Search

These are historic times for family medicine. The profession is moving beyond the visionary blueprint of the Future of Family Medicine (FFM) report while working to harness the momentum created by the FFM movement. Preparing for, and leading through, the next transformative wave of change (FFM version 2.0) will require the engagement of multigenerational and multidisciplinary visionaries who bring wisdom from diverse experiences. Active group reflection on the past will potentiate the collective work being done to best chart the future. Historical competency is critically important for family medicine's future. This article describes the historical context of the development and launch of the FFM report, emphasizing the professional activism that preceded and followed it. This article is intended to spark intergenerational dialog by providing a multigenerational reflection on the history of FFM and the evolution that has occurred in family medicine over the past decade. Such intergenerational conversations enable our elders to share wisdom with our youth, while allowing our discipline to visualize history through the eyes of future generations., (© Copyright 2014 by the American Board of Family Medicine.)

Ian McWhinney, MD, who passed away 1 year ago this month, was a founder of family medicine in North America. As a social philosopher and a naturalist, he had a great influence on the development of family medicine.

A growing number of Americans will soon have a Web-based personal medical home with connectedness to their chosen providers of care. The personal health record will become integrated with the electronic health record. Like other services on the Internet, patients will be able to direct much of their health care using clinical guidelines, such as prevention, chronic illness care, behavior change, and arrangement for minor acute care. Physician control and autonomy will give way to greater patient control over their care, a major culture change in medicine away from paternalism. While the personal family physician will continue as a primary caregiver, there will be a shift toward greater patient involvement in the coordination of care. Family medicine educators should begin now to educate medical students and residents for this new model of care.

Background and Objectives: There are few reports of systematic international physician development programs to create family medicine as a new specialty in a developing nation. This paper describes the process and outcomes of a large-scale effort to initiate new family medicine training through the Egyptian Ministry of Health and Population (MOHP) using a 12-week US-based program at the University of California, Irvine (UCI)., Methods: Generalist physicians (n=134) with 1 year of internship training, currently working under the MOHP in Egypt, were competitively selected to participate in a training program at UCI between 1998 and 2002. Participants were assessed before, during, and after the program using multiple measures of competencies in family medicine topics, practice, and teaching. Aggregate participant data, post-program quality surveys, and follow-up surveys of the program's influence on practice behaviors comprised the main measures used for program evaluation., Results: Participants showed improvement in knowledge and skills for family medicine practice and teaching for topics covered in the program. After returning to Egypt, 98% reported continued use of their newly acquired skills and knowledge. Participants reported that the program advanced their careers, they taught family medicine to other physicians, and they were likely to pursue certification under a newly established Family Medicine Board of Egypt. Self-reported practice in family medicine increased to 69% after the program versus 16% before., Conclusions: Overseas training programs are a viable method of introducing family medicine as a new clinical specialty. Ingredients for successful implementation and barriers are discussed.

In today's environment of decreasing resources and increasing competition among clinical delivery systems, survival and ultimate success require interdisciplinary cooperation and, if possible, integration. Academic leaders at the University of California, Irvine (UCI), have developed a collaborative model in which faculty in family medicine, general internal medicine, and general pediatrics cooperate extensively in education, research, and patient care. Generalist faculty jointly administer and teach both a four-year "doctoring" curriculum for medical students and an array of integrated curricula for primary care residents, including a communication skills course. Several primary faculty jointly developed a collaborative unit for health policy and research, now an active locus for multidisciplinary research. Other faculty worked together to develop a primary care medical group that serves as a model for interdisciplinary practice at UCI. Recently, the university recruited an associate dean for primary care who leads the new UCI Primary Care Coalition, reflecting and promoting this interspecialty cooperation. This coalition does not represent a step toward a generic primary care specialty; UCI's generalist disciplines have preserved their individual identities and structures. Yet interdisciplinary collaboration has allowed primary care faculty to share educational resources, a research infrastructure, and clinical systems, thus avoiding duplicative use of valuable resources while maximizing collective negotiating abilities and mutual success.

This article provides answers to many of the questions medical students ask about the specialty of family practice. It is the fourth update of a previous article and was developed in response to feedback from medical students at the 1997 National Congress of Student Members held by the American Academy of Family Physicians. Students at the 1998 Congress also identified areas of interest and concern. This article discusses the hours and income of the family physician, the scope of medical practice in the specialty, required continuing medical education and board certification, family practice residency training and combined-specialty training.

Background: Zafirlukast is an oral leukotriene receptor antagonist used in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate asthma. To investigate its effects in a clinical practice setting, we evaluated zafirlukast in a heterogeneous group of patients who had asthma of different degrees of severity and who were receiving concomitant asthma medications., Methods: A total of 3759 patients were enrolled at 924 sites. Patients received zafirlukast 20 mg twice a day for 4 weeks. Pulmonary function was measured twice a day, and overall asthma symptom scores, number of nighttime awakenings, severity of morning asthma symptoms, and beta2-agonist use were recorded daily., Results: In the efficacy analysis (3207 evaluable patients), all parameters showed statistically significant improvement that continued throughout the 4 weeks of the trial. A total of 71% of patients had improved pulmonary function and 72% had improved asthma symptoms. Improvement was consistent regardless of asthma severity category and regardless of concomitant asthma medication category. More than 70% of both physicians and patients indicated there was clinical improvement in pulmonary measures as well as in asthma symptoms. Common adverse events reported were headache (3.7%), nausea (1.4%), pharyngitis (1.4%), and sinusitis (1.1%)., Conclusions: Zafirlukast 20 mg twice a day is well tolerated and improves pulmonary function and asthma symptoms, regardless of asthma severity category and regardless of concomitant asthma medication category.

Pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum, and infant care are a continuum in the family life cycle for which the family physician is especially qualified to provide primary, comprehensive care. The purpose of this paper is to document and share the controversies, wisdom, and knowledge about caring for women and their families before, during, and after pregnancy. Family physicians can be leaders in developing an appropriate perinatal care system for the community. The level of care the family physician chooses to provide is discretionary. However, the family physician should be invested in ensuring that all families receive the greatest benefit from pregnancy, birth, and the newborn experience. Interest in perinatal care in family medicine is increasing, as reflected by the growing numbers participating in the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine Working Group on Family-Centered Perinatal Care. The authors of this article, who are active in this working group, hope that this information is useful in designing a balanced curriculum and delivery system for perinatal care in family medicine training programs.

To determine the reasons some family physicians continue to practice obstetrics when most of their colleagues do not, we surveyed family physicians in 26 counties of northern California whose practices include obstetrics and those who have recently discontinued it. In all, 70% of family physicians practicing obstetrics cited enjoying it as a reason for continuing this practice. Over a third of family physicians practicing obstetrics thought that obstetric practice was a responsibility to the community. Only 1 in 6 reported obstetrics to be important in terms of financial implications. Despite this, family physicians practicing obstetrics had a mean gross income derived from obstetric practice of $30,000 above the cost of their total malpractice premium. In contrast, a comparison group of family physicians who had recently discontinued obstetrics cited malpractice insurance costs most frequently as the reason for discontinuing it. Nearly 40% of these physicians indicated that they would be willing to return to obstetrics if circumstances were to change substantially. The most frequently cited change necessary for these physicians to return to obstetrics was a reduction in malpractice insurance rates.

Pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum, and infant care are a continuum in the family life cycle for which the family physician is especially qualified to provide primary, comprehensive care. The purpose of this paper is to document and share the controversies, wisdom, and knowledge about caring for women and their families before, during, and after pregnancy. Family physicians can be leaders in developing an appropriate perinatal care system for the community. The level of care the family physician chooses to provide is discretionary. However, the family physician should be invested in ensuring that all families receive the greatest benefit from pregnancy, birth, and the newborn experience. Interest in perinatal care in family medicine is increasing, as reflected by the growing numbers participating in the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine Working Group on Family-Centered Perinatal Care. The authors of this article, who are active in this working group, hope that this information is useful in designing a balanced curriculum and delivery system for perinatal care in family medicine training programs.

Recent expansion of Medicaid eligibility for pregnant women and increased reimbursement to physicians who provide perinatal services were designed to improve access to care. Family physicians provide a relatively high proportion of care to pregnant women on Medicaid, especially in rural areas. We surveyed all family physicians who provide obstetric services in 26 northern California counties regarding these changes and perceived barriers to providing obstetric care to women on Medicaid. Of surveyed physicians who limited the number of their Medicaid obstetric patients, 58% stated that recent Medicaid policy changes had increased their willingness to accept new Medicaid obstetric patients. Despite these policy changes, administrative issues and poor reimbursement were cited as the two most notable barriers to providing obstetric care to women on Medicaid. Fear of being sued by Medicaid patients is still seen as a barrier by physicians who have recently discontinued practicing obstetrics and by those who continue to care for a large number of Medicaid obstetric patients.

During their medical school years medical students are frequently exposed to misinformation about family practice from faculty members in other specialties. Responses to 26 questions frequently asked by medical students about family practice are presented with a review of recent literature. These responses may assist medical students and their advisors when considering careers in family practice.

Medical students frequently have questions about the specialty of family practice. Responses to 30 questions commonly asked about family practice are presented with a review of recent literature. These responses may assist medical students and their advisors in considering the choice of family practice as a career.

Preceptorships have become an important means by which medical students are exposed to family practice. In order for a preceptor to be successful in nurturing student interest in family practice, he must have a good understanding of certain characteristics of today's medical students. Important differences exist between preclinical and clinical students, and the preceptorship must be designed accordingly. Unless preceptors are carefully selected and trained, they may have a negative influence on student interest in family practice.

The nurse practitioner and physician's assistant are new health practitioners providing primary health care. When teamed with family physicians, these new health practitioners can extend patient services. Family physicians should be trained to work with new health practitioners effectively. Presented is a model where a nurse practitioner and family practice residents work as co-practitioners in a family practice unit. A nurse practitioner in this role can improve the continuity of the relationship between patient and provider in a family practice residency.

Epidemiologic methods of research can be readily used in family practice. Since the 19th century, family physicians have used epidemiologic methods in making important contributions to the understanding of disease. Using these methods requires an organized practice including patient registers, encounter data, and detailed records. Descriptive studies can define certain characteristics that are related to disease. Case-control and cohort studies can provide evidence for the association of risk factors and disease. A stepwise outline for carrying out a study is presented.