Search

Background and Aim: Anal fistulae (AF) are considered a challenge for colorectal surgeons, as they recur if not properly operated. Being a septic disease, they are correlated with immunodeficiency and surgery may be followed by anal incontinence (AI). The aim of this paper is to suggest a state-of-the-art treatment of AF., Methods: Pathogenesis, classification, diagnostic tools, intraoperative assessment, and surgeries proposed for AF have been reviewed, together with the results following conventional surgery and innovations aimed at sphincters' preservation., Results: Stress causes immunodepression and favors anal sepsis, and heavy smoking facilitates AF recurrences. Evacuation fistulography, MRI, and transanal ultrasound may help the diagnosis. Fistulotomy allows high cure rate, up to 96.4%, but may cause up to 64% of AI in transsphincteric AF. Fistulectomy with rectal advancement flap is effective in 80% of these cases and avoids AI. Other options are either suturing of AF internal orifice or positioning a cutting seton. Ligation of intersphincteric fistula track (LIFT) is a costless alternative carrying a success of 57-99% with 0-23% AI. Costly innovations, i.e., autologous stem cells, porcine derma sheet (Permacol), video-assisted fistula excision (VAAFT), porcine matrix (PLUG), and laser closure (FiLaC), minimize AI, but may carry AF recurrence. Their grades of recommendation range between 2B and 2C in the Guidelines of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery., Conclusion: Postoperative incontinence in transsphincteric AF may be minimized by both costless and costly sphincter-saving procedures, the latter carrying higher recurrence rate. The success of surgery may be increased by a different lifestyle., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The etiology of anal incontinence (AI) is often multifactorial. There is little data on the relationship between the etiology of AI, symptom severity, and the need for surgery. The aim of our study was to investigate this association in a large number of unselected patients with AI referred to a tertiary specialist coloproctological practice., Methods: Patients with AI seen at our unit between 1983 and 2008 were analyzed. The main etiologies were categorized as congenital, traumatic, neurologic, idiopathic, post-operative, post-obstetric, secondary to rectal prolapse, or inflammatory bowel disease. The severity of AI was graded using the validated Pescatori incontinence scale., Results: Overall, 1,046 patients were studied. The AI score was higher in patients with congenital (4.7 ± 1.1), traumatic (4.6 ± 1.4), and neurological (4.4 ± 1.2) incontinence. Surgical treatment was indicated in 214 cases (20.5%). Patients with AI related to trauma and congenital anomalies required surgery in 43.5 and 31.4% of cases, respectively, a percentage significantly higher than that for patients with other etiologies (P = 0.002). Prolapse-related AI usually responded to correction of the prolapse., Conclusions: Patients with congenital, traumatic, and neurological AI tend to have greater symptom severity. Traumatic, rectal prolapse-related, and congenital AI cases more often require surgery.

Purpose: Anal bulking agents are injected to pose a stronger obstacle to the involuntary passage of feces and gas. This prospective, multicenter study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Durasphere anal injection for the treatment of fecal incontinence., Patients and Methods: Thirty-three unselected patients with incontinence (24 females; mean age, 61.5 +/- 14 (range, 22-83) years) underwent anal bulking agent submucosal injection with carbon-coated microbeads (Durasphere) in the outpatient regimen. The causes of incontinence were obstetric lesions in 18.2 percent, iatrogenic in 36.4 percent, rectal surgery in 12.1 percent, and idiopathic in 33.3 percent. Previous unsuccessful treatments for fecal incontinence included diet and drugs in 16 patients, biofeedback training in 7 patients, sacral nerve modulation in 6 patients, sphincteroplasty in 2 patients, artificial bowel sphincter in 1 patient, and PTQ macroplastique bulking agent in 1 patient. Under local anesthesia and antibiotic prophylaxis, a mean of 8.8 (range, 2-19) ml of Durasphere were injected into the submucosa by using a 1.5-inch, angled, 18-gauge needle., Results: After a median follow-up of 20.8 (range, 10-22) months, the median Cleveland Clinic continence score decreased significantly from 12 to 8 (P < 0.001) and the median American Medical System score from 89 to 73 (P = 0.0074), but the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life did not change significantly (74 to 76, P = not significant). Anal manometry significantly improved (resting pressure increasing from 34 to 42 mmHg; P = 0.008) and squeezing pressure from 66 to 79 mmHg (P = 0.04). Two patients complained of moderate anal pain for a few days after the implant, one patient had asymptomatic leakage of the injected material through a mucosa perforation, and two had distal migration of the Durasphere along the dentate line., Conclusions: Anal bulking agent injection is a safe treatment and can mitigate the severity of fecal incontinence by increasing anal pressure but does not significantly improve the quality of life.

