Search

Purpose: To investigate if the application of Blephagel, an eyelid cleansing gel, causes subjective and/or objective cooling effects by measuring ocular symptomology and temperature., Methods: Twenty-five healthy subjects underwent baseline non-invasive temperature measurements on the closed upper eyelid (centrally, nasally, and temporally) and ocular surface temperature (OST) on both eyes using an infrared camera. A standard application of Blephagel was then applied to the closed upper eyelid and eyelashes with a sterile cotton-wool to one eye selected at random. Temperature measures were then repeated on both eyes after 30-60, 120-150, and 180-210 s. At each interval, subjects rated the comfort and any cooling sensation of each eye on a 0-10 scale., Results: After application of the gel, there was a significant difference in temperature at all locations on the eyelid between the test and control eyes over time (F = 9.322, p < 0.001). Post hoc analysis revealed this was significant from 30 to 60 s interval (36.3 ± 1.1 °C versus 37.2 ± 0.7 °C; p < 0.001) and the 120-150 s interval (36.8 ± 0.8 °C versus 37.2 ± 0.6 °C; p < 0.001). There was no significant variation between the OST locations over time (F = 3.350, p = 0.07). With respect to symptoms, there was a significant increase in cooling sensation in the test eye compared to the control eye over time (F = 10.438, p < 0.001), that remained throughout the experiment., Conclusions: Blephagel produces a reduction in temperature of the eyelids that is accompanied with a subjective cooling sensation., (Copyright © 2018 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare the in vitro anti-demodectic activity of four commercially available dedicated eyelid cleansers (Cliradex ® towelette cleanser, Oust™ Demodex ® cleanser, Blephadex™ eyelid foam, TheraTears ® SteriLid ® eyelid cleanser), tea tree oil, undiluted terpinen-4-ol and linalool; and to assess the terpinen-4-ol content of the commercial cleansers and tea tree oil., Methods: In vitro anti-demodectic efficacy assessment: 93 viable Demodex mites were acquired from the epilated eyelashes of 10 participants, and were randomised to application with one of the four eyelid cleansers, 100% and 50% tea tree oil, undiluted terpinen-4-ol and linalool, or no treatment. Following treatment application, mite viability was assessed for 300 min, based on limb/body movement and/or the development of a crenated/translucent appearance. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was then performed., Mass Spectrometry Analysis: The absolute concentration of terpinen-4-ol and the relative abundance of linalool in the four eyelid cleansers and tea tree oil were determined., Results: In vitro anti-demodectic efficacy assessment: No significant differences were observed between undiluted tea tree oil, terpinen-4-ol and linalool (all p > 0.05). Although all commercial eyelid cleansers effected lower mite survival probabilities than the untreated group, Cliradex ® was the only eyelid cleanser that demonstrated comparable antiparastic activity to 50% tea tree oil (p = 0.36)., Mass Spectrometry Analysis: Among the four eyelid cleansers, Cliradex ® contained the highest concentration of terpinen-4-ol, while linalool was present in TheraTears ® SteriLid ® only., Conclusions: Of the four commercial eyelid cleansers, Cliradex ® demonstrated the highest levels of in vitro anti-demodectic activity and terpinen-4-ol content. Undiluted linalool and terpenin-4-ol showed comparable antiparasitic efficacy, and the use of linalool in the management of demodectic blepharitis warrants further investigation., (Copyright © 2018 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of a dedicated eyelid cleanser and diluted baby shampoo in the management of blepharitis., Methods: Forty-three participants with clinical blepharitis signs were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-masked, paired-eye trial. A dedicated eyelid cleanser (TheraTears ® SteriLid ® ) was applied to the eyelids of one eye (randomized) and diluted baby shampoo (Johnson's ® No More Tears ® ) to the fellow eye, twice daily for 4 weeks. Tear film parameters, ocular surface characteristics, symptomology and cytology markers were assessed at baseline and day 28., Results: Baseline measurements did not differ between treatments (all p > 0.05). The eyelid cleanser was preferred over baby shampoo by the majority of participants (p < 0.001). Improvements in the tear lipid layer, inferior lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE), cylindrical collarettes, and MMP-9 expression were limited to the dedicated eyelid cleanser (all p < 0.05), and a greater decrease in SANDE symptoms score was also observed (p = 0.04). Meibomian gland capping and MUC5AC expression worsened with baby shampoo treatment (both p < 0.05). SPEED symptoms score, superior LWE, seborrhoeic lash crusting, and trichiasis decreased significantly following application of both treatments (all p < 0.05), but did not differ between treatments (all p > 0.05)., Conclusion: Clinical improvements in blepharitis occurred with both treatments. However, only the dedicated eyelid cleanser proved effective in reducing ocular surface inflammation, and was the preferred therapy. Long term impact of decreased goblet cell function secondary to baby shampoo treatment requires further exploration., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of eyelid hygiene after cataract surgery on eyelid and ocular surface findings, subjective symptoms and visual function, including functional visual acuity (FVA) and higher order aberration, in a randomized controlled study. Methods: Fifty patients who underwent cataract surgery at a single institution were involved. Twenty-five patients were instructed to wipe their eyelids twice a day from one to four weeks postoperatively, whereas the other 25 patients did not perform any eyelid hygiene. Optical measurement, FVA, meibomian glands, the grade of meibum, lid margin findings, fluorescein corneal staining findings, dry eye-related subjective symptoms and surgical satisfaction were assessed both preoperatively and one month postoperatively. Results: In the eyelid hygiene group, the visual maintenance ratio of FVA improved significantly (p = 0.048) and the higher order aberration of the 4th + 6th order deteriorated less (p = 0.027) compared with the control group. Multiple regression analyses showed that the change in visual maintenance ratio was associated with surgical satisfaction (p = 0.003), change in corneal staining score (p = 0.007), history of eye diseases (p = 0.029) and eyelid hygiene (p = 0.048). Conclusions: Eyelid hygiene after cataract surgery may be effective for visual function measured with an FVA test. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Progressively increasing number of eye surgeries forces the development of simple-to-use, effective methods to reduce the risk of postoperative endophthalmitis. We wondered whether the eyelid margin wipes containing 0,1% polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) (HexaClean, VERCO, Poland) influence the reduction of bacterial flora localized in the conjunctival sac and whether it can be used for prophylaxis before the cataract surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 95 patients before the cataract surgery were included in the study. The conjunctival swab was collected from patients twice -- before using eye wipes and after 5 days of eye wipes usage. The swabs were plated on microbiological enriched media and incubated under aerobic and microaerophilic conditions for 24-48 hours at 35°C ± 2°C. Then the identification of microorganisms was carried out using classic microbiological methods and tests. RESULTS: Bacterial strains were isolated from the conjunctival sac in 84% of patients before using the eye wipes. The largest group of isolated pathogens was Gram-positive cocci, and these were mainly methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci, which accounted for 72% of isolated strains. When the eye wipes were used, the bacterial flora was eliminated from the conjunctival sac in 54% of patients. A reduction in isolated strains and decreased variety of bacteria was observed in another 22% of patients. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the application of eyelid wipes with polyhexanide reduces a significant amount of the conjunctival sac microbiota, which may prevent inflammation after cataract surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To observe (1) changes in meibomian gland (MG) after exposure to intense pulsed light (IPL) and (2) to understand the mechanism by which IPL treats meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) in patients. Methods: A cohort study, including 35 MGD patients, was conducted. IPL treatment was administered in one group (IPL group;n = 18), and eyelid hygiene in another (control group;n = 17) for 3 months. All patients were given artificial tears during the treatment period. Associated ocular-surface indexes (ocular surface disease index, OSDI; tear breakup time, TBUT, Schirmer 1Test, corneal staining, and conjunctival staining), MG function, MG macro-morphology, and MG micro-morphology were examined before and after treatment. The relationships between the change in symptom score and the change in the other indexes (related ocular-surface indexes, MG functional indexes, and MG morphological indexes) were evaluated. Results: There was no statistical difference in pretreatment between the IPL and the control groups in terms of age, gender, related medical history, MGD stage, and all examined indexes, with the exception of conjunctival staining. OSDI, TBUT, meibum quality, MG expressibility, and MG dropout improved after treatment in both of the two groups (allP < 0.05). The MG microstructure indexes, including the MG acinar longest diameter (ALD), MG acinar unit density (AUD), and the positive rate of inflammatory cells (ICs) around glandular structures were significantly improved in the IPL group. No improvements of microstructure were found in the control group. Conclusion: IPL treatment improves the symptom score of patients, associated ocular-surface indexes, MG function, and MG macrostructure as well as eyelid hygiene. And IPL treatment particularly improves MG microstructure and decreases MG inflammation in MGD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

To determine the efficacy duration of eyelid hygiene for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) treatment, a total of 1015 participants with primary MGD, followed for at least 6 months, were enrolled. The participants were classified into the eyelid hygiene group and the control group. The participants who had stopped eyelid hygiene at any point in the observation period after the initial 2 months were classified into the withdrawal group. Analysis was conducted with a generalized linear mixed model. Treatment group, age, sex, ocular surface inflammation, anti-inflammatory treatments, and baseline MGD subtype were considered as fixed effects, and the individual factor was considered as a random effect. The MGD stage decreased significantly for the observational period in the eyelid hygiene group (p < 0.001). Approximately 40.1% of the participants continuously maintained eyelid hygiene throughout the observational period. The MGD stage in the eyelid hygiene group continued to decrease for 6 months and was maintained thereafter. After 4 months of stopping eyelid hygiene, the MGD stage in the withdrawal group was worse than in the eyelid hygiene group (p < 0.001) and similar to that in the control group (p = 0.762). Maintaining eyelid hygiene was significantly effective in MGD treatment. Efficacy increased with treatment for 6 months, and the efficacy duration was maintained for 4 months even after stopping eyelid hygiene. Therefore, we recommend that patients with MGD maintain eyelid hygiene, and compliance should be checked continuously. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]