Search

Introduction: Prone position ventilation (PPV) of patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) supported with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) may improve oxygenation and alveolar recruitment and is recommended when extensive dorsal consolidations are present, but only few data regarding adverse events (AE) related to PPV in this group of patients have been published., Methods: Nationwide retrospective analysis of 68 COVID-19 patients admitted from March 2020 - December 2021 with severe ARDS and need of V-V ECMO support. The number of patients treated with PPV, number of PPV-events, timing, the time spent in prone position, number and causes of AE are reported. Causes to stop the PPV regimen and risk factors for AE were explored., Results: 44 out of 68 patients were treated with PPV, and 220 PPV events are evaluated. AE were identified in 99 out of 220 (45%) PPV events and occurred among 31 patients (71%). 1 fatal PPV related AE was registered. Acute supination occurred in 19 events (9%). Causes to stop the PPV regimen were almost equally distributed between effect (weaned from ECMO), no effect, death (of other reasons) and AE. Frequent causes of AE were pressures sores and ulcers, hypoxia, airway related and ECMO circuit related. Most AE occurred during patients first or second PPV event., Conclusions: PPV treatment was found to carry a high incidence of PPV related AE in these patients. Causes and preventive measures to reduce occurrence of PPV related AE during V-V ECMO support need further exploration., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has increased, although its survival benefit in trauma patients with severe adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains controversial. We investigated the effect of veno-venous (VV)-ECMO on the clinical outcomes of trauma patients with severe ARDS., Methods: This was a retrospective study at a single center comprising trauma patients admitted between January 2013 and December 2017, diagnosed with severe ARDS using the Berlin definition (PaO2/FiO2 ratio ⩽100), in the 7 days following trauma. Patients were managed with VV-ECMO or conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality (mortality at 60 days); secondary outcomes comprised 28-day mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, ICU-free days, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), and MV-free days. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for the baseline differences., Results: Sixteen patients (22.5%) were managed with VV-ECMO and 55 were managed with CMV. After matching, the in-hospital mortality rate (43.8% vs 53.1%; p  = 0.760), 28-day mortality rate (37.5% vs 31.3%; p  = 0.750), median hospital LOS (39.5 vs 36.5 days; p  = 0.533), ICU-free days (0 vs 0 days; p  = 0.241), and MV-free days (0 vs 0 days; p  = 0.272) did not significantly differ between the VV-ECMO and CMV groups., Conclusion: In-hospital mortality (mortality at 60 days) did not differ significantly between the VV-ECMO and CMV groups. Although the safety of ECMO in trauma patients requires further investigation, VV-ECMO may be considered as a rescue therapy.

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a potential option for the management of severe acute respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19. Conflicting the use of this therapy is the known coagulopathy within COVID-19, leading to an incidence of venous thrombotic events of 25% to 49%. To date, limited guidance is available on optimal anticoagulation strategies in this population., Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utilization of a pharmacist-driven bivalirudin dosing protocol for anticoagulation in the setting of ECMO for COVID-19-associated respiratory failure., Methods: This was a single-center retrospective chart review over a 9-month period of patients receiving bivalirudin while on ECMO. All patients with acute respiratory failure requiring ECMO with a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction were included. Bivalirudin was dosed via aPTT monitoring after a starting dose of 0.2 or 0.3 mg/kg/h., Results: There were 33 patients included in this study, all receiving mechanical ventilation. The most common starting dose of bivalirudin was 0.2 mg/kg/h, with an average time to therapeutic range of 20 hours. Compared to previous reports, rates of bleeding were low at 15.1%, and 6.1% of patients developed a new venous thromboembolic event while on ECMO. ECMO survival was 51.5%, with an ICU mortality rate of 48.5%., Conclusion and Relevance: In the first published report of its use within this population, bivalirudin was found to be a viable choice for anticoagulation in those patients on ECMO for severe respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19.

The successful use of prolonged (ie, >28 days) veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) is being increasingly reported. However, limited data are available on its outcomes. This study investigated the outcomes of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients on prolonged ECMO support. We retrospectively evaluated 57 patients requiring V-V ECMO for ARDS between 2015 and 2020. The patients were divided into two groups according to ECMO duration: (a) ≤28 days group (n = 43, 75%) or (b) >28 days (n = 14, 25%) group. Clinical characteristics, complications, and outcomes between these two groups were statistically compared. There were no significant differences in demographics, comorbidity, ARDS etiology, and severity scores between the two groups. However, the mechanical ventilation period before ECMO initiation was significantly longer in the >28 days group than in the ≤28 days group (10.5 days vs. 1 day; P < .05). The incidence of positive bacterial blood culture results during ECMO was significantly higher in the >28 days group than in the ≤28 days group (43% vs. 9%; P < .05). Additionally, the hospital survival rate was significantly lower in the >28 days group than in the ≤28 days ECMO group (21% vs. 60%; P < .05). Prolonged ECMO was associated with worse hospital survival outcomes. Early initiation of ECMO along with meticulous care and appropriate treatment against infection during ECMO could improve the hospital survival of ARDS patients on prolonged ECMO support., (© 2021 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is increasingly used for severe but potentially reversible acute respiratory failure in adults; however, there are limited data regarding long-term morbidity. At our institution, most patients requiring veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have been followed up by a single physician. Our primary aim was to describe the serial long-term morbidity for respiratory, musculoskeletal and psychological functioning., A retrospective audit of inpatient and outpatient medical records was conducted. A total of 125 patients treated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for primary respiratory failure were included. The patients were young (mean (standard deviation) age 43.7 (4.1) years), obese (mean (standard deviation) body mass index 30.8 (10.4) kg/m 2 ), and mostly were male (59%). Most patients (60%) had no comorbidities., The survival rate to discharge was 70%, with body mass index and the number of comorbidities being independent predictors of survival on multiple logistic regression analysis. Over half (57%) of the Australian survivors had regular outpatient follow-up. They had a median of three reviews (range 1-9) over a median of 11.8 months (range 1.5-79) months. Breathlessness and weakness resolved in most within six months, with lung function abnormalities taking longer to resolve. Over half (60%) returned to employment within six months of discharge. Over a quarter (29%) displayed symptoms of anxiety, depression or post-traumatic stress disorder.

Legionella community-acquired pneumonia necessitating veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome has been reported in adults. However, few options remain in cases of refractory hypoxemia on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Herein, we describe adjunctive extended therapeutic hypothermia for refractory hypoxemia despite veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for successful management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to Legionella.

Objective: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used to provide support for patients with cardiopulmonary failure. Best available medical management often fails in these patients and referring hospitals have no further recourse for escalating care apart from transfer to a tertiary facility. In severely unstable patients, the only option might be to use ECMO to facilitate safe transport. This study aimed to examine the characteristics and outcomes of patients transported while receiving ECMO., Methods: Statistical analysis was performed on data gathered retrospectively from the electronic medical records of adult patients transported while receiving ECMO to Columbia University Medical Center between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2017., Results: Two hundred sixty five adult patients were safely transported while receiving ECMO with no transport-related complications that adversely affected outcomes. Transport distance ranged from 0.2 to 7084 miles with a median distance of 16.9 miles. One hundred eighty-three (69%) received on veno-venous, 72 (27%) veno-arterial, and 10 (3.8%) veno-venous arterial or veno-arterial venous configurations. Two hundred ten (79%) cannulations were performed at our institution at the referring hospital. Sixty-four percent of patients transported while receiving ECMO survived to hospital discharge., Conclusions: Interfacility transport during ECMO was shown to be safe and effective with minimal complications and favorable outcomes when performed at an experienced referral center using stringently applied protocols., (Copyright © 2018 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is a valuable life support in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in adult patients. However, the success of VV-ECMO is known to be influenced by the baseline settings of mechanical ventilation (MV) before its institution. This study was aimed at identifying the baseline ventilator parameters which were independently associated with hospital mortality in non-trauma patients receiving VV-ECMO for severe ARDS., Methods: This retrospective study included 106 non-trauma patients (mean age: 53 years) who received VV-ECMO for ARDS in a single medical center from 2007 to 2016. The indication of VV-ECMO was severe hypoxemia (P a O 2 / FiO 2 ratio < 70 mmHg) under pressure-controlled MV with peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) > 35 cmH 2 O, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) > 5 cmH 2 O, and F i O 2  > 0.8. Important demographic and clinical data before and during VV-ECMO were collected for analysis of hospital mortality., Results: The causes of ARDS were bacterial pneumonia (n = 41), viral pneumonia (n = 24), aspiration pneumonitis (n = 3), and others (n = 38). The median duration of MV before ECMO institution was 3 days and the overall hospital mortality was 53% (n = 56). The medians of PaO 2 / FiO 2 ratio, PIP, PEEP, and dynamic pulmonary compliance (PC dyn ) at the beginning of MV were 84 mmHg, 32 cmH 2 O, 10 cmH 2 O, and 21 mL/cmH 2 O, respectively. However, before the beginning of VV-ECMO, the medians of PaO 2 / FiO 2 ratio, PIP, PEEP, and PC dyn became 69 mmHg, 36 cmH 2 O, 14 cmH 2 O, and 19 mL/cmH 2 O, respectively. The escalation of PIP and the declines in PaO 2 / FiO 2 ratio and PC dyn were significantly correlated with the duration of MV before ECMO institution. Finally, the duration of MV (OR: 1.184, 95% CI: 1.079-1.565, p < 0.001) was found to be the only baseline ventilator parameter that independently affected the hospital mortality in these ECMO-treated patients., Conclusion: Since the duration of MV before ECMO institution was strongly correlated to the outcome of adult respiratory ECMO, medical centers are suggested to find a suitable prognosticating tool to determine the starting point of respiratory ECMO among their candidates with different duration of MV., Trial Registration: This study reported a health care intervention on human participants and was retrospectively registered. The Chang Gung Medical Foundation Institutional Review Board approved the study (no. 201601483B0 ) on November 23, 2016. All of the data were extracted from December 1, 2016, to January 31, 2017.

Introduction: ECMO provides respiratory and circulatory support in critically ill patients. In our study, we report on a single center experience with ECMO and aim to identify the prognostic markers for survival to discharge from hospital., Methods: A registry was maintained on all patients who underwent ECMO implantation from September 2012 till January 2016 at a single institution. The collected data was analyzed to identify baseline characteristics, outcomes including clinical variables predictive of poor outcome., Results: A total of 29 patients underwent ECMO implantation. The average age of patients was 42±18years. 59% were males (N=17). 19 cases had a cardiac indication for ECMO (66%) while 10 cases had a pulmonary indication (34%). On univariate analysis; presence of Multi-organ failure, SOFA score more than 18 and hemoglobin less than 10g/dl at baseline and after ECMO removal were associated with increased 30day mortality. Pearson correlation with 30day mortality showed a positive correlation with MOF (+0.562, p=0.002) and SOFA score >18 (+0.448, p=0.015) and a negative correlation with anemia (-0.507, p=0.005). 15 out of the total 29 patients (52%) died within 30days of admission. Patients with MOF (log rank: 10.926, p=0.001), SOFA score >18 (log rank: 7.758, p=0.005) and hemoglobin <10g/dl (log rank: 5.595, p=0.018) had decreased survival on 30day follow up., Conclusions: Although the use of ECMO as a last line in the treatment of critical patients refractory to conventional treatment measures constitutes an important improvement in their care; with 48% overall survival; patient selection and timing of ECMO initiation remains challenging. Patients who already had signs of MOF and a high SOFA score portended a poor response. Similarly for anemic patients. Hence the importance of consideration for ECMO use earlier in course of illness rather than later. Screening and aggressive treatment of anemia in those patients may help improve the outcomes., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background Methods Results Conclusion Severe acute respiratory syndrome (ARDS) may require veno‐venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V‐V ECMO). The aim of this study was to provide data on patient selection and outcome in a nationwide cohort study of patients with COVID‐19 associated ARDS supported with V‐V ECMO.We identified all patients with COVID‐19, who were supported with V‐V ECMO in Denmark from March 10, 2020, to December 31, 2021, and retrieved data on patients who were referred to‐ and accepted for ECMO, demographics, outcome data, and complications. Risk factors for mortality were analysed using multivariate Cox regression analysis.During the study period, 1836 patients were admitted to Danish intensive care units (ICUs). In the same period, there were 197 enquiries for ECMO of whom 118 patients were considered eligible. Overall, 71 patients were cannulated for ECMO; three patients were cannulated for veno‐arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V‐A ECMO) due to right sided heart failure and 68 patients were cannulated for V‐V ECMO. Two patients accepted for V‐V ECMO died during cannulation. The median age was 55 years (IQR 45–60) and 66% were males. The median duration of ECMO support was 13 days (IQR 7–21), mechanical ventilation median 26 days (IQR 14–42), ICU stay median 34 days (IQR 17–46), and length of hospital stay median 41 days (IQR 25–56). Ninety‐day mortality was 43%. Age of 60 years or more was associated with an increased risk of mortality. Pre‐existing hypertension was associated with a decreased risk of mortality.A nationwide, Danish cohort study of 68 COVID‐19 patients supported with V‐V ECMO, showed a 90‐day survival of 43%, which is in accordance with reports from comparable cohorts. Age of 60 years or more was associated with an increased risk of mortality. Pre‐existing hypertension was associated with a decreased risk of mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Maintaining the patient awake and not intubated during the venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) reduces the risk of ventilation-induced lung injury in patients with ARDS. Currently, there is a lack of data on outcomes and complications associated with the awake ECMO approach. Objectives: To evaluate outcomes and the occurrence of complications of awake ECMO approach guided by local safety protocol comprising ultrasound-guided cannulation, argatroban-based anticoagulation, respiratory support, and routine sedation targeted to reduce respiratory effort and keeping nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:1. Design: A single-center retrospective case series analysis. Methods: Consecutive patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (CARDS) treated by full awake VV ECMO approach from April 2019 to December 2023 were eligible. Results: Our center treated 10 patients (mean age 54.7 ± 11.6 years) with CARDS with an awake ECMO approach. The reasons for awake ECMO included the presence of barotrauma in six patients, a team consensus to prefer awake ECMO instead of mechanical ventilation in three patients, and the patient's refusal to be intubated in one case. Before ECMO, patients were severely hypoxemic, with a mean value of Horowitz index of 48.9 ± 9.1 mmHg and a mean respiratory rate of 28.8 ± 7.3 breaths per minute on high-flow nasal cannula or noninvasive ventilation support. The mean duration of awake VV ECMO was 558.0 ± 173.6 h. Seven patients (70%) were successfully disconnected from ECMO and fully recovered. Intubation from respiratory causes was needed in three patients (30%), all of whom died eventually. In total, three episodes of delirium, two episodes of significant bleeding, one pneumothorax requiring chest tube insertion, and one oxygenator acute exchange occurred throughout the 5580 h of awake ECMO. No complications related to cannula displacement or malposition occurred. Conclusion: The awake ECMO strategy guided by safety protocol appears to be a safe approach in conscious, severely hypoxemic, non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related ARDS. Plain language summary: Enhancing the safety and effectiveness of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy in awake, spontaneously breathing patients with the most severe form of COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) Why Was the Study Done? Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) represents a life-saving therapeutic approach that ensures appropriate gas exchange in patients with the most severe form of respiratory failure – acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Typically, patients are connected to ECMO when already deeply sedated and mechanically ventilated. The awake ECMO approach (keeping the patient awake, not intubated, and breathing spontaneously during ECMO support) minimizes the risks associated with mechanical ventilation and provides several relevant physiological benefits. However, the awake ECMO approach is also associated with several significant risks, including delirium, bleeding, and cannula displacement. Published papers have reported relatively frequent complications and method failures. What Did the Researchers Do? To address safety concerns regarding the awake ECMO approach, we present a single-center retrospective analysis of ten COVID-19-related ARDS patients treated with the awake ECMO approach, guided by the local safety protocol. What Did the Researchers Find? The awake ECMO approach yielded success (i.e., the patient was not intubated for respiratory causes, was successfully disconnected from ECMO, and fully recovered in seven patients (70.0%), outperforming previously published efficacy ranges. Three patients were intubated due to the progression of respiratory failure and eventually died. The incidence of adverse events during the 5,580 hours of awake ECMO was considered low. No cannula displacement or malposition occurred despite routine active physiotherapy, including walking during ECMO treatment in three patients. What Do the Findings Mean? The general applicability of the study is limited by the low number of patients and the retrospective monocentric design. However, the presented data illustrate real-life clinical scenarios and could aid clinicians in managing severely hypoxemic but still conscious and cooperative patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Preclinical animal models are crucial for advancing the clinical management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, there is a lack of positive findings from preclinical studies that translate into clinical practice. One possible reason for this is the inadequate optimization of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during injury development in animal models. Insufficient PEEP levels can lead to the inclusion of subjects with mild lung injury, resulting in erroneous conclusions. Therefore, it is important to prioritize PEEP optimization in preclinical ARDS models to achieve consistent and clinically relevant lung injury. A study conducted on an ovine model of ARDS found that optimizing PEEP during injury development can significantly alter injury levels and align them more accurately with clinical practice. Future preclinical studies should also incorporate clinically relevant adjunctive therapies to better replicate the complexity of ARDS in real-world scenarios. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly employed to support lung function in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). However, the long-term outcomes of the approach have not been encouraging when compared to those of conventional mechanical ventilation. Further, the long-term effects of ECMO on lung function and recovery are unclear. For this review, we examined the long-term lung function outcomes of patients with ARF treated with and without ECMO. Methods: We searched the Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and PubMed sites for studies comparing long-term (≥ 6 months) pulmonary function test results in patients with ARF treated with and without ECMO published until January 2024. We conducted a meta-analysis for percentage predicted values. Results: We included five studies. Our meta-analysis showed similar values of forced vital capacity (FVC%) (MD, 0.47; 95% CI, -3.56–4.50) and forced expiratory flow in the first second % (MD, 1.79; 95% CI, -2.17–5.75) in patients with ARF treated with or without ECMO. The FEV1/FVC % values were slightly higher in patients treated with ECMO than in those without ECMO (MD, 2.03; 95% CI, 0.01–4.04; p-value = 0.05). According to the meta-analysis, the values for total lung capacity % (MD, -3.20; 95% CI, -8.83–2.44) and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity % (MD, -0.72; 95% CI, -3.83–2.39) were also similar between patients undergoing ECMO and those without it. Conclusion: The meta-analysis of a small number of studies with significant selection bias indicates that patients with ARF treated with ECMO may have comparable long-term pulmonary function recovery to those treated with conventional strategies. Further investigations including a larger number of patients and focusing on the long-term impact of ECMO are needed to supplement the current evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Study Design and Methods Results Discussion Anticoagulation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) might still lead to severe bleeding complications. Heparin is the most frequently used anticoagulant, but novel drugs could be promising. Argatroban is a new alternative to heparin. To date, no robust studies have confirmed the clear superiority of argatroban (AG) over heparin, although it has some advantages and may be safer.An observational study was conducted in all adult veno‐venous ECMO patients with COVID‐19‐associated acute respiratory distress syndrome admitted to the University Hospital Ostrava (n = 63). They were anticoagulated with heparin in the first period and with AG in the second period, targeting the same activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT; 45–60 s). Bleeding complications requiring transfusion and life‐threatening bleeding events were evaluated. The primary objective was to compare heparin and AG in terms of bleeding, transfusion requirements and mortality‐related bleeding.The total time on ECMO per patient was 16 days with an in‐hospital mortality of 55.6%. The red blood cell consumption in the AG group (median 2.7 transfusions/week) was significantly lower than in the heparin group (median 4.2 transfusions/week, p = 0.011). Life‐threatening bleeding complications were higher in the heparin group compared to the AG group (35.7% vs. 10.2%, p = 0.035), and mortality‐related bleeding complications were also higher in the heparin group (21.4% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.032).Argatroban is an interesting alternative to heparin with less bleeding, less need for red blood cell transfusions and improved safety of ECMO with less mortality‐related bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The World Health Organization recommends extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a therapeutic option for the most critical cases of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, data on universally agreed-upon risk factors that contribute to ECMO weaning failure and mortality in COVID-19 patients undergoing ECMO are limited. This lack of consensus leads to significant uncertainties in developing effective management strategies for these patients. We aimed to identify the factors associated with early outcomes after ECMO support in patients with COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome, specifically the success rate of ECMO weaning and in-hospital mortality. Methods: We reviewed 25 patients with COVID-19 who received ECMO support at a single institution between January 2020 and July 2022. This retrospective data collection and review included clinical characteristics, adjunctive treatments, complications, and early patient outcomes. Results: A total of 72% of the patients were successfully weaned off ECMO, and 68% were discharged alive. Significant associations were observed between ECMO weaning success and in-hospital survival, particularly younger age and a history of rehabilitation therapy. Furthermore, the absence of a history of immunosuppressive therapy contributed significantly to successful ECMO weaning. Conclusions: Younger age and the implementation of rehabilitation therapy are associated with improved outcomes in patients with COVID-19 receiving ECMO support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This secondary data analysis of 620 hospitals examined how hospital capabilities and resources (for example, intensive care unit types and bed availability) influenced COVID-19 volume–outcome relationships. The analysis found that, regardless of hospital capability, as patient volumes surged, survival decreased. The article suggests that strategies to balance caseload surges across hospitals may help ensure patient safety. Visual Abstract. Association Between Hospital Type and Resilience During Caseload Stress: A Natural Quality-of-Care Experiment From the COVID-19 Pandemic This secondary data analysis of 620 hospitals examined how hospital capabilities and resources (for example, intensive care unit types and bed availability) influenced COVID-19 volume–outcome relationships. The analysis found that, regardless of hospital capability, as patient volumes surged, survival decreased. The article suggests that strategies to balance caseload surges across hospitals may help ensure patient safety. Background: Imbalances between hospital caseload and care resources that strained U.S. hospitals during the pandemic have persisted after the pandemic amid ongoing staff shortages. Understanding which hospital types were more resilient to pandemic overcrowding-related excess deaths may prioritize patient safety during future crises. Objective: To determine whether hospital type classified by capabilities and resources (that is, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO] capability, multiplicity of intensive care unit [ICU] types, and large or small hospital) influenced COVID-19 volume–outcome relationships during Delta wave surges. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: 620 U.S. hospitals in the PINC AI Healthcare Database. Participants: Adult inpatients with COVID-19 admitted July to November 2021. Measurements: Hospital-months were ranked by previously validated surge index (severity-weighted COVID-19 inpatient caseload relative to hospital bed capacity) percentiles. Hierarchical models were used to evaluate the effect of log-transformed surge index on the marginally adjusted probability of in-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice. Effect modification was assessed for by 4 mutually exclusive hospital types. Results: Among 620 hospitals recording 223 380 inpatients with COVID-19 during the Delta wave, there were 208 ECMO-capable, 216 multi-ICU, 36 large (≥200 beds) single-ICU, and 160 small (<200 beds) single-ICU hospitals. Overall, 50 752 (23%) patients required admission to the ICU, and 34 274 (15.3%) died. The marginally adjusted probability for mortality was 5.51% (95% CI, 4.53% to 6.50%) per unit increase in the log surge index (strain attributable mortality = 7375 [CI, 5936 to 8813] or 1 in 5 COVID-19 deaths). The test for interaction showed no difference (P  = 0.32) in log surge index–mortality relationship across 4 hospital types. Results were consistent after excluding transferred patients, restricting to patients with acute respiratory failure and mechanical ventilation, and using alternative strain metrics. Limitation: Residual confounding. Conclusion: Comparably detrimental relationships between COVID-19 caseload and survival were seen across all hospital types, including highly advanced centers, and well beyond the pandemic's learning curve. These lessons from the pandemic heighten the need to minimize caseload surges and their effects across all hospital types during public health and staffing crises. Primary Funding Source: Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years the number of patients treated in intensive care units by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) due to severe respiratory failure or cardiogenic shock has steadily increased [1]. Consequently, the number of invasive procedures and operations in these patients has also increased. A fundamental understanding of these systems and the clinical indications is therefore helpful for the practicing (non-cardiac) surgeon. This review article focuses on peripheral ECMO procedures: venovenous (V-V) ECMO for patients with respiratory failure and venoarterial (V-A) ECMO for circulatory support in cardiogenic shock. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Prone positioning (PP) has demonstrated its potential for improving outcomes in patients with ARDS who require invasive mechanical ventilation. However, the ability of prolonged proning to reduce mortality in patients with COVID-19 specifically, sessions lasting > 24 h remains uncertain. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we examined 158 subjects with COVID-19 pneumonia who required mechanical ventilation due to moderate-to-severe ARDS. Seventy-six subjects were placed in standard PP and 82 in extended PP, defined as prone sessions lasting at least 32 h. Our primary aim was to evaluate the effect of EPP on 90-d survival in subjects with COVID-19 with acute severe respiratory failure. To ensure the reliability of our findings and to minimize bias, we applied 3 adjustment approaches: cardinality matching (CM), matching weighting (MW), and inverse probability of treatment weighting with stabilized and trimmed weights (SW). We used Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models to analyze the effects of EPP on 90-d mortality and sensitivity analysis by calculating E-values. RESULTS: The overall crude 90-d mortality rate was 31.7%. The unadjusted 90-d mortality rates were 19.5% in the EPP group and 44.7% in the SPP group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.35 [95% CI 0.19- 0.63], P < .001). After adjustment for confounding factors using CM, MW, and SW, baseline covariates were balanced between the 2 groups. Subjects in the EPP group exhibited lower 90-d mortality rates after adjustment using CM (HR 0.42 [95% CI 0.23-0.79], P = .007), MW (HR 0.45 [95% CI 0.21-0.95], P = .036), or SW (HR 0.29 [95% CI 0.15-0.56], P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Extended PP was associated with improved 90-d survival in subjects with COVID-19 undergoing mechanical ventilation for severe ARDS. These findings suggest the potential benefit of EPP in the management of COVID-19-related respiratory failure. Further research and prospective studies are warranted to confirm and elucidate the underlying mechanisms of this association. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses the use of the ProtekDuo cannula for drainage in central venopulmonary-aortic ECMO during bilateral orthotopic lung transplantation. It presents a case report of a patient who successfully used the ProtekDuo cannula for an extended period of time. The article emphasizes the importance of organ donation and the challenges in meeting the demand for organs. It also addresses ethical considerations and the need for further research in organ transplantation. This resource provides valuable information for those interested in understanding the complexities and advancements in this field. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Bacterial pneumonia is one of the most common causes of acute respiratory distress syndrome. In fulminant cases, when mechanical ventilation fails, veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is required. However, this method is still associated with significant mortality and a wide range of potential complications. However, there are now many case reports of good outcomes even in patients with prolonged extracorporeal oxygenation, as in our rather complicated case report. Case presentation: Our case report describes a complicated but successful treatment of a severe, devastating bacterial pneumonia in a 39-year-old European polymorbid woman with a rare form of diabetes mellitus, which had been poorly compensated for a long time with limited compliance, in the context of a combined immunodeficiency that strongly influenced the course of the disease. The patient's hospitalization required a total of 30 days of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy and more than 50 days of mechanical ventilation. Numerous complications, particularly bleeding, required seven chest drains, two extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit changes, and one surgical revision. The patient's mental state required repeated psychiatric intervention. Conclusion: It is possible that even the initially severely damaged lung parenchyma can develop its regenerative potential if suitable conditions are provided for this process, including a sufficiently long period of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. We believe that this case report may also contribute to the consideration of the indications and contraindications of extracorporeal support. The authors also discuss the limitations and risks of prolonged veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support and periprocedural anticoagulation strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Methods Results Conclusion Barotrauma is a frequent complication in patients with severe respiratory failure and is associated with poor outcomes. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) implantation allows to introduce lung‐protective ventilation strategies that limit barotrauma development or progression, but available data are scarce. We performed a scoping review to summarize current knowledge on this therapeutic approach.We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies investigating ECMO as a strategy to prevent/limit barotrauma progression in patients with respiratory failure. Pediatric studies, studies on perioperative implantation of ECMO, and studies not reporting original data were excluded. The primary outcome was the rate of barotrauma development/progression.We identified 21 manuscripts presenting data on a total of 45 ECMO patients. All patients underwent veno‐venous ECMO. Of these, 21 (46.7%) received ECMO before invasive mechanical ventilation. In most cases, ECMO implantation allowed to modify the respiratory support strategy (e.g., introduction of ultraprotective/low pressure ventilation in 12 patients, extubation while on ECMO in one case, and avoidance of invasive ventilation in 15 cases). Barotrauma development/progression occurred in <10% of patients. Overall mortality was 8/45 (17.8%).ECMO implantation to prevent barotrauma development/progression is a feasible strategy and may be a promising support option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Improvements in oxygenation and lung mechanics with prone position (PP) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are inconstant. The objectives of the study were (i) to identify baseline variables, including the recruitment-to-inflation ratio (R/I), associated with a positive response to PP in terms of oxygenation (improvement of the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure over the inspired oxygen fraction (PaO2/FiO2) ≥ 20 mmHg) and lung mechanics; (ii) to evaluate whether the response to the previous PP session is associated with the response to the next session. Methods: In this prospective, observational, single-center study in patients who underwent PP for ARDS due to COVID-19, respiratory variables were assessed just before PP and at the end of the session. Respiratory variables included mechanical ventilation settings and respiratory mechanics variables, including R/I, an estimate of the potential for lung recruitment compared to lung overinflation. Results: In 50 patients, 201 PP sessions lasting 19 ± 3 h were evaluated. Neuromuscular blockades were used in 116 (58%) sessions. The PaO2/FiO2 ratio increased from 109 ± 31 mmHg to 165 ± 65 mmHg, with an increase ≥ 20 mmHg in 142 (71%) sessions. In a mixed effect logistic regression, only pre-PP PaO2/FiO2 (OR 1.12 (95% CI [1.01–1.24])/every decrease of 10 mmHg, p = 0.034) in a first model and improvement in oxygenation at the previous PP session (OR 3.69 (95% CI [1.27–10.72]), p = 0.017) in a second model were associated with an improvement in oxygenation with PP. The R/I ratio (n = 156 sessions) was 0.53 (0.30–0.76), separating lower- and higher-recruiters. Whereas PaO2/FiO2 improved to the same level in both subgroups, driving pressure and respiratory system compliance improved only in higher-recruiters (from 14 ± 4 to 12 ± 4 cmH2O, p = 0.027, and from 34 ± 11 to 38 ± 13 mL/cmH2O, respectively, p = 0.014). Conclusions: A lower PaO2/FiO2 at baseline and a positive O2-response at the previous PP session are associated with a PP-induced improvement in oxygenation. In higher-recruiters, lung mechanics improved along with oxygenation. Benefits of PP could thus be greater in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Survival after lung transplantation has significantly improved during the last two decades. The refinement of the already existing extracorporeal life support (ECLS) systems, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and the introduction of new techniques for donor lung optimization, such as ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP), have allowed the extension of transplant indication to patients with end-stage lung failure after acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and the expansion of the donor organ pool, due to the better evaluation and optimization of extended-criteria donor (ECD) lungs and of donors after circulatory death (DCD). The close monitoring of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) has allowed the early recognition of pulmonary antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which requires a completely different treatment and has a worse prognosis than acute cellular rejection (ACR). As such, the standardization of patient selection and post-transplant management has significantly contributed to this positive trend, especially at high-volume centers. This review focuses on lung transplantation after ARDS, on the role of EVLP in lung donor expansion, on ECMO as a principal cardiopulmonary support system in lung transplantation, and on the diagnosis and therapy of pulmonary AMR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Background: The COVID-19 pandemic presented significant challenges in managing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) being a critical but resource-intensive intervention. (2) Methods: This retrospective study analyzed veno-venous (VV) ECMO therapy in ARDS patients before and during the pandemic at a high-volume ECMO center in Germany. The study used a reduced ECMO team (one medical and one nursing specialist) to optimize patient care with limited resources, aiming to offer insights for future pandemic management. Data from 181 adult patients (age ≥ 18) with severe ARDS were analyzed: 57 pre-pandemic and 124 during the pandemic. (3) Results: Despite increased isolation measures during the pandemic (25% pre-COVID-19 vs. 79% during COVID-19, p < 0.0001), there was no significant change in transportation mode (ground vs. air) or ECMO implantation times at local hospitals. Similarly, time and distance for primary ECMO transport remained unchanged between the two periods. Complication rates related to ECMO circuit placement and prolonged transport were also insignificant across groups. However, ECMO therapy duration (median 12 days pre-COVID-19 vs. 19 days during COVID-19, p < 0.0001) and hospital stays (median 3 days pre-COVID-19 vs. 7 days during COVID-19, p < 0.01) were longer during the pandemic. Mortality rates were also higher during the pandemic (49% pre-COVID-19 vs. 65% during COVID-19, p < 0.05). (4) Conclusions: In conclusion, a reduced ECMO team proved to be an effective resource-saving strategy that maintained high-quality care with low complication rates, despite the additional challenges posed by pandemic-related isolation measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This narrative review delves into the intricate interplay between the lungs and the kidneys, with a focus on elucidating the pathogenesis of diseases influenced by immunological factors, acid–base regulation, and blood gas disturbances, as well as assessing the effects of various therapeutic modalities on these interactions. Key disorders, such as anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) disease, the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH), and Anti-neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV), are also examined to shed light on their underlying mechanisms. This review also explores the relationship between acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and acute kidney injury (AKI), emphasizing how inflammatory mediators can lead to systemic damage and impact multiple organs. In ARDS, fluid overload exacerbates pulmonary edema, while imbalances in blood volume, such as hypovolemia or hypervolemia, can precipitate renal dysfunction. The review highlights how mechanical ventilation strategies can compromise renal blood flow, trigger systemic inflammation, and induce hemodynamic and neurohormonal alterations, all contributing to lung and kidney damage. The impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on lung–kidney interactions is evaluated, highlighting its role in severe respiratory failure and its renal implications. Emerging therapies, such as mesenchymal stem cells and extracellular vesicles, are discussed as promising avenues to mitigate organ damage and enhance outcomes in critically ill patients. Overall, this review offers a nuanced exploration of lung–kidney dynamics, bridging historical insights with contemporary perspectives. It underscores the clinical significance of these interactions in critically ill patients and advocates for integrated management approaches to optimize patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has grown rapidly, driven by the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite its widespread adoption, neurological complications pose a significant risk, impacting both mortality and survivors' quality of life. Detecting these complications is challenging due to sedation and the heterogeneous nature of ECMO-associated neurological injury. Still, consensus of neurologic monitoring during ECMO is lacking since utilization and effectiveness of current neuromonitoring methods are limited. Especially in view of the heterogeneous nature of neurological injury during ECMO support an easily acquirable biomarker tracing neuronal damage independently from the underlying pathomechanism would be favorable. In a single-center prospective study on 34 severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients undergoing ECMO, we explored the potential of serum neurofilament light chain levels (NfL) as a biomarker for neurological complications and its predictive power towards the overall outcome of ECMO patients. Individuals experiencing neurological complications (41%) demonstrated a notable rise in NfL levels (Tbaseline median 92.95 pg/ml; T24h median 132 pg/ml (IQR 88.6–924 pg/ml), p = 0.008; T7d median 248 pg/ml (IQR 157–1090 pg/ml), p = 0.001). Moreover, under ECMO therapy, these patients exhibited markedly elevated concentrations compared to those without neurological complications (T24h median 70.75 pg/ml (IQR 22.2–290 pg/ml), p = 0.023; T7d median 128 pg/ml (IQR 51.8–244 pg/ml), p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the NfL dynamics between surviving patients and those who died during or shortly after ECMO therapy. While NfL indicates neuro-axonal damage during intensive care with ECMO therapy, we could not identify any correlation between survival outcome and the levels of NfL, indicating that NfL may not serve as a prognostic marker for survival. Nevertheless, additional studies involving a larger patient cohort are required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Due to an ageing population and prolonged lifespan, pressure injury (PI) incidence is increasing. Patients with a PI typically endure longer hospital stays, which create a significant burden on healthcare resources and costs. With appropriate preventive interventions, most PIs can be avoided; however, skin failure may become inevitable in particular instances. These are classified as unavoidable PIs. Patients in a critical condition are exposed to a unique set of therapies, medications and bodily states. Oftentimes, these instances decrease tissue tolerance, which may promote PI formation. Patients who are critically ill, especially those with extended stays in the intensive care unit, are susceptible to skin failure due to: prolonged immobility; mechanical ventilation; acute respiratory distress syndrome; COVID-19; sepsis; multiorgan system dysfunction; vasopressor use; and treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Poor perfusion leading to skin breakdown results from the compounding factors of circulatory collapse, build-up of metabolites, compromised lymphatic drainage, patient comorbidities, and ischaemia via capillary blockage in patients who are critically ill. In addition, similar physiology is present during end-of-life multisystem organ failure, which creates unavoidable skin deterioration. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of circumstances which decrease tissue tolerance and ultimately lead to PI development, despite adequate preventive measures in patients who are critically ill. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Study: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a significant increase in the use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) as a bridge to transplantation versus recovery. Unlike other etiologies of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), utilization of V-V ECMO in COVID-19 has been associated with longer duration of ECMO support requirements. Our team sought to evaluate outcomes associated with prolonged duration of ECMO support in this patient population. Methods: Single-center retrospective review of patients who were placed on ECMO due to COVID-19 associated ARDS. Specifically examining outcomes-transplant free survival, mortality and discharge rates-of patients requiring V-V ECMO support for greater than 50 days. Results: The median age of the cohort was 48 years and 13 patients (72%) were males. The median duration of ECMO support was 84 days (IQR 55-106). 11 patients (61%) had right ventricular dysfunction and 13 patients (72%) had pneumothoraces. There was a 33% percent (n = 6) mortality rate within cohort. One patient continues to require ECMO support at time of abstract submission. 11 patients (61%) patients were discharged, of which 3 patients required a lung transplant. Summary: Prolonged V-V ECMO can be associated with comparable outcomes to conventional V-V ECMO runs that are relatively shorter in duration. With availability of device and staffing, prolonged ECMO runs can potentially be justified in a highly selected patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although extracorporeal membrane ventilation offers the possibility for low-frequency ventilation, protocols commonly used in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) vary largely. Whether strict adherence to low-frequency ventilation offers benefit on important outcome measures is poorly understood. Background/Objectives: This pilot clinical study investigated the efficacy of low-frequency ventilation on ventilator-free days (VFDs) in patients suffering from ARDS who were treated with ECMO therapy. Methods: In this single-center randomized controlled trial, 44 (70% male) successive ARDS patients treated with ECMO (aged 56 ± 12 years, SAPS III 64 (SD ± 14)) were randomly assigned 1:1 to the control group (conventional ventilation) or the treatment group (low-frequency ventilation during first 72 h on ECMO: respiratory rate 4–5/min; PEEP 14–16 cm H2O; plateau pressure 23–25 cm H2O, tidal volume: <4 mL/kg). The primary endpoint was VFDs at day 28 after starting ECMO treatment. The major secondary endpoint was ICU mortality, 28-day mortality and 90-day mortality. Results: Twenty-three (52%) patients were successfully weaned from ECMO and were discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU). Twelve patients in the treatment group and five patients in the control group showed more than one VFD at day 28 of ECMO treatment. VFDs were 3.0 (SD ± 5.5) days in the control group and 5.4 (SD ± 6) days in the treatment group (p = 0.117). Until day 28 of ECMO initiation, patients in the treatment group could be successfully weaned off of the ventilator more often (OR of 0.164 of 0 VFDs at day 28 after ECMO start; 95% CI 0.036–0.758; p = 0.021). ICU mortality did not differ significantly (36% in treatment group and 59% in control group; p = 0.227). Conclusions: Low-frequency ventilation is comparable to conventional protective ventilation in patients with ARDS who have been treated with ECMO. However, low-frequency ventilation may support weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation in patients suffering from ARDS and treated with ECMO therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis (ABPM) is a chronic airway disease characterized by the presence of fungi that trigger allergic reactions and airway obstruction. Here, we present a unique case of ABPM in which a patient experienced sudden respiratory failure due to mucus plug-induced airway obstruction. The patient's life was saved by venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) and bronchoscopic removal of the plug. This case emphasizes the clinical significance of mucus plug-induced airway obstruction in the differential diagnosis of respiratory failure in patients with ABPM. Case study: A 52-year-old female clerical worker with no smoking history, presented with dyspnea. CT scan revealed mucus plugs in both lungs. Despite treatment, the dyspnea progressed rapidly to respiratory failure, leading to VV-ECMO placement. Results: CT revealed bronchial wall thickening, obstruction, and extensive atelectasis. Bronchoscopy revealed extensive mucus plugs that were successfully removed within two days. The patient's respiratory status significantly improved. Follow-up CT revealed no recurrence. Fungal cultures identified Schizophyllum commune, confirming ABPM. Histological examination of the mucus plugs revealed aggregated eosinophils, eosinophil granules, and Charcot-Leyden crystals. Galectin-10 and major basic protein (MBP) staining supported these findings. Eosinophil extracellular traps (EETs) and eosinophil cell death (ETosis), which contribute to mucus plug formation, were identified by citrullinated histone H3 staining. Conclusion: Differentiating between asthma exacerbation and mucus plug-induced airway obstruction in patients with ABPM and those with acute respiratory failure is challenging. Prompt evaluation of mucous plugs and atelectasis using CT and timely decision to introduce ECMO and bronchoscopic mucous plug removal are required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with severe respiratory failure due to COVID‐19 who are not under mechanical ventilation may develop severe hypoxemia when complicated with spontaneous pneumomediastinum (PM). These patients may be harmed by invasive ventilation. Alternatively, veno‐venous (V‐V) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may be applied. We report on the efficacy of V‐V ECMO and invasive ventilation as initial advanced respiratory support in patients with COVID‐19 and acute respiratory failure due to spontaneous PM. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study performed between March 2020 and January 2022. Enrolled patients had COVID‐19 and acute respiratory failure due to spontaneous PM and were not invasively ventilated. Patients were treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) with invasive ventilation (invasive ventilation group) or V‐V ECMO support (V‐V ECMO group) as the main therapeutic option. The primary outcomes were mortality and ICU discharge at 90 days after ICU admission. Results: Twenty‐two patients were included in this study (invasive ventilation group: 13 [59%]; V‐V ECMO group: 9 [41%]). The V‐V ECMO strategy was significantly associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33 [95% CI 0.12–0.97], p = 0.04). Five (38%) patients in the V‐V ECMO group were intubated and eight (89%) patients in the invasive ventilation group required V‐V ECMO support within 30 days from ICU admission. Three (33%) patients in the V‐V ECMO group were discharged from ICU within 90 days compared to one (8%) patient in the invasive ventilation group (HR 4.71 [95% CI 0.48–45.3], p = 0.18). Conclusions: Preliminary data suggest that V‐V ECMO without invasive ventilation may improve survival in COVID‐19‐related acute respiratory failure due to spontaneous PM. The study's retrospective design and limited sample size underscore the necessity for additional investigation and warrant caution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) as a potential intervention for patients with refractory cardiac arrest. ECPR involves draining blood from the body, oxygenating it, and then returning it to the arterial system, providing better oxygen delivery than conventional CPR. The article highlights the need for a proactive approach to implementing ECPR in the UK, as it is currently underutilized. The article also discusses the selection criteria for ECPR and the challenges in implementing ECPR services. The authors emphasize the importance of developing institutional expertise and ensuring equitable access to ECPR services across the UK. [Extracted from the article]

Rationale: Blood flow rate affects mixed venous oxygenation (SvO2) during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), with possible effects on the pulmonary circulation and the right heart function. Objectives: To describe the physiologic effects of different levels of SvO2 obtained by changing ECMO blood flow in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome receiving ECMO and controlled mechanical ventilation. Methods: Low (SvO2 target, 70–75%), intermediate (SvO2 target, 75–80%), and high (SvO2 target, >80%) ECMO blood flows were applied for 30 minutes in random order in 20 patients. Mechanical ventilation settings were left unchanged. The hemodynamic and pulmonary effects were assessed with pulmonary artery catheter and electrical impedance tomography. Measurements and Main Results: Cardiac output decreased from low to intermediate and to high blood flow/SvO2 (9.2 [6.2–10.9] vs. 8.3 [5.9–9.8] vs. 7.9 [6.5–9.1] L/min; P = 0.014), as well as mean pulmonary artery pressure (34 ± 6 vs. 31 ± 6 vs. 30 ± 5 mm Hg; P < 0.001) and right ventricular stroke work index (14.2 ± 4.4 vs. 12.2 ± 3.6 vs. 11.4 ± 3.2 g × m/beat/m2; P = 0.002). Cardiac output was inversely correlated with mixed venous and arterial Po2 values (R2 = 0.257; P = 0.031; and R2 = 0.324; P = 0.05). Pulmonary artery pressure was correlated with decreasing mixed venous Po2 (R2 = 0.29; P < 0.001) and with increasing cardiac output (R2 = 0.378; P < 0.007). Measures of V ˙ / Q ˙ mismatch did not differ between the three steps. Conclusions: In patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, increased ECMO blood flow rate resulting in higher SvO2 decreases pulmonary artery pressure, cardiac output, and right heart workload. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Severe viral infections often result in abnormal platelet function, affecting various stages of hemostasis. Activated platelets are often considered prothrombotic and more susceptible to further stimulation. However, emerging evidence suggests that initial hyperactivation is followed by platelet exhaustion and hypo-responsiveness, affecting platelet degranulation, activation, and aggregation. We examined early alterations in platelet aggregation among patients (N = 28) with acute respiratory distress syndrome and SARS-CoV-2 infection who were receiving mechanical ventilation and venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Blood samples were stimulated with four different activators: arachidonic acid, adenosine diphosphate, thrombin receptor-activating protein 6, and ristocetin. Our observations revealed that platelet aggregation was reduced in most patients upon admission (ranging from 61 to 89%, depending on the agonist used), and this trend intensified during the 5-day observation period. Concurrently, other coagulation parameters remained within normal ranges, except for elevated d-dimer and fibrinogen levels. Importantly, we found a significant association between platelet aggregation and patient mortality. Impaired platelet aggregation was more severe in patients who ultimately died, and reduced aggregation was associated with a significantly lower probability of survival, as confirmed by Kaplan–Meier analysis (p = 0.028). These findings underscore the potential of aggregometry as an early detection tool for identifying patients at higher risk of mortality within this specific cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a significant challenge in critical care, with high mortality rates despite advancements in treatment. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is employed as salvage therapy for refractory cases. However, some patients may continue to experience persistent severe hypoxemia despite being treated with VV-ECMO. To achieve this, moderate hypothermia and short-acting selective β1-blockers have been proposed. Methods: Using a swine model of severe ARDS treated with VV-ECMO, this study investigated the efficacy of moderate hypothermia or β-blockade in improving arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) three hours after VV-ECMO initiation. Primary endpoints included the ratio of VV-ECMO flow to cardiac output and arterial oxygen saturation before VV-ECMO start (H0) and three hours after ECMO start (H3). Secondary safety criteria encompassed hemodynamics and oxygenation parameters. Results: Twenty-two male pigs were randomized into three groups: control (n = 6), hypothermia (n = 9) and β-blockade (n = 7). At H0, all groups demonstrated similar hemodynamic and respiratory parameters. Both moderate hypothermia and β-blockade groups exhibited a significant increase in the ratio of VV-ECMO flow to cardiac output at H3, resulting in improved SaO2. At H3, despite a decrease in oxygen delivery and consumption in the intervention groups compared to the control group, oxygen extraction ratios across groups remained unchanged and lactate levels were normal. Conclusions: In a swine model of severe ARDS treated with VV-ECMO, both moderate hypothermia and β-blockade led to an increase in the ratio of VV-ECMO flow to cardiac output resulting in improved arterial oxygen saturation without any impact on tissue perfusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A combination of prone positioning (PP) and venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is safe, feasible, and associated with potentially improved survival for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, whether ARDS patients, especially non-COVID-19 patients, placed in PP before VV-ECMO should continue PP after a VV-ECMO connection is unknown. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that early use of PP during VV-ECMO could increase the proportion of patients successfully weaned from ECMO support in severe ARDS patients who received PP before ECMO. Methods: In this prospective observational study, patients with severe ARDS who were treated with VV-ECMO were divided into two groups: the prone group and the supine group, based on whether early PP was combined with VV-ECMO. The proportion of patients successfully weaned from VV-ECMO and 60-day mortality were analyzed before and after propensity score matching. Results: A total of 165 patients were enrolled, 50 in the prone and 115 in the supine group. Thirty-two (64%) and 61 (53%) patients were successfully weaned from ECMO in the prone and the supine groups, respectively. The proportion of patients successfully weaned from VV-ECMO in the prone group tended to be higher, albeit not statistically significant. During PP, there was a significant increase in partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) without a change in ventilator or ECMO settings. Tidal impedance shifted significantly to the dorsal region, and lung ultrasound scores significantly decreased in the anterior and posterior regions. Forty-five propensity score-matched patients were included in each group. In this matched sample, the prone group had a higher proportion of patients successfully weaned from VV-ECMO (64.4% vs. 42.2%; P = 0.035) and lower 60-day mortality (37.8% vs. 60.0%; P = 0.035). Conclusions: Patients with severe ARDS placed in PP before VV-ECMO should continue PP after VV-ECMO support. This approach could increase the probability of successful weaning from VV-ECMO. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov: NCT04139733. Registered 23 October 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Nowadays, it is largely accepted that albumin should not be used in hypoalbuminemia or for nutritional purpose. The most discussed indication of albumin at present is the resuscitation in shock states, especially distributive shocks such as septic shock. The main evidence-based indication is also liver disease. In this review, we provided updated evidence-based instruction for definite and potential indications of albumin administration in clinical practice, with appropriate dosing and duration. Methods: Data collection was carried out until November 2023 by search of electronic databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. GRADE system has been used to determine the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for each albumin indication. Results: A total of 165 relevant studies were included in this review. Fluid replacement in plasmapheresis and liver diseases, including hepatorenal syndrome, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and large-volume paracentesis, have a moderate to high quality of evidence and a strong recommendation for administering albumin. Moreover, albumin is used as a second-line and adjunctive to crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in hypovolemic shock, sepsis and septic shock, severe burns, toxic epidermal necrolysis, intradialytic hypotension, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, major surgery, non-traumatic brain injury, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and severe and refractory edema with hypoalbuminemia has a low to moderate quality of evidence and weak recommendation to use. Also, in modest volume paracentesis, severe hyponatremia in cirrhosis has a low to moderate quality of evidence and a weak recommendation. Conclusion: Albumin administration is most indicated in management of cirrhosis complications. Fluid resuscitation or treatment of severe and refractory edema, especially in patients with hypoalbuminemia and not responding to other treatments, is another rational use for albumin. Implementation of evidence-based guidelines in hospitals can be an effective measure to reduce inappropriate uses of albumin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Central nervous system (CNS) injury following initiation of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is common. An acute decrease in partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2) following VV-ECMO initiation has been suggested as an etiological factor, but the challenges of diagnosing CNS injuries has made discerning a relationship between PaCO2 and CNS injury difficult. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing VV-ECMO for acute respiratory failure. Arterial blood gas measurements were obtained prior to initiation of VV-ECMO, and at every 2–4 h for the first 24 h. Neuroimaging was conducted within the first 7–14 days in patients who were suspected of having neurological injury or unable to be examined because of sedation. We collected blood biospecimens to measure brain biomarkers [neurofilament light (NF-L); glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP); and phosphorylated-tau 181] in the first 7 days following initiation of VV-ECMO. We assessed the relationship between both PaCO2 over the first 24 h and brain biomarkers with CNS injury using mixed methods linear regression. Finally, we explored the effects of absolute change of PaCO2 on serum levels of neurological biomarkers by separate mixed methods linear regression for each biomarker using three PaCO2 exposures hypothesized to result in CNS injury. Results: In our cohort, 12 of 59 (20%) patients had overt CNS injury identified on head computed tomography. The PaCO2 decrease with VV-ECMO initiation was steeper in patients who developed a CNS injury (− 0.32%, 95% confidence interval − 0.25 to − 0.39) compared with those without (− 0.18%, 95% confidence interval − 0.14 to − 0.21, P interaction < 0.001). The mean concentration of NF-L increased over time and was higher in those with a CNS injury (464 [739]) compared with those without (127 [257]; P = 0.001). GFAP was higher in those with a CNS injury (4278 [11,653] pg/ml) compared with those without (116 [108] pg/ml; P < 0.001). The mean NF-L, GFAP, and tau over time in patients stratified by the three thresholds of absolute change of PaCO2 showed no differences and had no significant interaction for time. Conclusions: Although rapid decreases in PaCO2 following initiation of VV-ECMO were slightly greater in patients who had CNS injuries versus those without, data overlap and absence of relationships between PaCO2 and brain biomarkers suggests other pathophysiologic variables are likely at play. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prone position is an immediately available and easily implemented procedure that was introduced more than 50 years ago as a method for improvement of gas exchange in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In the meantime, a survival advantage could also be shown in patients with severe ARDS, which led to the recommendation of the prone position for treatment of severe ARDS by expert consensus and specialist society guidelines. The continuing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic moved the prone position to the forefront of medicine, including the widespread implementation of the prone position for awake, spontaneously breathing nonintubated patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory insufficiency. The survival advantage is possible due to a reduction of the ventilator-associated lung damage. In this article, the physiological effects, data on clinical results, practical considerations and open questions with respect to the prone position are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Even though much progress has been made to improve clinical outcomes, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a significant cause of acute respiratory failure. Protective mechanical ventilation is the backbone of supportive care for these patients; however, there are still many unresolved issues in its setting. The primary goal of mechanical ventilation is to improve oxygenation and ventilation. The use of positive pressure, especially positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), is mandatory in this approach. However, PEEP is a double-edged sword. How to safely set positive end-inspiratory pressure has long been elusive to clinicians. We hereby propose a pressure–volume curve measurement-based method to assess whether injured lungs are recruitable in order to set an appropriate PEEP. For the most severe form of ARDS, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is considered as the salvage therapy. However, the high level of medical resources required and associated complications make its use in patients with severe ARDS controversial. Our proposed protocol also attempts to propose how to improve patient outcomes by balancing the possible overuse of resources with minimizing patient harm due to dangerous ventilator settings. A recruitment-potential-oriented evaluation-based protocol can effectively stabilize hypoxemic conditions quickly and screen out truly serious patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the relationship between acute kidney injury (AKI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in critically ill patients. The study analyzed data from 10 randomized controlled trials conducted in the United States between 1996 and 2018. The authors found that AKI occurred in approximately 43.7% of patients with ARDS, with a higher incidence of AKI stage 3 and acute kidney disease (AKD) in patients with more severe AKI. The study also found that AKI was associated with higher mortality rates at 28 and 90 days. However, the study has some limitations, including the lack of consideration for certain variables and the heterogeneity of ARDS and AKI subphenotypes. Further research is needed to better understand the relationship between AKI and ARDS and to identify strategies for improving outcomes. [Extracted from the article]

Background: The survival benefit of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) in adult patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the efficiency and potential prognostic factors of VV-ECMO for severe ARDS in adults by evaluating our institutional experience and results. Materials and methods: This research studied ARDS patients receiving VV-ECMO between June 2011 and May 2023. The inclusion criteria were PaO2/FiO2 < 100 mmHg at FiO2 of 1.0. Retrospective data was analyzed to identify factors associated with successful ECMO weaning and hospital discharge survival. Results: A total of 18 patients were included in this study, with 7 cases (38.9%) successfully weaned from ECMO and 5 cases (27.8%) surviving hospital discharge. The overall complication rate was 77.8%. After treatment with VV ECMO, there were statistically significant improvements in both PaO2 and PaCO2 (P < 0.05). Patients in the successful weaning group had a lower pTB value, less accumulative volume of sodium bicarbonate during ECMO, and lower accumulative volume of intravenous immunoglobulin in the hospital compared to the unsuccessful weaning group (all P < 0.05). Furthermore, compared to the non-survivors, the survivors had less severe acidosis, higher mean arterial pressure before ECMO, a lower level of pCr, and a lower pTB value during ECMO (all P < 0.05). Conclusion: ECMO can effectively promote oxygenation and carbon dioxide (CO2) removal in patients with severe ARDS. Early initiation of ECMO with appropriate management could benefit in reducing comorbidities and mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

COVID‐19 associates with a hypercoagulant state and an increased risk for venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). Whether severe COVID‐19 infection requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support might lead to chronic pulmonary perfusion abnormalities and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease/hypertension remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate chronic pulmonary perfusion abnormalities in long‐term survivors of COVID‐19‐related severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) treated by ECMO at our institution. Pulmonary perfusion was examined by ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) single‐photon emission computed tomography or V/Q planar scintigraphy at least 3 months after ECMO explantation, comorbidities and incidence of thromboembolic events were recorded as well. Of 172 COVID‐19 patients treated by ECMO for severe COVID‐19 pneumonia between March 2020 and November 2021, only 80 were successfully weaned from ECMO. Of those, 37 patients were enrolled into the present analysis (27% female, mean age 52 years). Median duration of ECMO support was 12 days. In 24 (65%) patients VTE was recorded in the acute phase (23 patients developed ECMO cannula‐related deep vein thrombosis, 5 of them had also a pulmonary embolism, and one thrombus was associated with a central catheter). The median duration between ECMO explantation and assessment of pulmonary perfusion was 420 days. No segmental or larger mismatched perfusion defects were then detected in any patient. In conclusion, in long‐term survivors of COVID‐19‐related ARDS treated by ECMO, no persistent pulmonary perfusion abnormalities were detected although VTE was common. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses a case study of a 25-year-old male with sickle cell disease (SCD) who developed acute chest syndrome (ACS) and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The patient was successfully treated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO). ACS is a common cause of ICU admission for patients with SCD, and those requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 96 hours have a higher risk of mortality. The use of ECMO in patients with ACS is limited, but this case suggests that it may be a viable treatment option for severe cases. However, further research is needed to optimize ECMO candidacy and care for patients with ACS. [Extracted from the article]

Introduction: Iliopsoas haematoma (IPH) during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a rare bleeding complication that can be fatal due to its progression to abdominal compartment syndrome, but its incidence and risk factors are not well known. We have previously reported an IPH incidence rate of 16% in Japan. Among possible reasons for this high incidence, ethnicity has been hypothesised to play a role. Therefore, we used an international multi-centre cohort registry to test this hypothesis by determining the incidence rate of IPH. Methods: This study was performed using the COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium database, conducted in 30 countries across five continents between 3 January 2020, and 20 June 2022. Results: Overall, 1102 patients received ECMO for COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome. Of them, only seven were reported to have IPH, indicating an incidence rate of 0.64%, with comparable rates between the countries. The IPH group tended to have a higher mortality rate (71.4%) than the non-IPH group (51%). Conclusions: Overall incidence of IPH in the studied COVID-19 ECMO cohort was 0.64%. Most cases were reported from Japan, Belgium, and Italy. In our study, this rare complication did not appear to be confined to Asian patients. Due to the high fatality rate, awareness about the occurrence of IPH should be recognised. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with PaO2/FiO2 < 80 mmHg is a life-threatening condition. The optimal management strategy is unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of low tidal volumes (Vt), moderate Vt, prone ventilation, and venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) on mortality in severe ARDS. Methods: We performed a frequentist network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with participants who had severe ARDS and met eligibility criteria for VV-ECMO or had PaO2/FiO2 < 80 mmHg. We applied the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to discern the relative effect of interventions on mortality and the certainty of the evidence. Results: Ten RCTs including 812 participants with severe ARDS were eligible. VV-ECMO reduces mortality compared to low Vt (risk ratio [RR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59–0.99, moderate certainty) and compared to moderate Vt (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57–0.98, low certainty). Prone ventilation reduces mortality compared to moderate Vt (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66–0.93, high certainty) and compared to low Vt (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.63–1.02, moderate certainty). We found no difference in the network comparison of VV-ECMO compared to prone ventilation (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.72–1.26), but inferences were based solely on indirect comparisons with very low certainty due to very wide confidence intervals. Conclusions: In adults with ARDS and severe hypoxia, both VV-ECMO (low to moderate certainty evidence) and prone ventilation (moderate to high certainty evidence) improve mortality relative to low and moderate Vt strategies. The impact of VV-ECMO versus prone ventilation remains uncertain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Electrical burn injuries can be catastrophic, threatening severe disability or mortality. We present a patient who suffered from electrical shock, requiring bilateral above-knee amputations, right trans-radial amputation, renal replacement therapy, and veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA ECLS) therapy. While there exist reports of cases that have demonstrated the potential use of ECLS in burn patients with cardiogenic shock or acute respiratory distress syndrome, this is a unique case of VA ECLS use for an electrical injury patient who developed mixed distributive–obstructive shock secondary to pulmonary embolism and sepsis. Given the wide variety of morbidities that can result from electrical burns, VA ECLS is a promising tool for those who require cardiopulmonary support refractory to traditional measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]