Background: Disordered continence is frequently reported after operations for anal fistulae and pre-operative anorectal physiology may be carried out prior to surgery to improve functional outcome. Elderly patients and multiparous females are at higher risk for incontinence, whereas males under 60 have stronger sphincters. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive role of anal manometry and the causes of postoperative soiling and its effect on the quality of life in males with intact sphincters undergoing excision of either trans or supra sphincteric fistulae., Methods: Thirty-eight patients (median age 47 years) were analysed retrospectively. None had previous anal surgery and all were fully continent. Five had Crohn's disease. Anal pressures and rectal sensation were evaluated prior to fistulectomy by means of anal manometry in all cases and after surgery in those who had postoperative incontinence. A cutting seton was used in 17 patients, a rectal advancement flap in 15 and a double rectal-cutaneous flap in six. None had a lay-open. The intersphincteric plane was explored and drained in all cases. A previously described incontinence grading and score was used to assess postoperative soiling. The median follow-up was 22 (range 5-89) months. The patients with postoperative anal incontinence were evaluated with the Gastrointestinal quality of Life Index Questionnaire (0:poor, 4:good) at a median follow-up of 49 months., Results: Twenty-nine (76%) patients were continent after surgery, whereas 9 (24%) complained of some degree of anal incontinence (minor in 4, severe in 1, the 1-6 incontinence score being 3.7 +/- 1.3 (mean +/- s.d.m.). Their Quality of life score was 3.8 +/- 0.5 (mean +/- sdm). None of them had Crohn's disease, five had frequent diarrhoea, four had a reintervention for either anal fissure or recurrent fistula (two), three had a postseton anal deformity. No difference was found between continent and incontinent patients as far as pre-operative anal pressures were concerned, but the maximum rectal volume threshold was significantly higher in incontinent patients, 165 +/- 67 vs. 123 +/- 49 ml of air (P = 0.04)., Conclusions: Sphincter division, diarrhoea and anal deformity may cause soiling after fistulectomy in males and it does not severely affect quality of life. Surgery rather than manometry may predict it and rectal sensation may play a role which needs further investigation.

Background: The STARR double stapling procedure (DSP), i. e. transanal anteroposterior rectotomy, has been recently reported as a low-morbidity and effective operation for the treatment of rectocele and internal rectal mucosal prolapse (R-IMP) causing obstructed defecation. We report the postoperative complications and recurrence of symptoms following this novel operation., Patients and Methods: Fourteen chronically constipated women with RIMP, aged 36-72 years, presented with either severe complications or recurrence of symptoms following DSP performed by means of two circular staplers. All were followed for a median period of 12 months (range, 2-24) after DPS., Results: Severe rectal bleeding occurred in two cases postoperatively. Persistent severe anal pain was reported by seven patients, all presenting with anxiety. Four of them were multiparous. Three patients had fecal incontinence, both had vaginal deliveries. R-IMP recurred in six, obstructed defecation in seven cases. Four patients needed reintervention, one for suturing the bleeding area, one excising the recurrent prolapse, one for colpocele and one for rectal stricture. Four patients required biofeedback training for non-relaxing puborectalis and two needed psychotherapy., Conclusion: Parity, spastic floor syndrome and psychoneurosis seem to be the risk factors predisposing to failure of DSP, which may be followed by severe complications and early recurrence of symptoms requiring reoperation.

Introduction: Rectocele may be associated with both chronic constipation and anal incontinence. Several different surgical procedures have been advocated for rectocele repair. The aim of the present study was to evaluate anorectal function and clinical outcome in a consecutive series of patients who underwent selected endorectal or transperineal surgery for rectocele for whom operative treatment was determined by clinical and proctographic features. Attention was paid to the cohort of rectocele patients presenting with incontinence as a leading symptom., Methods: Sixty consecutive patients with symptomatic rectocele underwent surgical treatment at our institution. Fifty-eight of the patients were female (mean age 56; range, 21-70 years). Incontinence was graded according to a previously reported scoring system that accounts for the type and frequency of incontinence episodes. Preoperative anorectal manometry was performed using an open perfused polyethylene probe. Rectal sensation was recorded by balloon distention. Endoanal ultrasonography was performed with a 7.5-MHz probe. Preoperative defecography was performed at rest and on maximal squeeze and straining. Patients with obstructed defecation as their principal symptom, with associated mucosal rectal prolapse, underwent an endorectal procedure. For patients with associated anal incontinence (Grade B2 or greater), and without a rectal mucosal prolapse, a transperineal approach was performed with either an anterior external overlapping sphincteroplasty or levatorplasty. The median follow-up was 48 (range, 9-122) months., Results: There was no operative mortality. Postoperative complications occurred in 18 patients (30 percent). Of 43 patients with incontinence, 34 (79 percent) were available for postoperative evaluation. None were fully continent. However, in 25 patients (73.5 percent), continence improved after surgery; half had only mucus soiling or loss of gas. Incontinence scores decreased (i.e., improved) from 4.8 +/- 0.9 to 3.9 +/- 0.9 (P = 0.002). A significant improvement was found both after transanal and perineal procedures. Only ten initially continent patients were available for postoperative assessment. All patients stated that they had clinical improvement in constipation. Their preoperative mean anal resting pressure was 62.5 +/- 3.9 (standard error of the mean) mmHg, with a postoperative mean of 75.5 +/- 7 mmHg. The preoperative mean squeeze pressure was 83.1 +/- 8.5 mmHg, with a mean postoperative squeeze pressure of 88.5 +/- 7.9 mmHg (P = not significant). The maximal tolerable volumes were all within normal limits, confirming the proctographic evidence that there were no cases of megarectum in our patient series. The pudendal nerve terminal motor latency was abnormal in all but two patients with incontinence (mean pudendal nerve terminal motor latency = 3.1; range, 1.2-4 milliseconds). Rectoceles recurred in six patients (10 percent): five after a Block procedure and one after a Sarles-type operation. The postoperative endosonographic appearance varied according to the nature of the procedure performed., Conclusion: There are few data concerning patients with rectocele who have associated anal incontinence, however, surgical decision analysis resulted in improvement in both constipation and incontinence in the majority of our patients with rectocele. Nevertheless, because none of the patients gained full continence postoperatively, pelvic floor rehabilitation might be also needed to achieve better sphincter function in patients with incontinence.

Clinical and manometric results of Delorme's operation and sphincteroplasty were assessed retrospectively in patients undergoing this procedure for fecal incontinence and rectal prolapse. A series of 33 patients (11 males, 22 females; aged 18-83 years, mean 59) with external rectal prolapse were treated by Delorme's operation between 1989 and 1996. Mean follow-up was 39 months (range 7-84). Sphincteroplasty was associated in 12 cases with severe fecal incontinence due to striated muscle defects. Good results were achieved in 27 patients (79%); prolapse recurrence was observed in 6 (21%), the mean recurrence time being 9 months (range 1-24 months). There were no postoperative deaths. Minor complications occurred in 15 patients. Changes in preoperative and postoperative manometric patterns were as follows (mean +/- SEM): voluntary contraction from 59 +/- 6.9 to 66 +/- 7.1 mmHg (P = 0.05), resting tone from 33 +/- 5 to 32 +/- 4.3 mmHg, rectal sensation from 59 +/- 5 to 61 +/- 5.2 ml of air (n.s.). A solitary rectal ulcer syndrome was detected in five patients. The histological pattern demonstrated pathological changes in 40% of cases. Fecal incontinence was resolved in 6 of 20 cases (30%) and chronic constipation in 4 of 9 (44%). Failure (n = 3) was related primarily to postoperative sepsis. The incontinence score showed a mean improvement of 35% decreasing, from 4.5 +/- 0.39 to 2.9 +/- 0.44 after surgery (P < 0.01). In conclusion, Delorme's procedure did not lead to constipation and improved anal continence when associated with sphincteroplasty.

A grading system of anal incontinence (AI) is described that takes into account both degree and frequency of symptoms. A, B, and C indicate AI for flatus/mucus, liquid stool, and solid stool, respectively; 1, 2, and 3 indicate occasional, weekly, and daily AI. A scoring system, ranging from 0 (continence) to 6 (severe AI, i.e., daily AI for solid stool or C3) also is reported. Three hundred thirty-five patients have been evaluated by this method in our institution: 30 percent had severe AI, graded as C3; only 9 percent had mild symptoms graded as A. Both males and females could not control diarrhea (Grade B) in 44 percent of cases. Nearly half of the 110 patients who underwent surgery had a C3 incontinence before treatment. Positive results were achieved in 75 percent of cases after surgery: e.g., AI score significantly improved from 4.2 +/- 1.6 to 1.5 +/- 1.9 (P less than 0.001) in those with AI and rectal prolapse. Most of the failures were the patients with idiopathic C3 incontinence. In conclusion, this grading and scoring system allowed a satisfactory assessment of patients' AI before and after treatment. It may also be used to achieve an objective comparison between different series.

A prospective study was carried out to analyze the clinical, psychologic, and manometric short-term results of transanal electrostimulation (TES) in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Fifteen patients underwent TES. An initial clinical and manometric assessment was carried out before and 1 month after the procedure. A psychologic evaluation was also performed by means of interviews and appropriate tests. Early improvement of symptoms was noted in 10 patients. The nonresponders were women with gross daily incontinence to solid stool. At anal manometry, resting tone and rectal sensation remained unchanged, whereas a significant increase of voluntary contraction was observed following TES (from 48 +/- 26 to 59 +/- 39 mm Hg, P = 0.03). Psychologically, TES led to a significant decrease of both latent and paranoid anxiety related to symptoms (P = 0.02). At a clinical reassessment 6 months later, one of the nonresponders became continent after a further course of TES. In conclusion, TES is well accepted by the patients, is followed by positive emotional response, and, by improving striated sphincter function, seems to be effective in the treatment of partial fecal incontinence.

The aim of this multicentre study was to define the incidence of disordered continence after restorative proctocolectomy and ileoanal reservoir with respect to some factors which may influence the postoperative soiling rate. Two hundred and seven patients underwent the operation, 156 had their ileostomy closed and were all available for a functional assessment. Minor leakage was observed in 26.9% of cases, whereas 1.9% complained of troublesome faecal soiling. None had gross faecal incontinence. Patients over 45 years had significantly more soiling than those younger (45% vs 24%, p less than 0.05). Soiling was more prevalent in those with ulcerative colitis than with other diseases (35% vs 18% p less than 0.05). The soiling rate decreased after the first postoperative year from 34% to 21% (p less than 0.05). A bowel frequency higher than 5 evacuations/24 hours increased soiling from 20% to 48% (p less than 0.01). Pouchitis doubled the soiling rate from 26% to 50% (p less than 0.05) without there being any difference in sphincter function. Soiling was not significantly related to staged procedure, J-pouch, perineal complications or a long rectal cuff. Careful preoperative evaluation of the anal sphincter should be performed in older patients operated on for colitis as they are likely to leak during the first year following restorative proctocolectomy, especially in cases with diarrhoea or pouchitis.

Sphincteric and sensory components of anal continence were investigated before and after restorative proctocolectomy and three loop ileal reservoir. Bowel habit, appearance of small intestinal mucosa, resting tone, squeeze pressure, anal canal length, pouch capacity and ileal sensation were investigated in 50 patients. The physiologic, endoscopic and histologic patterns were related to the occurrence of functional disturbances. The pressures in the anal canal as measured by manometry were found to be within the range of normality. The length of the sphincter was 3.4 +/- 0.6 centimeters; the maximal capacity of the reservoir was 450 +/- 204 milliliters of air. An ileorectoanal inhibitory reflex was recorded postoperatively in 52 per cent of the patients and normal postoperative continence was observed in 86 per cent of the patients, with no instances of gross incontinence. According to the results of the present study, the anatomic rearrangement that occurs after this surgical procedure preserved a satisfactory continence due to the integrity of the anal sphincters; minor leakage rarely occurred and was mainly related to a long inflamed distal portion of the ileum requiring self catheterization after operations for colitis. The best results were obtained in patients with polyposis who neither had staged procedures nor preoperative steroids.

Sacral nerve stimulation induces pan colonic propagating pressure waves and increases defecation frequency in patients with slow-transit constipation. Dear Sir, I read with much interest the paper by Altomare et al. [[1]] on the effect of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) on intractable chronic constipation (CC). Effects of temporary sacral nerve stimulation on gastrointestinal motility and function in patients with chronic refractory slow-transit constipation. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Disordered continence is frequently reported after operations for anal fistulae and preoperative anorectal physiology may be carried out prior to surgery to improve functional outcome. Elderly patients and multiparous females are at higher risk for incontinence, whereas males under 60 have stronger sphincters. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive role of anal manometry and the causes of postoperative soiling and its effect on the quality of life in males with intact sphincters undergoing excision of either trans or supra sphincteric fistulae. Methods: Thirty-eight patients (median age 47 years) were analysed retrospectively. None had previous anal surgery and all were fully continent. Five had Crohn's disease. Anal pressures and rectal sensation were evaluated prior to fistulectomy by means of anal manometry in all cases and after surgery in those who had postoperative incontinence. A cutting seton was used in 17 patients, a rectal advancement flap in 15 and a double rectalcutaneous flap in six. None had a lay-open. The intersphincteric plane was explored and drained in all cases. A previously described incontinence grading and score was used to assess postoperative soiling. The median follow-up was 22 (range 5-89) months. The patients with postoperative anal incontinence were evaluated with the Gastrointestinal quality of Life Index Questionnaire (0:poor, 4:good) at a median follow-up of 49 months. Results: Twenty-nine (76%) patients were continent after surgery, whereas 9 (24%) complained of some degree of anal incontinence (minor in 4, severe in 1, the 1-6 incontinence score being 3.7 ± 1.3 (mean ± s.d.m.). Their Quality of life score was 3.8 ± 0.5 (mean ± sdm). None of them had Crohn's disease, five had frequent diarrhoea, four had a reintervention for either anal fissure or recurrent fistula (two), three had a postseton anal deformity. No difference was found between continent and incontinent patients as far as pre-operative anal pressures were concerned, but the maximum rectal volume threshold was significantly higher in incontinent patients, 165 ± 67 vs. 123 ± 49 ml of air (P = 0.04). Conclusions: Sphincter division, diarrhoea and anal deformity may cause soiling after fistulectomy in males and it does not severely affect quality of life. Surgery rather than manometry may predict it and rectal sensation may play a role which needs further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Many procedures are used to treat internal (IRP) and external rectal prolapse (ERP). We report the outcome of surgery tailored in accordance with an evolving Unit algorithm over a 21-year period. Method Two hundred and sixty-eight patients (151 IRP and 117 ERP) are reported. Perineal procedures (Delorme’s mucosectomy, Altemeier’s perineal rectosigmoidectomy) were used in frail elderly patients with ERP with abdominal sacrorectopexy or the Frykman-Goldberg procedure in fit patients. In IRP, prolapsectomy was most common with anterior hemi-Delorme’s procedures for rectocele and levatorplasty for coincident faecal incontinence. Clinical and functional outcome was assessed over a median of 61 months (range 4–184 months). Results Postoperative mortality was 0.4%. For ERP, a perineal procedure was carried out in 75 (61.4%) cases with a 7.2% complication rate, postoperative incontinence in 20 (26.7%), constipation in four (5.3%) and recurrence in 12 (16%). For 42 abdominal procedures, the complication rate was 5% with incontinence in 7.1%, constipation in eight (19%) and recurrence in five (11.9%). A perineal operation was used in 89.4% of patients with IRP with incontinence in 10.6%, persistent constipation in 48 (52.7%) and recurrence in 25 (27.5%). The overall incontinence rate was 11% following abdominal and 24% following perineal procedures ( P < 0.05). Recurrence of ERP was significantly higher following a perineal operation ( P < 0.05). Conclusion Tailored surgery for ERP achieves satisfactory results in terms of recurrence and functional outcome. For patients with IRP, perineal procedures are associated with a high incidence of recurrence and residual evacuatory difficulty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents information on a study which examined the clinical and functional outcome after rectal internal mucosal prolapse for patients with evacuatory difficulty. Several female patients participated in the study. The study concluded that primary excision of RIMP is not an effective treatment for obstructed defecation.

BACKGROUND: Stapled hemorrhoidopexy has become increasingly popular over the past five years, mainly because of the assumption that it is associated with less pain. However, persistent tags and recurrence might represent a problem, because piles are not excised and severe complications requiring surgery have been occasionally reported. The aim of the present study is to analyze the causes for and the outcome of reintervention following either severely complicated or failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy. METHODS: A total of 232 primary stapled hemorrhoidopexies and 65 reinterventions after stapled hemorrhoidopexy were performed by the authors in five centers devoted to colorectal surgery. Twelve patients of the latter group had the stapled hemorrhoidopexy performed in one of these centers. Thirty-five were males and 30 were females. The mean age was 50 (range, 29-81) years. In all cases the primary indication for stapled hemorrhoidopexy was either third-degree or fourth-degree symptomatic hemorrhoids. In all patients submitted to reoperation the diagnosis of either severely complicated or failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy was made. The clinical history of all of these patients was carefully studied and all underwent inspection, digital exploration, and proctoscopy. After the reintervention, proctoscopy was performed in 61 patients (92 percent) after a median follow-up of 5.5 (range, 1-36) months. RESULTS: Our reoperation rate after stapled hemorrhoidopexy was 11 percent. The most frequent indications for reintervention were persistent, severe anal pain (visual analog pain score higher than 7) in 29 patients (45 percent), severe postoperative bleeding in 20 (31 percent), anal fissure in 16 (21 percent), prolapsing piles in 12 (18 percent), rectal polyp in 11 (16 percent), anorectal sepsis in 11 (16 percent), and fecal incontinence in 7 (11 percent). Thirteen different types of reintervention were needed. Excisional hemorrhoidectomy, removal of staples, and fissurectomy and/or internal sphincterotomy were the most frequent operation (n = 41). A decrease in anal pain, as measured by visual analog pain score, was observed one month after reintervention, compared with that measured preoperatively (from 5.6 ± 3.6 to 3.0 ± 2.9) (P < 0.001). Bleeding requiring treatment occurred in six cases (10 percent), anal stricture requiring dilation occurred in three (5 percent), and fecal incontinence in three (5 percent). Proctoscopy showed no recurrences in 52 cases (80 percent) after the reintervention. CONCLUSION: Pain and bleeding mostly caused by piles, fissures, and retained staples were the most frequent causes for reoperation after stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Reintervention was associated with a high bleeding and soiling rate, but was effective in treating pain and other symptoms in the majority of patients. Because of the wide spectrum of different interventions required, a failed or complicated stapled hemorrhoidopexy might be better treated by an experienced colorectal surgeon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]