Although lexicosemantic deficits are not typically seen in older adults, some studies indicate that age-related changes in semantic processing may occur. We had groups of older and younger adults perform speeded lexical decision on mass (e.g., honey), count (e.g., car), and dual nouns, which may be either mass or count (e.g., lamb). Singular dual nouns engendered significantly faster response times in older adults than mass and count nouns, whereas younger adults manifested similar response times to count and dual nouns. These results point toward a three-way distinction in the lexicon between mass, count, and dual nouns. Older adults appear to treat a larger set of nouns as dual than do younger adults. This may be due to awareness of the mass/count ambiguity present in a greater number of lexical items, as a result of their greater linguistic experience. Alternatively, in order to conserve processing resources, older adults may not activate mass/count information when recognizing a dual noun unless a mass or count reading is forced by context. Resume Meme si les deficits lexicosemantiques ne sont par releves de facon systematique chez les adultes plus âges, certaines etudes revelent que des changements lies a l'âge dans le traitement semantique peuvent se produire. Nous avons demande a des groupes d'adultes plus jeunes et plus âges d'effectuer des decisions lexicales accelerees relativement a la masse (p.ex. le miel), le denombrement (p. ex. les voitures) et les noms doubles, qui peuvent concerner soit la masse ou le nombre (p. ex. agneau). Les noms doubles singuliers ont entraine des temps de reponse significativement plus courts chez les adultes plus âges que les noms de masse ou de denombrement, alors que les adultes plus jeunes manifestaient des temps de reponse semblables pour les noms de denombrement et de masse. Ces resultats semblent demontrer une distinction a trois voies dans le lexique entre la masse, le denombrement et les noms doubles. Les adultes plus âges semblent traiter un ensemble de noms comme double davantage que ne le font les adultes plus jeunes. Cela pourrait etre cause par une sensibilisation a l'ambiguite dans la masse/denombrement qui se trouve dans un plus grand nombre de termes lexicaux, en consequence de leur plus grande experience linguistique. En revanche, afin d'economiser leurs ressources de traitement, les adultes plus âges pourraient ne pas activer l'information sur la masse/denombrement lorsqu'ils reconnaissent un nom double a moins qu'une lecture de masse ou de denombrement ne soit forcee par le contexte. A considerable body of research on aging has revealed that various aspects of cognitive function are subject to age-related decline. These decrements appear in a variety of tasks, including memory tasks that require self-initiated processing, such as cued and free recall (Park, 2000) and tasks tapping into episodic memory (Burke, MacKay, & James, 2000; Light, 1996; Wingfield & Stine-Morrow, 2000; for a review, see Craik, 2000). Older adults also manifest deficits in certain language tasks, such as word-finding difficulty (Burke, MacKay, Worthley, & Wade, 199D and difficulty in retrieving proper names (Cohen & Faulkner, 1986; Maylor, 1990). There are, however, aspects of cognitive processing that appear to be well-preserved in healthy older adults. They are not typically thought to exhibit impairments on tasks that reflect the organization of lexicosemantic knowledge, such as generation of word associations (Bowles, Williams, & Poon, 1983; Burke & Peters, 1986; Lovelace & Cooley, 1982) and category exemplars (Howard, 1980). Likewise, online studies examining lexicosemantic processing have shown similar response patterns in older and younger adults. For example, frequency has been found to have similar effects on lexical decision in the two populations, although overall reaction times (RTs) are somewhat slower in older adults (Alien, Madden, & Crozier 1991; Alien, Madden, Weber, & Groth, 1993; Tainturier, Tremblay, & Lecours, 1989). …