Search

Background: Hemato-oncologic patients receiving intensive chemotherapy may develop severe neutropenia and serious bacterial and/or fungal infections. Granulocyte transfusions (GTs) may be beneficial as a bridging therapy in hemato-oncologic patients with febrile neutropenia., Aim: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of GTs in hemato-oncologic patients with febrile neutropenia., Materials and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated the effectiveness of 150 GTs in 88 hemato-oncologic patients. Donors were mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors and dexamethasone. Patients' hematological parameters (pre- and post-GT) and safety and effectiveness of GTs were analyzed., Results: The safety and effectiveness of GTs were assessed in the patients with various underlying conditions, including 78% with acute myeloid leukemia. In total, 150 GTs were administered, mostly during the chemotherapy induction phase. The GTs were well-tolerated by the patients, and a significant increment in white blood cell count and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was noticed in 95% of patients after the transfusion. The granulocyte dose was positively correlated with ANC after the transfusion. The average time to neutrophil recovery from the last day of GT was 6.7 days, and the 30-day survival rate was 77%. The donors were all men, and a significant increase in WBC count was observed post-mobilization. The median granulocyte yield was 2.28 × 10 10 /unit. All granulocyte products were crossmatched and irradiated before the transfusion., Conclusion: GTs can be a useful adjunctive treatment for febrile neutropenia in hemato-oncologic patients with multidrug-resistant sepsis. However, additional studies are required for confirming their effectiveness and establishing guidelines for their use., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Granulocyte transfusions for patients with prolonged neutropenia and severe infections has been a controversial practice. Previous studies suggest a benefit of high‐dose granulocyte transfusions (≥0.6 × 109/kg), although, until recently, the consistent production of high‐dose units has been challenging. Here, we present our experience and results utilizing high‐dose granulocyte transfusions at a large, tertiary academic medical center for the treatment of infections in adult, neutropenic patients. Study Design/Methods: A retrospective chart review (2018–2021) was conducted for all patients who received high‐dose granulocyte transfusions from donors stimulated with granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) and dexamethasone. Gathered parameters included patient demographics, clinical history, infection status, dose, clinical outcomes, pre‐ and post‐absolute neutrophil count (ANC), and transfusion times including time between granulocyte collection, administration, and posttransfusion ANC count. Gathered parameters were summarized using descriptive statistics, outcomes were assessed utilizing Kaplan–Meier curves/log‐rank/regression testing. Results: Totally 28 adult, neutropenic patients refractory to antimicrobial agents and/or G‐CSF received a total of 173 granulocyte concentrates. Median ANC increased from 0.7 × 109/L pre‐transfusion to 1.6 × 109/L posttransfusion. The mean granulocyte yield was 77.4 × 109 resulting in an average dose per kilogram of 0.90 × 109 ± 0.30 × 109 granulocytes. Composite day 42 survival and microbial response was 42.9% (n = 12/28) without significant adverse reactions. Discussion: Here, we demonstrate the successful and safe implementation of high‐dose granulocyte transfusions for neutropenic patients. Given the rapid and consistent production, distribution, and improved granulocyte quality, further investigations to determine the clinical efficacy of G‐CSF primed granulocyte transfusions is now possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Granulocyte transfusions are sometimes used as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of infection in patients with chronic granulomatous disease (CGD). However, granulocyte transfusions can be associated with a high rate of alloimmunization, and their role in CGD patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) or gene therapy (GT) is unknown. We identified 27 patients with CGD who received granulocyte transfusions pre- (within 6 months) and/or post-HCT or GT in a retrospective survey. Twelve patients received granulocyte transfusions as a bridge to cellular therapy. Six (50%) of these patients had a complete or partial response. However, six of 10 (60%) patients for whom testing was performed developed anti-HLA antibodies, and three of the patients also had severe immune-mediated cytopenia within the first 100 days post-HCT or GT. Fifteen patients received granulocyte transfusions post-HCT only. HLA antibodies were not checked for any of these 15 patients, but there were no cases of early immune-mediated cytopenia. Out of 25 patients who underwent HCT, there were 5 (20%) cases of primary graft failure. Three of the patients with primary graft failure had received granulocyte transfusions pre-HCT and were subsequently found to have anti-HLA antibodies. In this small cohort of patients with CGD, granulocyte transfusions pre-HCT or GT were associated with high rates of alloimmunization, primary graft failure, and early severe immune-mediated cytopenia post-HCT or GT. Granulocyte transfusions post-HCT do not appear to confer an increased risk of graft failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The data of 10 children who developed 13 high-risk febrile neutropenia with/without microbiologically documented severe infection, while being treated for a hematologic disorder were investigated retrospectively. The 24th hour post-transfusion neutrophil and platelet counts increased significantly, compared to the baseline values (p =0.034, p =0.025). Except three granulocyte transfusions (GTs) after which oliguria and/or mild respiratory distress developed, the transfusions were well tolerated. The clinical response, hematologic response and infection related mortality rates were 69.2%, 53.8% and 30.8%, respectively. Although our study includes limited number of patients, we can conclude that GT seems beneficial for children with severe sepsis during neutropenia. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Despite antibiotics, antifungals and haematopoietic growth factors, infections remain a major threat to neutropenic patients. To determine the role of granulocyte transfusions (GTs) in anti-infective therapy during neutropenia, GT administration was randomized in 74 adults with haematological or malignant diseases, febrile neutropenia and pulmonary or soft-tissue infiltrates after conventional or high-dose chemotherapy, a majority of them after allo-SCT (n=39). Neutrophil reconstitution was equal in the treatment and control arm. GT toxicity was minimal. The probability of 28-day survival after randomization was >80% in both groups, and no effect of GT on survival until day 100 could be detected in patients with fungal (n=55), bacterial or unknown infection (n=17) and various levels of neutropenia (ANC <500 vs >500 × 106/l). These findings can be attributed primarily to procedural obstacles, such as long delay from randomization to first GT, low cell content and slow sequence of GT, difficulties in randomizing a safe and potentially life-saving treatment in severely endangered individuals, and a large proportion of rapidly recovering patients in both arms. The requirement of another trial in a more specific patient population with daily transfusions of sufficient numbers of granulocytes to support or refute the empirically acknowledged benefits of GT is discussed.Bone Marrow Transplantation (2008) 42, 679–684; doi:10.1038/bmt.2008.237; published online 11 August 2008 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]