1. Genotype-Dependent Response to Desmopressin in Hemophilia A and Proposal of a Predictive Response Score.
- Author
-
Guillet B, Pawlowski M, Boisseau P, Répessé Y, Beurrier P, Bayart S, Delavenne X, Trossaërt M, and Lenting PJ
- Subjects
- Humans, Genotype, Treatment Outcome, Male, Adult, Hemostatics therapeutic use, France, Adolescent, Half-Life, Young Adult, Middle Aged, Child, Hemophilia A drug therapy, Hemophilia A blood, Hemophilia A genetics, Hemophilia A diagnosis, Deamino Arginine Vasopressin therapeutic use, Factor VIII genetics
- Abstract
Background: Desmopressin (DDAVP) is used in patients with moderate/mild hemophilia A (PWMHs) to increase their factor VIII (FVIII) level and, if possible, normalize it. However, its effectiveness varies between individuals. The GIDEMHA study aims to investigate the influence of F8 gene variants., Material and Methods: The study collected the trajectory of FVIII levels from therapeutic intravenous DDAVP tests in four French hemophilia treatment centers. A pharmacological analysis was performed associated with efficacy scores according to F8 variants: absolute and relative responses, as well as new scores: absolute duration (based on duration with FVIII ≥ 0.50 IU.mL
-1 ) and relative duration (based on half-life)., Results: From enrolled 439 PWMHs, 327 had a hot-spot F8 variant (with ≥5 PWMHs). For these, the median (min-max) basal and peak FVIII were 0.20 (0.02-0.040) and 0.74 (0.14-2.18) IU.mL-1 respectively, with FVIII recovery being 3.80 IU.ml-1 (1.15-14.75). The median FVIII half-life was 3.9 hours (0.7-15.9 hours). FVIII was normalized (≥0.50 IU.mL-1 ) in 224/327 PWMHs (69%) and the median time with normalized FVIII was 3.9 hours (0.0-54.1 hours). Following the response profiles to DDAVP defined by the four efficacy scores, four groups of F8 variants were isolated, and then compared using survival curves with normalized FVIII ( p < 0.0001): "long-lastingly effective" [p.(Glu739Lys), p.(Ser2030Asn), p.(Arg2178His), p.(Gln2208Glu), and T-stretch deletion in intron 13]; "moderately effective" [p.(Ser112Phe), p.(Ala219Thr), p.(Thr2105Ile), p.Phe2146Ser), and p.(Asp2150Asn)]; "moderately ineffective" [p.Ala81Asp), p.(Gln324Pro), p.(Tyr492His), p.(Arg612Cys), p.(Met701Val), p.(Val2035Asn), and p.(Arg2178Cys)]; and "frequently ineffective" [c.-219C > T, p.(Cys2040Tyr), p.(Tyr2169His), p.(Pro2319Leu), and p.(Arg2326Gln)]., Conclusion: In view of our data, we propose indications for DDAVP use in PWMH based on F8 variants for minor and major invasive procedures., Competing Interests: B.G. has received grants or consultant fees from CSL-Behring, LFB, NovoNordisk, Octapharma, Roche/Chugaï, and Sobi. Y.R. has received funding or consultant fees from BioMarin, CSL-Behring, LFB, NovoNordisk, Octapharma, Roche, Shire, Sobi, and Takeda. X.D. has received honoraria for participation in symposia by CSL Behring, Shire, Octapharma, and Sobi. M.T. has received funding or consultant fees from Bayer Healthcare, CSL-Behring, NovoNordisk, Octapharma, Parexel, Roche, Sanofi, Shire, Sobi, and Takeda. P.J.L. has received grants from Pfizer, Sanofi, Sobi, and Roche. M.P., S.B., P.Be., and P.Bo. declare no disclosure., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF