Search

Hypothesis: That disease or dysfunction of vestibular end organs in human patients will reduce or eliminate the contribution of the affected end organs to the total eye-movement response to DC surface galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS)., Background: It was assumed that DC GVS (at current of 5 mA) stimulates all vestibular end organs, an assumption that is strongly supported by physiological evidence, including the activation of primary vestibular afferent neurons by galvanic stimulation. Previous studies also have described the oculomotor responses to vestibular activation. Stimulation of individual semicircular canals results in eye movements parallel to the plane of the stimulated canal, and stimulation of the utricular macula produces changes in ocular torsional position. It was also assumed that the total three-dimensional eye-movement response to GVS is the sum of the contributions of the oculomotor drive of all the vestibular end organs. If a particular vestibular end organ were to be diseased or dysfunctional, it was reasoned that its contribution to the GVS-induced oculomotor response would be reduced or absent and that patients thus affected would have a systematic difference in their GVS-induced oculomotor response compared with the response of normal healthy individuals., Methods: Three-dimensional video eye-movement recording was carried out in complete darkness on normal healthy subjects and patients with various types of vestibular dysfunction, as diagnosed by independent vestibular clinical tests. The eye-movement response to long-duration bilateral and unilateral surface GVS was measured., Results: The pattern of horizontal, vertical, and torsional eye velocity and eye position during GVS of patients independently diagnosed with bilateral vestibular dysfunction, unilateral vestibular dysfunction, CHARGE syndrome (semicircular canal hypoplasia), semicircular canal occlusion, or inferior vestibular neuritis differed systematically from the responses of normal healthy subjects in ways that corresponded to the expectations from the conceptual approach of the study., Conclusion: The study reports the first data on the differences between the normal response to GVS and those of patients with a number of clinical vestibular conditions including unilateral vestibular loss, canal block, and vestibular neuritis. The GVS-induced eye-movement patterns of patients with vestibular dysfunction are consistent with the reduction or absence of oculomotor contribution from the end organs implicated in their particular disease condition.

We studied the compensatory eye movements made by subjects with unilateral vestibular deficits in response to passive (unpredictable, manually generated) and active (predictable, self-generated) head impulses. A typical head impulse is a brief, low-amplitude (15-20 degrees ), high-velocity (150-350 degrees /s), high-acceleration (4000-6000 degrees /s(2)), yaw head-on-trunk rotation. In the initial 75 ms of the response, the vestibulo-ocular reflex gain was significantly higher during active head impulses to both ipsilesional and contralesional sides, than during passive impulses. Mean gains were 0.15 (ipsilesional passive), 0.44 (ipsilesional active), 0.5 (contralesional passive), and 0.76 (contralesional active). Differences between active and passive head impulses were present from near the onset of head rotation. The mechanism for producing this behavior is unclear, but the findings could be related to enhanced sensitivity of second-order neurons during active head impulses. However, even with active movements, there is still a large and statistically significant asymmetry in the eye-movement responses for ipsilesional as opposed to contralesional head rotations. After 75 ms, rapid corrective eye movements often were generated to reduce any remaining gaze error.

To test a hypothesis about how otoliths resolve roll-tilts from translations, we measured human ocular torsion position [ocular counterrolling (OCR)] to maintained linear acceleration stimuli. All subjects (n = 8) were tested in two conditions where the same magnitude of shear along an interaural axis was generated in one of two ways: either by roll-tilt on a tilt-chair in a 1-g environment, or by centripetal linear acceleration during constant velocity rotation 1 m from the axis of rotation on a fixed-chair human centrifuge. The interaural shear to the otoliths was the same for these two conditions, but the dorsoventral shear was different and for all eight subjects the OCR on the centrifuge was significantly greater than the torsion on the tilt-chair, although the resultant angle was in fact smaller on the centrifuge than on the tilt-chair. The results confirm that dorsoventral shear is important for determining OCR. The otoliths may resolve potential stimulus ambiguities between tilts and translations by virtue of the different patterns of interaural and dorsoventral shear that these stimuli generate.

