Search

Abstract: Dietary oils such as corn oil, olive oil, and canola oil, which primarily contain triacylglycerol and small quantities of fatty acids, are highly palatable to animals. In a previous study, we examined the short-term (60 s) licking behavior of mice and observed that they exhibited a high licking response to a low concentration of fatty acid (linoleic acid), which is comparable to that observed for pure corn oil. This finding suggests that fatty acids contribute to the palatability of dietary oils. In order to supplement our knowledge of the fundamental features of fatty acid palatability in the oral cavity, we assessed the licking behavior of BALB/c mice to investigate the palatability of various types of long-chain fatty acids. The mice showed high licking responses to 1% unsaturated 16- and 18-carbon fatty acids (palmitoleic acid, 16:1; oleic acid, 18:1; linoleic acid, 18:2; and linolenic acid, 18:3), low licking responses to 16- and 20-carbon fatty acids (palmitic acid, 16:0 and arachidonic acid, 20:4), and no significant response to saturated fatty acids (stearic acid, 18:0 and arachidic acid, 20:0) or fatty acid derivatives (methyl linoleate and linole alcohol). Additionally, there were differences in the palatability of 18-carbon unsaturated fatty acids at very low concentrations. At fatty acid concentrations of 0.04% and 0.0625%, the mice showed significant preference for linoleic acid and linolenic acid, but not oleic acid, when compared with mineral oil. These results suggest that mice show high licking responses to 16- and 18-carbon unsaturated long-chain fatty acids at low concentrations. Further, we suggest that sensitivity to fatty acids is affected by the saturated state of the fatty acid, carbon chain length, and terminal carboxyl group. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: We investigated the palatability of a low concentration of linoleic acid (LA) in short-term two-bottle choice tests and licking tests. To examine the contribution of gustation, mice were rendered anosmic with olfactory nerve transection surgery and test solutions were prepared using mineral oil (saturated long-chain hydrocarbon) to minimize textural effects. In the two-bottle choice tests between various pairs of different concentrations of corn oil and LA, both anosmic and the sham-operated mice constantly preferred a higher concentration of corn oil and LA. In the licking tests, the initial licking rate for 1% LA was higher than that for mineral oil in anosmic mice. In accordance with the results of the two-bottle choice test, the initial licking rate for corn oil and LA increased in a concentration-dependent manner in both anosmic and sham-operated mice in the licking test, and reached its peak at 100% corn oil and 1% LA. A preference comparison between 1% LA and 100% corn oil showed that anosmic mice preferred 1% LA over 100% corn oil. These results suggest that mice could recognize dietary fat and fatty acid solutions in the oral cavity without any olfactory or textural cues and the fatty acid recognition on their tongues might provide a pivotal cue to how dietary fat is recognized in the oral cavity. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We investigated the effect of β-oxidation inhibition on the fat ingestive behavior of BALB/c mice. Intrapentoneal administration to mice of mercaptoacetate, an inhibitor of fatty acid oxidation, significantly suppressed intake of corn oil but not intake of sucrose solution or laboratory chow. To further examine the effect of mercaptoacetate on the acceptability of corn oil in the oral cavity, we examined short-term licking behavior. Mercaptoacetate significantly and specifically decreased the number of licks of corn oil within a 60-s period but did not affect those of a sucrose solution, a monosodium glutamate solution, or mineral oil. In contrast, the administration of 2-deoxyglucose, an inhibitor of glucose metabolism, did not affect the intake or short-term licking counts of any of the tasted solutions. These findings suggest that fat metabolism is involved in the mechanism underlying the oral acceptance of fat as an energy source. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Corn oil is reported to elicit a conditioned place preference (CPP) in a CPP test in mice. To further investigate a reinforcing effect of corn oil, we studied whether the corn oil acts as a reinforcer under a progressive ratio (PR) schedule in the operant task. BALB/c mice were trained to lever press for sucrose and corn oil. After reaching a stable break-point for 100% corn oil, the PR test was conducted for various concentrations of corn oil (0%–100%). The reinforcing effect of corn oil was increased in a concentration-dependent manner under the PR schedule. A mineral oil and 0.3% xanthan gum as vehicles did not show any reinforcing effect in the PR test, suggesting that oily and viscous texture was not related to the reinforcing property of corn oil. The break-point for corn oil was attenuated by pretreatment with (−)-sulpiride, a D(2) antagonist, in the PR test. On the other hand, SCH23390, a D(1) antagonist, did not influence the break-point. Furthermore, the pretreatment with (−)-sulpiride or SCH23390 did not influence the intake of corn oil in a one-bottle test for 30 min, suggesting that the dopaminergic system is involved in the reinforcing effect but not the consumption of corn oil in mice. In conclusion, operant response to corn oil is concentration-dependently enhanced under the PR schedule. This reinforcing effect of corn oil is at least partly mediated through the dopaminergic systems via D(2) receptors. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Free fatty acids (FFAs) were reported to be recognized in the oral cavity and possibly involved in fatty foods recognition. To understand the importance of oil recognition in the oral cavity, we investigated the effect of various concentrations of a fatty acid or corn oil on fluid intake as well as mice''s preferences in a two-bottle choice test and a licking test. Linoleic acid (LA), which is a main component of corn oil, was used as a representative FFA. In the two-bottle choice test between a pair of different concentrations of corn oil, the mice consistently adopted the higher concentration of corn oil. In the licking test for corn oil, the licking rates for the serial concentration of corn oils (0, 1, 5, 10 and 100%) were increased in a concentration-dependent manner. On the other hand, in the two-bottle test for a pair of different concentrations of LA (0, 0.125, 0.25 and 1%), 0.25% and 1% LA were preferred to mineral oil, but 0.25% and 1% LA were preferred equally in mice. In the licking test for LA, the mice showed the largest number of initial lickings for the 1% LA, while the licking rates for the high concentration of LA decreased. These results suggest that mice could discriminate the concentration of corn oil and LA in the oral cavity. We also suggest that pure corn oil is a highly preferable solution, while an optimal concentration of LA according to the preferences of mice is a low-range concentration (0.25–1%). [Copyright &y& Elsevier]