Search

Background:  Andexanet alfa (andexanet) is approved for specific anticoagulation reversal in patients with life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding during treatment with rivaroxaban or apixaban. There is limited experience with andexanet in patients with acute bleeding on edoxaban., Methods:  Patients with acute major bleeding within 18 hours of edoxaban intake were prospectively enrolled. Patients received a bolus and 2-hour follow-on infusion of andexanet. The co-primary efficacy outcomes were change in antifactor Xa activity and the percentage of patients achieving excellent or good hemostasis, 12 hours after andexanet treatment. Efficacy was analyzed in patients with confirmed major bleeding and baseline antifactor Xa activity ≥40 ng/mL. Safety was analyzed in all patients., Results:  Thirty-six patients (mean age: 82 years, 61.1% male and 91.7% with atrial fibrillation) with acute major bleeding on edoxaban received andexanet. The primary site of bleeding was intracranial in 29 patients (80.6%). In the efficacy population ( n  = 28), median antifactor Xa activity decreased from 121.1 (interquartile range [IQR]: 70.3-202.4) ng/mL at baseline to 24.0 (IQR: 77.7-83.7) ng/mL at the end of andexanet bolus (median decrease: 68.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 56.1-77.7%). Excellent or good hemostasis at 12 hours was achieved in 78.6% (95% CI: 59.0-91.7%) of patients. Within 30 days, four patients (11.1%) experienced a thrombotic event and four others (11.1%) died., Conclusion:  In patients with acute major bleeding on edoxaban, andexanet significantly decreased antifactor Xa activity. Hemostatic efficacy was similar to that observed in patients with bleeding on rivaroxaban or apixaban. Thrombotic events occurred at a rate expected in such patients., Competing Interests: A.P.B and L.X. have nothing to report. J.W.E. reports honoraria and/or research grants from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Pfizer, and Servier. S.M. reports grant support from Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Bayer, and Aspen Pharma; serving on advisory boards for Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Portola; receiving lecture fees from Portola; and serving on an adjudication committee for AbbVie. T.J.M. reports executive/steering committee payments for ANNEXA-I and ENRICH-AF studies from PHRI/McMaster University; consulting income from CSL Behring; and grants from NHLBI and Genentech. M.C. reports serving on a data and safety monitoring board for Bayer; receiving personal funding or serving on advisory boards for Bristol Myers Squibb Canada, CSL Behring, Servier Canada, Asahi Kasei, Precision Biologics, and Hemostasis Reference Laboratory; preparation of educational material and/or presentations and/or moderation of sessions for Pfizer, Alexion, CSL Behring, and Diagnostica Stago; and individual stock ownership for Alnylam. P.Y. reports former employment with Portola Pharmaceuticals Inc., now Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease. P.C. reports former employment with Portola Pharmaceuticals Inc., now Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease. G.L. reports employment with Portola Pharmaceuticals Inc., now Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease. S.J.C. reports institutional research grants and honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Portola/Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Bayer, and Daiichi Sankyo Inc., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Background and Purpose: It is unestablished whether andexanet alfa, compared with guideline-based usual care including prothrombin complex concentrates, is associated with reduced hematoma expansion (HE) and mortality in patients with factor-Xa inhibitor-related intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We compared the occurrence of HE and clinical outcomes in patients treated either with andexanet alfa or with usual care during the acute phase of factor-Xa inhibitor-related ICH., Methods: Data were extracted from the multicenter, prospective, single-arm ANNEXA-4 trial (Andexanet Alfa, a Novel Antidote to the Anticoagulation Effects of Factor Xa Inhibitors) and a multicenter observational cohort study, RETRACE-II (German-Wide Multicenter Analysis of Oral Anticoagulant-Associated Intracerebral Hemorrhage - Part Two). HE was based on computed tomography scans performed within 36 hours from baseline imaging. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed to adjust for baseline comorbidities and ICH severity. Patients presenting with atraumatic ICH while receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban within 18 hours of admission were included. Patients with secondary ICH or not fulfilling the inclusion criteria for the ANNEXA-4 trial were excluded. We compared ANNEXA-4 patients, who received andexanet alfa for hemostatic treatment, with RETRACE-II patients who were treated with usual care, primarily administration of prothrombin complex concentrates. Primary outcome was rate of HE defined as relative increase of ≥35%. Secondary outcomes comprised mean absolute change in hematoma volume, as well as in-hospital mortality and functional outcome., Results: Overall, 182 patients with factor-Xa inhibitor-related ICH (85 receiving andexanet alfa versus 97 receiving usual care) were selected for analysis. There were no relevant differences regarding demographic or clinical characteristics between both groups. HE occurred in 11 of 80 (14%) andexanet alfa patients compared with 21 of 67 (36%) usual care patients (adjusted relative risk, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.20-0.78]; P =0.005), with a reduction in mean overall hematoma volume change of 7 mL. There were no statistically significant differences among in-hospital mortality or functional outcomes. Sensitivity analysis including only usual care patients receiving prothrombin complex concentrates demonstrated consistent results., Conclusions: As compared with usual care, andexanet alfa was associated with a lower rate of HE in atraumatic factor-Xa inhibitor-related ICH, however, without translating into significantly improved clinical outcomes. A comparative trial is needed to confirm the benefit on limiting HE and to explore clinical outcomes across patient subgroups and by time to treatment. Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02329327 and NCT03093233.

Background: Lack of data on balancing bleeding and thrombosis risk causes uncertainty about restarting anticoagulants after major bleeding. Anticoagulant reversal trials offer prospectively gathered data after major bleeding with well-documented safety events and restarting behavior., Objectives: To examine the relationship of restarting anticoagulation with thrombosis, rebleeding, and death., Methods: This is a posthoc analysis of a prospective factor Xa inhibitor reversal study at 63 centers in North America and Europe. We compared outcomes of restarted patients with those not restarted using landmark and time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models. Outcomes included thrombotic and bleeding events and death and a composite of all three., Results: Of 352 patients enrolled, oral anticoagulation was restarted in 100 (28%) during 30-day follow-up. Thirty-four (9.7%) had thrombotic events, 15 (4.3%) had bleeding events (after day 3), and 49 (14%) died. In the landmark analysis comparing patients restarted within 14 days to those not, restarting was associated with decreased thrombotic events (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.112; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.001-0.944; p  = 0.043) and increased rebleeding (HR = 8.39; 95% CI: 1.13-62.29; p  = 0.037). The time-dependent Cox model showed evidence for a reduction in a composite (thrombotic events, bleeding, and death) attempting to capture net benefit (HR = 0.384; 95% CI: 0.161-0.915; p  = 0.031)., Conclusion: This analysis provides modest evidence that restarting anticoagulation in factor Xa inhibitor-associated major bleeding patients is correlated with reduced risk of thrombotic events and increased risk of rebleeding. There is low-level evidence of net benefit for restarting. A randomized trial of restarting would be appropriate., Competing Interests: T.J.M.: CSL Behring: consulting; Portola: grant support, steering committee; Octapharma: steering committee. B.K.: none. P.Y.: Portola: employee. S.M.: Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Aspen Pharma: grant support; Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Portola: advisory board; Portola: lecture fees; AbbVie: adjudication committee. J.B.-W.: Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo: grant support, lecture fees, advisory board fees; Pfizer: grant support; Portola: lecture fees, advisory board fees. J.W.E.: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Sanofi-Aventis: grant support, honoraria. M.C.: Bristol Myers Squibb Canada, Asahi Kasei, Servier Canada, Precision Biologics, Hemostasis Reference Laboratory, CSL Behring: advisory board; Alexion, Pfizer, CSL Behring, Diagnostica Stago: educational funding; Bayer, Leo Pharma: grant support; Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Octapharma: data safety monitoring board. L.X.: None. P.V.: Bayer Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Leo Pharma: grant support, consulting, lecture fees; Boehringer Ingelheim: adjudication committee; Anthos, Janssen, Portola: consulting. D.M.S.: Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Servier Canada, Novartis, Leo Pharma, Aspen Pharma, Portola: consulting. S.J.C.: Portola, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo: grant support, consulting; Javelin: consulting., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Background and Purpose: Andexanet alfa is a recombinant modified human FXa (factor Xa) developed to reverse FXa inhibition from anticoagulants. Hemostatic efficacy and reversal of anti-FXa activity with andexanet were assessed in patients from the ANNEXA-4 study (Andexanet Alfa, a Novel Antidote to the Anticoagulation Effects of FXa Inhibitors) with intracranial hemorrhage (ICrH)., Methods: ANNEXA-4 was a single-arm study evaluating andexanet in patients presenting with major bleeding ≤18 hours after taking an FXa inhibitor. Patients received a bolus plus 2-hour infusion of andexanet. Brain imaging in patients with ICrH was performed at baseline and at 1 and 12 hours postandexanet infusion. Coprimary efficacy outcomes were change in anti-FXa activity and hemostatic efficacy at 12 hours (excellent/good efficacy defined as ≤35% increase in hemorrhage volume/thickness). Safety outcomes included occurrence of thrombotic events and death at 30 days., Results: A total of 227 patients with ICrH were included in the safety population (51.5% male; mean age 79.3 years) and 171 in the efficacy population (99 spontaneous and 72 traumatic bleeds). In efficacy evaluable patients, excellent/good hemostasis 12 hours postandexanet occurred in 77 out of 98 (78.6%) and in 58 out of 70 (82.9%) patients with spontaneous and traumatic bleeding, respectively. In the subanalysis by FXa inhibitor treatment group in the efficacy population, median of percent change in anti-FXa from baseline to nadir showed a decrease of 93.8% for apixaban-treated patients (n=99) and by 92.6% for rivaroxaban-treated patients (n=59). Within 30 days, death occurred in 34 out of 227 (15.0%) patients and thrombotic events occurred in 21 out of 227 (9.3%) patients (safety population)., Conclusions: Andexanet reduced anti-FXa activity in FXa inhibitor-treated patients with ICrH, with a high rate of hemostatic efficacy. Andexanet may substantially benefit patients with ICrH, the most serious complication of anticoagulation., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02329327.

Aim: We describe the real-world utilization and outcomes associated with managing oral factor Xa inhibitor (FXai)-related major bleeds. Materials & methods: Electronic records from 45 US hospitals were queried (ICD-10-CM billing codes D68.32, T45.515x or T45.525x) to identify major bleed hospitalizations related to FXai use. Patient demographics, bleed type (intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal, critical compartment, traumatic, other), FXai taken, reversal or replacement agents administered (including andexanet alfa, four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate, fresh frozen plasma, others), in-hospital mortality and length of stay were recorded. Results: Of 3030 FXai-related hospitalizations for major bleeds, patients averaged 68 years old and 47% were women. In-hospital mortality was highest for intracranial hemorrhage (23%, n = 507) and lowest for gastrointestinal bleeds (4%, n = 1453). In-hospital mortality was lowest (4%) for bleeds managed with andexanet alfa (n = 342), compared with 10% for four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (n = 733), 11% for fresh frozen plasma (n = 925) and 8% for both other agents (n = 794) and no agents (n = 438). Median length of stay was 5 days across all agents, while ICU length of stay was shorter andexanet alfa (2 days) compared with other agents (3 days). Conclusion: In-hospital mortality differed by bleed type and agents administered. Andexanet alfa was associated with the lowest rate of in-hospital mortality across all bleed types.

As with any anticoagulant, factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors are associated with a risk of major bleeding. Andexanet alfa is a recombinant modified human FXa lacking enzymatic activity, developed for reversal of FXa inhibitor-induced anticoagulation. In two phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center studies, different regimens of andexanet alfa were administered to healthy volunteers after therapeutic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban or edoxaban, and multiple anticoagulation reversal and safety end points were evaluated. Andexanet alfa rapidly and effectively reversed anticoagulation with both rivaroxaban and edoxaban. Within 2 minutes after bolus, anti-FXa activity decreased significantly, with maximum decreases of ≈93% (P < .05) and ≈82% (P < .05), respectively, compared with placebo. The stoichiometric ratios of andexanet alfa:total anticoagulant at maximum reversal of anti-FXa activity ranged from 1:1 to 1.3:1 for rivaroxaban and 1.41:1 to 2.58:1 for edoxaban. Sustained normalization of thrombin generation for ≈2 hours and sustained decrease in unbound anticoagulant (maximum ≈80%) for up to ≈4 hours following completion of andexanet alfa administration, compared with placebo, were observed when andexanet was administered as a bolus or as a bolus followed by continuous infusion. Andexanet alfa was well tolerated, and there were no serious adverse events or thrombotic events. Andexanet alfa has been approved in the United States and Europe for reversal of anticoagulation in patients treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban who experience life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding. These studies were registered with clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT03578146 and #NCT03551743)., (© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Background: Andexanet alfa (andexanet) reverses the anticoagulant effects of factor Xa inhibitors, but it has not been assessed in clinical studies for apixaban reversal in trauma. This study evaluated andexanet for reversing apixaban anticoagulation in a porcine polytrauma model., Methods: Oral apixaban (20 mg q.d., n=21) or placebo (n=7; sham group) was administered to male pigs for 4 days before blunt liver injury and bi-lateral femur fracture. After trauma, animals were randomised 1:1:1 to a single andexanet bolus (1000 mg), a bolus (1000 mg) plus infusion (1200 mg over 2 h), or vehicle (control). Haemodynamic and coagulation variables were monitored for 5 h or until death. The primary endpoint was blood loss., Results: Mean blood loss in sham animals was 472 (standard deviation, 58) ml 12 min after injury and 658 (98) ml at 300 min, with 100% survival. Anticoagulation with apixaban significantly increased blood loss 12 min after injury [888 (133) ml, P<0.01]. Controls exhibited total blood loss of 3403 (766) ml, with 100% mortality. Andexanet bolus or bolus plus infusion significantly reduced blood loss to 1264 (205) and 1202 (95) ml, respectively), and increased survival to 100%. Haemodynamic parameters and markers of shock recovered to pre-trauma levels in andexanet-treated animals., Conclusion: Andexanet effectively reversed apixaban anticoagulation and reduced blood loss induced by severe trauma. Andexanet bolus alone had a similar impact on survival and blood loss as bolus plus infusion. Therefore, a 2 h andexanet infusion after the bolus may not be necessary to restore normal haemostatic mechanisms., (Copyright © 2019 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Andexanet alfa is a modified recombinant inactive form of human factor Xa developed for reversal of factor Xa inhibitors., Methods: We evaluated 352 patients who had acute major bleeding within 18 hours after administration of a factor Xa inhibitor. The patients received a bolus of andexanet, followed by a 2-hour infusion. The coprimary outcomes were the percent change in anti-factor Xa activity after andexanet treatment and the percentage of patients with excellent or good hemostatic efficacy at 12 hours after the end of the infusion, with hemostatic efficacy adjudicated on the basis of prespecified criteria. Efficacy was assessed in the subgroup of patients with confirmed major bleeding and baseline anti-factor Xa activity of at least 75 ng per milliliter (or ≥0.25 IU per milliliter for those receiving enoxaparin)., Results: Patients had a mean age of 77 years, and most had substantial cardiovascular disease. Bleeding was predominantly intracranial (in 227 patients [64%]) or gastrointestinal (in 90 patients [26%]). In patients who had received apixaban, the median anti-factor Xa activity decreased from 149.7 ng per milliliter at baseline to 11.1 ng per milliliter after the andexanet bolus (92% reduction; 95% confidence interval [CI], 91 to 93); in patients who had received rivaroxaban, the median value decreased from 211.8 ng per milliliter to 14.2 ng per milliliter (92% reduction; 95% CI, 88 to 94). Excellent or good hemostasis occurred in 204 of 249 patients (82%) who could be evaluated. Within 30 days, death occurred in 49 patients (14%) and a thrombotic event in 34 (10%). Reduction in anti-factor Xa activity was not predictive of hemostatic efficacy overall but was modestly predictive in patients with intracranial hemorrhage., Conclusions: In patients with acute major bleeding associated with the use of a factor Xa inhibitor, treatment with andexanet markedly reduced anti-factor Xa activity, and 82% of patients had excellent or good hemostatic efficacy at 12 hours, as adjudicated according to prespecified criteria. (Funded by Portola Pharmaceuticals; ANNEXA-4 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02329327.)., (Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Anticoagulants such as unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), fondaparinux, and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) targeting thrombin (IIa) or factor Xa (FXa) are widely used in prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. However, anticoagulant-associated bleeding is a concern that demands monitoring and neutralization. Protamine, the UFH antidote, has limitations, while there is no antidote available for certain direct FXa inhibitors. Improved antidotes in development include UHRA (Universal Heparin Reversal Agent) for all heparin anticoagulants; andexanet alfa (andexanet), a recombinant antidote for both direct FXa inhibitors and LMWHs; and ciraparantag (PER977), a small-molecule antidote for UFH, LMWHs, and certain DOACs. The binding affinities of these antidotes for their presumed anticoagulant targets have not been compared. Here, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) was used to determine the affinity of each antidote for its putative targets. Clotting and chromogenic FXa assays were used to characterize neutralization activity, and electron microscopy was used to visualize the effect of each antidote on clot morphology in the absence or presence of anticoagulant. ITC confirmed binding of UHRA to all heparins, and binding of andexanet to edoxaban and rivaroxaban, and to the antithrombin-enoxaparin complex. PER977 was found to bind heparins weakly, but not the direct FXa inhibitors studied. For UHRA and andexanet, an affinity at or below the micromolar level was found to correlate with neutralization activity, while no reversal activity was observed for the PER977/anticoagulant systems. Standard metrics of clot structure were found to correlate weakly with PER977's activity. This is the first study comparing 3 antidotes in development, with each exerting activity through a distinct mechanism., (© 2018 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Introduction: Increasing use of factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors necessitates effective reversal agents to manage bleeding. Andexanet alfa, a novel modified recombinant human FXa, rapidly reverses the anticoagulation effects of direct and indirect FXa inhibitors., Objective: To evaluate the ability of andexanet to reverse anticoagulation in vitro and reduce bleeding in rabbits administered edoxaban., Materials and Methods: In vitro studies characterized the interaction of andexanet with edoxaban and its ability to reverse edoxaban-mediated anti-FXa activity. In a rabbit model of surgically induced, acute hemorrhage, animals received edoxaban vehicle+andexanet vehicle (control), edoxaban (1 mg/kg)+andexanet vehicle, edoxaban+andexanet (75 mg, 5-minute infusion, 20 minutes after edoxaban), or edoxaban vehicle+andexanet prior to injury., Results: Andexanet bound edoxaban with high affinity similar to FXa. Andexanet rapidly and dose-dependently reversed the effects of edoxaban on FXa activity and coagulation pharmacodynamic parameters in vitro. In edoxaban-anticoagulated rabbits, andexanet reduced anti-FXa activity by 82% (from 548±87 to 100±41 ng/ml; P<0.0001), mean unbound edoxaban plasma concentration by ~80% (from 100±10 to 21±6 ng/ml; P<0.0001), and blood loss by 80% vs. vehicle (adjusted for control, 2.6 vs. 12.9 g; P = 0.003). The reduction in blood loss correlated with the decrease in anti-FXa activity (r = 0.6993, P<0.0001) and unbound edoxaban (r = 0.5951, P = 0.0035)., Conclusion: These data demonstrate that andexanet rapidly reversed the anticoagulant effects of edoxaban, suggesting it could be clinically valuable for the management of acute and surgery-related bleeding. Correlation of blood loss with anti-FXa activity supports the use of anti-FXa activity as a biomarker for assessing anticoagulation reversal in clinical trials.

Essentials There is currently no approved reversal agent for factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors Andexanet alfa has been developed to reverse the anticoagulant effects of FXa inhibitors Andexanet reduced blood loss and anticoagulation markers in rivaroxaban-anticoagulated rabbits Andexanet was well tolerated in monkeys and rats, with no evidence of prothrombotic activity SUMMARY: Background Andexanet alfa is a recombinant modified form of factor Xa (FXa), designed to bind to and reverse the anticoagulant activity of FXa inhibitors. Objectives To evaluate the ability of andexanet to reverse the anticoagulant activity of rivaroxaban, and assess its pharmacokinetics (PK) and toxicity in animal models. Methods The effects of andexanet on blood loss, anti-FXa activity, rivaroxaban unbound plasma concentrations and other coagulation parameters were assessed in a rabbit liver laceration 'treatment' model. Andexanet was administered 10 min after blood loss was initiated. The toxicity of repeated administration of andexanet (up to 60 mg kg -1 day -1 ) was assessed in cynomolgus monkeys. PK parameters were evaluated in rats and monkeys. Results Excess blood loss due to anticoagulation with rivaroxaban was significantly decreased by a single intravenous bolus administration of andexanet at 35 and 75 mg per rabbit, by 75% and 63%, respectively. This correlated with dose-dependent decreases in the unbound fraction of rivaroxaban and anti-FXa activity. Co-administration of rivaroxaban had no significant impact on the PK parameters of andexanet. Andexanet (up to 60 mg kg -1 day -1 ) was well tolerated in monkeys, with no accumulation of andexanet or rivaroxaban. There was a single occurrence of anaphylaxis, which resolved after treatment with diphenhydramine and epinephrine. There was no histological evidence of prothrombotic activity with high-dose andexanet compared with vehicle control, as measured by clot and fibrin deposition in all major organs. Conclusions These data suggest that andexanet is a promising therapy for the reversal of FXa inhibitor-induced anticoagulation, supporting clinical studies in humans., (© 2017 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Background: Andexanet alfa (andexanet) is a recombinant modified human factor Xa decoy protein that has been shown to reverse the inhibition of factor Xa in healthy volunteers., Methods: In this multicenter, prospective, open-label, single-group study, we evaluated 67 patients who had acute major bleeding within 18 hours after the administration of a factor Xa inhibitor. The patients all received a bolus of andexanet followed by a 2-hour infusion of the drug. Patients were evaluated for changes in measures of anti-factor Xa activity and were assessed for clinical hemostatic efficacy during a 12-hour period. All the patients were subsequently followed for 30 days. The efficacy population of 47 patients had a baseline value for anti-factor Xa activity of at least 75 ng per milliliter (or ≥0.5 IU per milliliter for those receiving enoxaparin) and had confirmed bleeding severity at adjudication., Results: The mean age of the patients was 77 years; most of the patients had substantial cardiovascular disease. Bleeding was predominantly gastrointestinal or intracranial. The mean (±SD) time from emergency department presentation to the administration of the andexanet bolus was 4.8±1.8 hours. After the bolus administration, the median anti-factor Xa activity decreased by 89% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58 to 94) from baseline among patients receiving rivaroxaban and by 93% (95% CI, 87 to 94) among patients receiving apixaban. These levels remained similar during the 2-hour infusion. Four hours after the end of the infusion, there was a relative decrease from baseline of 39% in the measure of anti-factor Xa activity among patients receiving rivaroxaban and of 30% among those receiving apixaban. Twelve hours after the andexanet infusion, clinical hemostasis was adjudicated as excellent or good in 37 of 47 patients in the efficacy analysis (79%; 95% CI, 64 to 89). Thrombotic events occurred in 12 of 67 patients (18%) during the 30-day follow-up., Conclusions: On the basis of a descriptive preliminary analysis, an initial bolus and subsequent 2-hour infusion of andexanet substantially reduced anti-factor Xa activity in patients with acute major bleeding associated with factor Xa inhibitors, with effective hemostasis occurring in 79%. (Funded by Portola Pharmaceuticals; ANNEXA-4 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02329327 .).

Background: Bleeding is a complication of treatment with factor Xa inhibitors, but there are no specific agents for the reversal of the effects of these drugs. Andexanet is designed to reverse the anticoagulant effects of factor Xa inhibitors., Methods: Healthy older volunteers were given 5 mg of apixaban twice daily or 20 mg of rivaroxaban daily. For each factor Xa inhibitor, a two-part randomized placebo-controlled study was conducted to evaluate andexanet administered as a bolus or as a bolus plus a 2-hour infusion. The primary outcome was the mean percent change in anti-factor Xa activity, which is a measure of factor Xa inhibition by the anticoagulant., Results: Among the apixaban-treated participants, anti-factor Xa activity was reduced by 94% among those who received an andexanet bolus (24 participants), as compared with 21% among those who received placebo (9 participants) (P<0.001), and unbound apixaban concentration was reduced by 9.3 ng per milliliter versus 1.9 ng per milliliter (P<0.001); thrombin generation was fully restored in 100% versus 11% of the participants (P<0.001) within 2 to 5 minutes. Among the rivaroxaban-treated participants, anti-factor Xa activity was reduced by 92% among those who received an andexanet bolus (27 participants), as compared with 18% among those who received placebo (14 participants) (P<0.001), and unbound rivaroxaban concentration was reduced by 23.4 ng per milliliter versus 4.2 ng per milliliter (P<0.001); thrombin generation was fully restored in 96% versus 7% of the participants (P<0.001). These effects were sustained when andexanet was administered as a bolus plus an infusion. In a subgroup of participants, transient increases in levels of d-dimer and prothrombin fragments 1 and 2 were observed, which resolved within 24 to 72 hours. No serious adverse or thrombotic events were reported., Conclusions: Andexanet reversed the anticoagulant activity of apixaban and rivaroxaban in older healthy participants within minutes after administration and for the duration of infusion, without evidence of clinical toxic effects. (Funded by Portola Pharmaceuticals and others; ANNEXA-A and ANNEXA-R ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02207725 and NCT02220725.).