Vertical eye position-dependence of the human vestibuloocular reflex during passive and active yaw head rotations. The effect of vertical eye-in-head position on the compensatory eye rotation response to passive and active high acceleration yaw head rotations was examined in eight normal human subjects. The stimuli consisted of brief, low amplitude (15-25 degrees ), high acceleration (4,000-6,000 degrees /s2) yaw head rotations with respect to the trunk (peak velocity was 150-350 degrees /s). Eye and head rotations were recorded in three-dimensional space using the magnetic search coil technique. The input-output kinematics of the three-dimensional vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) were assessed by finding the difference between the inverted eye velocity vector and the head velocity vector (both referenced to a head-fixed coordinate system) as a time series. During passive head impulses, the head and eye velocity axes aligned well with each other for the first 47 ms after the onset of the stimulus, regardless of vertical eye-in-head position. After the initial 47-ms period, the degree of alignment of the eye and head velocity axes was modulated by vertical eye-in-head position. When fixation was on a target 20 degrees up, the eye and head velocity axes remained well aligned with each other. However, when fixation was on targets at 0 and 20 degrees down, the eye velocity axis tilted forward relative to the head velocity axis. During active head impulses, the axis tilt became apparent within 5 ms of the onset of the stimulus. When fixation was on a target at 0 degrees, the velocity axes remained well aligned with each other. When fixation was on a target 20 degrees up, the eye velocity axis tilted backward, when fixation was on a target 20 degrees down, the eye velocity axis tilted forward. The findings show that the VOR compensates very well for head motion in the early part of the response to unpredictable high acceleration stimuli-the eye position- dependence of the VOR does not become apparent until 47 ms after the onset of the stimulus. In contrast, the response to active high acceleration stimuli shows eye position-dependence from within 5 ms of the onset of the stimulus. A model using a VOR-Listing's law compromise strategy did not accurately predict the patterns observed in the data, raising questions about how the eye position-dependence of the VOR is generated. We suggest, in view of recent findings, that the phenomenon could arise due to the effects of fibromuscular pulleys on the functional pulling directions of the rectus muscles.

This study was designed to measure ocular movements evoked by galvanic (DC) stimulation using computerised video-oculography. Long duration (>30 s) galvanic vestibular stimulation at currents of up to 5 mA through large-area surface electrodes over the mastoid processes causes maintained changes in the ocular torsional position of both eyes in healthy human subjects. With the subject seated and the head held firmly, torsion was measured by a computer-based image-processing system (VTM). Torsion was recorded in darkness, with or without a single fixation point. With bilateral stimulation, the upper poles of both eyes always torted away from the side of cathode placement and toward the anode. For unilateral stimulation, torsion was directed away from the cathode or toward the anode. The magnitude of ocular torsion was dependent on current strength: with bilateral stimulation the peak torsion was on average 2.88 degrees for 5-mA current intensity compared with 1.58 degrees for 3 mA. A smaller amplitude of torsion was obtained for unilateral stimulation. The average peak torsion was the same for both eyes for all forms of stimulation. Our findings indicate that low-intensity galvanic stimulation evokes ocular torsion in normal subjects, an effect which is consistent with an action on otolith afferents.

We studied the human vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) in response to head 'impulses': brief, unpredictable, passive, high-acceleration (up to 4000 degrees/s2), low-amplitude (20-30 degrees) head rotations. We delivered the head impulses approximately in the plane of the semicircular canal (SCC) being tested. To test the anterior and posterior SCCs, the head impulses were delivered in a diagonal plane, midway between the frontal (roll) and sagittal (pitch) planes. We recorded head and eye position in three dimensions with scleral search coils in nine normal subjects, seven patients following unilateral surgical vestibular neurectomy and three patients following unilateral posterior SCC occlusion. In the post-surgical patients we demonstrated a severe, permanent VOR gain deficit (0.2-0.3) for head impulses directed toward any single non-functioning SCC. The sensitivity of the test depends on the physiological properties of primary vestibular afferents, and its specificity depends on the anatomical orientation of the SCCs. The diagonal head impulse is the first test of individual vertical SCC function in humans, and together with the horizontal head impulse, forms a comprehensive battery of SCC-plane tests. These canal-plane impulses could be useful in evaluating patients with vertigo or other vestibular disorders.

1. The kinematics of the human angular vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) in three dimensions was investigated in 12 normal subjects during high-acceleration head rotations (head "impulses"). A head impulse is a passive, unpredictable, high-acceleration (3,000-4,000 degrees/s2) head rotation of approximately 10-20 degrees in roll, pitch, or yaw, delivered with the subject in the upright position and focusing on a fixation target. Head and eye rotations were measured with dual search coils and expressed as rotation vectors. The first of these two papers describes a vector analysis of the three-dimensional input-output kinematics of the VOR as two indexes in the time domain: magnitude and direction. 2. Magnitude is expressed as speed gain (G) and direction as misalignment angle (delta). G is defined as the ratio of eye velocity magnitude (eye speed) to head velocity magnitude (head speed). delta is defined as the instantaneous angle by which the eye rotation axis deviates from perfect alignment with the head rotation axis in three dimensions. When the eye rotation axis aligns perfectly with the head rotation axis and when eye velocity is in a direction opposite to head velocity, delta = 0. The orientation of misalignment between the head and the eye rotation axes is characterized by two spatial misalignment angles, which are the projections of delta onto two orthogonal coordinate planes that intersect at the head rotation axis. 3. Time series of G were calculated for head impulses in roll, pitch, and yaw. At 80 ms after the onset of an impulse (i.e., near peak head velocity), values of G were 0.72 +/- 0.07 (counterclockwise) and 0.75 +/- 0.07 (clockwise) for roll impulses, 0.97 +/- 0.05 (up) and 1.10 +/- 0.09 (down) for pitch impulses, and 0.95 +/- 0.06 (right) and 1.01 +/- 0.07 (left) for yaw impulses (mean +/- 95% confidence intervals). 4. The eye rotation axis was well aligned with head rotation axis during roll, pitch, and yaw impulses: delta remained almost constant at approximately 5-10 degrees, so that the spatial misalignment angles were < or = 5 degrees. delta was 9.6 +/- 3.1 (counterclockwise) and 9.0 +/- 2.6 (clockwise) for roll impulses, 5.7 +/- 1.6 (up) and 6.1 +/- 1.9 (down) for pitch impulses, and 6.2 +/- 2.2 (right) and 7.9 +/- 1.5 (left) for yaw impulses (mean +/- 95% confidence intervals). 5. VOR gain (gamma) is the product of G and cos(delta). Because delta is small in normal subjects, gamma is not significantly different from G. At 80 ms after the onset of an impulse, gamma was 0.70 +/- 0.08 (counterclockwise) and 0.74 +/- 0.07 (clockwise) for roll impulses, 0.97 +/- 0.05 (up) and 1.09 +/- 0.09 (down) for pitch impulses, and 0.94 +/- 0.06 (right) and 1.00 +/- 0.07 (left) for yaw impulses (mean +/- 95% confidence intervals). 6. VOR latencies, estimated with a latency shift method, were 10.3 +/- 1.9 (SD) ms for roll impulses, 7.6 +/- 2.8 (SD) ms for pitch impulses, and 7.5 +/- 2.9 (SD) ms for yaw impulses. 7. We conclude that the normal VOR produces eye rotations that are almost perfectly compensatory in direction as well as in speed, but only during yaw and pitch impulses. During roll impulses, eye rotations are well aligned in direction, but are approximately 30% slower in speed.

We recorded three-dimensional eye movements during angular acceleration steps from 0 to 250 degrees/s at 20 degrees/s2 about an earth-vertical axis. Experiments were performed on 27 normal subjects and on 19 patients who had recovered well from unilateral vestibular deafferentation on the right or left side. In addition to compensatory horizontal eye movements, significant vertical and torsional eye movement components were elicited. These vertical and torsional eye velocity traces led to a shift of the axis of eye velocity away from the axis of head velocity. Horizontal, vertical, and torsional velocity components showed clear differences between normals and patients with unilateral vestibular deafferentation. In normals, the axis of eye velocity tilted backward and slightly away from the axis of head velocity. Patients showed similar, but more pronounced, shifts during rotations toward the intact ear and shifts in the opposite direction for rotations toward the operated ear. Eye velocity traces were analyzed with special consideration given to the orientation of the axis of eye velocity. We speculate that the vertical and torsional velocity components may be due to the effects of Listing's plane, as well as the contributions of the otolith signals.

Using dual torsion scleral search coils we have recorded 3-dimensional eye position during yaw angular accelerations of 20 degrees/s2 about an earth vertical axis in healthy subjects and in patients with unilateral vestibular deafferentation (UVD). These experiments produced two interesting results: i) even in healthy subjects, the axis of eye velocity did not coincide with the (earth vertical) stimulus axis during centred rotation; ii) Patients with UVD had torsional eye velocity components that were systematically different from those in normal subjects. While in normals the direction of the torsional component of the eye velocity depended on the direction of rotation and was on average approximately symmetric for CW and CCW yaw rotation, there was a clear asymmetry in patients, which was distinctly different for left and right UVD.

The static ocular torsional position of both eyes of 23 patients was measured by means of fundus photographs one day before and one week after unilateral vestibular neurectomy for the treatment of acoustic neuroma, Ménière's disease or paroxysmal vertigo. The results showed that in all patients the vestibular neurectomy caused both eyes to tort (i.e. to roll around the visual axis) toward the side of the neurectomy when measured one week after operation. The extent of this torsion was an average of 9.5 degrees one week after operation and there was no statistically significant difference in the average magnitude of the torsion in the two eyes. In 8 of these patients, additional measurements were made at intervals up to one year after operation and it was found that in these patients there is a significant reduction in torsion over time from an average of 10.2 degrees one week after operation to an average of 2.8 degrees by 16 weeks after operation. The change in torsional eye position following the neurectomy was accompanied by a change in the perceived visual orientation of a small (9.5 degrees visual angle) illuminated horizontal line at a straight ahead eye level position in an otherwise completely darkened room. One week after operation when asked to adjust the line to the perceived gravitational horizontal by rotating it in roll (i.e. around an X axis), patients who had had a right vestibular neurectomy consistently set the line so that the right side of the line (from the patient's point of view) was below the true gravitational horizontal. Similarly patients after a left neurectomy consistently set the line so that the left side of the line was below the true gravitational horizontal. There is a high correlation (r = 0.95) between the direction and magnitude of the change in torsional eye position and the direction and magnitude of the change in the perceived visual horizontal one week after operation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

We studied reversed optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) in 31 patients and found that it is actually the patient's own gaze-modulated spontaneous nystagmus shifted to the primary position of gaze by optokinetic stimulation. Two of our 31 patients were known to have congenital nystagmus. Most of the 29 others were adults who presented with neurological symptoms and nystagmus and were therefore suspected of having posterior fossa lesions. However, their nystagmographic findings and benign natural history suggest that they also had congenital nystagmus, which was unrecognized until they developed incidental neurological symptoms. These cases support the view that reversed OKN is pathognomonic of a benign, probably congenital, nystagmus.

Unilateral loss of horizontal semicircular canal function, termed canal paresis, is an important finding in dizzy patients. To our knowledge, apart from head-shaking nystagmus, no clinical sign of canal paresis has yet been described and the term derives from the characteristic finding on caloric tests: little or no nystagmus evoked by either hot or cold irrigation of the affected ear. We describe a simple and reliable clinical sign of total unilateral loss of horizontal semicircular canal function: one large or several small oppositely directed, compensatory, refixation saccades elicited by rapid horizontal head rotation toward the lesioned side. Using magnetic search coils to measure head and eye movement, we have validated this sign in 12 patients who had undergone unilateral vestibular neurectomy.

Head shaking and congenital nystagmus were recorded in a patient presented with visual tasks. When she was at rest the nystagmus took a 6 cycles per second saw-tooth wave-form. When she was attentive the nystagmus beat at a 2 to 2.6 cycles per second with a saddle-shaped deformation which permitted foveation. The head shaking occurred occasionally when the patient was attentive and was phase-locked to the nystagmus with resemblances in wave form and direction. Deceleration of the head shaking to zero velocity and peak displacement (to the left) coincided with the onset of the saddle of the nystagmus and hence assisted foveation; all other parts of the head-shaking cycle were detrimental to vision. It is proposed that the head shaking has a common pathological origin with the nystagmus and that, just as an isolated congenital nystagmus wave form becomes altered with attention to permit periods of foveal fixation, the pattern of combined head and eye nodding in this patient provided similar peroids of fixation.

Objective: Patients with superior canal dehiscence (SCD) have large sound-evoked vestibular reflexes with pathologically low threshold. We wished to determine whether a recently discovered measure of the vestibulo-ocular reflex--the ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (OVEMP)--produced similar high-amplitude, low-threshold responses in SCD, and could differentiate patients with SCD from normal control patients. Methods: Nine patients with CT-confirmed SCD and 10 normal controls were stimulated with 500 Hz, 2 ms tone bursts and 0.1 ms clicks at intensities up to 142 dB peak SPL. Conventional VEMPs were recorded from the ipsilateral sternocleidomastoid muscle to determine threshold, and OVEMPs were recorded from electrode pairs placed superior and inferior to the eyes. Three-dimensional eye movements were measured with scleral dual-search coils. Results: In patients with SCD, OVEMP amplitudes were significantly larger than normal (p<0.001) and thresholds were pathologically low. The n10 OVEMP in the contralateral inferior electrode became particularly large with increasing stimulus intensity (up to 25 μV) and with up-gaze (up to 40 μV). Sound-evoked (slow-phase) eye movements were present in all patients with SCD (vertical: upward; torsional: upper pole away from the affected side; and horizontal: towards or away from the affected side), but began only as the OVEMP response became maximal, which is consistent with the surface potentials being produced by activation of the extraocular muscles that generated the eye movements. Conclusions: OVEMP amplitude and threshold (particularly the contralateral inferior n10 response) differentiated patients with SCD from normal controls. Our findings suggest that both the OVEMPs and induced eye movements in SCD are a result of intense saccular activation in addition to superior canal stimulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]