Search

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two nondigested, nonabsorbed dietary components on objective and subjective measures of gastrointestinal (GI) function., Methods: A placebo-controlled parallel study compared the effects of wheat bran (20 g/day or 40 g/day in cereal), a well-known dietary fiber, with those of olestra (20 g or 40 g/day in potato chips), a nonabsorbed fat, on stool output, stool apparent viscosity (log peak force for extrusion [PF]), stool water content, and GI symptoms. Sixty subjects resided on a metabolic ward for 9 days: 3 days baseline and 6 days treatment., Results: Compared with placebo, consumption of 20 g/day wheat bran for 6 days resulted in a rapid (within 38 h) increase in mean (+/-SE) stool output (placebo, 150 +/- 29 g/day; bran, 246 +/- 35 g/day, p < 0.05), a directional increase in mean stool water content (placebo, 81.2 +/- 0.8%; bran, 83.9 +/- 0.8%), stool water output (placebo, 159 +/- 54 g/day; bran, 238 +/- 30 g/day), and bowel movement frequency (BM/day) (placebo, 2.2 +/- 0.4; bran, 2.6 +/- 0.4), and no stool-softening effect (placebo log PF, 2.9 +/- 0.1 g; bran log PF, 2.9 +/- 0.1 g). Wheat bran 40 g/day results were not significantly different from wheat bran 20 g/day. Compared with placebo, consumption of olestra 20 g/day and 40 g/day for 6 days showed no significant difference in mean stool output (151 +/- 18 g/day and 204 +/- 28 g/day, respectively), mean BM frequency (1.8 +/- 0.2 BM/day and 2.1 +/- 0.3 BM/day, respectively), and stool water output (138 +/- 13 g/day and 184 +/- 31 g/day, respectively), a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in stool water content (75.5 +/- 1.7% and 72.6 +/- 2.2%, respectively), and either no effect on stool apparent viscosity (olestra 20 g/day, mean log PF, 3.0 +/- 0.1 g) or a gradual stool-softening effect beginning study day 6 (olestra 40 g/day, log PF, 2.7 +/- 0.1 g). None of the treatment groups showed a significant increase in GI symptoms compared with placebo., Conclusions: Consumption of wheat bran in excess of levels in a typical Western diet significantly increased stool output, but did not soften normal-viscosity stool nor result in an increase in common GI symptoms. The observed plateau effect for wheat bran at 40 g/day suggests a maximal mechanical stimulatory effect. Consumption of olestra in excess of usual snacking conditions did not result in a significant increase in stool output or common GI symptoms. At the highest level tested, olestra resulted in a gradual stool-softening effect after several days of consumption.

Background: Increased consumption of non-digested, non-absorbed substrates, such as dietary fibre, can lead to an increase in colonic transit rate and stool output. The effects of dietary fibre and olestra on the consistency and water content of digesta residue within the large bowel were not known., Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of dietary fibre and olestra on regional dehydration and apparent viscosity of digesta residue throughout the large bowel., Methods: Seventy-eight pigs were fed diet alone (control) or supplemented with 40 g/day or 80 g/day dietary fibre or olestra and sacrificed 24, 48, 96 or 192 h after initiation of dosing. The large bowel was removed, divided into 13 segments, and the digesta residue/stool was analysed for apparent viscosity (peak force for extrusion) and percentage water content., Results: In control animals, digesta residue occurred as a continuum, from liquid in the cecum (87.9% water) to solid in the rectum (71. 5% water). The relatively small decrease in percentage water content (16.4%) resulted in a marked increase in mean apparent viscosity (liquid = 87 g peak force; solid=3919 g peak force). Dietary fibre increased the percentage water content of digesta residue throughout the large bowel. In contrast, olestra decreased the percentage water content of digesta residue in the mid and distal large bowel. At 40 g/day, dietary fibre showed a significant (P < 0.05) digesta residue/stool softening effect for all time points, beginning at 24-h (single dose). Olestra 40 g/day did not significantly soften digesta residue/stool until 48 h (2 doses, P < 0.05), and was not different from control at 96 h. At 80 g/day, both dietary fibre and olestra significantly (P < 0.01) softened digesta residue/stool at all time points. There were no liquid or oily stools at any dose or time-point., Conclusions: Relatively small changes in water content result in large changes in digesta residue/stool apparent viscosity. Dietary fibre increased digesta residue/stool water content throughout the bowel, resulting in softer digesta residue/stool. In contrast, olestra decreased stool water content, yet had a similar stool softening effect compared to dietary fibre.

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of olestra and sorbitol consumption on three accepted objective measures of diarrhea (stool output >250 g/day, liquid/watery stools, bowel movement frequency >3/day), and how stool composition influences reports of common gastrointestinal symptoms. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the effects of sorbitol (40 g/day in candy), a poorly absorbed sugar-alcohol with known osmotic effects, with those of olestra (20 or 40 g/day in potato chips), a nonabsorbed fat, on objective measures of stool composition and GI symptoms. Sixty-six subjects resided on a metabolic ward for 12 days: 2 days lead-in, 4 days baseline, 6 days treatment. Sorbitol 40 g/day resulted in loose/liquid stools within 1-3 h of consumption. In contrast, olestra resulted in a dose-responsive stool softening effect after 2-4 days of consumption. Subjects reported "diarrhea" when mean stool apparent viscosity (peak force (PF), g) decreased from a perceived "normal" (mean +/- SE, 1355 +/- 224 g PF; firm stool) to loose (260 +/- 68 g PF) stool. Mean apparent viscosity of stool during treatment: placebo, 1363 +/- 280 g (firm); olestra 20 g/day 743 +/- 65 g (soft); olestra 40 g/day, 563 +/- 105 g (soft); and sorbitol 40 g/day, 249 +/- 53 g (loose). Of the 1098 stool samples collected, 38% (419/1098) were rated by subjects as "diarrhea," yet only 2% of treatment days (all in the sorbitol treatment group) met commonly accepted criteria for a clinical diarrhea. Sorbitol, but not olestra, increased the severity of abdominal cramping, urgency and nausea compared to placebo. Olestra consumption, at levels far in excess of normal snacking conditions, resulted in a gradual stool softening effect after several days of consumption, did not meet any of the three objective measures of diarrhea, and did not increase GI symptoms. Sorbitol consumption, at only 80% of the dose requiring a "laxative effect" information label, resulted in rapid onset loose/liquid stools and a significant increase in abdominal cramping, urgency and nausea. Overall, subjects categorized stool as "diarrhea" when stool decreased from their perceived "normal," but the vast majority of these reports were not associated with clinically significant diarrhea., (Copyright 2000 Academic Press.)