Search

In this retrospective observational cohort study, we aimed to describe the rate of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circuit change, the associated risk factors and its relationship with patient characteristics and outcome in patients receiving venovenous (VV) ECMO at our center between January 2015 and November 2017. Twenty-seven percent of the patients receiving VV ECMO (n = 224) had at least one circuit change, which was associated with lower ICU survival (68% vs 82% p=0.032) and longer ICU stay (30 vs . 17 days p < 0.001). Circuit duration was similar when stratified by gender, clinical severity, or prior circuit change. Hematological abnormalities and increased transmembrane lung pressure (TMLP) were the most frequent indication for circuit change. The change in transmembrane lung resistance (Δ TMLR) gave better prediction of circuit change than TMLP, TMLR, or ΔTMLP. Low postoxygenator PO 2 was indicated as a reason for one-third of the circuit changes. However, the ECMO oxygen transfer was significantly higher in cases of circuit change with documented "low postoxygenator PO 2 " than those without (244 ± 62 vs. 200 ± 57 ml/min; p = 0.009). The results suggest that circuit change in VV ECMO is associated with worse outcomes, that the Δ TMLR is a better predictor of circuit change than TMLP, and that the postoxygenator PO 2 is an unreliable proxy for the oxygenator function., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2023.)

Objective: The criteria and process for liberation from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome are not standardized. The predictive accuracy of the oxygen challenge test as a diagnostic test in determining weaning and decannulation from venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was tested., Design: A single-centre, retrospective, observational cohort study., Setting: Tertiary referral severe respiratory failure centre in a university hospital in the United Kingdom., Patients: 253 adults with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation., Intervention: None., Measurements and Main Results: Patients had median age: 43 years (interquartile range: 32-52) years, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation days: 9 (interquartile range: 6-14) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score 17.5 (interquartile range: 15-20). Oxygen challenge test value (PaO 2-OCT ) with best prediction was 31 kPa (232 mmHg; sensitivity 0.74; specificity 0.70; area under curve 0.77 (confidence interval: 0.73-0.81)). PaO 2-OCT did not perform well as a prospective test to identify readiness to decannulation. Only 24 patients (10%) were decannulated 48 hours after their first positive oxygen challenge test (true positive) and 73.4% patients were false positives (positive oxygen challenge test but not decannulated). True positives had higher tidal volume (541 ± 218 vs 368 mL ± 210; p < 0.05) and minute ventilation (9.34 ± 5.36 vs 6.33 L/min ± 4.43; p < 0.05). Blood flow (3.17 ± 0.23 vs 3.53 L/min ± 0.56; p < 0.05), sweep gas flow (1.42 ±1.83 vs 3.74 L/min ± 2.43; p < 0.05) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation minute volume at time of first positive oxygen challenge test was lower in true positives (1.66 ± 2.26 vs 4.82 ± 3.43 L/min). This was a strong predictor for decannulation within 48 hours (area under curve: 0.88, confidence interval: 0.88-0.89)., Conclusions: In severe acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, the PaO 2-OCT is a poor predictor of readiness to decannulate from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Additional factors involved in the control of respiratory drive and carbon dioxide clearance, particularly native lung dead space and total minute ventilation, should be assessed.

This review focuses on the use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory failure across all blood flow ranges. Starting with a short overview of historical development, aspects of the physiology of gas exchange (i.e., oxygenation and decarboxylation) during extracorporeal circulation are discussed. The mechanisms of phenomena such as recirculation and shunt playing an important role in daily clinical practice are explained.Treatment of refractory and symptomatic hypoxemic respiratory failure (e.g., acute respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS]) currently represents the main indication for high-flow veno-venous-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. On the other hand, lower-flow extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal might potentially help to avoid or attenuate ventilator-induced lung injury by allowing reduction of the energy load (i.e., driving pressure, mechanical power) transmitted to the lungs during mechanical ventilation or spontaneous ventilation. In the latter context, extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal plays an emerging role in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients during acute exacerbations. Both applications of extracorporeal lung support raise important ethical considerations, such as likelihood of ultimate futility and end-of-life decision-making. The review concludes with a brief overview of potential technical developments and persistent challenges.

Objectives: Quantification of potential for lung recruitment may guide the ventilatory strategy in acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, there are no quantitative data on recruitability in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome who require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. We sought to quantify potential for lung recruitment and its relationship with outcomes in this cohort of patients., Design: A single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study., Setting: Tertiary referral severe respiratory failure center in a university hospital in the United Kingdom., Patients: Forty-seven adults with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation., Intervention: None., Measurements and Main Results: In patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome-mainly of pulmonary origin (86%)-the potential for lung recruitment and the weight of nonaerated, poorly aerated, normally aerated, and hyperaerated lung tissue were assessed at low (5 cmH2O) and high (45 cmH2O) airway pressures. Patients were categorized as high or low potential for lung recruitment based on the median potential for lung recruitment value of the study population. The median potential for lung recruitment was 24.3% (interquartile range = 11.4-37%) ranging from -2% to 76.3% of the total lung weight. Patients with potential for lung recruitment above the median had significantly shorter extracorporeal membrane oxygenation duration (8 vs 13 d; p = 0.013) and shorter ICU stay (15 vs 22 d; p = 0.028), but mortality was not statistically different (24% vs 46%; p = 0.159)., Conclusions: We observed significant variability in potential for lung recruitment in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Patients with high potential for lung recruitment had a shorter ICU stay and shorter extracorporeal membrane oxygenation duration.

Objectives: Minimally invasive extracorporeal CO2 removal is an accepted supportive treatment in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Conversely, the potential of such technique in treating acute respiratory distress syndrome patients remains to be investigated. The aim of this study was: 1) to quantify membrane lung CO2 removal (VCO2ML) under different conditions and 2) to quantify the natural lung CO2 removal (VCO2NL) and to what extent mechanical ventilation can be reduced while maintaining total expired CO2 (VCO2tot = VCO2ML + VCO2NL) and arterial PCO2 constant., Design: Experimental animal study., Setting: Department of Experimental Animal Medicine, University of Göttingen, Germany., Subjects: Eight healthy pigs (57.7 ± 5 kg)., Interventions: The animals were sedated, ventilated, and connected to the artificial lung system (surface 1.8 m, polymethylpentene membrane, filling volume 125 mL) through a 13F catheter. VCO2ML was measured under different combinations of inflow PCO2 (38.9 ± 3.3, 65 ± 5.7, and 89.9 ± 12.9 mm Hg), extracorporeal blood flow (100, 200, 300, and 400 mL/min), and gas flow (4, 6, and 12 L/min). At each setting, we measured VCO2ML, VCO2NL, lung mechanics, and blood gases., Measurements and Main Results: VCO2ML increased linearly with extracorporeal blood flow and inflow PCO2 but was not affected by gas flow. The outflow PCO2 was similar regardless of inflow PCO2 and extracorporeal blood flow, suggesting that VCO2ML was maximally exploited in each experimental condition. Mechanical ventilation could be reduced by up to 80-90% while maintaining a constant PaCO2., Conclusions: Minimally invasive extracorporeal CO2 removal removes a relevant amount of CO2 thus allowing mechanical ventilation to be significantly reduced depending on extracorporeal blood flow and inflow PCO2. Extracorporeal CO2 removal may provide the physiologic prerequisites for controlling ventilator-induced lung injury.

Extracorporeal gas exchange is increasingly used for various indications. Among these are refractory acute respiratory failure, including the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and the avoidance of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) by enabling lung-protective ventilation. Additionally, extracorporeal gas exchange allows the treatment of hypercapnic respiratory failure while helping to unload the respiratory muscles and avoid intubation and invasive ventilation, as well as facilitating weaning from the ventilator. These indications are based on a reasonable physiologic rationale but must be weighed against the costs and complications associated with the technique. This article summarizes current evidence and indications for extracorporeal gas exchange., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: The ratio of Pa O 2 to Fi O 2 (P/F) defines acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) severity and suggests appropriate therapies., Objectives: We investigated 1) whether a 150-mm-Hg P/F threshold within the range of moderate ARDS (100-200 mm Hg) would define two subgroups that were more homogeneous; and 2) which criteria led the clinicians to apply extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in severe ARDS., Methods: At the 150-mm-Hg P/F threshold, moderate patients were split into mild-moderate (n = 50) and moderate-severe (n = 55) groups. Patients with severe ARDS (Fi O 2 not available in three patients) were split into higher (n = 63) and lower (n = 18) Fi O 2 groups at an 80% Fi O 2 threshold., Measurements and Main Results: Compared with mild-moderate ARDS, patients with moderate-severe ARDS had higher peak pressures, Pa CO 2 , and pH. They also had heavier lungs, greater inhomogeneity, more noninflated tissue, and greater lung recruitability. Within 84 patients with severe ARDS (P/F < 100 mm Hg), 75% belonged to the higher Fi O 2 subgroup. They differed from the patients with severe ARDS with lower Fi O 2 only in Pa CO 2 and lung weight. Forty-one of 46 patients treated with ECMO belonged to the higher Fi O 2 group. Within this group, the patients receiving ECMO had higher Pa CO 2 than the 22 non-ECMO patients. The inhomogeneity ratio, total lung weight, and noninflated tissue were also significantly higher., Conclusions: Using the 150-mm-Hg P/F threshold gave a more homogeneous distribution of patients with ARDS across the severity subgroups and identified two populations that differed in their anatomical and physiological characteristics. The patients treated with ECMO belonged to the severe ARDS group, and almost 90% of them belonged to the higher Fi O 2 subgroup.