1. Anticoagulant treatment in German family practices - screening results from a cluster randomized controlled trial.
- Author
-
Ulrich LR, Mergenthal K, Petersen JJ, Roehl I, Rauck S, Kemperdick B, Schulz-Rothe S, Berghold A, and Siebenhofer A
- Subjects
- Administration, Oral, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Atrial Fibrillation complications, Atrial Fibrillation drug therapy, Benzimidazoles therapeutic use, Coumarins therapeutic use, Dabigatran, Female, Germany, Heart Diseases drug therapy, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Humans, International Normalized Ratio, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Morpholines therapeutic use, Pulmonary Embolism prevention & control, Pyrazoles therapeutic use, Pyridones therapeutic use, Rivaroxaban, Stroke etiology, Stroke prevention & control, Thiophenes therapeutic use, Thrombosis drug therapy, Venous Thromboembolism prevention & control, beta-Alanine analogs & derivatives, beta-Alanine therapeutic use, Anticoagulants therapeutic use, Family Practice standards, Guideline Adherence statistics & numerical data, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Process Assessment, Health Care, Thromboembolism prevention & control
- Abstract
Background: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) with coumarins and new anticoagulants are highly effective in preventing thromboembolic complications. However, some studies indicate that over- and under-treatment with anticoagulants are fairly common. The aim of this paper is to assess the appropriateness of treatment in patients with a long-term indication for OAC, and to describe the corresponding characteristics of such patients on the basis of screening results from the cluster randomized PICANT trial., Methods: Randomly selected family practices in the federal state of Hesse, Germany, were visited by study team members. Eligible patients were screened using an anonymous patient list that was generated by the general practitioners' software according to predefined instructions. A documentation sheet was filled in for all screened patients. Eligible patients were classified into 3 categories (1: patients with a long-term indication for OAC and taking anticoagulants, 2: patients with a long-term indication for OAC but not taking anticoagulants, 3: patients without a long-term indication for OAC but taking an anticoagulant on a permanent basis). IBM SPSS Statistics 20 was used for descriptive statistical analysis., Results: We screened 2,036 randomly selected, potentially eligible patients from 52 family practices. 275 patients could not be assigned to one of the 3 categories and were therefore not considered for analysis. The final study sample comprised 1,761 screened patients, 1,641 of whom belonged to category 1, 78 to category 2, and 42 to category 3. INR values were available for 1,504 patients of whom 1,013 presented INR values within their therapeutic ranges. The majority of screened patients had very good compliance, as assessed by the general practitioner. New antithrombotic drugs were prescribed in 6.1% of cases., Conclusions: The screening results showed that a high proportion of patients were receiving appropriate anticoagulation therapy. The numbers of patients with a long-term indication for OAC therapy that were not receiving oral anticoagulants, and without a long-term indication that were receiving OAC, were considerably lower than expected. Most patients take coumarins, and the quality of OAC control is reasonably high., Trial Registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN41847489.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF