1. A Comparison Between Sea‐Bottom Gravity and Satellite Altimeter‐Derived Gravity in Coastal Environments: A Case Study of the Gulf of Manfredonia (SW Adriatic Sea).
- Author
-
Zampa, L. S., Lodolo, E., Creati, N., Busetti, M., Madrussani, G., Forlin, E., and Camerlenghi, A.
- Subjects
- *
GRAVIMETRY , *GRAVITY anomalies , *GRAVITY , *SUBMARINE geology , *CARBONATE rocks , *FAULT zones - Abstract
The marine gravity field derived from satellite altimetry is generally biased in coastal areas by signals back‐scattered from the adjacent land. As a result, the derived gravity anomalies are generally unreliable for geophysical and geological interpretations of near‐shore environments. We compared two different altimetry models with sea‐bottom gravity measurements acquired along the Italian coast to quantify the errors generated by reflections from onshore areas and verify the quality of the geologic models inferred from gravity data. We focused on the Gulf of Manfredonia, in the SE sector of the Adriatic Sea, where (a) two different sea‐bottom gravity surveys have been conducted over the years, (b) the bathymetry is mainly flat, and (c) seismic data has revealed a prominent carbonate ridge covered by hundreds of meters of Oligocene‐Quaternary sediments. Gravity field derivatives have been used to enhance both deep geological contacts and coastal noise. The analyses point to a ringing noise that degrades the altimeter signals up to 17 km from the coast. Differences between observations and gravity calculated from a geological model and constrained by seismic data show that all the data sets investigated register approximately the same interference patterns associated with the Gondola Fault Zone. This study shows the potential for integrating gravity anomalies from satellite altimetry with high‐resolution near‐shore data, such as that provided by sea‐bottom gravity network available around the Italian coasts. Future applications will use this technique to improve the analysis of the connections between marine and inland geology in transitional areas. Plain Language Summary: We present a comparative analysis between two types of gravity data used in geophysical studies: satellite altimeter‐derived gravity and sea‐bottom gravity. It is generally accepted that the quality of satellite altimetry data in the vicinity of the coast is impaired by signals reflected from nearby land. We show how this may affect the interpretation of gravity anomalies and how it could be solved by integrating altimetry‐derived gravity data with high‐resolution marine gravity networks in the proximity of coasts. We chose as a test area the Gulf of Manfredonia on the South Adriatic coast of Italy, which hosts a major tectonic feature, namely, the Gondola Fault Zone. The fault zone is not clearly expressed at the seafloor, which is generally flat, but it dislocates carbonate rocks located hundreds of meters below the sediments. In so doing, it creates lateral density contrasts that are detectable in the gravity data. Key Points: Comparison between sea‐bottom and satellite altimeter‐derived gravity allowed to estimate the noise effects in altimeter data, near‐shoreThe high‐resolution sea‐bottom gravity available along the Italian coasts detects effects of sources not seen by satellite altimeter dataCombined analysis of satellite altimeter and sea‐bottom gravity gives a complete view on the offshore continuation of near‐shore structures [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF