1. Assessing human‐specific CrAssphage recovery after acidification‐filtration concentrating method in environmental water
- Author
-
Akechai Kongprajug, Skorn Mongkolsuk, Thitirat Petcharat, Natcha Chyerochana, Kwanrawee Sirikanchana, and Watsawan Sangkaew
- Subjects
Pollution ,media_common.quotation_subject ,02 engineering and technology ,010501 environmental sciences ,01 natural sciences ,law.invention ,Feces ,020401 chemical engineering ,law ,Humans ,Environmental Chemistry ,0204 chemical engineering ,Water pollution ,Waste Management and Disposal ,Effluent ,Filtration ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Water Science and Technology ,media_common ,Sewage ,Ecological Modeling ,Water Pollution ,Water ,Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ,Pulp and paper industry ,Wastewater ,Environmental science ,Sewage treatment ,Seawater ,Water quality ,Water Microbiology ,Environmental Monitoring - Abstract
Pinpointing water pollution sources using host-specific gastrointestinal microbes, known as microbial source tracking (MST), have significant benefits for countries with water quality management issues related to pollution. A recently discovered bacteriophage, crAssphage, shows promise as a human-specific MST marker. However, loss of genetic materials during the recovery and the detection processes could alter the ability to measure virus quantities in a water sample. This study determined the crAssphage recovery efficiencies in water sources, including seawater, freshwater, and influent and effluent from a wastewater treatment plant, by spiking natural crAssphage concentrates prior to DNA extraction and quantitative PCR analysis. The results showed that river and seawater with no or low crAssphage background experienced no recovery loss. Evaluating recovery efficiencies in samples with high crAssphage backgrounds posed a challenge due to the inability to prepare high crAssphage titers. This study highlights the importance of intra-laboratory assessment of recovery efficiency in environmental samples for retrieving absolute crAssphage quantification with correction of bias among water samples and increase in data accuracy. PRACTITIONER POINTS: In laboratory assessment of recovery efficiency is crucial for bias correction and data accuracy for absolute crAssphage quantification in water samples. No loss in crAssphage recovery was observed in river and seawater that contained no or low crAssphage backgrounds. Inability to prepare high crAssphage spike concentrations remains the major limitation for evaluating recovery in samples with high crAssphage backgrounds. The results underline the importance of evaluating method recovery in real environmental samples that reflect actual matrix effect. Absolute crAssphage quantification, as human-specific pollution marker, could be used for prioritizing water quality restoration and area-based management plan.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF