Search

A number of studies have reported that both the immediate and proactive effects of exposure to a shock stressor are less pronounced in female than in male rats. A separate area of research has demonstrated that female rats are less sensitive to the analgesic effects of morphine than males. Experiments from our laboratory, as well as others, have found that exposure to a context associated with shock (i.e., conditioned fear context) at the time of morphine administration, enhances the analgesic effects of morphine. Since previous studies have exclusively employed male rats, the purpose of Experiment 1 was to determine if a sex difference exists to this context conditioned fear-induced enhancement of morphine-induced analgesia. The findings of Experiment 1 showed that females do not appear to exhibit conditioned fear-induced enhancement of morphine analgesia as compared to males. Experiment 2 demonstrated that females exhibited higher levels of conditioned fear-induced enhancement of morphine analgesia during diestrus I than estrous. Experiment 3 demonstrated that females exhibited lower levels of conditioned analgesia compared to males, while both groups exhibited similar freezing levels. The findings of the present experiments suggest that the sex difference observed in Experiment 1 may be due to differences in conditioned analgesia.

1. Previous studies have shown that morphine analgesia is enhanced when analgesia testing is conducted in an environment that has been previously paired with shock, but not in a novel or neutral environment. 2. Two experiments were conducted to assess if enhanced morphine analgesia could be demonstrated in a neutral context if rats were first exposed to conditioned fear cues. This was done by pre-exposing rats to a context previously paired with shock and testing for enhanced morphine analgesia in a neutral context immediately following removal from the conditioned fear context. To determine if conditioned analgesia contributed to the enhanced morphine analgesia, rats were tested for analgesic responsiveness immediately following removal from conditioned fear cues, prior to morphine administration. 3. In Experiment 1, although conditioned analgesia was not observed, a small enhancement of morphine analgesia was demonstrated in an neutral context in rats pre-exposed to conditioned fear cues, compared to non-conditioned controls. 4. In Experiment 2, which employed more sensitive test procedures, a strong enhancement of morphine analgesia was observed in a neutral context only in those rats that demonstrated conditioned analgesia.

A variety of physical stressors have been shown to enhance reactivity to opioid drugs. Few studies have examined the effects of nonphysical stressors on opioid drug reactivity. In this regard, it has previously been shown that animals administered morphine in the presence of shock-associated cues demonstrate increases in hypoalgesia relative to nonshock control animals. These findings have typically been viewed as being mediated by the activation of endogenous pain inhibition systems via conditioned fear. In this series, we further examined the nature of these effects by assessing the effects of conditioned fear on acute morphine dependence. Experiment 1 revealed that animals administered 3 mg/kg morphine in the presence of context fear cues demonstrated an enhanced withdrawal response when removed and administered 3 mg/kg naloxone. Because it is known that conditioning effects do not diminish over time, a second experiment examined whether the enhancement of acute dependence by context fear would still be evident 72 h postconditioning. As in Experiment 1, animals administered morphine in a context associated with shock demonstrated an enhancement of acute dependence. Experiment 2b revealed that the shock parameters used in these studies can induce a hypoalgesic response on the test that is opioid mediated. These findings are discussed with regard to the neuroanatomy of fear systems as they relate to the neuropharmacological study of opioid withdrawal.

In a recent series of studies, we observed that exposure to prolonged foot shock increased hypoalgesia induced by morphine. This increase was observed only when testing was conducted in the presence of shock-associated cues, suggesting that it resulted from context-conditioned fear. However, we do not know whether the extended stressor parameters employed in that study are necessary for an observance of the effect. Therefore, in the present study, we assessed the effect of the number of shock trials (either 0, 20, 100, or 200) on the hypoalgesia observed following morphine administration. In addition, we measured activity as an independent index of context-conditioned fear, because in prior studies there had been no independent behavioral assessment of the conditioning of fear to the context. Although others have shown a covariation of conditioned fear and context-induced hypoalgesia using shock parameters and test paradigms different from our own, we sought to assess whether the same covariation would hold for conditioned fear and the hypoalgesia observed following the administration of morphine. The results showed increased hypoalgesia in all groups exposed to foot shock, demonstrating that prolonged exposure to foot shock is not necessary for an observance of this effect. In addition, the results revealed a linear relationship between number of trials of shock and hypoalgesia, but a U-shaped relationship between trials and activity. The pattern of results is considered in light of Fanselow's Perceptual-Defensive-Recuperative model.

Exposure to inescapable tail shock or foot shock has been shown to produce effects on a number of learning tasks. Tail-shock exposure is also known to influence nociception and morphine reactivity. The present series of experiments investigated the effects of foot shock known to induce learned helplessness effects in our laboratory on the subsequent reactivity to morphine. A first set of experiments investigated the hypoalgesic response to a 4 mg/kg dose morphine over 4 consecutive days following exposure to foot shock. Experiment 1A did not reveal an effect of foot shock on morphine-induced hypoalgesia when testing was conducted in a novel context. In Experiment 1B, we observed an increased hypoalgesic response to morphine when testing was conducted in the shock context. The findings of Experiment 1B were replicated in Experiment 2 and extended to assess the contribution of conditioned fear hypoalgesia to these effects. The possible mechanisms responsible for these findings are discussed.