Search

"Chairwork" is a collection of experiential methods that utilize movement between chairs and dialogue with parts of the self to bring about change. Because of their emotionally intense nature, therapists often assume that a robust therapeutic relationship is a prerequisite for these tasks. However, it could be said that chairwork also supports the development and strengthening of the alliance. This article presents a single‐session, chairwork‐centered treatment with an individual experiencing social anxiety. Verbatim extracts and post‐intervention feedback illustrate the reciprocal and reinforcing roles of client participation, therapist facilitation, and the therapeutic bond during chairwork. Moreover, the case demonstrates that relationship and technique are intimately bound when using experiential methods, suggesting that therapists do not always need to privilege the former to implement the latter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Action-based methods such as behavioural experiments, role-play and (by extension) 'chairwork' are powerful techniques recommended in core supervisory texts for cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). Despite this, experiential methods are seldom used by supervisors, suggesting that supervision often drifts from a 'doing process' to a 'talking process'. A number of factors contribute to this divergence from best practice, including limited confidence and a lack of familiarity with experiential procedures amongst supervisors. To address this, the current paper presents a variety of action-based techniques for enhancing supervisees' technical, perceptual, interpersonal, reflective and personal competencies. Behavioural experiments, empty-chair, multi-chair and role-playing exercises for maintaining treatment fidelity, enhancing empathic attunement, repairing therapeutic ruptures, resolving impasses and working through negative countertransference are described, amongst others. Further research is needed to establish the nature and extent of supervisory drift, as well as the efficacy of action-based methods. Key learning aims: As a result of reading this paper, readers should: (1) Understand why supervision sometimes drifts from being a 'doing' process. (2) Appreciate the value of experiential, action-based supervisory methods. (3) Feel competent using action-based methods to enhance supervisees' clinical skills. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reappraisal strategies such as 'thought challenging' and 'cost-benefits analysis' are a hallmark of cognitive therapy, but sometimes fail to bring about lasting changes in the cognitive-affective structures underlying psychopathology. Modern theories of information processing suggest that experiential, action-based interventions such as chairwork may be a more efficacious route to cognitive modification. Based upon this hypothesis, a 'dialogical' approach to cognitive therapy is presented, which aims to bring about change through evocative, here-and-now interactions with parts of the self (self-to-self dialogues) and other individuals (self-to-other dialogues). Implementation principles and facilitation skills which guide this approach are outlined. To illustrate how dialogical interventions are utilized in clinical practice, chair-based strategies for socializing clients to the cognitive behavioural model, restructuring cognitions, facilitating emotional processing, resolving ambivalence, addressing distressing memories, building character strengths, and overcoming therapeutic impasses are described. Key learning aims: As a result of reading this paper, the reader should: (1) Understand the limits of 'standard' cognitive techniques. (2) Appreciate some of the advantages of experiential methods of intervention, namely chairwork. (3) Learn how dialogical interventions are conceptualized, implemented, and facilitated in cognitive therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]