Search

Background: Warfarin is used for the prevention and treatment of various thromboembolic complications. It is an efficacious anticoagulant, but it has a narrow therapeutic range, and regular monitoring is required to ensure therapeutic efficacy and at the same time avoid life-threatening adverse events. The objective was to assess management and resource consumption associated with patient monitoring episodes during warfarin treatment in primary health care in Sweden., Methods: Delphi technique was used to systematically explore attitudes, demands and priorities, and to collect informed judgements related to monitoring of warfarin treatment. Two separate Delphi-panels were performed in three and two rounds, respectively, one concerning tests taken in primary health care centres, involving 34 GPs and 10 registered nurses, and one concerning tests taken in patients' homes, involving 49 district nurses., Results: In the primary health care panel 10 of the 34 GPs regularly collaborated with a registered nurse. Average time for one monitoring episode was estimated to 10.1 minutes for a GP and 21.4 minutes for a nurse, when a nurse assisted a doctor. The average time for monitoring was 17.6 minutes for a GP when not assisted by a nurse. Considering all the monitoring episodes, 11.6% of patient blood samples were taken in the individual patient's home. Average time for such a monitoring episode was estimated to 88.2 minutes. Of all the visits, 8.2% were performed in vain and took on average 44.6 minutes. In both studies, approximately 20 different elements of work concerning management of patients during warfarin treatment were identified., Conclusion: Monitoring of patients during treatment with warfarin in primary health care in Sweden involves many elements of work, and demands large resources, especially when tests are taken in the patient's home.

Objectives: Our aim was to conduct a survey about urinary symptoms and to find out if questioning patients about symptoms is helpful for the GP to make medical decisions concerning prostate problems among middle-aged men., Methods: Twelve hundred randomly chosen men aged 55--65 years from the general population in north-west Stockholm, Sweden were sent a questionnaire consisting of symptom questions focusing on prostate problems based on the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS). A subset of 120 respondents were asked to answer the same questions again and to participate in a urological examination including urodynamics and ultrasonography. The main outcome measures were the prevalence of urinary symptoms and the relationship between the symptom score and objective measures., Results: A response rate of 86% was obtained in the questionnaire study. Twenty-one per cent of the respondents stated that they had general problems related to urination. Among individual symptoms, post-void dribbling and a weak stream were most common. Among the men examined at the Urological Department, the average prostatic volume was found to be 40 cm(3). Three out of four were assessed to have infravesical obstruction. No correlation between subjective symptoms and objective measurements of either a statistical or clinical significance was found., Conclusions: Urinary symptoms are common among middle-aged men. Further, an enlarged prostate and/or infravesical obstruction is often found in the ageing man. Information obtained by asking prostate-specific symptom questions cannot, however, serve as the foundation for the GP to find those men whose problems would be solved by actions directed at the prostate.

This study sought to evaluate how the addition of a general practitioner (GP) surgery influences the utilization of an emergency department (ED). An intervention trial with historical control was conducted in a Swedish university hospital ED. A GP surgery was established in the ED by the addition of GP physicians without the addition of other personnel (nurses, secretaries, aids). The number of persons evaluated and managed by the GP physicians and ED physicians were quantified preintervention (April 1992 to October 1993) and postintervention (April 1994 to October 1995). Further information was obtained by questionnaires distributed to all physicians and patients during three sample study weeks: 1 week before intervention and 6 and 18 months after the intervention. Patient volume, percentages of inappropriate visits, and types of services were recorded. The addition of GP physicians increased the number of visits to the ED by 27% (4,694 per month to 5,952 per month). The percentage of patients managed in the ED who had nonurgent complaints (primary health care needs) increased with the intervention from 22% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19%, 25%) to 33% (95% CI 30%, 37%). The increased demand on the ED of patients with nonurgent complaints increased the average waiting time for patients with urgent or emergent complaints from 35 minutes to 40 minutes (14%). The introduction of GPs to an ED increased the number and proportion of patients presenting to the ED with nonurgent complaints.

This study evaluates the effects of an intervention on hostility and time pressure in primary health care patients. A total of 47 men and women were studied, of whom 22 participated in an intervention program and 25 were controls. The intervention group changed global Type A behavior, hostility and time pressure significantly more than the control group and this change was stable up to 2 years following the study. Men altered their behavior significantly more than women.

All general practitioners at three Swedish health centres continuously assessed their patients' degree of functional deficiency on a 1-5 scale over a period of 5 1/2 years. They also registered diagnoses and certain other medical measures. Around 85% were judged to be ill to some degree, but few were seriously ill. There were small differences in functional capacity between men and women of different ages: both benign, self-limiting complaints and severe illnesses could be associated with considerable problems, while many patients with severe diseases had little discomfort. There was also a considerable discrepancy between functional impairment and work capacity. Using a combination of functional assessment with routine registration of diagnoses seems to be a useful method of obtaining a modulated, distinct picture of the types of patient encountering the general practitioner. However, further development work within the field is needed.