Search

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) pathways control glucose and fatty acid metabolism and the onset of obesity and diabetes. Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) are GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for G(i) and G(q) α-subunits that control the intensity and duration of GPCR signaling. Herein we determined the role of Rgs16 in GPCR regulation of liver metabolism. Rgs16 is expressed during the last few hours of the daily fast in periportal hepatocytes, the oxygen-rich zone of the liver where lipolysis and gluconeogenesis predominate. Rgs16 knock-out mice had elevated expression of fatty acid oxidation genes in liver, higher rates of fatty acid oxidation in liver extracts, and higher plasma β-ketone levels compared with wild type mice. By contrast, transgenic mice that overexpressed RGS16 protein specifically in liver exhibited reciprocal phenotypes as well as low blood glucose levels compared with wild type littermates and fatty liver after overnight fasting. The transcription factor carbohydrate response element-binding protein (ChREBP), which induces fatty acid synthesis genes in response to high carbohydrate feeding, was unexpectedly required during fasting for maximal Rgs16 transcription in liver and in cultured primary hepatocytes during gluconeogenesis. Thus, RGS16 provides a signaling mechanism for glucose production to inhibit GPCR-stimulated fatty acid oxidation in hepatocytes.

It is well established that medium and long chain (+)-acylcarnitines (i.e. fatty acid esters of the unnatural d-isomer of carnitine) inhibit the oxidation of long chain fatty acids in mammalian tissues by interfering with some component(s) of the mitochondrial carnitine palmitoyltransferase (CPT) system. However, whether their site of action is at the level of CPT I (outer membrane), CPT II (inner membrane), carnitine-acylcarnitine translocase (CACT, inner membrane), or some combination of these elements has never been resolved. We chose to readdress this question using rat liver mitochondria and employing a variety of assays that distinguish between the three enzyme activities. The effect on each of (+)-acetylcarnitine, (+)-hexanoylcarnitine, (+)-octanoylcarnitine, (+)-decanoylcarnitine, and (+)-palmitoylcarnitine was examined. Contrary to longstanding belief, none of these agents was found to impact significantly upon the activity of CPT I or CPT II. Whereas (+)-acetylcarnitine also failed to influence CACT, both (+)-octanoylcarnitine and (+)-palmitoylcarnitine strongly inhibited this enzyme with a similar IC(50) value ( approximately 35 microm) under the assay conditions employed. Remarkably, (+)-decanoylcarnitine was even more potent (IC(50) approximately 5 microm), whereas (+)-hexanoylcarnitine was far less potent (IC(50) >200 microm). These findings resolve a 35-year-old puzzle by establishing unambiguously that medium and long chain (+)-acylcarnitines suppress mitochondrial fatty acid transport solely through the inhibition of the CACT component. They also reveal a surprising rank order of potency among the various (+)-acylcarnitines in this respect and should prove useful in the design of future experiments in which selective blockade of CACT is desired.

Fatty acids are important metabolic substrates for the pancreatic beta-cell, and long term exposure of pancreatic islets to elevated concentrations of fatty acids results in an alteration of glucose-induced insulin secretion. Previous work suggested that exaggerated fatty acid oxidation may be implicated in this process by a mechanism requiring changes in metabolic enzyme expression. We have therefore studied the regulation of carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPT I) gene expression by fatty acids in the pancreatic beta-cell line INS-1 since this enzyme catalyzes the limiting step of fatty acid oxidation in various tissues. Palmitate, oleate, and linoleate (0.35 mM) elicited a 4-6-fold increase in CPT I mRNA. The effect was dose-dependent and was similar for saturated and unsaturated fatty acids. It was detectable after 1 h and reached a maximum after 3 h. The induction of CPT I mRNA by fatty acids did not require their oxidation, and 2-bromopalmitate, a nonoxidizable fatty acid, increased CPT I mRNA to the same extent as palmitate. The induction was not prevented by cycloheximide treatment of cells indicating that it was mediated by pre-existing transcription factors. Neither glucose nor pyruvate and various secretagogues had a significant effect except glutamine (7 mM) which slightly induced CPT I mRNA. The half-life of the CPT I transcript was unchanged by fatty acids, and nuclear run-on analysis showed a rapid (less than 45 min) and pronounced transcriptional activation of the CPT I gene by fatty acids. The increase in CPT I mRNA was followed by a 2-3-fold increase in CPT I enzymatic activity measured in isolated mitochondria. The increase in activity was time-dependent, detectable after 4 h, and close to maximal after 24 h. Fatty acid oxidation by INS-1 cells, measured at low glucose, was also 2-3-fold higher in cells cultured with fatty acid in comparison with control cells. Long term exposure of INS-1 cells to fatty acid was associated with elevated secretion of insulin at a low (5 mM) concentration of glucose and a decreased effect of higher glucose concentrations. It also resulted in a decreased oxidation of glucose. The results indicate that the CPT I gene is an early response gene induced by fatty acids at the transcriptional level in beta- (INS-1) cells. It is suggested that exaggerated fatty acid oxidation caused by CPT-1 induction is implicated in the process whereby fatty acids alter glucose-induced insulin secretion.

In the rat, the gene for liver mitochondrial carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPT I), though dormant prior to birth, is rapidly activated postnatally. We sought to elucidate which hormonal and/or nutritional factors might be responsible for this induction. In cultured hepatocytes from 20-day-old rat fetus, the concentration of CPT I mRNA, which initially was very low, increased dramatically in a dose-dependent manner after exposure of the cells to dibutyryl cAMP (Bt2cAMP). Similar results were obtained when long-chain fatty acids (LCFA), but not medium-chain fatty acids, were added to the culture medium. The effects of Bt2cAMP and LCFA were antagonized by insulin, also dose dependently. In contrast, CPT II gene expression, which was already high in fetal hepatocytes, was unaffected by any of the above manipulations. Bt2cAMP stimulated CPT I gene expression even when endogenous triacylglycerol breakdown was suppressed by lysosomotropic agents suggesting that the actions of cAMP and LCFA were distinct. Moreover, half-maximal concentrations of Bt2cAMP and linoleate produced an additive effect CPT I mRNA accumulation. While linoleate and Bt2cAMP stimulated CPT I gene transcription by twofold and fourfold, respectively, the fatty acid also increased the half-life of CPT I mRNA (50%). When hepatocytes were cultured in the presence of 2-bromopalmitate, (which is readily converted by cells into its non-metabolizable CoA ester) CPT I mRNA accumulation was higher than that observed with oleate or linoleate. Similarly, the CPT I inhibitor, tetradecylglycidate, which at a concentration of 20 microM did not itself influence the CPT I mRNA level, enhanced the stimulatory effect of linoleate. The implication is that induction of the CPT I message by LCFA does not require mitochondrial metabolism of these substrates; however, formation of their CoA esters is a necessary step. Unlike linoleate, the peroxisome proliferator, clofibrate, increased both CPT I and CPT II mRNA levels and neither effect was offset by insulin. It thus appears that the mechanism of action of LCFA differs from that utilized by clofibrate, which presumably works through the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor. We conclude that the rapid increase in hepatic CPT I mRNA level that accompanies the fetal to neonatal transition in the rat is triggered by the reciprocal change in circulating insulin and LCFA concentrations, coupled with elevation of the liver content of cAMP.