15 blocks; 9 dose × duration treatment combinations) approximately 72 d before harvest. Weekly pen weights, chute temperament scores, and animal mobility were determined during the RH feeding period. At harvest, carcass data were collected on all steers, and tenderness was measured on steaks from 3 or 4 randomly selected steers from each pen and slice shear force (SSF) was determined on one steak selected from each side of the carcass after aging for 14 or 21 d. For feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, and SSF, no dose × duration interactions were observed (P ≥ 0.11). With increasing RH dose, average daily gain (ADG) and gain-to-feed ratio (G:F) increased linearly (P ≤ 0.01), whereas BW gain increased linearly with RH dose and duration (P ≤ 0.01). Hot carcass weight (P = 0.02) and longissimus muscle (LM) area (P ≤ 0.01) increased linearly with increasing RH dose. The percentage of carcasses in the USDA Yield Grade 2 category increased linearly (P ≤ 0.01) and percentage of carcasses in the USDA Yield Grade 4 category tended (P = 0.08) to decrease linearly as RH dose increased. In the 14-d aged steaks, the percentage of steaks with SSF ≤ 15.3 kg decreased linearly (P ≤ 0.01), whereas the percentage of steaks with ≥20.0 kg SSF increased linearly (P ≤ 0.01) with increasing RH dose. After 21-d aging, there was a tendency (P = 0.06) for a greater percentage of steaks from steers fed RH to have SSF ≥ 20.0 kg (2% of total steaks), but no difference (P ≥ 0.12) in the percentage of steaks with SSF ≤ 19.9 kg. Final chute temperament (P ≥ 0.45) and animal mobility (P ≥ 0.67) scores were not affected by feeding RH. Increasing the dose of RH (300 or 400 mg∙steer−1∙d−1) fed for 28 to 42 d before harvest increased ADG, G:F, hot carcass weight, and LM area when fed to Holstein steers with no negative effects on behavior or mobility. The percentage of steaks classified as not tender improved when steaks were aged for 21 d from steers treated with RH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Our objective was to determine how calffed or yearling finishing systems affect the performance and efficiency of dairy-beef crossbred steers. Dairy-beef hybrid steers were acquired from Land O' Lakes Calf Milk Research Facility at Grey Summit, Missouri at 12-wk (BW/SD) of age and transported to Willard Sparks Beef Research Center (WSBRC). Upon arrival at WSBRC, steers were weighed, vaccinated, treated for parasites, and implanted with 36 mg of zeranol (Ralgro). Alternating groups of steers were placed either directly on finishing diets (FIN) or on high-quality pasture and supplementation for 5 to 6 mo before returning to WSBRC for finishing (GRW/FIN). Steers in FIN were grown on successively higher energy growing diets through d 112, stepping up to a 20% roughage growing diet from d 28 to 112. On d 112, FIN steers were transitioned to a 12% roughage finishing diet. A final 8% roughage finishing was fed to FIN steers from d 224 to slaughter. Steers in FIN were reimplanted with Ralgro on d 56, Component TE-IS (80 mg trenbolone acetate, 16 mg estradiol, and 29 mg tylosin tartrate; Elanco US, Greenfield, IN) on d 112, and Component TE-S (200 mg progesterone, 20 mg estradiol benzoate, 29 mg tylosin tartrate; Elanco) on d 224. Steers in GRW/FIN were returned to WSBRC, weighed, and processed when they reached 312 ± 7.0 kg. Steers in GRW/FIN were implanted with Component TE-IS at the start of finishing, and Component TE-S on d 120. Steers in GRW/FIN were stepped up to the finishing diet when they reached 407 ± 6.0 kg. Finishing diets for the final 28 d for FIN and GRW/FIN included ractopamine hydrochloride at a rate of 300 mg·steer-1·d-1. At WSBRC, steers within each finishing system were sorted by BW into 4 to 5 head pens. Initial and terminal BW were greater (P < 0.01) in steers in the GRW/FIN finishing system. Body weight at reimplant was greater (P < 0.01) for FIN. Steers in the GRW/FIN system were on feed for fewer (P < 0.01) days compared with FIN steers. Average daily gain (ADG) and DMI (kg·steer-1·d-1) were greater (P < 0.01) for GRW/FIN. Steers in GRW/FIN had a greater (P < 0.02) feed:gain ratio than those placed directly into a finishing system. There were no differences (P < 0.10) in USDA Yield Grade, marbling, ribeye area (REA), or back-fat thickness (BFT) between finishing systems. Steers in FIN had a greater (P < 0.01) dressing percentage (DP) and lighter (P < 0.01) hot carcass weight than those for GRW/FIN. Finishing system has an impact on performance and efficiency of dairy-beef hybrid steers, but minimal impact on carcass quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this experiment was to determine the effects of dietary inclusion of lasalocid in combination with zeranol implants on the performance and carcass characteristics of hair sheep. Thirty wether hair lambs (BW = 25.8 + 4.6 kg) were stratified by BW and BCS and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 experimental treatments in a randomized complete block design. The treatments included no implant or ionophore (CON); and the experimental treatment, receiving the ionophore lasalocid (Bovatec® 91; Zoetis, Kalamazoo, MI) and anabolic zeranol implants (Ralgro®; MSD Animal Health, Spartan, RSA; LZ). Lambs on the LZ treatment received 12 mg of zeranol on d 0, 56, and 112, unless lambs were harvested prior to day 112, and consumed an average of 35 mg per day of lasalocid. Lambs had ad libitum access to feed and water throughout the experiment and were housed in individual, slatted floor pens. Performance data were collected on d 0, 14, 28, 56, 84, and at harvest. After d 84, harvest dates were selected and lambs were harvested by block based on proximity to ideal harvest weight and fat thickness. Lasalocid in the diet combined with zeranol implants increased final BW by 14.2% in comparison to CON (P < 0.01). Overall ADG was increased by 36.2% (P < 0.01), and overall G:F was improved by 24.4% for LZ when compared to CON (P = 0.01). There was no difference in overall DMI between treatments (P = 0.13). Hot carcass weight (HCW; P < 0.01), and loin eye area (LEA; P < 0.01) were also greater for the LZ treatment. Dietary inclusion of lasalocid in combination with zeranol implants improved overall BW, ADG, and feed efficiency as well as HCW and LEA in hair sheep. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Yearling Angus steers (n = 64; arrival BW = 322 ± 44 kg) from a single ranch were used to determine the effects of delivering feed once (1X) or twice (2X) per day on finishing performance and carcass characteristics. Steers were blocked by BW and randomly assigned to pens (4.57 × 15.24 m; 4 steers per pen). Pens were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 experimental treatments (1X or 2X). All steers were fed a common dry-rolled corn finishing ration for 141 d. Feed was delivered to steers in fence-line concrete bunks (4.57 m in length; 1.14 m per steer) with the only difference between experimental treatments being the frequency of feed delivery. The 1X steers received 100% of the daily feed call at 0930 h, while the 2X steers received 50% of the daily feed call at both 0930 and 1400 h. Pen served as the experimental unit, and all steers were harvested on d 142. There were no differences in final BW (P = 0.95) or overall ADG (P = 0.94) between experimental treatments; however, overall DMI was greater for the 1X steers (P < 0.01). The difference in DMI combined with no difference in ADG resulted in a 4% improvement in overall G:F for the 2X steers (P = 0.03). There were no differences between the experimental treatments for any carcass characteristics (P ≥ 0.28). While this experiment was conducted in a small pen research setting, the results suggest that the frequency of feed delivery impacts the intake and feed efficiency of feedlot steers. Consideration should be given to the impacts of feed delivery on feedlot logistics and batching in commercial settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spring (SPRING) and fall (FALL) born steers (n = 211) were used in a mixed effects model to evaluate calving season and conception method [artificial insemination (AI) or natural service (NS)] on finishing performance and carcass traits. SPRING were weaned in October, grazed dormant range for 90 days and grazed wheat pasture for 90 days before shipping to finish. FALL were weaned in May, and grazed tallgrass prairie for 120 days before shipping to finish. Initial and final BW, days on feed, ADG, DMI, and gain to feed efficiency were evaluated as performance measures. Dry matter intake and gain:feed were analyzed on pen basis. Hot carcass weight, yield grade, fat thickness, ribeye area, and marbling score were collected at harvest. Bodyweight of SPRING and AI steers were heavier (P ≤ 0.05) entering and leaving the feedlot than FALL and NS steers, respectively. Compared to FALL steers, ADG (P < 0.01) and DMI (P = 0.03) were greater for SPRING and required less days on feed (P ≤ 0.05). Calving season and conception method (P ≥ 0.2) did not affect gain:feed. Conception method (P = 0.5) did not affect ADG, DMI, and days on feed. SPRING had higher yield grades (P < 0.01) and increased in fat thickness (P = 0.01) compared to FALL steers. There were no differences (P = 0.2) in hot carcass weight, ribeye area, and marbling score due to season of birth. Steers born from AI mating had greater hot carcass weight (P = 0.01) and marbling score (P = 0.02), but conception method did not affect yield grade, fat thickness, and ribeye area (P > 0.2). These results demonstrate SPRING steers are heavier entering and leaving the feedlot, have higher ADG and DMI, and require less days on feed; however, gain:feed, hot carcass weight, ribeye area, and marbling score did not differ from FALL steers. An economic analysis is needed to validate an AI program based on calving season in north-central Oklahoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Three experiments were conducted to determine the effects of monensin supplementation during the stocker and finishing phase on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of beef steers. In Exp. 1 and 2, steers (n = 61, BW = 345 ± 20 kg and n = 70, BW = 298 ± 26 kg) were fed hay and supplement or grazed wheat pasture (Exp. 1) or bermudagrass (Exp. 2) and then were transported 1,068 km to Canyon, TX, for finishing. For Exp. 3 steers (n = 59, BW = 322 ± 31 kg) grazed wheat pasture and then transported 636 km to Stillwater, OK, for finishing. Treatments were arranged as a 3 × 2 factorial with three monensin levels during the stocker phase (0, 800, 1600 g/ton fed in a free choice mineral) and two levels during finishing [0 (UN) or 37.5 mg/kg diet DM (RUM). There were no location × treatment interactions (P ≥ 0.19) for performance or carcass measurements, therefore data were pooled across locations. Stocker × feedlot treatment interactions were not observed for performance data (P ≥ 0.50), but were observed for carcass characteristics. Cattle consuming RUM in the feedlot had decreased (P < 0.01) DMI and increased (P < 0.01) G:F compared with UN. Cattle on 1600UN treatment had the greatest LM area whereas 0U had the least (103.4 vs 96.3 cm2). Steers on the 800UN and 1600UN treatments had decreased YG and 800RUM had the greatest (2.31 and 2.22 vs 2.75). Cattle consuming RUM during finishing had increased (P = 0.03) fat thickness compared to UN. Supplementation of monensin to stocker cattle may have minimal impact on subsequent feedlot performance. Providing monensin in feedlot diets still decreases DMI and improves feed efficiency of feedlot cattle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]