Search

Beta-band (15-30 ​Hz) corticomuscular and intermuscular coherences are important markers of the corticospinal interaction. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether amount of visual feedback during an isometric pinch grip contraction would influence these coherences in young and elderly adults. Thirty-three healthy young and elderly subjects performed pinch grip force-matching task with right thumb and index finger, while scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) and electromyogram (EMG) from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscles were recorded. The amount of visual feedback was altered by manipulation of visual gain (low and high). Beta-band corticomuscular coherence was computed between EEG over the sensorimotor cortex and EMG from the FDI muscle and between EEG and EMG from the APB muscle (EEG-FDI and EEG-APB coherences). Also, beta-band intermuscular coherence was computed between EMG signals from the FDI and APB muscles (EMG-EMG coherence). Task performance was quantified as standard deviation (SD) of force and mean force error (MFE). EEG-FDI coherence was larger at high than low visual gain in the elderly but not in the young subjects, whereas there was no effect of age or visual gain on EEG-APB coherence. EMG-EMG coherence was smaller at high than low visual gain in the young and elderly subjects. The MFE was smaller at high than low visual gain in the young and elderly subjects, but the SD of force was smaller at high than low visual gain only in the young subjects. These results suggest that the effect of aging on beta-band coherence depends on the amount of visual feedback and further that visual feedback modulates beta-band corticomuscular and intermuscular coherences differently., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Variability is an inherent feature of the motor output. Although low-frequency oscillations (<0.5 Hz) are the most important contributor to the variability of force during single-joint isolated force tasks, it remains unclear whether they contribute to the variability of a more complex task, such as a voluntary postural task., Research Question: Do low-frequency oscillations contribute to postural sway (center of pressure (COP) variability) when participants attempt to voluntarily maintain posture in a forward leaning position?, Methods: Fourteen healthy young adults performed two tasks: 1) stand quietly (control condition); 2) leaned their body forward to 60% of their maximum lean distance by dorsiflexing the ankle joint. We recorded the COP and electromyographic (EMG) activity from the medial gastrocnemius (MG) and soleus (SL) muscles. We quantified the following: 1) COP variability as the standard deviation (SD) of anteroposterior COP displacements; 2) modulation of COP as the power in COP displacements from 0 to 2 Hz; 3) modulation of EMG bursting as the power in the rectified and smoothed EMG from 0 to 2 Hz; 4) modulation of the interference EMG as the power in the EMG from 10 to 35 and 35-60 Hz., Results: The SD of COP displacements related to the COP oscillations <0.5 Hz in both quiet standing and lean tasks. However, only for the lean task, the <0.5 Hz COP oscillations related to the EMG burst oscillations <0.5 Hz of the MG muscle. The EMG burst oscillations <0.5 Hz of the MG muscle further related to the interference EMG oscillations from 35 to 60 Hz for the lean task., Significance: Voluntary control of forward leaning posture relates to low-frequency neural inputs to the MG muscle., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Mirror therapy using mirror visual feedback (MVF) has been applied to the stroke rehabilitation of hemiparesis. One possible mechanism of mirror therapy is the functional interhemispheric connectivity between sensorimotor areas via corpus callosum. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the MVF-induced motor learning in 2 patients with callosal disconnection. Callosal connection in patients was evaluated by clinical measures and the interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Both patients suffered from somatosensory cognitive disconnection, and one showed the loss of IHI. Motor training with MVF significantly improved the motor behavior of both patients. Extending our previous study, the results of callosal patients suggested that the visual feedback through a mirror might play the crucial important role for the improvement of motor performance, rather than interhemispheric interaction via corpus callosum.

The clinical use of mirror visual feedback (MVF) was initially introduced to alleviate phantom pain, and has since been applied to the improvement of hemiparesis following stroke. However, it is not known whether MVF can restore motor function by producing plastic changes in the human primary motor cortex (M1). Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation to test whether M1 plasticity is a physiological substrate of MVF-induced motor behavioral improvement. MVF intervention in normal volunteers using a mirror box improved motor behavior and enhanced excitatory functions of the M1. Moreover, behavioral and physiological measures of MVF-induced changes were positively correlated with each other. Improved motor performance occurred after observation of a simple action, but not after repetitive motor training of the nontarget hand without MVF, suggesting the crucial importance of visual feedback. The beneficial effects of MVF were disrupted by continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) over the M1, but not the control site in the occipital cortex. However, MVF following cTBS could further improve the motor functions. Our findings indicate that M1 plasticity, especially in its excitatory connections, is an essential component of MVF-based therapies.